Genovese, Ariana

Background: Anatomically accurate illustrations are imperative in medical education, serving as crucial tools to facilitate comprehension of complex anatomical structures. While traditional illustration methods involving human artists remain the gold standard, the rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) models presents a new opportunity to automate and accelerate this process. This study evaluated the potential of GAI models to produce craniofacial anatomy illustrations for educational purposes. Methods: Four GAI models, including Midjourney v6.0, DALL-E 3, Gemini Ultra 1.0, and Stable Diffusion 2.0 were used to generate 736 images across multiple views of surface anatomy, bones, muscles, blood vessels, and nerves of the cranium in both oil painting and realistic photograph styles. Four reviewers evaluated the images for anatomical detail, aesthetic quality, usability, and cost-effectiveness. Inter-rater reliability analysis assessed evaluation consistency. Results: Midjourney v6.0 scored highest for aesthetic quality and cost-effectiveness, and DALL-E 3 performed best for anatomical detail and usability. The inter-rater reliability analysis demonstrated a high level of agreement among reviewers (ICC = 0.858, 95% CI). However, all models showed significant flaws in depicting crucial anatomical details such as foramina, suture lines, muscular origins/insertions, and neurovascular structures. These limitations were further characterized by abstract depictions, mixing of layers, shadowing, abnormal muscle arrangements, and labeling errors. Conclusions: These findings highlight GAI’s potential for rapidly creating craniofacial anatomy illustrations but also its current limitations due to inadequate training data and incomplete understanding of complex anatomy. Refining these models through precise training data and expert feedback is vital. Ethical considerations, such as potential biases, copyright challenges, and the risks of propagating inaccurate information, must also be carefully navigated. Further refinement of GAI models and ethical safeguards are essential for safe use.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is not merely a tool for the future of clinical medicine; it is already reshaping the landscape, challenging traditional paradigms, and expanding the horizons of what is achievable in healthcare [...]

Current clinical care relies heavily on complex, rule-based systems for tasks like diagnosis and treatment. However, these systems can be cumbersome and require constant updates. This study explores the potential of the large language model (LLM), LLaMA 2, to address these limitations. We tested LLaMA 2′s performance in interpreting complex clinical process models, such as Mayo Clinic Care Pathway Models (CPMs), and providing accurate clinical recommendations. LLM was trained on encoded pathways versions using DOT language, embedding them with SentenceTransformer, and then presented with hypothetical patient cases. We compared the token-level accuracy between LLM output and the ground truth by measuring both node and edge accuracy. LLaMA 2 accurately retrieved the diagnosis, suggested further evaluation, and delivered appropriate management steps, all based on the pathways. The average node accuracy across the different pathways was 0.91 (SD ± 0.045), while the average edge accuracy was 0.92 (SD ± 0.122). This study highlights the potential of LLMs for healthcare information retrieval, especially when relevant data are provided. Future research should focus on improving these models’ interpretability and their integration into existing clinical workflows.

Background: Effective pain management is crucial for both comfort and outcomes, yet predicting and managing this pain is difficult. This study aimed to analyze postoperative pain in patients undergoing hand surgery at the Mayo Clinic Florida, examining how patient characteristics and anxiety affect pain outcomes. Methods: We conducted a single-arm clinical trial at Mayo Clinic Florida, recruiting patients undergoing hand surgery. Preoperative pain and anxiety were assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Postoperatively, patients used an iPhone app to record pain levels and medication use every four hours. Devices were collected three days after surgery. We analyzed the relationship between demographics, PCS, STAI scores, and pain levels using linear and logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided with significance set at p < 0.05, analyzed with R4.2.2. Results: Data were collected from 62 patients (62.9% women, 37.1% men) undergoing hand surgery. Participants were mainly White (90.3%), with 50% being in the middle-aged adult group. Most had low anxiety levels (80.6% STAI-S, 82.3% STAI-T) and low catastrophizing (61.3% PCS). Postoperative pain was low, with median scores between 1.0 and 2.0 over three days. Demographics, anxiety, and catastrophizing were not significant predictors of pain levels. Logistic regression showed time as a significant factor, with pain levels peaking on Day 3. Conclusions: Postoperative pain after hand surgery was generally low, with time being a significant predictor of increased pain. Demographic factors, anxiety, and catastrophizing did not significantly affect pain levels. Pain management should emphasize time-sensitive interventions and ongoing monitoring.