Frye, Mark A.

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate pharmacological treatment patterns in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) with and without comorbid substance use disorder (SUD) and anxiety disorder (AX), we leveraged the Global Bipolar Cohort to analyze cross‐regional practices across North America, Europe, and the Pacific. Methods Fourteen cohorts contributed aggregate data on pharmacotherapy, demographics, diagnostic subtypes, and comorbidities. Proportional meta‐analyses using generalized linear mixed models were conducted to examine prescription trends and identify clinical differences. Results The sample ( N = 11,521) was 60% female and 84% Caucasian. Participants were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups based on comorbidity status: those with comorbid AX only, comorbid SUD only, both AX and SUD, or neither. The AX+SUD subgroup showed higher rates of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), rapid cycling, obesity, and unemployment, reflecting a more severe clinical profile. Regional variations were notable: North American cohorts reported higher prevalence of AX and SUD than European and Pacific cohorts. Antidepressants use for AX were more common in Europe and the Pacific, while North American prescribing patterns were more variable. Benzodiazepine use was high among individuals with SUD across all regions. Lithium and first‐generation antipsychotic prescriptions varied, with higher rates observed in Europe. Conclusions Findings underscore the heterogeneity of BD and the influence of comorbid AX and SUD on illness burden and treatment. Regional prescribing variations underscore the need for context‐specific guidelines. Gaps in data on medication‐assisted treatment for SUD point to areas for future research. These insights can support more individualized and effective care for complex BD presentations.

Abstract Objectives To systematically evaluate the certainty of evidence for treatment strategies across age groups and mood phases in bipolar disorder, and develop an open access web platform to facilitate shared decision making. Design Living umbrella review, evaluation, analysis, and communication hub (U-REACH) project. Data sources PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cochrane library databases, from inception to 19 November 2024. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Systematic reviews with network or pairwise meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials of pharmacological, nutraceutical, psychosocial, brain stimulation, or circadian rhythm based treatments, administered as monotherapy (without concurrent interventions), augmentation treatment (interventions added to an ongoing treatment regimen), or combination treatment (simultaneous initiation of two different interventions), examining any age group, bipolar disorder phase (ie, acute bipolar depression, mania or mixed episodes, or maintenance), treatment, control, or outcome. Results 77 studies met the inclusion criteria (21 network meta-analyses and 56 pairwise meta-analyses), including 116 unique pharmacological (n=74), brain stimulation (n=18), nutraceutical (n=13), psychosocial (n=8), and circadian rhythm based (n=3) treatments as monotherapy, augmentation, or combination therapy, along with five control interventions. These studies covered 133 unique outcomes (45 efficacy outcomes and 88 safety outcomes) resulting in 2510 meta-analyses with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) ratings of the certainty of the evidence as high (n=236), moderate (n=827), low (n=986), and very low (n=461). A communication hub, the Evidence Based Interventions for Bipolar Disorder (EBI-BD) platform, was developed and the full results are freely available ( https://ebibd-database.org ), including the preference based tool (12 interventions and 17 safety outcomes). Interventions effective across outcomes varied by phases. For bipolar depression, effective interventions in adults were cariprazine, divalproex or valproate, fluoxetine, ketamine (augmentation), lamotrigine, lumateperone, lurasidone, olanzapine, olanzapine with fluoxetine, and quetiapine, whereas effective interventions in children and adolescents were lurasidone and olanzapine with fluoxetine. For mania episodes, effective interventions in adults were aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, cariprazine, divalproex or valproate, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine (also augmentation), risperidone (also as augmentation), tamoxifen, and ziprasidone, whereas effective interventions in children and adolescents were aripiprazole, asenapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone. For maintenance, interventions effective across outcomes in adults were aripiprazole (also the long acting injectable formulation), asenapine, divalproex or valproate, lithium, olanzapine, group psychoeducation (augmentation), quetiapine, and risperidone long acting injectable formulation. Interventions effective across phases were aripiprazole (also as augmentation and as a long acting injectable formulation), asenapine, cariprazine, cognitive behavioural therapy (augmentation), divalproex or valproate, lamotrigine, lithium, olanzapine (also as augmentation), paliperidone, quetiapine (also as augmentation), and risperidone (also as augmentation and the long acting injectable formulation) (adults). Treatment effects by neuroscience based nomenclature classes are also reported. Conclusions The EBI-BD tool can help clinicians make evidence based, personalised treatment decisions for bipolar disorder. This resource can inform clinical guidelines and provides a foundation for continuously improving bipolar disorder care as new evidence emerges. Trial registration Open Science Framework https://osf.io/pjmvn/ Readers’ note This is a living systematic review and may be updated in the next two years if additional evidence emerges.

ABSTRACT Background Higher time in sedentary behavior and insufficient physical activity are very common in bipolar disorder (BD). Whereas physical activity and exercise offer significant benefits across mental health, brain health, and heart health in BD. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders Nutrition and Exercise Task Force (NExT) synthesized evidence to evaluate the impacts of sedentary behavior, physical activity, and exercise on illness course, physical health, and treatment outcomes. Methods A best‐evidence synthesis was conducted using a question‐and‐answer format. We searched PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to March 1st, 2026, supplemented by reference lists and existing guidelines. Search terms included combinations of physical activity, exercise, sedentary behavior, and bipolar disorder‐related terms. Results Observational studies show that individuals with BD exhibit significantly higher sedentary behavior and lower physical activity compared to the general population, with notable discrepancies between self‐reported and objective measurements. Evidence on physical activity's protective role against BD onset is mixed, with some prospective and Mendelian randomization studies suggesting reduced risk, while others report bidirectional or null associations. Preliminary findings from clinical trials indicate that exercise improves overall functioning, reduces mood episode frequency and hospitalizations, and alleviates depressive symptoms, with one pilot study showing an 82% antidepressant response rate. Exercise also shows potential to reduce anxiety and improve sleep, though robust data are limited. Conclusions Despite limited high‐quality evidence, physical activity and exercise demonstrate promising physical and mental health benefits for individuals with BD. Future research should prioritize multicenter randomized controlled trials, enhanced assessment tools, and accessible, tailored programs to integrate physical activity into routine BD management.

ABSTRACT Objective To provide expert recommendations for the development of a specialty bipolar clinic that promotes best clinical practices for the delivery of safe and effective care. Methods Members of the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC) Bipolar Clinics Work Group met in a series of 1‐h monthly video calls over 18 months to discuss all aspects of their respective institution's bipolar clinics, including services provided, administrative processes, staffing models, characteristics of patients treated, patient volumes, finances, and research. The group also invited psychiatrists from outside of the NNDC who ran large bipolar clinics to contribute their thoughts and experiences on the subject. In addition, the NNDC sent a 20‐question survey to all 27 sites asking clinic directors specific questions about their bipolar clinics, if applicable. Further meetings and discussions incorporating results from the survey took place to produce a comprehensive set of recommendations. Results Twenty‐one of 27 NNDC sites (81%) responded to the survey. Twelve of 21 (57%) sites had a specific bipolar clinic, and another 4 (19%) were looking to start one. Clinics were based in university settings. The meetings, clinic survey, and discussions resulted in 10 recommendations describing services and operations for bipolar specialty clinics. Conclusions Given the complexity of bipolar disorder, specialty clinics are important to enhance care. Clinics with a wide array of services that include consultation, medication management, bipolar‐specific psychotherapies, and patient/family psychoeducation provide the most comprehensive care. Challenges to these clinics include maintaining ongoing patient access as well as ensuring long‐term financial stability.

Abstract Introduction Bipolar disorder (BD) has been associated with increased medical burden and accelerated biological aging. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate molecular pathways related to cellular senescence, inflammation, and telomere maintenance, which are implicated in both BD and aging. This study examined whether aging-related lncRNA expression reflects familial vulnerability or illness-specific effects, and whether childhood trauma and lifestyle factors modulate these signatures within a gene–environment framework. Methods In this cross-sectional study, expression levels of aging-related lncRNAs, including Antisense Non-coding RNA in the INK4 Locus (ANRIL), HOX Transcript Antisense Intergenic RNA (HOTAIR), Nuclear Enriched Abundant Transcript 1 (NEAT1), Taurine Upregulated Gene 1 (TUG1), Metastasis-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma Transcript 1 (MALAT1), Growth Arrest-Specific 5 (GAS5), and Telomerase RNA Component (TERC), were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) (n=68), siblings without BD diagnosis (SIB) (n=54), and healthy controls (HC) (n=70) using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Childhood trauma and lifestyle were assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the Healthy Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II). Principal component analysis generated a composite aging-related lncRNA factor. Results At the individual transcript level, NEAT1 and TERC were elevated, whereas GAS5 was reduced, in both BD and SIB relative to HC. The aging-related lncRNA composite score was higher in BD and SIB than in HC (F = 7.315, p = 0.001). Familial liability to BD (presence vs. absence of familial liability ) showed a significant main effect on the composite score (F(1,182)=8.18, p=0.005) and interacted with childhood trauma (F(1,182)=10.14, p=0.002). In multivariable models, total CTQ and physical neglect were independently associated with lower composite scores, while familial liability remained a positive predictor (all p<0.001). Conclusions Aging-related lncRNA alterations mark familial vulnerability to BD and are shaped by childhood trauma within a gene–environment interaction framework.

ABSTRACT Background This study aimed to explore the effect of family history (FH) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) for multiple psychiatric disorders on lithium response in bipolar disorder (BD). Method The sample included patients from the Mayo Clinic BD Biobank. FH in first‐degree relatives was obtained via the patient questionnaire. Linear regression models tested the association of FH and PRS for BD, major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SCZ), alcohol use disorder (AUD), anxiety disorder (ANX), and attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with lithium response measured by the Alda A score adjusted for the Alda B sum score. Post hoc models additionally adjusted for clinical covariates (age at onset, rapid cycling, and BD subtype). Results 716 patients had Alda scores for lithium response (61.9% females, mean age = 43.4 years). FH‐BD ( β = −0.57, p = 0.015), AUD ( β = −0.44, p = 0.045), and ANX ( β = −0.61, p = 0.050) were associated with worse lithium response. After adjusting for clinical covariates, associations for FH‐BD and FH‐ANX were no longer significant. PRS‐BD was associated with better response ( β = 0.22, p = 0.041), while PRS‐MDD ( β = −0.28, p = 0.01) and PRS‐ADHD ( β = −0.24, p = 0.028) were associated with worse response, with effects largely unchanged after adjusting for clinical covariates. In the combined model considering all FHs simultaneously, only FH‐BD remained significantly associated with worse lithium response ( β = −0.71, p = 0.039). In the combined model for PRS, only PRS‐BD ( β = 0.31, p = 0.008; better response) and PRS‐MDD ( β = −0.29, p = 0.020; worse response) showed significant associations. Conclusions In this exploratory study, FH‐BD, AUD, and ANX were associated with poor response, though only FH‐AUD remained significant after adjusting for clinical factors. PRS‐BD predicted better response, while PRS‐MDD was associated with worse response. These findings suggest independent and potentially complementary roles of FH and PRS. Integrating both familial and genetic risk measures may improve personalized treatment strategies and outcomes for BD patients.

Abstract Background The Global Bipolar Cohort (GBC) was established to identify existing bipolar disorder (BD) cohorts worldwide and foster collaborations focused on descriptive and analytic outcomes relevant to BD. A distributed analytic framework has been implemented to engage multiple sites without the need for central data pooling. This report describes the GBC endeavor and global functional impairment patterns. Cross-cohort comparisons of functional correlates are limited by heterogeneous measures and data-sharing constraints. Large, culturally diverse comparisons are needed to distinguish broadly reproducible correlates from cohort-specific effects. Participating sites completed a 28-item descriptive survey covering diagnostic methods, cognition, genetics, treatment, functioning, and follow-up strategies. We implemented a harmonized local logistic regression model of dichotomized functional outcome and shared summary statistics only. Results We identified 69 cohorts across five continents. Thirty-seven cohorts contributed functional outcome analyses from 17,130 participants. Outcome measures included clinician-rated disability scales and social indicators such as employment and marital status. The proportion classified with poor functioning ranged from 16% to 77% (mean 50%). In 32 of 37 cohorts, the overall regression model significantly explained variance in functioning. Current depressive symptoms were the most robust and reproducible correlate of poor functional outcome: they were assessed in 29 cohorts, significant in 22 (75.8%), ranked among the top three correlates in 22, and were the top-ranked correlates in 19. Associations between depressive burden and poor functioning were observed across clinician-rated disability scales and work or social indicators, and across geographically diverse cohorts. Comorbid substance use disorder and medication-related variables were associated with poorer functioning in subsets of cohorts, whereas sex, ancestry, bipolar subtype, psychosis history, and premorbid IQ showed weak or inconsistent associations. Cognitive measures, available in a minority of regression models, showed modest and non-uniform effects. Conclusions Across heterogeneous international cohorts, current depressive symptom burden emerged as the most consistent correlate of poor functioning in bipolar disorder. These findings replicate earlier multisite work at a larger scale, show that protocol-based distributed analyses can identify reproducible clinical signals without sharing individual-level data, and support prioritizing detection and treatment of depressive symptoms when aiming to improve real-world functioning. Future work should expand longitudinal harmonization and representation of under-studied populations.

Summary The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology convened a 45-member international expert task force to identify circumstances supporting the deprescribing of core psychotropic medications for major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorders. Three Delphi survey rounds plus a selective literature review identified points of consensus (predefined as ≥75% agreement) about when antidepressant, antipsychotic, mood stabiliser and sedative-hypnotic deprescribing is warranted. Twenty out of 32 statements (63%) achieved consensus across seven thematic areas. In MDD, panellists favoured discontinuing antidepressants when mechanisms of action are duplicative, adequate trials produce ≤25% improvement or loss of prior efficacy cannot be regained through dose increases or augmentations. Indefinite antidepressant maintenance in MDD was favoured after three or more lifetime episodes. In bipolar disorder, antidepressant deprescribing was favoured in the setting of rapid cycling, mixed features or emerging mania/hypomania symptoms; and discouraged if prior antidepressant cessation led to relapse. In nonpsychotic mood disorders, panellists favoured deprescribing antipsychotics that caused significant weight gain or tardive dyskinesia over adding pharmacological antidotes. Deprescribing to achieve an eventual medication-free status was considered inappropriate, in bipolar type 1, but not necessarily bipolar type 2 disorder. Although individualised circumstances necessarily inform psychopharmacology management, clinical presentations that misalign with existing pharmacotherapies may signal the desirability of cautious deprescribing.

ABSTRACT Introduction Sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), initially developed for type 2 diabetes, have shown promise in improving renal outcomes in patients with and without diabetes. However, their effect on lithium‐associated kidney dysfunction remains unknown. Methods This historical cohort study included patients from Mayo Clinic (2001–2023) with mood disorders who received lithium for ≥ 6 months and later used SGLT2i for ≥ 1 month. Data on SGLT2i use and lithium treatment were extracted from electronic health records. Serum creatinine values were used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectories. Linear mixed‐effects models with piecewise linear splines were used to estimate eGFR slopes before and after SGLT2i initiation, adjusted for age and sex. Results Fifty‐six patients (mean age 57.4 years, 46.4% female), predominantly with bipolar disorder (87.5%), were included. The mean eGFR, measured nearest to SGLT2i initiation, was 77.9 ± 26.0 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , and the mean duration of SGLT2i use was 19.5 ± 17.8 months. Before SGLT2i initiation, eGFR declined at a rate of −1.43 mL/min/1.73 m 2 per year ( p < 0.001). After initiation, eGFR increased by 0.69 mL/min/1.73 m 2 per year, reflecting a + 2.13 change ( p = 0.025). Sensitivity analyses, including only patients on lithium at SGLT2i initiation ( n = 22) or who had > 1 year of SGLT2i use ( n = 29) showed similar, though non‐significant, changes in slopes. Conclusion SGLT2i treatment was associated with a significant improvement in eGFR trajectory in patients with mood disorders who received long‐term lithium therapy. These findings suggest a potential role for SGLT2is in mitigating lithium‐associated kidney dysfunction and highlight the need for randomized controlled trials in this population.