Mardini, Samir

Abstract Goals/Purpose The imperative for precision in aesthetic surgery necessitates a robust framework for evaluating the impact of facial interventions on perceived age. Our study introduces a cutting-edge AI model aimed at discerning an individual's perceived age from facial characteristics. This tool is designed to augment the assessment of various plastic surgery procedures, facilitating the tailoring of interventions to each patient's unique facial aging pattern. Methods/Technique We harnessed a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), pre-trained on the extensive ImageNet dataset, and further refined using 523,051 pre-annotated facial images from the IMBD-WIKI database, normalized as per the Mathias et al. face detection paradigm. Faces were processed into a 299x299 pixel matrix, maintaining a 40% margin around the face for uniformity. The Xception architecture was employed for its advanced feature extraction capabilities. The model was refined and tested against a diverse set of 100 patient faces from the Mayo Clinic's database, categorized by demographic and procedural data. The AI model employed regression analysis and softmax probability for precise age estimation. Results/Complications The AI model exhibited a remarkable accuracy rate of 92.5% in age estimation for pre procedural patients, with a standard deviation of 3.2 years. It significantly outperformed traditional methods in identifying fine-grained age-related features. The AI model discerned an average perceived age reduction of 3.5 years across all patients post-procedure, with a notable variance among different types of surgeries. Certain procedures, such as rhytidectomy and blepharoplasty, showed a more pronounced age-reduction effect. Conclusion The AI model presents an accurate and objective method for quantifying perceived age, serving as a significant benchmark in facial aesthetic evaluation. By illustrating measurable age reduction following various procedures, with some surgeries yielding more substantial changes in perceived age, the model stands as a testament to the effectiveness of plastic surgery interventions. The precision of our model in predicting age pre- and post-procedure underscores its potential to assist surgeons in custom-tailoring surgeries to individual aging patterns. This innovation is poised to refine the decision-making process in aesthetic surgery, ensuring treatments are aligned with the desired outcomes for rejuvenation and patient-specific needs, ultimately advancing the frontier of personalized plastic surgery.

Background: Eyelid ptosis may present with upper lid dermatochalasis and brow ptosis. When indicated, ptosis correction (PC) is advocated during upper blepharoplasty (UB). In this study, the authors aimed to report their outcomes following UB and PC. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent UB from November of 2018 to March of 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and revisions were recorded. Cox regression was performed to assess predictors of revision. Results: Overall, 278 patients with 533 UB were included. The mean patient age was 67.3 years. The mean follow-up was 8.3 months. In 169 cases (31.7%), a brow lift was performed. UB and PC were performed in 109 cases (20.5%), of which 60 (55%) involved Müller muscle conjunctival resection and 49 (45%) were levator repairs. New dry eye symptoms lasting 3 months or longer occurred in 4 cases (0.8%), all of which resolved. The revision rate was 3.8% after UB (residual skin [ n = 11], hypertrophic scar [ n = 4], and Herring law–related ptosis [ n = 1]) versus 9.2% after UB and PC (overcorrection [ n = 4], residual skin [ n = 4], and asymmetry [ n = 2]). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased revision rates after UB and PC ( P = 0.008). There was no difference in revision rates between different techniques of PC. Conclusions: In this study of 278 patients presenting for dermatochalasis, up to 21% of cases required ptosis correction in addition to upper blepharoplasty. Ptosis correction is a safe procedure when combined with upper blepharoplasty, regardless of technique used. The revision rate in our series was 9.2% after the combined procedure, which is greater than the revision rate of upper blepharoplasty only but comparable to that in the literature. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Background: Dynamic facial reanimation is the gold standard treatment for a paralyzed face. The use of the cross-face nerve graft (CFNG) in combination with the masseteric nerve to innervate the free gracilis muscle has been reported to provide both spontaneity and strong neural input. We report a case series of dual innervation, using a novel method where the branch to masseter is coapted to the side of the CFNG. Methods: Eight patients received free gracilis muscle transfer using the new dual innervation method between September 2014 and December 2017. The CFNG, which was performed nine months prior, was sutured in an end-to-end fashion to the obturator nerve. A nerve graft was coapted to the ipsilateral masseteric nerve and then sutured in an end-to-side fashion to the CFNG proximal to its coaptation to the obturator nerve. Results: All patients recovered smile function with and without teeth clenching around the same time period. Smiles without teeth clenching appeared later in two of eight patients and earlier in one of eight patients, being noted at an average of 8.25 months of follow-up versus 7.6 months. The estimate of true attainment is limited by the spacing of follow-up dates. Average follow-up time was 36.07 months (range: 10–71.5). FACE-Gram software smile analysis with and without biting demonstrated similar excursion on average (7.64 mm versus 8.6 mm respectively, P = 0.93), both of which are significantly improved from preoperation. Conclusion: This novel method of a dual-innervated free gracilis muscle transfer offers a viable technique that achieves a symmetric, strong, and emotional smile.

Summary: After a transnasal endoscopic resection of a high-grade adenoid cystic carcinoma that underwent adjuvant chemoradiation, there was delayed recurrence managed by en bloc resection through an open craniofacial approach. Subsequently, the patient developed a chronic nasocranial fistula with secondary infection and bone flap resorption. This resulted in infectious episodes with secondary scalp incisional dehiscence and hardware exposure which required multiple bone debridement procedures, hardware removal, prolonged IV antibiotics, and hyperbaric oxygen treatment. The nasocranial fistula and chronic frontal bone osteomyelitis persisted despite the previous interventions. The patient underwent a frontal bone removal and obliteration of the anterior cranial base fistula with a free vastus lateralis muscle flap. At 4 weeks postoperatively, the intranasal portion of the muscle flap had completely mucosalized. After a 6-week course of IV antibiotics, a secondary cranioplasty using a custom-made poly-ether-ether-ketone implant was performed. The patient remained disease- and infection-free for the duration of follow-up (17 months).