Back to Authors

Trugman, Joel M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-8878

Mayo Clinic

AbbVie (United States)

Citations 25

Decrease in Body Weight With Once-Daily Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Post Hoc Analysis (P1-2.002)
Hay, Deborah L., Severt, Lawrence, Finnegan, Michelle , Ma, Julia, Guo, Hua , Trugman, Joel M. , Dodick, David W. , Hay, Deborah L., Walker, Christopher S. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Ailani, Jessica , Finnegan, Michelle

Neurology | December 6, 2023 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 18_supplement | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.98.18_supplement.714 Get It

Monthly Migraine Days, Acute Medication Use Days, and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life in Responders to Atogepant: A Post Hoc Analysis (S31.008)
McAllister, Peter , Mechtler, Laszlo , Ma, Julia, Dabruzzo, Brett , Dufek, Matthew B., Severt, Lawrence, Finnegan, Michelle , Trugman, Joel M. , Dodick, David W. , Lipton, Richard B. , Nahas, Stephanie J. , Pozo‐Rosich, Patricia

Neurology | December 6, 2023 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 18_supplement | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.98.18_supplement.681 Get It

Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes When Ubrogepant Is Administered During the Migraine Prodrome (Premonitory Phase): Results From the PRODROME Trial (P9-12.001)
Ma, Julia, Smith, Jonathan H., Severt, Lawrence, Stokes, Jonathan , Gandhi, Pranav , Parikh, Krutika, Trugman, Joel M. , Lipton, Richard B. , Harriott, Andrea M. , Dodick, David W.

Neurology | April 28, 2023 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 17_supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000202049 Get It

Efficacy of Ubrogepant for the Treatment of Migraine Symptoms During the Prodrome (Premonitory Phase): Results From the PRODROME Trial (S47.002)
Starling, Amaal J. , Liu, Chengcheng , Yu, Sung Yun , Brand‐Schieber, Elimor , Finnegan, Michelle , Trugman, Joel M. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Ailani, Jessica , Dodick, David W.

Neurology | April 28, 2023 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 17_supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000202047 Get It

Characterizing Prodrome (Premonitory Phase) in Migraine: Results From the PRODROME Trial Screening Period (S41.009)
Yu, Sung Yun , Severt, Lawrence, Finnegan, Michelle , Trugman, Joel M. , Schwedt, Todd J. , Lipton, Richard B. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Chiang, Chia‐Chun , Klein, Brad , Liu, Chengcheng

Neurology | April 28, 2023 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 17_supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000202046 Get It

Ubrogepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine When Administered During the Prodrome (Premonitory Phase): Results From a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study (S47.001)
Liu, Chengcheng , Lu, Kaifeng , Yu, Sung Yun , Severt, Lawrence, Finnegan, Michelle , Trugman, Joel M. , Dodick, David W. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Schwedt, Todd J. , Lipton, Richard B.

Neurology | April 28, 2023 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 17_supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000202043 Get It

Efficacy of Ubrogepant in the Acute Treatment of Migraine With Mild Pain vs Moderate or Severe Pain
Adams, Aubrey Manack, Lai, Jeff, Yu, Sung Yun , Finnegan, Michelle , Kuang, Amy , Trugman, Joel M. , Burstein, Rami , Adams, Aubrey M, Kuang, Amy W, Lipton, Richard B. , Dodick, David W. , Goadsby, Peter J.

Neurology | August 17, 2022 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 17 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000201031 Get It

Rates of Response to Atogepant for Migraine Prophylaxis Among Adults
Blumenfeld, Andrew , McAllister, Peter , Lu, Kaifeng , Dabruzzo, Brett , Miceli, Rosa, Severt, Lawrence, Finnegan, Michelle , Trugman, Joel M. , Lipton, Richard B. , Pozo‐Rosich, Patricia , Dodick, David W. , Li, Ye

JAMA Network Open | June 8, 2022 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 6 | Pages: e2215499

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15499 Get It

Time course of efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine: Results from the randomized, double-blind ADVANCE trial
Silberstein, Stephen D. , Tassorelli, Cristina , Guo, Hua , Lu, Kaifeng , Dabruzzo, Brett , Miceli, Rosa, Severt, Lawrence, Finnegan, Michelle , Trugman, Joel M. , Silberstein, Stephan D , Tassorelli, Cristina , Schwedt, Todd J. , Lipton, Richard B. , Ailani, Jessica

Cephalalgia | September 15, 2021 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 3-11

10.1177/03331024211042385 Get It

Background Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist for the preventive treatment of migraine. Methods In the double-blind, phase 3 ADVANCE trial, participants with 4–14 migraine days/month were randomized to atogepant 10 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. We evaluated the time course of efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine. Analyses included change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days during each of the three 4-week treatment periods, change in weekly migraine days during weeks 1–4, and proportion of participants with a migraine on each day during the first week. Results We analyzed 873 participants (n = 214 atogepant 10 mg, n = 223 atogepant 30 mg, n = 222 atogepant 60 mg, n = 214 placebo). For weeks 1–4, mean change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days ranged from −3.1 to −3.9 across atogepant doses vs −1.6 for placebo ( p < 0.0001). For weeks 5–8 and 9–12, reductions in mean monthly migraine days ranged from −3.7 to −4.2 for atogepant vs −2.9 for placebo ( p ≤ 0.012) and −4.2 to −4.4 for atogepant vs −3.0 for placebo ( p < 0.0002), respectively. Mean change from baseline in weekly migraine days in week 1 ranged from −0.77 to −1.03 for atogepant vs −0.29 with placebo ( p < 0.0001). Percentages of participants reporting a migraine on post-dose day 1 ranged from 10.8% to 14.1% for atogepant vs 25.2% with placebo ( p ≤ 0.0071). Conclusion Atogepant demonstrated treatment benefits as early as the first full day after treatment initiation, and sustained efficacy across each 4-week interval during the 12-week treatment period. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03777059
Efficacy of ubrogepant based on prior exposure and response to triptans: A post hoc analysis
Blumenfeld, Andrew , Goadsby, Peter J. , Hutchinson, Susan , Liu, Chengcheng , Finnegan, Michelle , Trugman, Joel M. , Szegedi, Armin, Hutchinson, Susan , Goadsby, Peter J , Dodick, David W.

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | March 22, 2021 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 422-429

10.1111/head.14089 Get It

Abstract Objective To determine the potential efficacy of ubrogepant for acute treatment of migraine based on historical experience with triptans. Background Although triptans have improved migraine treatment, their efficacy and tolerability may limit their utility in some individuals. Ubrogepant is a small‐molecule, oral calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute treatment of migraine in adults. Methods This post hoc analysis of pooled data from the pivotal trials ACHIEVE I and II, identically designed, randomized, double‐blind, phase 3, single‐attack trials of ubrogepant in adults with a history of migraine with/without aura, examined the efficacy and tolerability of ubrogepant 50 mg versus placebo based on participants’ historical experience with triptans: triptan responder, triptan‐insufficient responder, and triptan naïve. Co‐primary efficacy endpoints were pain freedom and absence of most bothersome migraine‐associated symptom (MBS) 2 h post initial dose. Adverse events (AEs) within historical triptan experience subgroups were evaluated. Results In the pooled analysis population ( n = 1799), 682 (placebo, n = 350; ubrogepant 50 mg, n = 332), 451 (placebo, n = 223; ubrogepant, n = 228), and 666 (placebo, n = 339; ubrogepant, n = 327) participants were triptan responders, triptan‐insufficient responders, and triptan‐naïve, respectively. Response rates on co‐primary efficacy endpoints were higher for ubrogepant versus placebo across all groups. Treatment‐by‐subgroup interaction p values based on odds ratios for pain freedom ( p = 0.290) and absence of MBS ( p = 0.705) indicated no significant impact of historical triptan experience on ubrogepant efficacy. AE incidence for ubrogepant did not differ appreciably across historical triptan experience subgroups. Conclusions Ubrogepant efficacy and tolerability did not differ for the acute treatment of migraine in participants classified as triptan responders, triptan‐insufficient responders, and triptan‐naïve based on their historical experience with triptans.