Back to Authors

Manly, Jennifer J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9481-7497

Mayo Clinic

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Citations 24

O1‐09‐01: CTNNA3, CAPRIN2 and SPG20 are significantly associated with Alzheimer's disease in preliminary analyses of a genome‐wide association study in African‐Americans
Reitz, Christiane , Hall, Kathleen, Evans, Denis A., Ertekin‐Taner, Nilüfer , Fallin, Danielle, Pericak‐Vance, Margaret A. , Haines, Jonathan L. , Mayeux, Richard , Schellenberg, Gerard D. , Manly, Jennifer J. , Bennett, David A. , Buxbaum, Joseph D. , Kamboh, M. Ilyas , Foroud, Tatiana , Goate, Alison , Farrer, Lindsay A.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 19, 2012 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4S_Part_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.251 Get It

Assessment of cognition in early dementia
Silverberg, Nina, Ryan, Laurie, Petersen, Ronald C. , Posner, Holly, Hilsabeck, Robin C. , Rizzo, Albert, Ott, Brian R. , Albert, Marilyn S. , Wagster, Molly V., Schinka, John A., Cullum, C. Munro , Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski , Balota, David A., Budson, Andrew E. , Strutt, Adriana M. , Gollan, Tamar H. , Babcock, Debra, Kramer, Joel H. , Carrillo, María C. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Snyder, Peter J. , Gallagher, Michela , Raber, Jacob , Possin, Katherine L. , King, Jonathan W. , Kaye, Jeffrey , Rao, Stephen M. , Loewenstein, David , Brandt, Jason , Manly, Jennifer J. , Barnes, Lisa L. , Ganguli, Mary , Litvan, Irene , Ferman, Tanis J.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 25, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.001 Get It

Better tools for assessing cognitive impairment in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are required to enable diagnosis of the disease before substantial neurodegeneration has taken place and to allow for detection of subtle changes in the early stages of progression of the disease. The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association convened a meeting to discuss state‐of‐the art methods for cognitive assessment, including computerized batteries, as well as new approaches in the pipeline. Speakers described research using novel tests of object recognition, spatial navigation, attentional control, semantic memory, semantic interference, prospective memory, false memory, and executive function as among the tools that could provide earlier identification of individuals with AD. In addition to early detection, there is a need for assessments that reflect real‐world situations so as to better assess functional disability. It is especially important to develop assessment tools that are useful in ethnically, culturally, and linguistically diverse populations as well as in individuals with neurodegenerative disease other than AD.
The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease
Chertkow, Howard , Jack, Clifford R. , Kawas, Claudia H. , Klunk, William E. , Mayeux, Richard , Mohs, Richard C. , Morris, John C. , Rossor, Martin N. , Scheltens, Philip , Carrillo, María C. , Thies, Bill, Weıntraub, Sandra , Phelps, Creighton H., McKhann, Guy M. , Knopman, David S. , Hyman, Bradley T. , Koroshetz, Walter J. , Manly, Jennifer J. , Jack, Clifford R , Scheltens, Philip , Morris, John C

Alzheimer's & Dementia | April 22, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 263-269

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 Get It

The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of revising the 1984 criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. The workgroup sought to ensure that the revised criteria would be flexible enough to be used by both general healthcare providers without access to neuropsychological testing, advanced imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measures, and specialized investigators involved in research or in clinical trial studies who would have these tools available. We present criteria for all‐cause dementia and for AD dementia. We retained the general framework of probable AD dementia from the 1984 criteria. On the basis of the past 27 years of experience, we made several changes in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis. We also retained the term possible AD dementia, but redefined it in a manner more focused than before. Biomarker evidence was also integrated into the diagnostic formulations for probable and possible AD dementia for use in research settings. The core clinical criteria for AD dementia will continue to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in clinical practice, but biomarker evidence is expected to enhance the pathophysiological specificity of the diagnosis of AD dementia. Much work lies ahead for validating the biomarker diagnosis of AD dementia.