Herrmann, Sandra M.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury (ICPi-AKI) has emerged as an important toxicity among patients with cancer. Methods We collected data on 429 patients with ICPi-AKI and 429 control patients who received ICPis contemporaneously but who did not develop ICPi-AKI from 30 sites in 10 countries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of ICPi-AKI and its recovery. A multivariable Cox model was used to estimate the effect of ICPi rechallenge versus no rechallenge on survival following ICPi-AKI. Results ICPi-AKI occurred at a median of 16 weeks (IQR 8–32) following ICPi initiation. Lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and extrarenal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were each associated with a higher risk of ICPi-AKI. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis was the most common lesion on kidney biopsy (125/151 biopsied patients [82.7%]). Renal recovery occurred in 276 patients (64.3%) at a median of 7 weeks (IQR 3–10) following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids within 14 days following ICPi-AKI diagnosis was associated with higher odds of renal recovery (adjusted OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.58 to 4.41). Among patients treated with corticosteroids, early initiation of corticosteroids (within 3 days of ICPi-AKI) was associated with a higher odds of renal recovery compared with later initiation (more than 3 days following ICPi-AKI) (adjusted OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.79). Of 121 patients rechallenged, 20 (16.5%) developed recurrent ICPi-AKI. There was no difference in survival among patients rechallenged versus those not rechallenged following ICPi-AKI. Conclusions Patients who developed ICPi-AKI were more likely to have impaired renal function at baseline, use a PPI, and have extrarenal irAEs. Two-thirds of patients had renal recovery following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids was associated with improved renal recovery.

Introduction: Morbidity and mortality attributable to hypertension are higher in African American (AAEH) compared to Caucasian essential hypertensive (EH) patients, possibly related to a differential effect on vascular injury and repair. While circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) preserve endothelial integrity IEC detach from sites of injury and represent markers of vascular damage. We hypothesized that plasma levels of IEC and inflammatory markers would be higher in AAEH compared to EH patients. METHODS: Inferior vena cava levels of CD34+/KDR+ (EPC) and VAP-1+ (IEC) cells were measured by FACS in EH and AAEH under fixed sodium intake (150 mEq/d) and blockade of the renin-angiotensin-system, and compared to systemic levels in normotensive control subjects (n=19 each). Systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines and EPC homing factors were measured by Luminex. Results: Blood pressure, serum creatinine, lipids, antihypertensive medications, and EPC levels did not differ between EH and AAEH patients. Circulating IEC were higher in AAEH, and inversely correlated with EPC levels (Figure). Systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines and EPC homing factors were higher in AAEH compared to EH patients (Table), and correlated directly with IEC. Conclusion: Despite preserved kidney function and controlled BP, circulating inflammatory markers were elevated in AAEH and correlated with increased IEC and decreased EPC levels. Increased release of cytokines and IEC in AAEH may impair EPC reparative capacity and predispose to hypertensive vascular injury. This process may aggravate vascular damage and accelerate hypertension-related morbidity/mortality rates in AAEH.

Background: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein7 (IGFBP-7) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) reflect G1-cell cycle arrest and are used as biomarkers for AKI. Recent studies show that these biomarkers rise in ischemic conditions and suggest that they actually may limit the severity of AKI. We tested the hypothesis that renal vein [IGFBP-7]*[TIMP-2] correlate with reductions in renal blood flow (RBF) and post-stent single kidney (SK)-GFR changes in patients with RVD undergoing contrast-based imaging and stent revascularization Methods: Inpatient studies were performed during 150 mEq Na+ intake and ACE/ARB Rx in patients with hemodynamically severe RVD (n=29, Doppler velocity = 318 ± 100cm/sec, and eGFR= 34.7 ± 11.7 mL/ min) scheduled for renal artery stenting, and compared to essential hypertensive (EH) healthy controls (n=32). Cortical and medullary RBFs (by multidetector CT) and renal vein levels of IGFBP-7 and TIMP-2 were measured before renal artery stenting and 3 months later Results: Pre-stenting IGFBP-7 and TIMP-2 levels were elevated in RVD compared to EH (18.5±2. vs 15.7±1.5 and 97.4±23.1vs 62.7±9.2 ng/mL respectively, P <0.0001). Baseline renal vein levels of IGFBP-7 * TIMP-2 correlated inversely with pre-stent RBF (r= - 0.53, P=0.01) and directly with the change (%) in SK-GFR observed 3 months after stenting Conclusion: IGFBP-7 and TIMP-2 levels are elevated in patients with chronic RVD as a function of the baseline reduction in RBF, and associate with subsequent improvement in SK-GFR 3 months after revascularization. These data are consistent with renovascular occlusion inducing cell-cycle arrest that serves to protect kidney function.

AbstractRegenerative, cell-based therapy is a promising treatment option for diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which has no cure. To prepare for clinical translation, this systematic review and meta-analysis summarized the effect of cell-based interventions in DKD animal models and treatment-related factors modifying outcomes. Electronic databases were searched for original investigations applying cell-based therapy in diabetic animals with kidney endpoints (January 1998-May 2019). Weighted or standardized mean differences were estimated for kidney outcomes and pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses tested treatment-related factor effects for outcomes (creatinine, urea, urine protein, fibrosis, and inflammation). In 40 studies (992 diabetic rodents), therapy included mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC; 61%), umbilical cord/amniotic fluid cells (UC/AF; 15%), non-MSC (15%), and cell-derived products (13%). Tissue sources included bone marrow (BM; 65%), UC/AF (15%), adipose (9%), and others (11%). Cell-based therapy significantly improved kidney function while reducing injury markers (proteinuria, histology, fibrosis, inflammation, apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal-transition, oxidative stress). Preconditioning, xenotransplantation, and disease-source approaches were effective. MSC and UC/AF cells had greater effect on kidney function while cell products improved fibrosis. BM and UC/AF tissue sources more effectively improved kidney function and proteinuria vs adipose or other tissues. Cell dose, frequency, and administration route also imparted different benefits. In conclusion, cell-based interventions in diabetic animals improved kidney function and reduced injury with treatment-related factors modifying these effects. These findings may aid in development of optimal repair strategies through selective use of cells/products, tissue sources, and dose administrations to allow for successful adaptation of this novel therapeutic in human DKD.

Abstract Background and Aims While the percentage of women entering nephrology has increased over the years, women representation and sex disparities in the authorship of major nephrology Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) has not been examined. Our study evaluates current sex disparities and women representation, and the nationalities of women authors in nephrology CPGs developed by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI), and the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP), the official guideline body of the ERA-EDTA. Method We examined the number of female versus male guideline workgroup members (panelists) for all available CPGs in each of the three organizations as of Dec. 2020, which are available on their respective websites. We discerned the sex of the panelists based on google search and their affiliated institutional websites. We obtained the nationalities of the workgroup members from the authorship information of the respective CPG. Results Of the total 488 panelists in all three organizations, 115 (23.6%) were females and 373 (76.4%) males. KDIGO had 184 panelists, of which 46 (25%) were females. The CPGs with the highest and the least women representation are ‘Diabetes in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)’ (41.2%) and ‘Anemia in CKD’ (11.8%), respectively. The countries with the highest number of women representations are the USA (20), followed by Canada (6), and China (4). In KDOQI, 39 (31%) of 127 panelists were female. While CPGs related to ‘Evaluation and management of CKD’ and ‘Nutrition in children with CKD’ each had 50% female panelists, ‘Blood pressure management in CKD’ CPG had 10% female panelists. 28 (72%) of the total 39 women were from the USA. The ERBP had 30 (17%) females of the total 177 panelists. ‘CKD in older patients’ CPG comprised 42.1% female panelists. CPGs for ‘Glycemic control in diabetes’ and ‘Glucose lowering drugs in diabetes’ had no female panelists. Belgium and UK each had six women representatives, while France and The Netherlands 4 women representatives each. Conclusion The guidelines developed by the most prominent organizations – KDIGO, KDOQI, and ERA-EDTA have less than 25% women representation. While it is encouraging to note that there is more women representation in some of the CPGs developed by KDIGO in 2020, evaluating the barriers contributing to the under-representation of women in major nephrology organizations is warranted. Also notable is a lack of women representation from developing countries.

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) facilitate repair in experimental diabetic kidney disease (DKD). However, the hyperglycemic and uremic milieu may diminish regenerative capacity of patient-derived therapy. We hypothesized that DKD reduces human MSC paracrine function. Adipose-derived MSC from 38 participants with DKD and 16 control subjects were assessed for cell surface markers, trilineage differentiation, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), in vitro function (coculture or conditioned medium experiments with T cells and human kidney cells [HK-2]), secretome profile, and cellular senescence abundance. The direction of association between MSC function and patient characteristics were also tested. RNA-seq analysis identified 353 differentially expressed genes and downregulation of several immunomodulatory genes/pathways in DKD-MSC versus Control-MSC. DKD-MSC phenotype, differentiation, and tube formation capacity were preserved, but migration was reduced. DKD-MSC with and without interferon-γ priming inhibited T-cell proliferation greater than Control-MSC. DKD-MSC medium contained higher levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines (indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase 1 and prostaglandin-E2) and prorepair factors (hepatocyte growth factor and stromal cell–derived factor 1) but lower IL-6 versus control-MSC medium. DKD-MSC medium protected high glucose plus transforming growth factor-β–exposed HK-2 cells by reducing apoptotic, fibrotic, and inflammatory marker expression. Few DKD-MSC functions were affected by patient characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, hemoglobin A1c, kidney function, and urine albumin excretion. However, senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity was lower in DKD-MSC from participants on metformin therapy. Therefore, while DKD altered the transcriptome and migratory function of culture-expanded MSCs, DKD-MSC functionality, trophic factor secretion, and immunomodulatory activities contributing to repair remained intact. These observations support testing of patient-derived MSC therapy and may inform preconditioning regimens in DKD clinical trials.

The development of a wide range of novel antineoplastic therapies has improved the prognosis for patients with a wide range of malignancies, which has increased the number of cancer survivors substantially. Despite the oncological benefit, cancer survivors are exposed to short- and long-term adverse cardiovascular toxicities associated with anticancer therapies. Systemic hypertension, the most common comorbidity among cancer patients, is a major contributor to the increased risk for developing these adverse cardiovascular events. Cancer and hypertension have common risk factors, have overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms and hypertension may also be a risk factor for some tumor types. Many cancer therapies have prohypertensive effects. Although some of the mechanisms by which these antineoplastic agents lead to hypertension have been characterized, further preclinical and clinical studies are required to investigate the exact pathophysiology and the optimal management of hypertension associated with anticancer therapy. In this way, monitoring and management of hypertension before, during, and after cancer treatment can be improved to minimize cardiovascular risks. This is vital to optimize cardiovascular health in patients with cancer and survivors, and to ensure that advances in terms of cancer survivorship do not come at the expense of increased cardiovascular toxicities.

Drawing from basic knowledge of stem-cell biology, embryonic development, wound healing, and aging, regenerative medicine seeks to develop therapeutic strategies that complement or replace conventional treatments by actively repairing diseased tissue or generating new organs and tissues. Among the various clinical-translational strategies within the field of regenerative medicine, several can be broadly described as promoting disease resolution indirectly through local or systemic interactions with a patient’s cells, without permanently integrating or directly forming new primary tissue. In this review, we focus on such therapies, which we term disease-modulating regenerative therapies (DMRT), and on the extent to which they have been translated into the clinical arena in four distinct areas of nephrology: renovascular disease (RVD), sepsis-associated AKI (SA-AKI), diabetic kidney disease (DKD), and kidney transplantation (KTx). As we describe, the DMRT that has most consistently progressed to human clinical trials for these indications is mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), which potently modulate ischemic, inflammatory, profibrotic, and immune-mediated tissue injury through diverse paracrine mechanisms. In KTx, several early-phase clinical trials have also tested the potential for ex vivo –expanded regulatory immune cell therapies to promote donor-specific tolerance and prevent or resolve allograft injury. Other promising DMRT, including adult stem/progenitor cells, stem cell–derived extracellular vesicles, and implantable hydrogels/biomaterials remain at varying preclinical stages of translation for these renal conditions. To date (2021), no DMRT has gained market approval for use in patients with RVD, SA-AKI, DKD, or KTx, and clinical trials demonstrating definitive, cost-effective patient benefits are needed. Nonetheless, exciting progress in understanding the disease-specific mechanisms of action of MSCs and other DMRT, coupled with increasing knowledge of the pathophysiologic basis for renal-tissue injury and the experience gained from pioneering early-phase clinical trials provide optimism that influential, regenerative treatments for diverse kidney diseases will emerge in the years ahead.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, but to the authors' knowledge, limited data exist regarding the safety and efficacy of these agents in transplant recipients. Herein, the authors have reported their experience with 17 patients who were treated with ICIs for metastatic malignancies after undergoing solid organ transplantation. Methods Data were abstracted for solid organ transplant recipients who received ICIs for the treatment of malignancy between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2019. The authors identified 7 kidney, 8 liver, and 2 heart transplant recipients. Outcomes of interest were adverse drug reactions, cancer progression, and patient survival. Results The most common malignancies treated with ICIs were metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (5 patients; 29%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (5 patients; 29%), which were noted exclusively among liver transplant recipients. The median duration on ICIs was 1.7 months (interquartile range, 0.4‐7.6 months). Five patients (29%) developed adverse reactions, including 4 patients (24%) with immune‐related adverse events(irAEs), 3 patients (18%) with acute allograft rejections, 1 patient (6%) with autoimmune colitis, and 1 patient (6%) with ICI‐induced cardiotoxicity (the patient was a heart transplant recipient). The cumulative incidence of cancer progression was 50% and 69%, respectively, at 6 months and 12 months. Eleven patients (65%) died over the median follow‐up period of 4.6 months (interquartile range, 1.5‐13.2 months) from the time of ICI initiation, with cancer progression being the most common cause of death. Conclusions ICIs can be used as individualized therapy in selected patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation but more studies are needed to determine how best to use these agents to improve outcomes further.