Vij, Ravi

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES The incidence of myeloma in older adults is increasing, yet little is known about geriatric impairments in these patients. We aimed to examine the prevalence of geriatric impairments in older adults with myeloma and the association between geriatric assessment and autologous stem cell transplant eligibility. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Two academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS A total of 40 adults 65 years and older with newly diagnosed myeloma were enrolled. MEASUREMENT Participants completed a primarily self‐administered geriatric assessment, including measures of functional status, comorbidities, polypharmacy, psychosocial status, social support, quality of life, cognition, and physical performance. Outcomes were autologous stem cell transplant eligibility and receipt. RESULTS Forty patients enrolled; their mean age was 71 years. Geriatric impairments were common: 62% reported dependence in one or more instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), 76.9% had polypharmacy (four or more medications), and 47.5% had one or more comorbidities. Median time on the Timed Up and Go was 13.3 ± 4.9 seconds. Those considered candidates for autologous stem cell transplant (N = 26) were younger, with fewer comorbidities, better performance status, and faster performance on the Timed Up and Go test. Factors independently associated with receiving autologous stem cell transplant (N = 21) included age and IADL dependence. CONCLUSION Impairments in geriatric domains are common in this population, even among those considered to have a good performance status. Geriatric assessment domains are associated with both transplant eligibility and receipt. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:987–991, 2019.

TPS8053 Background: The advent of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) have significantly improved outcomes in MM, and the first monoclonal antibodies for MM have been recently approved (daratumumab, elotuzumab). Despite novel therapies and improved disease management, MM is still considered incurable and most pts relapse, confirming the need for additional treatment options. MM cells express PD-L1, with higher levels observed after relapse and with advanced disease. Additionally, PD-L1–expressing immune cells in the microenvironment promote MM cell survival and potential immune escape. However, anti–PD-1 monotherapy did not result in objective responses in the MM cohort of a Ph I study, suggesting that MM pts need combination therapy. Daratumumab has activity as a single agent, as well as in combination with IMiDs plus dexamethasone and bortezomib plus dexamethasone in R/R MM. Immunomodulatory activity for daratumumab has also been reported. Thus, disruption of the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway may be additive or synergistic. The safety and efficacy of atezo (anti–PD-L1) alone or with lenalidomide or pomalidomide and/or daratumumab will be evaluated in a Ph Ib study of MM pts. NCT02431208. Methods: R/R MM pts with ≤ 3 prior therapies will be enrolled in Cohorts A (atezo), B (atezo + lenalidomide), D (atezo + daratumumab) and E (atezo + daratumumab + lenalidomide); MM pts with measurable disease after ASCT (Cohort C: atezo) or ≥ 3 prior therapies (Cohort F: atezo + daratumumab + pomalidomide) will also be enrolled. Cohorts B, D, E and F include a safety run-in (D) or dose escalation phase (B, E, F) and an expansion. Lenalidomide and pomalidomide will be dose escalated and the MTD evaluated in expansion phases. Atezo will be given at 1200 mg IV (A, B, C) or 840 mg IV (D, E, F); pts will get daratumumab at 16 mg/kg IV (D, E, F). All pts will be ECOG PS ≤ 2. Primary endpoints are ORR and the RP2D of lenalidomide and pomalidomide with atezo and daratumumab and the RP2D of lenalidomide with atezo. DOR and PFS are secondary endpoints; safety, PK and the relationship between biomarkers and other endpoints, including efficacy, will be assessed. Pts will be enrolled at 19 US sites. Clinical trial information: NCT02431208.

e18061 Background: Despite a favorable genetic profile, African-Americans (AAs) with mm have poorer outcomes secondary to inferior treatment. NCI-CCs provide the highest-quality of care and attendance has been associated with better outcomes in many cancers. AAs have greater access to NCI-CCs proximally; however, they attend these facilities at lower rates than their white peers. The impact of attendance at NCI-CCs on mediating racial disparities in mm outcomes has not been reported on to date. Methods: We reviewed cases of mm the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database from 2000-2011 who were enrolled in Medicare Part A and B > 1 year prior to diagnosis, excluding cases enrolled prior to age 65 and those where mm diagnosis occurred post-mortem. Any center designated a NCI-clinical or -comprehensive center in 2002, 2005, or 2010 was considered a NCI-CC; attendance was defined as 2 or more claims on separate dates (MEDPAR and Outpatient files) from a NCI-CC in the 12 months following mm diagnosis. Logistic regression was performed to determine if race was associated with attendance, Cox regression to determine the association of attendance with survival. Results: 21,843 cases were analyzed; the median age was 77 years; 80% were white, 15% AA/Black. Overall NCI-CC attendance was low, only 11% of the population. Compared to white patients, black patients had a 13% decreased odds (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-0.99) of NCI-CC attendance after controlling for age, gender, socioeconomic status, geographic, and overall health variables. Attendance was associated with a 28% decrease risk for death (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.76), but had little impact on black-white outcome disparities. Black patients had a 9% increase in risk (aHR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.13) after controlling for NCI-CC attendance. Conclusions: Black patients with mm have lower NCI-CC attendance. This may be related to referral bias and/or patient declining referral. NCI-CC attendance was associated with superior outcomes; however, controlling for attendance did not mediate black-white outcome disparities suggesting that racial treatment disparities pervade beyond access to NCI-CCs.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is twice as common in African Americans (AA) compared to European Americans (EA). The reported familial clustering and the elevated MM risk among first-degree relatives of cases implicate genetic susceptibility. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in EA have identified 16 novel risk loci. In this study, we tested the generalizability of the established risk alleles to AA and conducted a meta-GWAS analysis using two sets of AA to identify additional novel common MM risk variants. In the first study, we genotyped 1,305 incident AA MM cases from the African American Multiple Myeloma Study (AAMMS) using the Illumina HumanCore GWAS array and compared them to 7,078 AA controls from the African Ancestry Prostate Cancer Consortium (AAPC) and African Ancestry Breast Cancer Consortium (AABC) using the Illumina 1M-Duo. In the second study, 95 additional AAMMS cases and 435 AA MM cases from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) were genotyped using the Illumina MegaBead Chip and compared to 2,390 AA controls from the Multiethnic Cohort. The Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) was used to impute the overlapping typed SNPS from each GWAS case and control set together. Per-allele risk associations were tested for 8,715,278 overlapping genotyped and imputed variants with >1% frequency and >0.8 imputation score using unconditional logistic regression in both sets, and the combined effects were estimated using a fixed-effect meta-analysis. Of the 16 reported risk loci discovered in EA, directional consistency was present for 15 variants; eight of these replicated at nominal significance p<0.05, with the most statistically significant variant being rs4487645 at 7p15.3 (OR=1.38, p=3.56×10-6). AA individuals with polygenic risk scores from these 16 variants (PRS) in the top 10% stratum had a 1.44-fold increased MM risk compared to those with a PRS in the 25th -75th percentiles. Additionally, we identified three suggestive novel loci located at 12q12, 9p24.3 and 9p13.1 at p<1×10-6, with ORs ranging from 1.25-1.55, but none reached genome-wide significance. The variant at 9p24.3 is located in an intron in the KANK1 gene and a correlated SNP in EAs (r2=0.5) is strongly associated with gene expression in neoplastic plasma cells (unpublished, Weinhold and Morgan). Our study replicated most of the reported risk loci discovered among EA, demonstrated that a PRS constructed using the 16 reported risk alleles was associated with MM risk, and provides suggestive evidence for additional loci associated with MM risk in AAs. Citation Format: Zhaohui Du, Chi Song, Kristin Rand, Niels Weinhold, David Van Den Berg, Amie Hwang, Xin Sheng, Victor Hom, Sikander Ailawadhi, Ajay K. Nooka, Seema Singhal, Karen Pawlish, Edward S. Peters, Cathryn Bock, Ann Mohrbacher, Alexander Stram, Sonja I. Berndt, William Blot, John David Carpten, Antoinette Stroup, Andrew Olshan, Wei Zhang, African Ancestry Breast & Prostate Consortium, Stephen Chanock, Jayesh Mehta, Graham A. Colditz, Jeffrey Wolf, Thomas G. Martin, Michael Tomasson, Mark A. Fiala, Howard Terebelo, Nalini Janakiraman, Laurence Kolonel, Loic LeMarchand, Elad Ziv, Daniel Stram, Ravi Vij, Leon Bernal-Mizrachi, Gareth J. Morgan, Jeffrey A. Zonder, Carol Ann Huff, Sagar Lonial, Robert Z. Orlowski, David V. Conti, Christopher A. Haiman, Wendy Cozen. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of multiple myeloma among African Americans [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 223.

BACKGROUNDEarly treatment failure (ETF) in follicular lymphoma (FL), defined as relapse or progression within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy, is a newly recognized marker of poor survival and identifies a high‐risk group of patients with an expected 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate of approximately 50%. Transplantation is an established option for relapsed FL, but its efficacy in this specific ETF FL population has not been previously evaluated.METHODSThis study compared autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto‐HCT) with either matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) as the first transplantation approach for patients with ETF FL (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing auto‐HCT or allo‐HCT between 2002 and 2014. The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival, relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM).RESULTSFour hundred forty FL patients had ETF (auto‐HCT, 240; MSD hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HCT], 105; and MUD HCT, 95). With a median follow‐up of 69 to 73 months, the adjusted probability of 5‐year OS was significantly higher after auto‐HCT (70%) or MSD HCT (73%) versus MUD HCT (49%; P = .0008). The 5‐year adjusted probability of NRM was significantly lower for auto‐HCT (5%) versus MSD (17%) or MUD HCT (33%; P < .0001). The 5‐year adjusted probability of disease relapse was lower with MSD (31%) or MUD HCT (23%) versus auto‐HCT (58%; P < .0001).CONCLUSIONSPatients with high‐risk FL, as defined by ETF, undergoing auto‐HCT for FL have low NRM and a promising 5‐year OS rate (70%). MSD HCT has lower relapse rates than auto‐HCT but similar OS. Cancer 2018;124:2541‐51. © 2018 American Cancer Society.