Back to Authors

Farber, Charles Michael

0000-0002-2753-6986

Mayo Clinic

Medical Oncology, Simon Cancer Center, Morristown

Citations 25

Outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence in the phase III PERSIST-1 study of pacritinib vs. best available therapy.
Harrison, Claire , Egyed, Miklós , Szőke, Anita , Suvorov, Aleksandr , Perkins, Andrew C. , Mayer, Jiřı́ , Schouten, Harry C. , Tosi, Patrizia , Zhou, Huafeng, Nangalia, Jyoti , Ganly, Peter S. , Farber, Charles Michael , Zachée, Pierre , Scheid, Christof , Dean, James P. , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Mead, Adam J. , Mesa, Ruben A. , Perkins, Andrew C

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 7066-7066

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.7066 Get It

Reasons for initiation of treatment and predictors of response for patients with Rai stage 0/1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving first-line therapy: an analysis of the Connect®CLL cohort study
Flowers, Christopher R. , Nabhan, Chadi , Mato, Anthony R. , Lamanna, Nicole , Kiselev, Pavel , Swern, Arlene S., Sullivan, Kristen , Flick, E. Dawn, Sharman, Jeff P. , Kay, Neil E. , Farber, Charles Michael , Davids, Matthew S.

Leukemia & Lymphoma | February 8, 2018 | Volume: 59 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2327-2335

10.1080/10428194.2018.1427860 Get It

Results of the PERSIST-1 phase III study of pacritinib (PAC) versus best available therapy (BAT) in primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF).
Egyed, Miklós , Szőke, Anita , Suvorov, Aleksandr , Perkins, Andrew C. , Mayer, Jiřı́ , Jourdan, Éric , Schouten, Harry C. , Tosi, Patrizia , Cernohous, Paul, Nangalia, Jyoti , Harrison, Claire , Mesa, Ruben A. , Ganly, Peter S. , Farber, Charles Michael , Zachée, Pierre , Scheid, Christof , Dean, James P. , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Mead, Adam J. , Perkins, Andrew C

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: LBA7006-LBA7006

10.1200/jco.2015.33.18_suppl.lba7006 Get It

LBA7006 Background: PAC is a potent JAK2 inhibitor without significant JAK1 inhibition with minimal myelosuppression in early-phase studies in MF. Methods: The efficacy and safety of daily oral PAC was compared to BAT (2:1 randomization stratified for risk and platelet count). The 10 endpoint was the proportion of ITT patients (pts) achieving ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR) at week (wk) 24 by centrally reviewed MRI or CT. Secondary endpoints included the proportion achieving ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at wk 24 using the MPN Symptom Assessment Form. Results: Patients:327 were enrolled (PAC:220, BAT:107), 62% with 10 MF. Median time from diagnosis was 1.12 years (PAC 0.99, BAT 1.60): 32% and 15% had a platelet counts < 100,000/µL or <50,000/ µL; 75% were JAK2V617F positive. Efficacy: The median duration of treatment was 16.2 months PAC and 5.9 months BAT. Sixty-two percent of BAT patients received active disease directed therapy. The SVR rates at week 24 were 19.1% for PAC vs. 4.7% for BAT (p=0.0003) in ITT and 25% vs. 5.9% (p=0.0001) in the evaluable population. 79% of BAT patients crossed over to PAC; 21% had achieved a >35% reduction in spleen volume at data cutoff. TSS composite V1 + V2 response rates were 24.5%for PAC vs. 6.5% for BAT (p<0.0001) by ITT, and were 40.9% vs. 9.9% in evaluable pts (p<0.0001). Efficacy with baseline cytopenias: In pts with <100,000 and <50,000 platelets/μ/L, the SVR rates were 16.7% for PAC vs. 0% for BAT (p=0.009), and 22.9% vs. 0% (p=0.045) by ITT and 23.5% vs. 0% (p=0.007) and 33.3% vs. 0% (p=0.037) in evaluable pts. In RBC transfusion dependent pts, 25.7% of PAC pts became RBC independent vs. 0% of BAT pts (p=0.043). Safety: The most common adverse events (AE) for PAC were diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting; (grade 3 were <5%, <1%, <1% respectively). Hematologic AEs were similar between PAC and BAT. Conclusions: This study demonstrated PAC was well tolerated and induced significant and sustained SVR and symptom control even in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. PAC therapy resulted in RBC transfusion independence in a significant proportion of pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01773187.
Real‐world clinical experience in the Connect® chronic lymphocytic leukaemia registry: a prospective cohort study of 1494 patients across 199 US centres
Mato, Anthony R. , Nabhan, Chadi , Weiss, Mark A. , Lamanna, Nicole , Grinblatt, David L. , Flinn, Ian W. , Kozloff, Mark, Flowers, Christopher R. , Kiselev, Pavel , Swern, Arlene S., Flick, E. Dawn, Sharman, Jeff P. , Kay, Neil E. , Kipps, Thomas J. , Farber, Charles Michael , Sullivan, Kristen A , Flinn, Ian W

British Journal of Haematology | November 8, 2016 | Volume: 175 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 892-903

10.1111/bjh.14332 Get It

SummaryThe clinical course of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is heterogeneous, and treatment options vary considerably. The Connect® CLL registry is a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study that provides a real‐world perspective on the management of, and outcomes for, patients with CLL. Between 2010 and 2014, 1494 patients with CLL and that initiated therapy, were enrolled from 199 centres throughout the USA (179 community‐, 17 academic‐, and 3 government‐based centres). Patients were grouped by line of therapy at enrolment (LOT). We describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of, and practice patterns for, patients with CLL enrolled in this treatment registry, providing patient‐level observational data that represent real‐world experiences in the USA. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were performed on 49·3% of patients at enrolment. The most common genetic abnormalities detected by FISH were del(13q) and trisomy 12 (45·7% and 20·8%, respectively). Differences in disease characteristics and comorbidities were observed between patients enrolled in LOT1 and combined LOT2/≥3 cohorts. Important trends observed include the infrequent use of genetic prognostic testing, and differences in patient characteristics for patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy combinations. These data represent experiences of patients with CLL in the USA, which may inform treatment decisions in everyday practice.
Follicular Lymphoma in the United States: First Report of the National LymphoCare Study
Friedberg, Jonathan W. , Cerhan, James R. , Flowers, Christopher R. , Dillon, Hildy, Rogers, Eric S., Hainsworth, John D. , Wong, Elaine K., Zelenetz, Andrew D. , Link, Brian K. , Taylor, Michael D. , Farber, Charles Michael , Vose, Julie M. , Cerhan, James R , Link, Brian K , Zelenetz, Andrew D

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 9, 2009 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1202-1208

10.1200/jco.2008.18.1495 Get It

Purpose Optimal therapy of follicular lymphoma (FL) is not defined. We analyzed a large prospective cohort study to identify current demographics and patterns of care of FL in the United States. Patients and Methods The National LymphoCare Study is a multicenter, longitudinal, observational study designed to collect information on treatment regimens and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed FL in the United States. Patients were enrolled between 2004 and 2007. There is no study-specific prescribed treatment regimen or intervention. Results Two thousand seven hundred twenty-eight subjects were enrolled at 265 sites, including the 80% of patients enrolled from nonacademic sites. Using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), three distinct groups independent of histologic grade could be defined. Initial therapeutic strategy was: observation, 17.7%; rituximab monotherapy, 13.9%; clinical trial 6.1%; radiation therapy, 5.6%; chemotherapy only, 3.2%; chemotherapy plus rituximab, 51.9%. Chemotherapy plus rituximab regimens were: rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, 55.0%; rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone, 23.1%; rituximab plus fludarabine based, 15.5%; other, 6.4%. The choice to initiate therapy rather than observe was associated with age, FLIPI, stage, and grade (P < .01). Significant differences in treatment (P < .01) across regions of the United States were noted. Contrary to practice guidelines, treatment of stage I FL frequently omits radiation therapy. Conclusion Widely disparate therapeutic approaches are utilized for FL. Initial therapy is deferred in a small subset of patients. There is no single standard of care for the treatment of de novo FL, although antibody use is ubiquitous when therapy is initiated. These disparate approaches to the initial care of patients with FL render a heterogeneous group of patients at relapse.