Abstract Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been associated with lower rates of postoperative complications in ulcerative colitis (UC), both in the elective and emergency setting, compared to the traditional open approach. Despite these findings, some clinical guidelines state that minimally invasive surgery is not superior to open surgery in UC and emphasize an individual approach based on the surgeon’s judgment. This study analyzed the trends in open and minimally invasive approaches in total colectomies for UC. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the ACS-NSQIP database encompassing all patients undergoing total colectomy for UC from 2012 to 2021. The primary endpoint involved analyzing open, laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic surgery trends. A time series analysis was performed to forecast the future direction of these surgical techniques. Quarter (Q) and admission year were reported for time trend analysis. Dynamic relationships between various time series representing different surgical techniques were modeled using Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models. These models were employed to predict future trends in operative approaches until Q2 of 2025, along with 95% confidence intervals. Results A total of 7099 patients (44.5% female) were included, with a mean age of 45.1 (±17.8) years and mean BMI of 25.5 (±7.7) kg/m². Smoking was reported in only 8.7% of patients, with 49.1% classified as ASA 3 and 41.4% as ASA 2. Most patients (71.5%) were on steroids or immunosuppressants at the time of intervention. At the beginning of the study period, nearly half of the interventions were performed with an open approach (45.2%), followed by laparoscopy (35.7%) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (19%). Trends indicated a decline in open surgery to 17.7% by Q2 of 2021, with an increase in laparoscopic (45%), hand-assisted (25%), and a consistent growth of robotic surgery to 12.3%. Forecasting shown in Figure 1 suggested a continuous decrease in open surgery until Q2 of 2025 (8.7%, 95% CI 0-32.5%), with laparoscopic (51.2%, 95% CI 26.4-75.9%), hand-assisted (29.1%, 95% CI 11.9-46.3%), and robotic (11.0%, 95% CI 7.5-14.6%) approaches on the rise. Conclusion Minimally invasive surgical techniques have steadily grown over the past decade in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Predictions indicate continued growth, displacing traditional open approach, which may persist as a rescue procedure.
P1104 Shifting Surgical Landscape in Crohn's Colitis: Laparoscopic Supremacy and Robotic Upsurge
Abstract Background Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder that can cause transmural inflammation throughout the digestive tract. When CD affects the colon, it is known as Crohn's colitis (CC), a serious condition often requiring surgical resection. Surgical trends in CC have changed significantly over the past decade, shifting towards minimally invasive surgery, with laparoscopic and robotic procedures becoming increasingly common. This study examines how surgical trends in CC have changed in recent years and predicts how they may change. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis using the ACS-NSQIP database, focusing on patients who underwent colonic resections for CC between 2012 and 2021, including 20,109 patients. Our main goal was to examine trends in open, laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic surgery. We utilized time series analysis, specifically quarter and year of admission data, and employed Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models to explore the dynamic relationships among these surgical techniques. To analyze the time trends, we reported the quarter (Q) and year of admission. These models enabled us to forecast future trends, accompanied by 95% confidence intervals, extending our predictions up until Q2 of 2025. Results As shown in Figure 1, open surgery has been the most common approach to CC since Q1 2012, accounting for 52.3% of all procedures. Laparoscopic surgery was the next most common approach, at 33.3%, followed by hand-assisted laparoscopy at 14.4%. Laparoscopy rapidly expressed market supremacy, by steadily becoming the most widespread approach by Q2 of 2017, representing 42.2% of CC surgery and peaking in Q2 2020 at 43.5%. This growth in laparoscopy came at the expense of open surgery, which experienced a significant decline, reaching its lowest point of 28.5% in Q2 2021. Hand-assisted procedures gradually increased in popularity over the years but remained less popular than open and laparoscopic methods, peaking at 24.0% in Q4 2019. Robotic procedures experienced slow but steady growth, from 1.9% in Q1 2013 to 10% in Q2 2021. Future trends suggest that laparoscopy will continue to grow steadily, reaching 45% (95% CI 28.2-61.7%) by the end of our prediction period. Robotic surgery is poised to significantly shift CC surgery trends, with resections expected to reach 12.6% (95% CI 9.3-15.8%) by Q2 2025, while a subsequent decline in open procedures to 20.8% (95% CI 0-43%). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery has emerged as the favored surgical approach in CC and is expected to maintain its supremacy into the near future. Open colonic resections are anticipated to decline, making way for the increasing prevalence of robotic surgery.
Abstract Background:Presacral tumors are a rare entity typically treated with an open surgical approach. A limited number of minimally invasive resections have been described. Aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic resection of presacral tumors. Methods: This was a retrospective single system analysis, conducted at a quaternary referral academic healthcare system, and included all patients who underwent a robotic excision of a presacral tumor between 2015 and 2023. Outcomes of interest were operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, length of stay, margin status, and recurrence rates. Results: Sixteen patients (11 females, 5 males) were included. Median age of the cohort was 51 years (range 25-69). Median operative time was 197 minutes (range 98-802). Median estimated blood loss was 40 ml, ranging from 0 to 1800 ml, with one patient experiencing conversion to open surgery after uncontrolled hemorrhage. Urinary retention was the only post-operative complication that occurred in 3 patients (19%) and was solved within 30 days in all cases. Median length of stay was one day (range 1-6). Median follow-up was 6.7 months (range 1-110). All tumors were excised with appropriate margins, but one benign and one malignant tumor recurred (12.5%). Ten tumors were classified as congenital (one was malignant), two were mesenchymal (both malignant), and five were miscellaneous (one malignant). Conclusions:Robotic resection of select presacral pathology is feasible and safe. Further studies must be conducted to determine complication rates, outcomes, and long-term safety profiles.