Khanna, Sahil

Background: Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL) is approved in the United States and Canada for prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) in adults following standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotic treatment. Objectives: Provide an updated integrated safety analysis, incorporating final safety data from Punch CD3-OLS. Design: Safety data were combined from five RBL trials: three phase II and two phase III trials. Methods: Adult participants had documented rCDI and completed SOC therapy before receiving one or two doses of RBL or placebo, rectally administered as one treatment course. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded for ⩽6 months. Results: TEAEs were reported in 70.9% (845/1192) of RBL recipients; most TEAEs were mild to moderate and gastrointestinal in nature. Most serious TEAEs were related to preexisting conditions or CDI. There was no clustering of serious TEAEs. Most TEAEs leading to death were related to preexisting conditions. Conclusion: Overall, data demonstrate RBL has a favorable 6-month safety profile. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01925417; NCT02299570; NCT02589847; NCT03244644; NCT03931941.

Background: Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL) is a microbiota-based product for the prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) in adults following antibiotic treatment. The safety and clinical effectiveness of RBL administered via colonoscopy in adults with rCDI were evaluated in CDI-SCOPE. An 8-week analysis showed 9.8% of participants had RBL-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; primary endpoint) and 95.1% experienced treatment success (no CDI recurrence). Objectives: To evaluate long-term safety and clinical effectiveness of RBL through 6 months of follow-up in CDI-SCOPE. Design: Single-arm exploratory phase IIIb trial conducted at 12 sites in the United States. Methods: Eligible adults with rCDI received a single 150-mL dose of RBL to the right colon via colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was RBL-related TEAEs through 8 weeks after RBL administration or confirmed treatment failure. Secondary endpoints included safety up to 6 months after RBL administration. Exploratory analyses included assessment of further CDI episodes. Results: Of the 41 participants enrolled, 39 completed trial assessments through 6 months. From 8 weeks through 6 months after RBL administration, 36 TEAEs in 15 participants (36.6%) were reported, one of which (irritable bowel syndrome) was RBL-related; most TEAEs (97.2%) were of mild or moderate severity. Over the 6-month trial period, 23 participants (56.1%) experienced 69 TEAEs; 94.2% were of mild or moderate severity. Serious TEAEs occurred in three participants (7.3%), none of which were related to RBL or its administration, and no TEAEs led to discontinuation or death. Overall, 38 participants (92.7%) did not experience further CDI episodes, 1 (2.4%) did between 8 weeks and 6 months, and 2 (4.9%) had an indeterminate outcome due to trial withdrawal before 8 weeks. Conclusion: RBL administered via colonoscopy was safe and effective for preventing CDI recurrence in adults with rCDI in CDI-SCOPE. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05831189.

Abstract Background The term “incomplete microscopic colitis” (MCi) has been suggested to define patients with chronic watery diarrhea not fulfilling the complete histologic criteria for MC. There are inconsistent data on the epidemiology of MCi and the optimal management of these patients. Methods A systematic search of randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies of adults with biopsy-proven MCi (incomplete lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis) was conducted using Cochrane, Medline, Scopus, and Embase from inception to May 6, 2025. Data were extracted on (1) incidence and prevalence of MCi, (2) patient features and risk factors, (3) clinical response with treatment, and (4) relapse after treatment cessation. Data were pooled using the random-effects model to calculate weighted pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Of 136 potentially relevant publications identified, 49 passed abstract screening, and 17 studies (1 RCT and 16 observational) were included, with a total of 1370 patients with MCi (median age of 62 years and 69.6% women). The incidence rate of MCi ranged from 0.96 to 5.0 cases per 100 000 person-years. The pooled proportion of concurrent autoimmune disease with MCi was 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.28; I2 = 95%), and 46% (95% CI, 0.28-0.64; I2 = 95%) were on medications associated with microscopic colitis (MC). The pooled clinical remission rate with any induction therapy was 78% (95% CI, 0.68-0.89; I2 = 81%) and 85% (95% CI, 0.72-0.98; I2 = 88%) with budesonide. Conclusions Patients with MCi share similar characteristics with full MC including demographics, risk factors, and response to therapy, indicating that the histologic criteria for MC should potentially be broadened.

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treatment guidelines suggest varied approaches for patients with first (frCDI) or multiply recurrent CDI (mrCDI). Low microbial diversity, elevated primary bile acids (BA), and low secondary BA concentrations favor germination of C. difficile spores into toxin-producing bacteria and are believed to increase rCDI risk. Greater understanding of the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome in rCDI may inform management of the disease. We describe a post hoc comparison of GI microbiome and bile acid profiles between patients with frCDI and mrCDI in a Phase 3 open-label trial, ECOSPOR IV, of fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk (VOWST®; VOS, formerly SER-109), an orally-administered live microbiome therapeutic. Methods Patients received VOS following symptom resolution after standard-of-care antibiotics. Pretreatment baseline (within 3 days following antibiotic completion) and Week 1 post-dosing stool samples were collected for whole metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics. Diversity was calculated from MetaPhlAn2 species profiles. Concentrations of primary and secondary BAs were measured via targeted LC-MS/MS. Results rCDI rates through Week 8 were similarly low in both frCDI and mrCDI patients (6.5% versus 9.7%, respectively). Baseline microbial diversity was similarly low between frCDI and mrCDI subgroups (P > .05). Diversity and secondary BA concentrations increased in both subgroups, whereas primary BA concentrations declined following VOS dosing, leading to few differences between subgroups at Week 1. Conclusions These data suggest commonalities in microbiome disruption in patients with frCDI and mrCDI that contribute to recurrence and suggest that antibiotics followed by a live microbiome therapy may be an optimal treatment strategy for rCDI, regardless of number of prior CDI recurrences.

ImportanceSystemic antibiotic use for patients with a non–Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major risk factor for recurrent CDI. Increasing use of oral vancomycin for secondary prophylaxis against recurrent CDI in this context has uncertain efficacy.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether oral vancomycin prophylaxis compared with placebo is effective against recurrent CDI during and 8 weeks after the end of study treatment.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in 4 large health systems across the upper Midwest US. Adults who had completed treatment for CDI within the past 180 days and were taking a systemic antibiotic for a non-CDI indication were enrolled between May 21, 2018, and March 30, 2023, and followed up for 8 weeks after the end of study treatment.InterventionParticipants were randomized 1:1 to 125 mg of oral vancomycin or placebo once daily during antibiotic use for a non-CDI plus 5 days following cessation of those antibiotics.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was recurrent CDI incidence during treatment and the 8-week follow-up period. The secondary outcome was vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus carriage in stool.ResultsAmong 81 randomized participants (median age, 59 years [IQR, 50-67 years]), all were included in the primary as-randomized analysis (39 in the vancomycin group; 42 in the placebo group). Sixty patients (74.1%) completed 8-week follow-up and were included in the secondary as–completed treatment analysis (31 in the vancomycin group; 29 in the placebo group). Recurrent CDI occurred in 17 of 39 participants in the oral vancomycin group (43.6%) and 24 of 42 in the placebo group (57.1%; absolute difference in percentage, −13.5% [95% CI, −35.1% to 8.0%]). Adverse events occurred in 27 of 39 participants in the oral vancomycin group (69.2%) and 27 of 42 in the placebo group (64.3%). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus carriage was found in 15 of 30 patients in the oral vancomycin group (50.0%) and 6 of 25 in the placebo group (24.0%) (P = .048) 8 weeks after treatment.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, the incidence of recurrent CDI was lower (though did not reach significance) in participants taking oral vancomycin compared with those taking placebo. Because the study was underpowered, it was unable to reveal firm conclusions about the efficacy (or lack thereof) of vancomycin prophylaxis with respect to recurrent CDI.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03462459

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treated with bezlotoxumab (BEZ) has been demonstrated to have a lower recurrence rate than placebo in clinical trials. However, real-world data on BEZ’s effectiveness remain limited and heterogeneous. Objectives: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of BEZ in preventing CDI recurrence through a single-center retrospective cohort and a meta-analysis. Design: A retrospective cohort study and a meta-analysis. Methods: A retrospective study of patients treated with BEZ from 2017 to 2021 was performed at the Mayo Clinic. Demographics, CDI diagnostics, and several prespecified risk factors were analyzed. A literature search was conducted in August 2024 utilizing the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies reporting CDI resolution rates with BEZ were included. The random-effects model described by DerSimonian and Laird was used to calculate weighted pooled resolution rates (WPR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed heterogeneity with the inconsistency index ( I 2 ) statistic. Results: Across 28 studies and our retrospective cohort, 2639 CDI patients were analyzed. Among 1786 patients treated with BEZ, 1450 achieved clinical resolution (WPR: 81.6%, 95% CI 77.2–85.6%), with significant heterogeneity ( I ² = 77.3%). In subgroup analysis, the pooled relative risk of recurrence was 0.56 (95% CI 0.36–0.88; p < 0.01) for BEZ with SoC compared to SoC alone. A WPR of 83.3% (95% CI 75.5%–91.1%) for patients receiving BEZ with SoC was observed when compared with a WPR of 70.8% (95% CI 62.7%–78.8%) in patients receiving SoC alone on subgroup analysis. In our cohort of 47 patients, the CDI resolution rate was 72.3% (34/47). Conclusion: Our retrospective study and meta-analysis demonstrate the real-world efficacy of BEZ in reducing CDI recurrence. The higher recurrence rates in our cohort likely reflect the high-risk nature of the population, including a greater proportion of immunocompromised patients.

Objectives Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools can enhance the quality and efficiency of medical research, but their improper use may result in plagiarism, academic fraud and unreliable findings. Transparent reporting of GAI use is essential, yet existing guidelines from journals and institutions are inconsistent, with no standardised principles. Design and setting International online Delphi study. Participants International experts in medicine and artificial intelligence. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure is the consensus level of the Delphi expert panel on the items of inclusion criteria for GAMER (Rreporting guideline for the use of Generative Artificial intelligence tools in MEdical Research). Results The development process included a scoping review, two Delphi rounds and virtual meetings. 51 experts from 26 countries participated in the process (44 in the Delphi survey). The final checklist comprises nine reporting items: general declaration, GAI tool specifications, prompting techniques, tool’s role in the study, declaration of new GAI model(s) developed, artificial intelligence-assisted sections in the manuscript, content verification, data privacy and impact on conclusions. Conclusion GAMER provides universal and standardised guideline for GAI use in medical research, ensuring transparency, integrity and quality.

Background: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) occurs in up to 35% of patients with CDI, and further recurrence is common. Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL) is safe and effective for preventing rCDI in adults following antibiotic treatment for rCDI when administered rectally. There is clinical interest in alternative routes of administration. Objectives: CDI-SCOPE assessed the safety and clinical effectiveness of RBL when administered via colonoscopy to adults with rCDI. Design: Single-arm, exploratory phase IIIb trial conducted at 12 sites in the United States. Methods: Eligible adults with rCDI received one administration of RBL consisting of one 150-mL dose of RBL, delivered via colonoscopy to the right side of the colon. The primary endpoint assessed RBL-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) within 8 weeks of RBL administration or until confirmed treatment failure. Secondary endpoints included treatment success (absence of CDI recurrence for 8 weeks following RBL administration), physician experience administering RBL via colonoscopy, and physician perception of participant benefit. Results: Of 54 participants screened, 41 were enrolled and received RBL via colonoscopy; 39 participants completed the 8-week visit. Five TEAEs in four participants (9.8%) were assessed as related to RBL, all of which were gastrointestinal and mild in severity. Overall, 18 participants (43.9%) experienced 33 TEAEs within 8 weeks, most of which were of mild (25/33; 75.8%) or moderate (5/33; 15.2%) severity. No TEAEs led to intensive care unit admission or death. Overall, 39 participants (95.1%) experienced treatment success; 2 participants (4.9%) withdrew consent and had an indeterminate outcome. Among physicians, 90.2% of investigators indicated a “positive” or “very positive” experience administering RBL by colonoscopy. All physicians assessed participant benefit as “much” or “very much” improved. Conclusion: This single-arm study suggests RBL administered via colonoscopy is practical, safe, and effective for preventing CDI recurrence following antibiotic treatment in adults. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05831189.

Large language models (LLMs) transform healthcare by assisting clinicians with decision-making, research, and patient management. In gastroenterology, LLMs have shown potential in clinical decision support, data extraction, and patient education. However, challenges such as bias, hallucinations, integration with clinical workflows, and regulatory compliance must be addressed for safe and effective implementation. This manuscript presents a structured framework for integrating LLMs into gastroenterology, using Hepatitis C treatment as a real-world application. The framework outlines key steps to ensure accuracy, safety, and clinical relevance while mitigating risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI)-driven healthcare tools. The framework includes defining clinical goals, assembling a multidisciplinary team, data collection and preparation, model selection, fine-tuning, calibration, hallucination mitigation, user interface development, integration with electronic health records, real-world validation, and continuous improvement. Retrieval-augmented generation and fine-tuning approaches are evaluated for optimizing model adaptability. Bias detection, reinforcement learning from human feedback, and structured prompt engineering are incorporated to enhance reliability. Ethical and regulatory considerations, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, General Data Protection Regulation, and AI-specific guidelines (DECIDE-AI, SPIRIT-AI, CONSORT-AI), are addressed to ensure responsible AI deployment. LLMs have the potential to enhance decision-making, research efficiency, and patient care in gastroenterology, but responsible deployment requires bias mitigation, transparency, and ongoing validation. Future research should focus on multi-institutional validation and AI-assisted clinical trials to establish LLMs as reliable tools in gastroenterology.