Okuno, Scott H.

Abstract Lessons Learned Despite having significant rationale, S0502 failed to accrue for a number of reasons. Vetting a trial first, with scientific experts and funding agencies, does not guarantee success, especially when dealing with a rare tumor and/or one with an existing highly effective therapy. In the present case, adding an intravenous drug to an oral medication as part of a regimen expected to be continued for many years likely decreased patient (and physician) convenience and, thus, interest in the study. Background. Imatinib mesylate, a potent inhibitor of the KIT and PDGFR tyrosine kinases, is highly effective in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, most imatinib-treated tumors eventually become resistant, accounting for a median progression-free survival of 19–23 months. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) correlates with poor prognosis in GIST; bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, is effective in a variety of solid tumors. We postulated combination therapy with imatinib plus bevacizumab would benefit patients with advanced GIST, particularly those reliant on VEGFA-dependent angiogenesis. Methods. Patients with metastatic or surgically unresectable GIST were eligible for this phase III open-label clinical trial, S0502. At registration, patients were randomly assigned to either imatinib 400 mg (standard) or 800 mg (patients with exon 9 KIT mutations), or imatinib plus bevacizumab, 7.5 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks. Patients were treated to progression, symptomatic deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, treatment delay greater than 4 weeks, or patient choice to withdraw from the study. The primary objective was to determine whether the addition of bevacizumab to imatinib would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line treatment of incurable GIST. Results. S0502 opened on April 15, 2008. As of fall 2009, only 12 patients from at least 178 eligible SWOG centers plus those participating through Cancer Trials Support Unit had been entered in the study. Despite an aggressive promotion scheme involving the other cooperative groups and a major GIST patient advocacy group, accrual remained slow. The trial was closed on October 1, 2009, having accrued only 2% of the 572 patients planned. No scientific conclusions were forthcoming because of the small number of patients entered in the study. Two patients of the 6 in the combination arm reported grade 3 toxicities, 1 with proteinuria and 1 with fatigue, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and anemia. Conclusion. No conclusions may be drawn from this trial and, thus, the combination of imatinib plus bevacizumab cannot be recommended for use.

Abstract Background: Traditional adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) consists of 60-66 Gy of radiation therapy (XRT) given in 2 Gy daily fractions along with high dose cisplatin if the patient has high risk factors. Despite the excellent cure rates for HPV+ OPSCC, one in three patients treated with conventional treatment will develop grade >3 long-term sequelae from therapy. There is intense interest in de-intensifying adjuvant therapy for this patient population in order to maximize quality of life while maintaining excellent historical rates of disease control. Methods: MC1273 is a phase II non-randomized trial open at Mayo Clinic Rochester testing a novel course of aggressive therapy de-escalation following surgery for HPV+ OPSCC. The primary endpoint is local/regional control at 2 years while secondary endpoints include toxicity and quality of life (QOL). The eligibility criteria include all patients with p16-positive OPSCC with less than a ten pack-year smoking history who have had a complete surgical resection. Exclusion criteria include positive surgical margins, prior history of malignancy, and history of connective tissue disorders. Patients are divided into two prospective cohorts depending upon risk factors found at surgery. Patients with intermediate risk disease (≥T3, ≥N2, lymphovascular invasion, or perineural invasion) are enrolled in MC1273A while patients with extracapsular extension (ECE) are enrolled in MC1273B. Patients on MC1273A receive 30 Gy of radiation delivered in 1.5 Gy twice-daily fractions over the course of two weeks along with weekly docetaxel (15 mg/m2) given on day 1 and day 8. Patients on MC1273B receive a similar treatment regimen but also have the nodal level with positive ECE concurrently boosted to 36 Gy in 1.8 Gy twice-daily fractions. In addition to standard of care follow-up, patients receive a swallowing assessment with speech therapy immediately before XRT, one month post-XRT, and one year post-XRT. Patients also have QOL assessment consisting of the XeQOLS, Eq-5D, FACT H&N (Vers 4) and Dermatology Life Quality Index assessed at pre-XRT and 3, 12, and 24 months post-XRT. Results: Each cohort of MC1273 is powered to detect a 10% local/regional failure rate with 85% confidence. Each cohort will accrue 35 evaluable patients and 5 additional patients to account for ineligibilities and violations (40 patients total per cohort.) MC1273A began accrual in September 2013. The first five patients were monitored for grade ≥4 acute toxicities before proceeding to open accrual. MC1273B began accrual in May 2014 and has also proceeded to open accrual. Accrual will also begin in Mayo Clinic Scottsdale in the first quarter of 2015. Conclusions: MC1273 is meeting its accrual targets and should finish accrual by 2016. We anticipate that preliminary results for toxicity will be available by 2017 and local/regional data will be available by 2018. Citation Format: Daniel J. Ma, Katharine A. Price, Eric J. Moore, Joaquin J. Garcia, Scott H. Okuno, Daniel L. Price, Jeff A. Sloan, Nathan R. Foster, Robert L. Foote. MC1273: Phase II evaluation of aggressive dose de-escalation for adjuvant chemoradiation in HPV associated oropharynx cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT227. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT227

We report a response to pazopanib in a 69-year-old man with heavily pre-treated metastatic extraosseous Ewing sarcoma in addition to molecular profiling of his tumor. To our knowledge, this case is the earliest to demonstrate activity of an oral multi-targeted kinase inhibitor in Ewing sarcoma. This case provides rationale for adding a Ewing sarcoma arm to SARC024, a phase II study of regorafenib, another multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, in patients with liposarcoma, osteosarcoma and Ewing and Ewing-like sarcomas (NCT02048371). This national multi-institutional study is ongoing.

Purpose TH-302, a prodrug of the cytotoxic alkylating agent bromo-isophosphoramide mustard, is preferentially activated in hypoxic conditions. This phase II study investigated TH-302 in combination with doxorubicin, followed by single-agent TH-302 maintenance therapy in patients with first-line advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) to assess progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Patients and Methods In this open-label phase II study, TH-302 300 mg/m 2 was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 with doxorubicin 75 mg/m 2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. After six cycles, patients with stable and/or responding disease could receive maintenance monotherapy with TH-302. Results Ninety-one patients initiated TH-302 plus doxorubicin induction treatment. The PFS rate at 6 months (primary efficacy measure) was 58% (95% CI, 46% to 68%). Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 7.7 months); median overall survival was 21.5 months (95% CI, 16.0 to 26.2 months). Best tumor responses were complete response (n = 2 [2%]) and partial response (n = 30 [34%]). During TH-302 maintenance (n = 48), five patients improved from stable disease to partial response, and one patient improved from partial to complete response. The most common adverse events during induction were fatigue, nausea, and skin and/or mucosal toxicities as well as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. These were less severe and less frequent during maintenance. There was no evidence of TH-302–related hepatic, renal, or cardiac toxicity. Conclusion PFS, overall survival, and tumor response compared favorably with historical outcomes achieved with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced STS. A phase III study of TH-302 is ongoing (NCT01440088).

Abstract Purpose: Endoglin/CD105 is a homodimeric transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed on the proliferating endothelium of solid tumors. TRC105, the chimeric IgG1 antibody with high affinity binding for human CD105, has recently undergone human testing. This exploratory study sought to validate CD105 as a potential therapeutic target in sarcomas. Methods: We performed immunohistochemical staining for CD105 expression in 146 retrospectively identified paraffin embedded sarcoma patient samples in our tumor registry, utilizing an anti-CD105 antibody (clone 4G11, Novocastra). The diagnoses were verified and samples were examined for CD105 expression in the malignant vasculature as well as tumor cells. Results: The vast majority of specimen expressed CD105 in the tumor vasculature, 134 of 137 evaluable cases. CD105 expression in the cells of the varied sarcoma histologies themselves were as follows: 19/20 angiosarcomas, 6/7 Ewing sarcomas, 8/20 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas, 6/20 uterine leiomyosarcomas (LMS), 4/20 osteosarcomas, 3/20 non-uterine LMS, 3/20 synovial sarcomas. None of the 19 evaluated chondrosarcoma cells expressed CD105. Thirteen of 19 angiosarcomas showed CD105 expression in >50% of tumor cells, 3 of 19 showed CD105 expression in 25-49% of the tumor cells and 3 of 19 showed CD105 expression in 5-24% of tumor cells. Conclusions: CD105 targeting appears to be a rational antiangiogenic therapeutic approach in sarcomas, with particular emphasis on angiosarcomas. A clinical trial utilizing TRC105 in soft tissue sarcomas is currently under development. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):B237. Citation Format: Karen Fritchie, Steven Attia, Scott Okuno, Carola Arndt, Steven Robinson. CD105: A therapeutic target for sarcomas. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B237.

Objectives. To assess the clinical features and local control (LC) outcomes in adult patients with localized Ewing Sarcoma (ES).Methods. The records of 102 ES patients with localized disease ≥18 years of age seen from 1977 to 2007 were reviewed. Factors relevant to prognosis, survival, and LC were analyzed.Results.The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 60% and 52%, respectively, for the entire cohort. Treatment era (1977–1992 versus 1993–2007) remained an independent prognostic factor for OS on multivariate analysis, with improved outcomes observed in the 1993–2007 era (P=0.02). The 5-year OS and EFS for the 1993–2007 era were 73% and 60%, respectively. Ifosfamide and etoposide based chemotherapy and surgery were more routinely used in the 1993–2007 era (P<0.01). The 5-year local failure rate (LFR) was 14%, with a 5-year LFR of 18% for surgery, 33% for radiation, and 0% for combined surgery and radiation in the 1993–2007 era (P=0.17).Conclusion. Modern survival outcomes for adults with localized ES are similar to multi-institutional results in children. This improvement over time is associated with treatment intensification with chemotherapy and increased use of surgery. Aggressive LC (combined surgery and radiation) may improve outcomes in poor prognosis patients.

Desmoid tumors are a rare group of locally aggressive, non malignant tumors of fibroblastic origin that can lead to significant morbidity due to local invasion. Despite advances in the understanding of these tumors, their natural history is incompletely understood and the optimal treatment is still a matter of debate. Local control is the main goal of treatment and there has been a change in philosophy regarding the management of these tumors from aggressive surgical resection to function preservation. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to plan local control with acceptable morbidity. The current Mayo Clinic algorithm for the treatment of these tumors is based on institutional experience and the available evidence in the literature: asymptomatic/non progressive lesions away from vital structures are managed with observation and regular imaging; primary or recurrent desmoid tumors which are symptomatic or progressive or near vital structures are managed with wide surgical resection when wide surgical margins are possible with minimal functional and cosmetic loss. When positive or close surgical margins are likely, surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy or definitive radiotherapy is preferred. If likely functional or cosmetic deficit is unacceptable, radiotherapy is the treatment of choice. Unresectable lesions are considered for radiotherapy, chemotherapy or newer modalities however an unresectable lesion associated with a painful, functionless, infected extremity is managed with an amputation.

Abstract We have demonstrated that crosstalk between the Hedgehog-GLI-GLI and EGFR signaling pathway exists and contribute to pancreatic tumorigenesis. This interaction can be abrogated by targeting both pathways simultaneously and results in a synergistic antitumor effect in vitro and in vivo in pancreatic tumor models. Based on these results we have undertaken a phase I trial of GDC-0449 (an orally administered Hedgehog pathway inhibitor) and erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor to: 1) determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of GDC-0449 combined with erlotinib in unresectable solid tumors; 2) describe the adverse events associated with this treatment combination; 3) describe the responses of this treatment combination; and 4) to assess the effect of the erlotinib and GDC-0449 combination on selected biomarkers in circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor biopsies, and FDG-PET in a cohort of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated at the MTD. During the dose escalation portion of the trial, eligible patients receive GDC-0449 150 mg p.o. daily and erlotinib 50, 75, 100, or 150 mg daily p.o. at dose levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Eligibility criteria include: histologic proof of solid tumors that are unresectable, not amenable to any other standard therapies, or patient refused standard therapy,; ANC ≥&gt; 1500/μL; PLT ≥&gt; 100,000/ μL; Total bilirubin ≤&lt; upper limit of normal (ULN); AST ≤&lt; 3 x ULN; Creatinine ≤&lt; 1.5 x ULN; Hemoglobin ≥&gt; 9.0 g/dL; INR within normal limits (Cohort II [MTD Cohort] only); ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1 or ≤ 2. For the MTD cohort, only patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas without prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease and tumor amenable to biopsies are eligible. Toxicity assessment is performed at each 28-day treatment cycles and response assessment every second treatment 28 day cycle. 12 patients have been entered-pancreas (3), colorectal (3), neuroendocrine (2), scc anus (2), gallbladder (1), thymoma (1). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reported at dose level 4. At the MTD, up to 20 patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer will be entered to assess the biologic effect of GDC-0449+erlotinib. Pre- and post- treatment biopsies of metastases and FDG-PET will be performed. Weekly collection of CTCs will be undertaken and immunofluorescence microscopy of total & phosphoMAPK, EGFR, AKT, PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2, and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) of PATCHED1, GLI1, and its target genes (BCL-2, BFL-1/A1, 4-1BB) will be performed. In addtion, total & phosphoMAPK, EGFR, and AKT, as well as PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2 by immunohistochemistry and Q-PCR of PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2, BFL-1/A1, 4-1BB will be analyzed in tumor biopsies. Supported by CA69912, CA136526 and CA102701. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1807.

Purpose Gemcitabine as a single agent and the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel have activity in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. To determine if the addition of docetaxel to gemcitabine improved clinical outcome of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, we compared a fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine versus a lower dose of gemcitabine with docetaxel. Patients and Methods In this open-label phase II clinical trial, the primary end point was tumor response, defined as complete or partial response or stable disease lasting at least 24 weeks. A Bayesian adaptive randomization procedure was used to produce an imbalance in the randomization in favor of the superior treatment, accounting for treatment-subgroup interactions. Results One hundred nineteen of 122 randomly assigned patients had assessable outcomes. The adaptive randomization assigned 73 patients (60%) to gemcitabine-docetaxel and 49 patients (40%) to gemcitabine alone, indicating gemcitabine-docetaxel was superior. The objective Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response rates were 16% (gemcitabine-docetaxel) and 8% (gemcitabine). Given the data, the posterior probabilities that gemcitabine-docetaxel was superior for progression-free and overall survival were 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel and 3.0 months for gemcitabine alone; median overall survival was 17.9 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel and 11.5 months for gemcitabine. The posterior probability that patients receiving gemcitabine-docetaxel had a shorter time to discontinuation for toxicity compared with gemcitabine alone was .999. Conclusion Gemcitabine-docetaxel yielded superior progression-free and overall survival to gemcitabine alone, but with increased toxicity. Adaptive randomization is an effective method to reduce the number of patients receiving inferior therapy.