Back to Authors

Butler, Kristina A.

Mayo Clinic

WinnMed

Citations 12

Fine needle aspiration cytology of cervical lymph node involvement by ovarian serous borderline tumor
Butler, Kristina , Bell, Debra A., Chen, Longwen , Butler, Kristina A.

CytoJournal | July 26, 2016 | Volume: 13 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 16

10.4103/1742-6413.187052 Get It

Serous borderline tumor (SBT) involving a cervical lymph node is extremely rare. In addition, fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the involved cervical lymph node shares tremendous morphologic similarity with other low-grade papillary carcinomas. Thus, it can be easily misdiagnosed as metastatic carcinoma. A 42-year-old female had a history of bilateral SBT and postbilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. She presented with left cervical lymphadenopathy 6 months later. FNA cytology showed a low-grade papillary neoplasm with psammoma bodies. Needle core biopsy along with immunostains was diagnostic of cervical lymph node involvement (LNI) of SBT. although extremely rare, cervical LNI can be found in patients with SBTs. FNA cytology, sometimes, is indistinguishable from metastatic papillary adenocarcinoma. Cell block or needle core biopsy is essential to make the correct diagnosis.
The role of sexuality symptoms in myeloproliferative neoplasm symptom burden and quality of life: An analysis by the MPN QOL International Study Group
Geyer, Holly L. , Andréasson, Björn , Dueck, Amylou C. , Scherber, Robyn M. , Martin, Kari A. , Butler, Kristina , Harrison, Claire , Radia, Deepti , Cervantes, Francisco , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Reiter, Andreas , Birgegård, Gunnar , Passamonti, Francesco , Senyak, Zhenya, Xiao, Zhijian , Samuelsson, Jan , Butler, Kristina A., Dueck, A. C. , Kosiorek, Heidi , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Paoli, Chiara , Mesa, Ruben A. , Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques , Passamonti, Francesco

Cancer | April 12, 2016 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1888-1896

10.1002/cncr.30013 Get It

BACKGROUNDPatients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis, are faced with oppressive symptom profiles that compromise daily functioning and quality of life. Among these symptoms, sexuality‐related symptoms have emerged as particularly prominent and largely unaddressed. In the current study, the authors evaluated how sexuality symptoms from MPN relate to other patient characteristics, disease features, treatments, and symptoms.METHODSA total of 1971 patients with MPN (827 with essential thrombocythemia, 682 with polycythemia vera, 456 with myelofibrosis, and 6 classified as other) were prospectively evaluated and patient responses to the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN‐SAF) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC‐QLQ C30) were collected, along with information regarding individual disease characteristics and laboratory data. Sexuality scores were compared with an age‐matched, healthy control population.RESULTSOverall, patients with MPN were found to have greater sexual dysfunction compared with the healthy population (MPN‐SAF score of 3.6 vs 2.0; P<.001), with 64% of patients with MPN describing some degree of sexual dysfunction and 43% experiencing severe symptoms. The presence of sexual symptoms correlated closely with all domains of patient functionality (physical, social, cognitive, emotional, and role functioning) and were associated with a reduced quality of life. Sexual problems also were found to be associated with other MPN symptoms, particularly depression and nocturnal and microvascular‐related symptoms. Sexual dysfunction was more severe in patients aged >65 years and in those with cytopenias and transfusion requirements, and those receiving certain therapies such as immunomodulators or steroids.ConclusionsThe results of the current study identify the topic of sexuality as a prominent issue for the MPN population, and this area would appear to benefit from additional investigation and management. Cancer 2016;122:1888–96. © 2016 American Cancer Society.