Caviness, John N.

Purpose In this study, the authors examined whether rhythm metrics capable of distinguishing languages with high and low temporal stress contrast also can distinguish among control and dysarthric speakers of American English with perceptually distinct rhythm patterns. Methods Acoustic measures of vocalic and consonantal segment durations were obtained for speech samples from 55 speakers across 5 groups (hypokinetic, hyperkinetic, flaccid-spastic, ataxic dysarthrias, and controls). Segment durations were used to calculate standard and new rhythm metrics. Discriminant function analyses (DFAs) were used to determine which sets of predictor variables (rhythm metrics) best discriminated between groups (control vs. dysarthrias; and among the 4 dysarthrias). A cross-validation method was used to test the robustness of each original DFA. Results The majority of classification functions were more than 80% successful in classifying speakers into their appropriate group. New metrics that combined successive vocalic and consonantal segments emerged as important predictor variables. DFAs pitting each dysarthria group against the combined others resulted in unique constellations of predictor variables that yielded high levels of classification accuracy. Conclusions This study confirms the ability of rhythm metrics to distinguish control speech from dysarthrias and to discriminate dysarthria subtypes. Rhythm metrics show promise for use as a rational and objective clinical tool.

Purpose This report describes the speech characteristics of individuals with a neurodegenerative syndrome called pallido-ponto-nigral degeneration (PPND) and examines the speech samples of at-risk, but asymptomatic, relatives for possible preclinical detection. Method Speech samples of 9 members of a PPND kindred were subjected to perceptual characterization. Speech deterioration patterns were reported for 2 participants followed longitudinally at 6-month intervals. Cross-sectional findings were reported for 3 participants at various stages of disease. Longitudinal and cross-sectional findings were used to guide the examination of 4 at-risk, but asymptomatic, participants. Results Results revealed a progressive mixed dysarthria with hypokinetic, spastic, and flaccid features. It was characterized primarily by vocal tremor and high-frequency vocal flutter, speaking rate abnormalities most often in the direction of slowing, and a tendency toward monopitch. Dysarthria progression was marked by exacerbation and increasing severity of early features, progressive decrease in spontaneous speech output, verbal perseverations, and eventual mutism. Results for at-risk participants revealed preclinical speech abnormalities that preceded other motor signs. Speech results were examined in light of available autopsy findings for site of lesion associations. Conclusion The dysarthria of PPND is an early harbinger of disease onset. It has a mixed presentation, with hypokinetic, spastic, and flaccid features.

This investigation examined listener transcriptions of phrases produced by speakers with mild to severe hypokinetic dysarthria to examine individual strategies for the identification of word boundaries in connected speech. It was hypothesized that the most efficient listeners would use syllabic strength information to guide their parsing of the continuous acoustic stream. Six-hundred transcribed phrases (10 listeners ×60 phrases) were coded independently by two judges to identify (1) correct word transcriptions, (2) evidence of accurate lexical parsing, regardless of exact word identification, and (3) the proportions of accurate parsing of strong and weak syllable word onsets. Linear regression analysis of the group data revealed that correct segmentation of strong syllable word onsets predicted listener performance on segmenting weak syllable word onsets [R=0.805, F(1,29)=51.440, p<0.001]. Despite a wide range of listener performance on ``words correct,'' individual strategies for perceptual segmentation were evident only in the transcriptions for the most severe speaker. In this case, the poorest listeners exhibited disproportionate difficulty with the segmentation weak syllable word onsets. Results suggest that a listener's ability to use syllabic strength information in lexical parsing determines, in part, their ability to recognize word onsets. [Work supported by NIDCD, NIH.]

This study is the third in a series that has explored the source of intelligibility decrement in dysarthria by jointly considering signal characteristics and the cognitive–perceptual processes employed by listeners. A paradigm of lexical boundary error analysis was used to examine this interface by manipulating listener constraints with a brief familiarization procedure. If familiarization allows listeners to extract relevant segmental and suprasegmental information from dysarthric speech, they should obtain higher intelligibility scores than nonfamiliarized listeners, and their lexical boundary error patterns should approximate those obtained in misperceptions of normal speech. Listeners transcribed phrases produced by speakers with either hypokinetic or ataxic dysarthria after being familiarized with other phrases produced by these speakers. Data were compared to those of nonfamiliarized listeners [Liss et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3415–3424 (2000)]. The familiarized groups obtained higher intelligibility scores than nonfamiliarized groups, and the effects were greater when the dysarthria type of the familiarization procedure matched the dysarthria type of the transcription task. Remarkably, no differences in lexical boundary error patterns were discovered between the familiarized and nonfamiliarized groups. Transcribers of the ataxic speech appeared to have difficulty distinguishing strong and weak syllables in spite of the familiarization. Results suggest that intelligibility decrements arise from the perceptual challenges posed by the degraded segmental and suprasegmental aspects of the signal, but that this type of familiarization process may differentially facilitate mapping segmental information onto existing phonological categories.

This investigation evaluated a possible source of reduced intelligibility in hypokinetic dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners’ perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. A paradigm of error analysis was adopted in which listener transcriptions of phrases were coded for the presence and type of word boundary errors. Seventy listeners heard 60 phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria. The six-syllable phrases alternated strong and weak syllables and ranged in length from three to five words. Lexical boundary violations were defined as erroneous insertions or deletions of lexical boundaries that occurred either before strong or before weak syllables. A total of 1596 lexical boundary errors in the listeners’ transcriptions was identified unanimously by three independent judges. The pattern of errors generally conformed with the predictions of the Metrical Segmentation Strategy hypothesis [Cutler and Norris, J. Exp. Psychol. 14, 113–121 (1988)] which posits that listeners attend to strong syllables to identify word onsets. However, the strength of adherence to this pattern varied across speakers. Comparison of acoustic evidence of syllabic strength to lexical boundary error patterns revealed a source of intelligibility deficit associated with this particular type of dysarthric speech pattern.

This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners’ perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis was conducted on listener transcripts from phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria, ataxic dysarthria, and normal controls. By design, the hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric tapes elicited similar intelligibility (words-correct) scores. However, they elicited different numbers and patterns of lexical boundary errors. The nature of the error pattern differences can be traced to the listeners’ use of available syllabic strength information to segment the acoustic stream. Specifically, although both dysarthric speech samples elicited numerous lexical boundary errors, those for the hypokinetic speech generally conformed to predictions offered from studies of degraded normal speech. Those for the ataxic speech did not conform strongly to such predictions. It appears that the prosodic deficits of the ataxic speech (tendency toward syllabic isochrony, excessive loudness variation, and reduced vowel working space consequent to reductions in vowel strength) posed more of a problem for listeners than did the prosodic deficits of the hypokinetic speech (rapid rate, monotony, reduced vowel working space).