Peersen, Anina

e15527 Background: Fruquintinib, regorafenib, and trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) alone or in combination with bevacizumab (bev) are approved for use in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following progression on or intolerance to fluoropyrimidine-based therapy with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and targeted agents if indicated. All three medications have established overall survival (OS) benefit when used third line or later; however, there is a paucity of literature and guideline recommendations regarding optimal sequencing of these agents. The aim of this study was to investigate OS in patients (pts) with mCRC based on the sequencing of these three “late-line” treatments. Methods: This retrospective, multi-site cohort study evaluated OS in pts with mCRC who received fruquintinib possibly sequenced with regorafenib and/or TAS-102 +/- bev between 11/01/2023 and 11/19/2024. Pts prescribed fruquintinib (N = 64) were identified utilizing SlicerDicer within EPIC. Pts were excluded from final analysis for incomplete information, non-mCRC diagnosis, or failure to initiate fruquintinib (N = 21). OS was defined as the time from initiation of first late-line therapy to death from any cause. Cox regression models were utilized for multivariable adjustment. P-values were calculated using Chi-Square for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables. Results: Forty-three pts were included in the final analysis. The median age at initiation of first late-line therapy was 56 years old. Most pts had left-sided primary tumors (60.5%) and liver metastases (79.1%). RAS and BRAF V600E mutations occurred in 65.1% and 4.7% of pts, respectively, and 83.7% of pts had received prior bev therapy. All pts were pMMR/MSI-S. TAS-102 +/- bev was the most common first late-line agent utilized (72.1%), and fruquintinib the most common second late-line agent (73%). Regorafenib was prescribed in only 12 pts (27.9%) and used primarily as a second or third late-line option. OS was not statistically different based on initial late-line therapy chosen (median OS 19.2 months for TAS-102 +/- bev and not estimable for fruquintinib and regorafenib, p = 0.058). This result was maintained on multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, liver metastases, and RAS mutation status. However, fruquintinib sequenced after TAS-102 +/- bev demonstrated improved OS (median 20.5 months) compared to fruquintinib as first or last late-line therapy (median not estimable vs. 15.8 months, p = 0.049). Conclusions: Fruquintinib sequenced after TAS-102 +/- bev may confer an OS advantage in the treatment of mCRC. However, prospective studies evaluating sequencing strategies representative of standard prescribing patterns are still needed to firmly establish optimal sequencing of fruquintinib, regorafenib, and TAS-102-based therapy.

Abstract Objective Glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) may develop in patients following successful surgery for endogenous hypercortisolism. Effective strategies to minimize GWS and improve quality of life (QoL) are currently lacking. We aimed to determine the impact of hydrocortisone vs prednisone therapy on GWS and QoL during the first 12 weeks postsurgery. Methods Single-center prospective cohort study (2019-2024) of adults with endogenous hypercortisolism who developed postoperative adrenal insufficiency and treated with either prednisone or hydrocortisone. Quality of life was assessed with Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Cushing QoL questionnaires at baseline and at 12 weeks postsurgery. GWS was assessed using weekly AddiQoL questionnaires for the first 12 weeks postsurgery. Results Of 165 patients, 101 (61%) were treated with hydrocortisone and 64 (39%) with prednisone. At baseline, no group differences were found in the hypercortisolism subtype, comorbidities, or QoL assessments. At follow-up, no group differences in final total daily hydrocortisone equivalent dose were seen. When adjusting for the baseline QoL assessment, patients treated with prednisone demonstrated a higher degree of improvement in their QoL, particularly in the SF-36 mental component score (estimate 0.33, 95% CI, 0.04-0.63), SF-36 role-emotional limitation (estimate 0.52, 95% CI, 0.2-0.84), and SF-36 body pain (estimate 0.31, 95% CI, 0.07-0.56) subcomponents. In the multivariable analysis of age, sex, body mass index, glucocorticoid type, baseline clinical severity score, and baseline QoL assessment, prednisone therapy was an independent predictor of better SF-36 mental component at 12 weeks postsurgery. Conclusions Prednisone therapy was associated with better mental health QoL than hydrocortisone at 12 weeks postsurgery in patients with hypercortisolism.

592 Background: Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in biliary tract cancers (BTC) is rare, estimated to be 1-5%. MSI-H across solid tumors has shown unprecedented durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) regardless of anatomic location. Here we describe the clinical outcomes of unresectable BTC patients with MSI-H treated with ICIs and their conversion to surgery. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients (pts) with advanced BTC who had been identified with MSI-H by molecular analysis performed between 2017 and 2024 at Mayo Clinic and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), defined as time from initiation of first-line systemic treatment to death; Time-to-treatment failure (TTF), defined as time from initiation of treatment to cessation due to any cause; and response. All analyses were done descriptively. Results: We identified 22 MSI-H pts with BTC, 19 with cholangiocarcinoma and 3 with gallbladder cancer. Median age at diagnosis was 61 (range 26-86), 20 (90.9%) were Caucasian, 9 (40.9%) were male gender, and 5 (22.7%) had etiology as Lynch syndrome. Twelve (54.5%) pts had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Twenty pts (90.9%) received first line systemic therapy, of whom 11 (55%) continued onto second line. Among the 20 pts that received first line therapy, median TTF was 7.6 months (95% CI: 4.8-14.3), objective response was observed in 7 (35%) pts, and disease control was observed in 15 pts (75%). Among the 11 pts that continued onto second line systemic treatment, objective response was observed in 4 pts (36%) and disease control was observed in 6 pts (55%). Among the 20 pts that received first line therapy, 19 (95%) ever received ICI +/- chemotherapy as a part of their treatment plan. Two-year OS for pts who ever received ICI was 63% (95% CI: 41%-96%). In total, 4 pts (20%) were restaged to resectable following treatment with an ICI, underwent resection, and currently have no evidence of disease. Conclusions: Administration of ICI during treatment plan in pts with MSI-H confirmed durable response and even downstage pts to resectable stage for curative intent. Testing for MSI-H should be performed upfront to guide treatment decision.

532 Background: HCC accounts for 80% of primary liver cancers, and worldwide, is the third common cause of cancer-related death. Two FDA approved 1st line systemic treatment options include atezo/bev and durva ± treme. Herein we report outcomes of these regimens in the 1st line setting via a real-world, multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Methods: We reviewed clinical outcomes of patients (pts) who initiated 1st line atezo/bev or durva ± treme for unresectable HCC between March 2017 and February 2024, across 5 institutions (Mayo Clinic, University of Alabama, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and University of Michigan). Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Best (objective) response was tabulated. Multivariable analyses were performed using Cox models and logistic regression for time-to-event and binary outcomes, respectively, while adjusting for age, sex, race, HCC etiology, Child-Pugh class, and ALBI grade. Results: A total of 433 HCC pts were included; atezo/bev (336), durva ± treme (97). Median age at the start of therapy was 68 years; 77% were male, 82% were Caucasian. Etiologies of HCC were viral hepatitis (38%), MASLD (20%), alcohol (10%), non-viral multifactorial (10%), or unknown (22%). Pts receiving durva ± treme were less likely to have cirrhosis (11% vs. 28%, p<0.01) but similar in terms of macrovascular invasion (63% vs. 58%, p=0.35) compared to pts receiving atezo/bev. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were similar between the two groups, with the most common being disease progression - atezo/bev (56%) and durva ± treme (47%). The differences in clinical outcomes were not statistically significantly and remained consistent after multivariable adjustment. (Table, atezo/bev as the reference group). Outcomes were significantly different between Child-Pugh classes (CP: A,B,C) respectively, OS: 19.0 m, 6.4 m, 1.9 m (p<0.001); TTF: 6.1 m, 2.7 m, 1.3 m (p<0.001). Conclusions: In this real-world retrospective cohort study of unresectable HCC, the differences in overall survival, objective response, and time to treatment failure were not statistically significant between atezo/bev and durva ± treme in the 1st line setting. Outcome Atezo/bev Durva±treme Univariate p-value Multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) Multivariable adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) Overall Survival, Median (month) 14.0 14.6 0.77 0.78 (0.54-1.14) --- Time to Treatment Failure, Median (month) 4.9 4.1 0.71 0.95 (0.72-1.26) --- Objective response, % 26.3% 21.1% 0.31 --- 0.78 (0.43-1.39)

Abstract Background Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B. Patients and Methods We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy. Results Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival. Conclusion Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.

e15146 Background: Wnt/ß-catenin signaling dysregulation is found in approximately 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The impact of B-catenin activation on HCC overall survival has remained controversial. Prior studies suggest activating CTNNB1 mutations may predict for immunotherapy (IO) resistance while others did not corroborate this finding. Here we describe the clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients (pts) with CTNNB1 (+) and without CTNNB1 (-) mutations treated with novel first line IO/anti-VEGF therapies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of pts with HCC who had molecular analysis performed between 2019 and 2023 at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. The study was reviewed and approved by the IRB. Clinical and molecular features were compared descriptively. The primary outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as time from first-line treatment initiation to off treatment or death, and overall survival (OS), defined as time from first-line treatment initiation to death, compared between the two cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 29 CTNNB1+ and 62 CTNNB1- (wt) pts with HCC. Median age at diagnosis was 66 (range 30-86), 80 (88%) were Caucasian, 68 (75%) were male gender, and 22 (24%) had etiology as hepatitis B/hepatitis C, 82 (90%) were Child-Pugh A and 77 (85%) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Clinic (BCLC)=C at diagnosis. Eighteen (90%, n=20) CTNNB 1+ pts received first-line IO (Atezolizumab/bevacizumab [AB]) vs 39 (72%, n=54) in CTNNB1- pts. All pts were microsatellite stable (MSS). CTNNB1+ had a similar median tumor mutational burden (TMB), higher rate of TERT co-mutation, and lower rate of TP53 co-mutation (table) compared to CTNNB-. Of 57 AB pts, 5 (27%) of CTNNB1 + had an objective response, compared to 6 (16.7%) CTNNB1- pts. Time to treatment failure with first-line AB and overall survival were similar between the two cohorts (Table). Conclusions: Our study suggests CTNNB1 status is not prognostic in HCC pts receiving IO based therapy. Prospective study is warranted to further investigate predictive biomarkers for HCC sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors and VEGF-targeted therapy. [Table: see text]