Parrondo, Ricardo D

Abstract Background Chimeric-antigen-receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed outcomes for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, yet early identification of patients at highest risk for death remains elusive. A prognostic model that leverages only the information routinely available at the time of CAR-T evaluationcould guide pre-infusion counseling, intensity of follow-up, and resource allocation. Methods We analyzed a prospectively maintained cohort of CAR-T recipients treated at Mayo Clinic to develop and test our model. For each patient, data (vital signs, lab results, cardiac assessments [ECG and echocardiography], and PET/CT images) from initial CAR-T evaluation (up to 60 days prior to CAR-T infusion) was considered. Vital signs and labs were left un-imputed, while ECG, echocardiographic parameters, and PET/CT features were forward-filled from the preceding 60 days. Each patient-day was labeled as “outcome present” or “no outcome,” enabling supervised training of gradient-boosting models to predict overall survival (OS) at 6 months post CAR-T infusion. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 10,000-fold bootstrapping with data shuffling between each iteration to derive confidence intervals for stability. To enhance interpretability, we also developed a simplified model using the top 19 features (determined by Shapley value-based importance), aiming to preserve predictive accuracy with a smaller feature set. Results A total of 570 CAR-T cell treated patients were included in this study (476 patients in the training cohort and 94 patients in the validation cohort). The median age was 64 years and 61% males. The primary diagnoses were B-cell lymphoma (324 patients) and multiple myeloma (246 patients). A total of 4,851 individual vital-sign readings, 11,781 laboratory measurements were included. PET/CT images were available in 318 patients. The ML model demonstrated high discriminative ability for predicting OS at 6 months post CAR-T infusion. Vital signs alone produced a mean AUC of 0.63; radiomics features alone produced a mean AUC of 0.71, while laboratory tests alone produced a mean AUC of 0.84. The features most contributory to each single-modality model were then combined into a simplified multimodal model with a total of 19 features, which produced a mean AUC of 0.87, with a 95% CI of 0.73 - 0.97. The 19 features included in the simplified model were: LDH, ferritin, uric acid, eosinophils, fibrinogen, D-dimer, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, QTc, QT interval, and the radiomics features of sphericity, first-order Kurtosis, first-order mean, first-order energy, first-order total energy, shape maximum2D diameter (sagittal plane), SUV CoV, SUVp90, shape flatness. This multimodal predictive model was then applied to the validation cohort (uninvolved with model training or testing), which produced an AUC of 0.93, with a 95% CI of 0.84 - 0.98. Conclusions Our ML-driven approach successfully predicts overall survival 6 months post CAR-T infusion, highlighting those individuals at most risk of poor outcomes at the time of CAR-T evaluation. The strong performance of the multimodal version of the model suggests that each data domain contributes complementary resolving power, and by including novel data types, such as PET CT radiomics features, the most accurate predictions could be realized. By providing accurate, near-real-time risk stratification for poor outcomes within 6 months of CAR-T infusion, the model could facilitate proactive patient management. Prospective studies of the integration of this ML model into CAR-T treatment workflows will be crucial to confirm its clinical benefits and to facilitate its adoption in practice.

Abstract Introduction: BGB-16673 is an orally available protein degrader that blocks BTK signaling by tagging BTK for degradation through the cell's proteasome pathway, leading to tumor regression. CaDAnCe-101 (BGB-16673-101; NCT05006716) is an ongoing open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating BGB-16673 monotherapy in patients with B-cell malignancies. Here, updated safety and efficacy results of BGB-16673 are presented in patients with WM in the phase 1 portion of the study. Methods Eligible patients had confirmed relapsed/refractory (R/R) WM (≥2 prior therapies), an ECOG performance status of 0-2 (0-1 in the EU), and previous treatment with an anti-CD20 antibody and, in the US, Japan, and EU, a covalent BTK inhibitor. BGB-16673 was dosed once daily orally. The primary objectives of this phase 1 study were to evaluate safety and tolerability (NCI-CTCAE v5.0) and establish the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose for expansion. A secondary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR; modified IWWM-6 consensus criteria), with the first assessment after 4 weeks of treatment. Results As of May 23, 2025, 42 patients with WM were enrolled and treated (100 mg, n=15; 200 mg, n=14; 350 mg, n=13). Median age was 72.0 years (range, 46-81 years), and the median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-11), including prior covalent BTK inhibitors (n=42 [100%]), BCL2 inhibitors (n=10 [23.8%]), noncovalent BTK inhibitors (n=7 [16.7%]), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (n=42 [100%]), and chemotherapy (n=39 [92.9%]). In total, 33.3% of patients (12/36) had WM with BTK mutations, 85.7% (36/42) with MYD88 mutations, 51.3% (20/39) with CXCR4 mutations, 52.8% (19/36) with TP53 mutations, and 5.6% (2/36) with PLCG2 mutations. Median follow-up was 8.8 months (range, 0.8-31.0 months). Overall, 97.6% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade (grade ≥3, 59.5%; serious TEAEs, 35.7%). The most common (≥20% incidence) TEAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were neutropenia (38.1%; grade ≥3, 33.3%, most common grade ≥3 TEAE), diarrhea (26.2%; no grade ≥3), contusion/bruising (26.2%; no grade ≥3), and thrombocytopenia (21.4%; grade ≥3, 7.1%). No atrial fibrillation was observed. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and major hemorrhage (grade 3 hematemesis caused by concurrent gastritis/duodenitis unrelated to treatment) occurred in 1 patient (2.4%) each. Seven patients (16.7%) had a grade ≥3 infection, including 2 patients with fungal infections. Three patients (7.1%) had TEAEs that led to treatment discontinuation (anemia, cerebral aspergillosis, pericardial effusion/pleural effusion; n=1 each), and 2 patients (4.8%) had a TEAE that led to dose reduction. Two patients (4.8%) died due to TEAEs (septic shock in the context of progressive disease [PD] and cerebral aspergillosis; n=1 each). All 42 patients were response-evaluable and the ORR (minor response [MR] or better) was 83.3% (n=35), the major response rate (partial response [PR] or better) was 64.3% (n=27), and the very good partial response (VGPR) rate was 26.2% (n=11). Median time to first overall response was 1.0 months (range, 0.9-3.8 months) and to best overall response was 1.9 months (range, 0.9-7.4 months). Responses deepened over time: of 9 patients with stable disease at first disease assessment, 3 transitioned to MR and 2 to PR; of 20 patients with initial MR, 10 transitioned to PR and 2 to VGPR; and of 13 patients with initial PR, 7 transitioned to VGPR. Thirty patients (71.4%) remain on treatment. Two deaths were due to PD. Responses were seen in patients previously treated with a covalent BTK inhibitor (35/42 [83.3%]) and a noncovalent BTK inhibitor (7/7 [100%]) and in patients who discontinued a prior BTK inhibitor due to PD (28/35 [80%]). Responses were independent of mutations in BTK (with, 12/12; without, 17/24), MYD88 (with, 30/36; without, 5/6), CXCR4 (with, 18/20; without, 14/19), TP53 (with, 16/19; without, 13/17), and PLCG2 (with, 1/2; without, 28/34). The 9-month duration of response rate was 84.1% (95% CI, 63.1%-93.7%). Conclusions Data from this ongoing phase 1 study demonstrate that the novel BTK degrader BGB-16673 was well tolerated and continued to show substantial antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated BTK inhibitor–exposed R/R WM, including those with BTK, MYD88, CXCR4, and TP53 mutations. Enrollment is ongoing in the phase 2 portion of the study.

PURPOSE This analysis aimed to contextualize the symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (PN) experienced by patients with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) treated with elranatamab in the MagnetisMM-3 clinical trial with those experienced by patients with TCR MM receiving a new line of physician's choice of therapy in the real-world MagnetisMM-14 study. METHODS MagnetisMM-3 included 123 patients and MagnetisMM-14 included 35 who had TCR MM and were enrolled under the same eligibility criteria. Patient-reported symptoms of PN were collected monthly using the Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy-20 item (CIPN20) questionnaire and compared for clinically meaningful differences across sensory, motor, and autonomic domains. Higher scores indicated worse patient-reported PN symptoms. RESULTS Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics for patients in MagnetisMM-3 and MagnetisMM-14 were generally similar. Patients in MagnetisMM-3 had a median of five ( v four in MagnetisMM-14) prior lines of therapy. In MagnetisMM-14, common index therapies included elotuzumab + pomalidomide (23%), carfilzomib + pomalidomide (19%), or carfilzomib + cyclophosphamide (19%), all with corticosteroids. Mean scores for sensory (15.8 v 14.8) and motor (14.4 v 12.2) domains of the CIPN20 were similar between MagnetisMM-3 and MagnetisMM-14 at baseline. Mean scores for the autonomic domain were 14.0 versus 21.3 at baseline, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences for any domain were found between month 6 scores or changes in scores from baseline to month 6 between MagnetisMM-3 and MagnetisMM-14 populations. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that elranatamab treatment was not associated with a worsening of patient-reported PN symptoms across the sensory, motor, and autonomic domains of the CIPN20. Moreover, PN symptoms reported with elranatamab treatment were similar to those reported with other common therapies used in real-world clinical practice for the management of MM. MagnetisMM-3 ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04649359 .

Abstract Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), 2 B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, have transformed outcomes for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; however, the 6 to 8 weeks manufacturing time risks disease progression or death in up to 10% of patients. Talquetamab, a G-protein–coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D)–targeting bispecific antibody, represents a promising option. We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis across 20 centers (18 United States, 2 Germany) evaluating talquetamab as a bridging therapy prior to cilta-cel or ide-cel. Among 134 patients receiving talquetamab, 119 proceeded to CAR-T (n = 98 cilta-cel, n = 21 ide-cel). Reasons for not proceeding (n = 15) included progression (n = 7), manufacturing failure (n = 6), or patient decision (n = 2). Median age was 65 years and had median 5 prior lines of therapy. Notably, 85% would not have met CARTITUDE-1/KarMMa eligibility criteria. Talquetamab was administered for a median 23 days. Toxicity was manageable: no grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), 2% grade 3 immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and grade 1 to 2 talquetamab unique toxicities (70% oral, 38% skin, and 17% nail; 60% resolved). Talquetamab achieved 71% response rate. After CAR-T, 88% responded (54% complete response), with low-grade toxicities (2 grade ≥3 CRS, 1 grade 3 ICANS, and 5% grade ≥3 infections). Two cases of facial palsy and 1 acute myeloid leukemia occurred. Talquetamab correlated with sustained soluble BCMA decline and peak CAR-T expansion around day 14. Talquetamab bridging appears safe, enabling the majority of difficult-to-treat patients to successfully proceed to BCMA CAR-T therapy.

SummaryIn individuals with high‐count monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis (MBL), we investigated if lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly found by imaging was associated with shorter time to first chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) therapy (TTFT) and overall survival (OS). Individuals with MBL seen at Mayo Clinic (2002–2019) were retrospectively divided into three cohorts based on imaging studies within 1 year of diagnosis: no imaging studies (Cohort A); imaging with no evidence of lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly (Cohort B); imaging with evidence of lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly (Cohort C). We compared baseline characteristics, TTFT and OS across the MBL cohorts to a cohort of individuals with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). A total of 1078 patients were included: 640 with MBL and 438 with SLL. Compared to Cohort B, individuals in Cohort C were more likely to have unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV) (43% vs. 25% p = 0.016), high‐risk fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (del17p and del11q in 15% vs. 4%, p = 0.038) and higher expression of CD38 (31% vs. 16%; p = 0.011). After adjusting for sex and CLL‐International Prognostic Index (IPI), lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly was associated with a shorter TTFT (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–4.04, p = 0.042) but not OS (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.62–1.92, p = 0.775). Lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly on imaging in individuals with high‐count MBL is associated with a more unfavourable risk profile and shorter time to first CLL‐directed therapy.

CLL is the most prevalent adult leukemia in Western countries, characterized by the accumulation of monoclonal B lymphocytes. Over the past decade, the therapeutic landscape for CLL has undergone significant transformations, primarily due to the introduction of targeted small molecular therapies like BTK inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors, that have improved patient outcomes drastically. Despite significant advances, long-term disease management remains challenging for patients with double-refractory CLL, where responses with subsequent therapies are short-lived. Resistance to these therapies can arise through several mechanisms like kinase-altering BTK mutations, alterations in the BCL-2 pathway, and adaptations within the tumor microenvironment, necessitating the exploration of new therapeutic options. This review provides an in-depth overview of the promising novel treatment approaches under investigation in CLL, focusing on advanced cellular therapies (CAR T-cell therapy), T-cell engagers, new monoclonal antibodies, and various next-generation small molecule inhibitors including BTK degraders, PI3K inhibitors, MALT1 inhibitors, c-MYC inhibitors, CDK9 inhibitors, and agents targeting angiogenesis and DNA damage repair. In this review, we will discuss the novel therapeutic targets and agents as well as ongoing trials, emphasizing the potential of these treatments to overcome resistance and meet the unmet needs of patients, particularly those with double-refractory CLL.

Abstract Teclistamab is an anti-CD3-/B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) bispecific antibody approved for use in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. We undertook a retrospective study of post-approval, real-world outcomes with teclistamab in the US Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. Among 509 patients, 89% would have been ineligible for the MajesTEC-1 trial, primarily due to prior BCMA-directed therapy, cytopenias, or diminished performance status. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 54% (1.4% grade ≥3) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 11% (2.2% grade ≥3), with no fatal events. Infections occurred in 42% and contributed to death in 5%. Partial response (PR) or better was achieved in 53% and very good PR or better in 45%. With 10.1 months of median follow-up, the estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months and 12-month overall survival was 61%. Independent predictors of less than very good PR and shorter PFS included BCMA-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the previous 9 months, high disease burden, lymphopenia, and elevated ferritin. Significance: T cell–engaging bispecific antibodies such as teclistamab represent an important new treatment modality for multiple myeloma and other blood cancers. This study evaluates the real-world safety and efficacy of teclistamab, including its activity in populations not represented in the initial phase I/II study, and identifies clinical variables associated with treatment response. See related commentary by Zweegman et al., p. 542