Jazayeri, Seyed Behnam

Background The hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) has emerged as a vital measure of tissue-level collateral blood flow, helping to identify patients who are likely to benefit from mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to assess the HIR’s predictive accuracy for clinical outcomes following MT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched to identify studies comparing good versus poor HIR groups based on studies’ reported cut-offs. We pooled binary outcomes to calculate odds ratios (OR) and continuous outcomes to calculate mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using random-effects models. PROSPERO registration code: CRD42024609185. Results 14 studies with 2987 patients, 1553 with good HIR and 1434 with poor HIR, were included in this meta-analysis. Patients with poor HIR exhibited a significantly higher baseline infarct volume compared with those with good HIR (MD 30.6 mL, 95% CI 20.8 mL to 40.3 mL, P<0.01), though baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (P=0.12) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (P=0.35) were comparable between groups. The rates of infarct growth (MD 22.4 mL, 95% CI 6.7 mL to 38.0 mL, P<0.01) and 3-month mortality (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.58, P=0.04) were higher among the poor HIR group and good functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 3 months) was lower (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.80, P<0.01). The rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.37) and successful reperfusion (P=0.47) were comparable among groups. Conclusion This meta-analysis highlights the significant negative impact of poor HIR on patient outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for personalized treatment strategies for patients with poor HIR.

Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a primary treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. While effective, 20-40% of patients experience hemorrhagic transformation (HT), and around 50% fail to achieve favorable functional outcomes. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a non-invasive and cost-effective method for real-time monitoring of hemodynamic status following MT. However, the prognostic value of TCD parameters in predicting HT and poor functional outcome is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4 TCD parameters (mean flow velocity (MFV), MFV index, peak systolic velocity (PSV), and pulsatility index (PI) in patients with and without HT and favorable vs poor functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 vs 3-6). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched on July 25, 2024 to identify observational studies in which TCD parameters were measured within 48 hours from successful MT (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b–3) of anterior circulation. Risk of bias assessment was performed using a standardized tool tailored for TCD studies. The standardized mean difference (Hedges’ g) with 95% CI and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI were calculated using random-effects models. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42024575381). Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. No study had high risk of bias. MFV and MFV index were higher in patients with HT+ compared with HT- (Hedges' g = 0.42 and 0.54, p = 0.015 and 0.005, respectively). Patients with MFV index ≥1.3 showed a higher risk of all HT (RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.27–3.17, p = 0.003), symptomatic HT (RR, 4.68; 95% CI,1.49–14.65, p=0.008), and poor functional recovery at 90 days (RR, 1.66; 95% CI,1.32–2.08, p<0.001), respectively. There was no difference in mean PSV (p=0.1) and PI (p=0.3) among groups with and without HT. Conclusion: Our study highlights the prognostic value of TCD parameters, particularly MFV index, in predicting HT, symptomatic HT, and poor functional recovery after successful MT in the anterior circulation. Our findings were limited by low number of studies. Large-scale and multi-center studies are needed to confirm these findings and validate the MFV index as a reliable predictor to improve post-thrombectomy care.

Introduction: Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS) represents about 25% of ischemic strokes, with patent foramen ovale (PFO) involved in roughly 25% of those cases. Recent studies (REDUCE, CLOSE, RESPECT) indicate that PFO closure may benefit select patients. Accurate PFO diagnosis is crucial for treatment decisions but current methods, such as transcranial Doppler (TCD) with bubble study, transthoracic echocardiography with bubble study (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and cardiac computed tomography (CT), vary in accuracy. This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of TCD compared to TTE, TEE, and cardiac CT, to determine the most reliable modality for detecting PFO in patients with ESUS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of ESUS patients aged 18 and older referred to our vascular lab between July 2023 and September 2024. Each patient underwent at least two PFO detection methods: TCD with bubble study, TTE with bubble study, TEE, and cardiac CT. PFO presence was confirmed if identified by at least two detection methods. Patients with extracardiac shunts were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall test performance were evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, with higher AUC values indicating better performance. Differences in AUCs were assessed using DeLong’s test. Statistical analysis was performed using Analyse-it for Microsoft Excel (version 2.30). Results: Of 187 enrolled patients, 63 (33.7%) had evidence of right-to-left shunt. The mean age of the cohort was 63 ± 18 years, with 51% being male. PFO was confirmed in 36 patients. Sensitivity was highest for TCD (93.1%), followed by TTE (87.1%), TEE (86.7%), and cardiac CT (42.9%). Specificity was highest for cardiac CT (87.5%), followed by TTE (84%), TCD (59.1%), and TEE (47.1%). The AUC was highest for TTE (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76–0.95), followed by TCD (AUC: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64–0.87), TEE (AUC: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50–0.81), and cardiac CT (AUC: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.42–0.88). No statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance across pairwise comparisons were found (p > 0.05). Conclusion: TCD with bubble study is highly sensitive for screening right-to-left shunt, while cardiac CT is highly specific for detecting PFO in ESUS patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and refine diagnostic strategies.

Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are used as definitive therapy or as a bridge to heart transplant in patients with advanced heart failure. Thromboembolic complications such as acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are common among patients with LVAD support. This study aims to evaluate the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusions (LVO) and LVAD-support. Methods A comprehensive systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to find observational studies with reports of ≥5 MTs in adult patients with LVAD support (PROSPERO registration code CRD42024597541). Rates of successful and complete reperfusion, favorable functional outcomes at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2 or equal to pre-stroke mRS), mortality at 90 days, any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH) were pooled using generalized linear mixed models. Results Eight studies were included with data from 51 patients and 62 MTs. The rate of successful reperfusion was 87.4% (95% CI 62.5% to 96.6%) and complete reperfusion rate was 57.3% (95% CI 35.1% to 76.9%). Rate of favorable functional recovery was 62.5% (95% CI 42.2% to 79.2%). Rate of sICH was 6.4% (95% CI 0.9% to 34.0%). Mortality rate was 16.7% (95% CI 7.1% to 34.7%). Between 25–40% of patients who were waiting for a heart transplant before their stroke received a heart transplant after MT. Conclusions MT for the emergent treatment of AIS in the setting of LVAD is relatively safe and efficacious for achieving successful reperfusion and good functional recovery.

AbstractObjectiveAbout 25% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) present within the intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) therapeutic window of <4.5 h. This study is to elucidate the safety and efficacy of IVT in the extended therapeutic window (ETW) in patients with AIS.MethodsUsing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. A rigorous risk of bias assessment was conducted using the RoB2 tool. Rates of excellent and good functional outcome (mRS 0–1 and mRS 0–2) at 90 days, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality at 90 days were pooled using generalized linear mixed model and compared with controls. Meta‐analyses were conducted employing random‐effect models with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effect of imaging modalities used for patient selection.ResultsEight randomized controlled trials (n = 2221, 59% male) were included. At 90 days IVT showed higher rates of functional recovery: mRS 0–1: RR 1.21 95% CI 1.1–1.34, p < 0.001, and mRS 0–2: RR 1.11 95% CI 1.03–1.18, p = 0.004. Rate of mortality at 90 day was not different between groups: RR 1.17 95% CI 0.93–1.48, p = 0.17. However, the rate of sICH was higher among IVT group: RR 2.93 95% CI 1.53–5.6, p = 0.001. Subgroup analysis showed higher mRS 0–1 among patients who were selected based on perfusion imaging (p < 0.05).InterpretationThe use of IVT in AIS in ETW is beneficial especially with the use of perfusion imaging for patients' selection.

Background Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a non-invasive, bedside tool that allows for real-time monitoring of the patient’s hemodynamic status following mechanical thrombectomy (MT). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the predictive value of TCD parameters following successful MT (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b–3). Methods In July 2024, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, to identify observational studies in which TCD parameters were measured within 48 hours of MT. Using random-effects models, we compared four TCD parameters (mean flow velocity (MFV), MFV index, pulsatility index (PI), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) among groups with vs without hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and favorable vs poor functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 vs 3–6). Results Eleven studies comprising 1432 patients (59% male; mean age range: 63–73 years) were included. The MFV and MFV index were higher in patients with HT (Hedges' g=0.42 and 0.54, P=0.015 and 0.005, respectively). Patients with MFV index ≥1.3 showed a higher risk of all HT (RR 1.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28 to 3.03, P=0.002), symptomatic HT (RR 4.68; 95% CI 1.49 to 14.65, P=0.008), and poor functional status at 90 days (RR 1.65; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.14, P=0.029), respectively. There was no difference in mean PSV (P=0.1) and PI (P=0.3) among groups with and without HT. Conclusion This study underscores the prognostic value of the MFV index in predicting HT, symptomatic HT, and poor functional recovery after successful MT in the anterior circulation. Large-scale, multi-center studies are necessary to confirm these findings and to validate the MFV index as a reliable predictor for improving post-thrombectomy care.