Sokumbi, Olayemi

Erythema multiforme (EM) is an immune-mediated condition that classically presents with discrete targetoid lesions and can involve both mucosal and cutaneous sites. While EM is typically preceded by viral infections, most notably herpes simplex virus (HSV), and certain medications, a large portion of cases are due to an unidentifiable cause. EM can be confused with other more serious conditions like Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS); however, clinical research has provided significant evidence to classify EM and SJS as separate disorders. Treatment of EM is highly variable, depending on the etiology, the involvement of mucosal sites, and the chronicity (acute vs. recurring) of the disease. If the etiology or causal medication/infection is identified, then the medication is stopped and/or the infection is treated prior to initiating symptomatic treatment. Treatment for acute EM is focused on relieving symptoms with topical steroids or antihistamines. Treatment for recurrent EM is most successful when tailored to individual patients. First line treatment for recurrent EM includes both systemic and topical therapies. Systemic therapies include corticosteroid therapy and antiviral prophylaxis. Topical therapies include high-potency corticosteroids, and antiseptic or anesthetic solutions for mucosal involvement. Second-line therapies for patients who do not respond to antiviral medications include immunosuppressive agents, antibiotics, anthelmintics, and antimalarials

Primary cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma (PCGD-TCL) is an extremely rare and aggressive T-cell neoplasm with complex heterogeneity. We present a series of two patients who presented with firm, subcutaneous nodules and were diagnosed with PCGD-TCL. In both cases, biopsies demonstrated a both superficial and deep adnexotropic infiltrate comprised of angiocentric, medium- to large-sized atypical lymphocytes. The infiltrate extended into the panniculus. Immuno–histochemical stains highlighted atypical lymphocytes that expressed CD3, CD8 and CD56 but were negative for EBV ISH. A brisk histiocytic response with focal aggregation into granulomas was highlighted with a PG-M1 stain. The atypical lymphocytes were positive for gene rearrangements on a TCR delta stain and negative for βF-1. CT and PET scan in one of the two patients demonstrated diffuse, subcutaneous, ground-glass foci; hypermetabolic soft tissue nodules; and lymphadenopathy in the lungs, as well as splenomegaly. A diagnosis of histiocyte-rich PCGD-TCL was rendered. A histiocyte-rich, granulomatous variant of γδ T-cell lymphoma is extremely rare. Its potentially misleading resemblance to inflammatory granulomatous conditions could pose a diagnostic pitfall in this already challenging condition. This variant may resemble granulomatous mycosis fungoides and granulomatous slack skin syndrome, but it has a distinct, aggressive clinical outcome.

Background: Observations highlighting the “unmasking” of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma after treatment with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) have been recently reported. However, there remains a paucity of literature describing the evolution of clinical and histopathological features that characterizes this phenomenon. Objective: To define the clinical and histopathologic evolution of atypical lymphoid infiltrates after the administration of dupilumab for AD. Methods: A cross-sectional study of clinical and histopathologic features in 7 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of “atypical lymphoid infiltrate” or mycosis fungoides (MF) on dupilumab for AD was performed. Results: Seven patients with atypical lymphoid infiltrates or MF in evolution after dupilumab therapy (age range 27–74 years) were reviewed. Average duration of AD before MF diagnosis was 5.7 years, and the average duration on dupilumab treatment was 9.8 months. Notable histopathologic features across predupilumab and postdupilumab biopsies included progressive increase in the densities of the atypical lymphoid infiltrates (7/7), presence of atypical epidermotropic lymphocytes (6/7), and papillary dermal fibrosis (6/7). Limitations: Small retrospective cohort study. Conclusion: These cases highlight the transformation of lymphoid infiltrates after dupilumab treatment for AD and emphasize the importance of clinical and histopathologic evaluation before and during treatment with dupilumab for treatment-refractory presumed AD.

We report a male patient who developed eight different cancers between ages 57 and 64. BRAF p.V600E mutation was detected in Langerhans cell histiocytosis, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, histiocytic sarcoma, melanoma, and adenocarcinoma of the lung. It was not detected in multiple myeloma, basal cell carcinoma, and papillary thyroid cancer. BRAF p.V600E was not detected in normal skin tissue biopsy indicating that BRAF V600E was a somatic mutation affecting cancer cells. The presence of eight different cancers with five of them positive for BRAF p.V600E in a single patient is unprecedented. This type of BRAF p.V600E-associated poly-neoplastic syndrome has never been reported in the medical literature.

Abstract: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most commonly diagnosed cutaneous cancer in the United States with more than 2.5 million treated annually. Genetic studies have revealed that approximately 90% of BCCs have a mutation in the hedgehog-signaling pathway. Patients with BCC usually have an excellent prognosis with surgical modalities, however, patients with locally advanced BCC may potentially experience significant cosmetic or functional impairment, with only surgical intervention. Vismodegib is a hedgehog pathway inhibitor that has been successful in treating patients with locally advanced BCC. We report a patient with BCC with a good response to vismodegib and a novel xanthomatous change in the excision specimen.

Background: Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (FMF) is a variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that has clinical overlap with a variety of inflammatory follicular unit disorders. However, we describe distinctive presentations of FMF with acneiform features that can be diagnostically challenging, leading to diagnostic delay. Objective: To highlight the importance of histopathologic and immunohistochemical evaluation for diagnostic confirmation of presumed inflammatory follicular unit–based disorders that are unusual in presentation or unresponsive to standard therapies. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study of 5 consecutive patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of FMF was conducted. The clinical, histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular genetic features of cases are presented. Results: We describe 5 patients with clinical and histopathologic presentations of FMF masquerading as hidradenitis suppurativa, furunculosis, or acne vulgaris (age range 34–66 years, 4:1 female to male). Clinical morphologies included open and closed comedones, inflammatory pustules, papules and nodules, follicular papules with keratotic plugging, cysts, and scarring involving the face, trunk, and intertriginous areas. All patients failed to respond to standard therapies, including topical and oral antibiotics, topical and oral retinoids, or topical corticosteroids, before receiving the diagnosis of FMF. Lesional skin biopsies showed a perifollicular CD4-positive T-lymphocytic infiltrate with pilotropism, intrafollicular mucin deposition, foreign-body granulomatous inflammation, acute inflammation, and follicular epithelial necrosis. None had concurrent systemic mycosis fungoides. Limitations: Small retrospective cohort study. Conclusion: We present these cases to expand the clinical and histopathologic spectrum of FMF that may strikingly resemble acneiform disorders and to highlight the importance of diagnostic reconsideration with histopathologic evaluation.