Objective To explore the role of alpha‐synuclein (αSyn) oligomers and neurofilament light chain (NfL) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with pure autonomic failure (PAF) as markers of future phenoconversion to multiple system atrophy (MSA). Methods Well‐characterized patients with PAF (n = 32) were enrolled between June 2016 and February 2019 at Mayo Clinic Rochester and followed prospectively with annual visits to determine future phenoconversion to MSA, Parkinson's disease (PD), or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). ELISA was utilized to measure NfL and protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) to detect αSyn oligomers in CSF collected at baseline. Results Patients were followed for a median of 3.9 years. Five patients converted to MSA, 2 to PD, and 2 to DLB. NfL at baseline was elevated only in patients who later developed MSA, perfectly separating those from future PD and DLB converters as well as non‐converters. ASyn‐PMCA was positive in all but two cases (94%). The PMCA reaction was markedly different in five samples with maximum fluorescence and reaction kinetics previously described in MSA patients; all of these patients later developed MSA. Interpretation αSyn‐PMCA is almost invariably positive in the CSF of patients with PAF establishing this condition as α‐synucleinopathy. Both NfL and the magnitude and reaction kinetics of αSyn PMCA faithfully predict which PAF patients will eventually phenoconvert to MSA. This finding has important implications not only for prognostication, but also for future trials of disease modifying therapies, allowing for differentiation of MSA from Lewy body synucleinopathies before motor symptoms develop. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:1212–1220
Alpha‐Synuclein Oligomers and Neurofilament Light Chain in Spinal Fluid Differentiate Multiple System Atrophy from Lewy Body Synucleinopathies
ObjectiveTo explore the role of alpha‐synuclein (αSyn) oligomers and neurofilament light chain (NFL) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as markers of early multiple system atrophy (MSA) and to contrast findings with Lewy body synucleinopathies.MethodsIn a discovery cohort of well‐characterized early MSA patients (n = 24) and matched healthy controls (CON, n = 14), we utilized enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay to measure NFL and protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) to detect αSyn oligomers in CSF. We confirmed findings in a separate prospectively enrolled cohort of patients with early MSA (n = 38), Parkinson disease (PD, n = 16), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB, n = 13), and CON subjects (n = 15).ResultsIn the discovery cohort, NFL was markedly elevated in MSA patients, with perfect separation from CON. αSyn‐PMCA was nonreactive in all CON, whereas all MSA samples were positive. In the confirmatory cohort, NFL again perfectly separated MSA from CON, and was significantly lower in PD and DLB compared to MSA. PMCA was again nonreactive in all CON, and positive in all but 2 MSA cases. All PD and all but 2 DLB samples were also positive for αSyn aggregates but with markedly different reaction kinetics from MSA; aggregation occurred later, but maximum fluorescence was higher, allowing for perfect separation of reactive samples between MSA and Lewy body synucleinopathies.InterpretationNFL and αSyn oligomers in CSF faithfully differentiate early MSA not only from CON but also from Lewy body synucleinopathies. The findings support the role of these markers as diagnostic biomarkers, and have important implications for understanding pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the synucleinopathies. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:503–512
0787 Autonomic Dysfunction and Phenoconversion in Idiopathic/Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
Abstract Introduction REM-sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a common finding among patients with synucleinopathies. We aimed to determine the degree of autonomic dysfunction in patients presenting with idiopathic RBD (iRBD), and the predictive value of autonomic dysfunction for phenoconversion to a defined neurodegenerative disease. Methods We searched our electronic medical record for patients diagnosed with iRBD who also underwent standardized autonomic function testing within 6 months of iRBD diagnosis, and who had clinical follow-up of at least 3 years following iRBD diagnosis. Patients who received a diagnosis of phenoconversion within 3 months of autonomic testing were excluded. The composite autonomic severity score (CASS) was derived and compared between phenoconverters and non-converters using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results We identified 18 patients who fulfilled in- and exclusion criteria. Average age at autonomic testing was 67 ± 6.6 years. Twelve (67%) patients phenoconverted during the follow-up period; 6 developed PD, the other 6 DLB. Fifteen (83%) patients had at least mild autonomic dysfunction. There were no significant differences between overall converters and non-converters in total CASS or CASS subscores. However, iRBD patients who developed DLB had significantly higher total and cardiovagal CASS scores compared with those who developed PD (p <0.05), and a trend for higher adrenergic CASS scores compared to those who developed PD and those who did not phenoconvert (p=0.08 for each). Conclusion Autonomic dysfunction was seen in 83% of iRBD patients, and more severe baseline cardiovagal and adrenergic autonomic dysfunction in iRBD was associated with phenoconversion to DLB but not PD. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the value of autonomic testing for predicting phenoconversion and disease phenotype in iRBD. Support
Intrathecal administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cells in multiple system atrophy
The baroreflex plays a key role in human BP (blood pressure) regulation. Its efferent limb consists of a vagal and a sympathetic component. The Valsalva manoeuvre is widely used to quantify vagal baroreflex function [BRS_vagal (vagal baroreflex sensitivity)], but most studies have focused on the R–R interval response to BP decrement, even though the subsequent response to an increment in BP is important and different. In the present study, we sought to evaluate whether BRS_vagal can be determined from BRSvagalinc (BRS_vagal derived from the rise in BP during phases III–IV of the Valsalva manoeuvre), to assess the association between BRSvagalinc and BRSvagaldec (BRS_vagal derived from the preceeding BP decrement) and to validate BRSvagalinc as an index of autonomic function. We studied patients with severe autonomic failure (n=49, 25 female), mild autonomic failure (n=25, 11 female) and matched normal controls (n=29, 15 female). BRSvagalinc and BRSvagaldec were calculated as the regression slope of R–R interval and systolic BP during phases III–IV and the early phase II of the Valsalva manoeuvre respectively, and compared these with other autonomic indices across the groups. BRSvagalinc was calculated in all subjects and correlated highly with BRSvagaldec (r=0.72, P<0.001). BRSvagalinc also correlated significantly with BP changes during phases II and IV of the Valsalva manoeuvre and sympathetic barosensitivity. BRSvagalinc was significantly different between the groups, being highest in the controls and lowest in patients with severe autonomic failure. In conclusion, vagal BRS, determined by relating R–R interval with the BP increase following phase III, is a valuable autonomic index, provides additional information about vagal baroreflex function and reflects overall severity of autonomic failure.
Determination of vagal baroreflex sensitivity in normal subjects
ABSTRACTIntroduction: The Valsalva maneuver (VM) is used widely to quantify the sensitivity of the vagal baroreflex loop (vagal baroreflex sensitivity, BRS_v), but most studies have focused on the heart rate (HR) response to blood pressure (BP) decrement (BRS_v↓), even though the subsequent response to an increment in BP after the VM (BRS_v↑) is important and different. Methods: We evaluated recordings of HR and BP in 187 normal subjects during the VM and determined both BRS_v↑, as determined by relating HR to the BP increase after phase III and BRS_v↓. Results: BRS_v↑ was related inversely to age. In addition, BRS_v↓, age, and magnitude of phase IV were independent predictors of BRS_v↑ in a multivariate model, accounting for 47% of the variance of BRS_v↑. Conclusions: The results indicate that both BRS_v↑ and BRS_v↓ become blunted with increasing age and that these indices relate to each other. Muscle Nerve 50: 535–540, 2014
A randomised controlled study of the effect of cholinesterase inhibition on colon function in patients with diabetes mellitus and constipation
Objectives Chronic constipation in diabetes mellitus is associated with colonic motor dysfunction and is managed with laxatives. Cholinesterase inhibitors increase colonic motility. This study evaluated the effects of a cholinesterase inhibitor on gastrointestinal and colonic transit and bowel function in diabetic patients with constipation. Design After a 9-day baseline period, 30 patients (mean±SEM age 50±2 years) with diabetes mellitus (18 type 1, 12 type 2) and chronic constipation without defaecatory disorder were randomised to oral placebo or pyridostigmine, starting with 60 mg three times a day, increasing by 60 mg every third day up to the maximum tolerated dose or 120 mg three times a day; this dose was maintained for 7 days. Gastrointestinal and colonic transit (assessed by scintigraphy) and bowel function were evaluated at baseline and the final 3 and 7 days of treatment, respectively. Treatment effects were compared using analysis of covariance, with gender, body mass index and baseline colonic transit as covariates. Results 19 patients (63%) had moderate or severe autonomic dysfunction; 16 (53%) had diabetic retinopathy. 14 of 16 patients randomised to pyridostigmine tolerated 360 mg daily; two patients took 180 mg daily. Compared with placebo (mean±SEM 1.98±0.17 (baseline), 1.84±0.16 (treatment)), pyridostigmine accelerated (1.96±0.18 (baseline), 2.45±0.2 units (treatment), p<0.01) overall colonic transit at 24 h, but not gastric emptying or small-intestinal transit. Treatment effects on stool frequency, consistency and ease of passage were significant (p≤0.04). Cholinergic side effects were somewhat more common with pyridostigmine (p=0.14) than with placebo. Conclusions Cholinesterase inhibition with oral pyridostigmine accelerates colonic transit and improves bowel function in diabetic patients with chronic constipation. Clinical trial registration number TrialRegNo (NCT 00276406).