Olsen, Timothy W.

A 12-year-old female individual receives a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and reports bilateral blurry vision, large blue paracentral scotomata, and a migraine without a scintillating scotoma. What would you do next?

This case report describes a diagnosis of ophthalmic artery and central retinal vein occlusion in a female patient with a history of end-stage mantle cell lymphoma.

Purpose: To examine the impact of physician face mask use on the rates and outcomes of postinjection endophthalmitis. Methods: A multicenter retrospective, comparative cohort study comparing endophthalmitis rate and visual acuity of eyes that developed endophthalmitis after antivascular endothelial growth factor injections at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR) and at Mayo Clinic Health System sites depending on physician masking. Results: A total of 164,824 injections were performed at MCR and Mayo Clinic Health System sites. Of these, 66,098 injections were in the no mask group and 98,726 injections were in the mask group. Overall, there were no differences in the rates of infectious endophthalmitis in the no mask versus mask cohorts (overall: no mask: 20 cases [0.0303%] vs. mask: 41 cases (0.0415%); P = 0.24; infectious: no mask: 12 cases [0.018%] versus mask: 13 cases [0.0132%]; P = 0.42). At MCR alone, there was a significant reduction in infectious endophthalmitis between the no mask versus mask groups (no mask: 9 cases [0.0297%] versus mask: 2 cases [0.003%]; P < 0.001). Only 2 cases of infectious endophthalmitis occurred at MCR after the face mask policy was implemented (1 in 30,000 injections). At presentation and at 6 months, the average visual acuity was similar for patients who developed endophthalmitis between the no mask versus mask groups. Conclusion: Physician face mask use did not affect the rate or outcome of postinjection endophthalmitis. However, there was a significant reduction at MCR after masking along with other quality improvement measures, including performance of injections in a dedicated procedure room and preparation of patients by nurses, that led to a low rate of endophthalmitis.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe an exceedingly rare presentation of secondary vitreoretinal involvement by the uncommon entity “indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract” and illustrate the utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for diagnosis. Methods: This is a case report. Results: A 57-year-old woman with presumed iritis on chronic topical prednisolone acetate presented with increased vitreous opacities in the right eye. She had a history of biopsy-confirmed indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract involving the stomach and duodenum, JAK2-rearrangement positive, controlled on maintenance oral methotrexate. Vitreous biopsy was unremarkable with small CD3-positive and CD4-positive and CD20-negative lymphocytes, along with histiocytes and fibroblasts. Immunostains showed CD4 positivity, and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed a JAK2 gene rearrangement, consistent with the patient's previously diagnosed indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Intravitreal methotrexate injections were started in the right eye. MRI of the brain and lumbar puncture with cytology, MYD88, IL10, and flow cytometry performed at the time of right eye vitreoretinal lymphoma diagnosis revealed no evidence of central nervous system lymphoma, but subsequent bone marrow biopsy demonstrated 5% involvement by indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, JAK2-rearrangement positive, with a lung nodule on PET computed tomography. She returned 4 months later with fatigue, night sweats, and blurry vision in the left eye with vitreous and anterior chamber cellular infiltration and retinal vasculitis. Conclusion: T-cell vitreoretinal lymphoma is rare, and diagnosis can be challenging. Despite inconclusive cytology in this case, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization detected a JAK2 gene rearrangement, which confirmed the involvement by indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract and prompted appropriate treatment and workup for recurrent systemic or central nervous system lymphoma.