Baselga, José

Abstract Background: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR, HER1) is known to heterodimerize with HER2 and may modulate the effectiveness of trastuzumab or lapatinib. Historically, it has been difficult to measure, but recently we reported a new, standardized, quantitative immunofluorescence assay and a novel EGFR antibody which showed that high levels of EGFR were associated with decreased benefit in the concurrent arm of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG/Alliance) N9831 trial (Rimm et al, SABCS 2012). Here we assess its value in the neo-adjuvant setting in the NeoALTTO trial. Methods: NeoALTTO randomized 455 breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant trastuzumab, lapatinib or both and showed benefit in both single anti-HER2 therapy arms, and the combination therapy showing about twice as much benefit as either single drug arm. We used the previously described AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence to measure EGFR levels using the D38B1 antibody on between 4 and 140 fields of view per slide on 353 specimens. The averaged EGFR score was standardized to the absolute concentration using cell lines and western blots and the 13 ng/ug total protein established in the N9831 trial was tested to determine predictive value for pathological complete response (pCR) defined as ypT0/is. Results: In NeoALTTO, 19% of the patients had EGFR levels above 13 ng/ug, compared to 16% in NCCTG N9831. The pCR rate was 35.3% in the patients with low EGFR, compared with 29.8% for high EGFR but this difference was not statistically significant. However, when adjusted for treatment and hormone receptor (HR) status, high EGFR is statistically significantly associated with lower response rate(p = 0.038). Continuous analysis measures were not significant. The effect on overall response at 6 weeks was also weakly significant when adjusting for treatment and HR status (p = 0.06). Surprisingly, for HR negative patients in the lapatinib only arm, the pCR rate in the low EGFR group was 47.2% compared with 16.0% in the high group. While this difference is statistically significant (p = 0.014), it should be interpreted cautiously because of the small numbers of patients and the multiple tests performed. Conclusions: High expression of EGFR by the AQUA platform appears to be associated with decreased pCR rate from HER2 targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting. This observation is consistent with NCCTG N9831. Although underpowered, high EGFR levels predicted decreased pCR rate from lapatinib, the opposite of that anticipated for this small molecule dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor. Further studies are required to determine the clinical utility of this assay and the biological mechanisms underlying these observations. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-08-09.

Abstract Learning Objectives Discuss methods for improving the efficiency of global clinical trials. Explain the need for national regulatory authorities and collaborative cancer groups to initiate efforts to quicken the activation process in their countries. Describe the activation process of phase III studies and its complex and heterogeneous regulation across different geographic and economic regions. Purpose. This study measured the time taken for setting up the different facets of Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization (ALTTO), an international phase III study being conducted in 44 participating countries. Methods. Time to regulatory authority (RA) approval, time to ethics committee/institutional review board (EC/IRB) approval, time from study approval by EC/IRB to first randomized patient, and time from first to last randomized patient were prospectively collected in the ALTTO study. Analyses were conducted by grouping countries into either geographic regions or economic classes as per the World Bank's criteria. Results. South America had a significantly longer time to RA approval (median: 236 days, range: 21–257 days) than Europe (median: 52 days, range: 0–151 days), North America (median: 26 days, range: 22–30 days), and Asia-Pacific (median: 62 days, range: 37–75 days). Upper-middle economies had longer times to RA approval (median: 123 days, range: 21–257 days) than high-income (median: 47 days, range: 0–112 days) and lower-middle income economies (median: 57 days, range: 37–62 days). No significant difference was observed for time to EC/IRB approval across the studied regions (median: 59 days, range 0–174 days). Overall, the median time from EC/IRB approval to first recruited patient was 169 days (range: 26–412 days). Conclusion. This study highlights the long time intervals required to activate a global phase III trial. Collaborative research groups, pharmaceutical industry sponsors, and regulatory authorities should analyze the current system and enter into dialogue for optimizing local policies. This would enable faster access of patients to innovative therapies and enhance the efficiency of clinical research.

Abstract Background. Third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been shown to be superior to tamoxifen in multiple randomized clinical trials and become the new standard of treatment for postmenopausal women with early or advanced endocrine-sensitive breast cancer. It is thus important to identify biomarkers predicting resistance to AIs so that alternative therapeutic options can be employed. A two gene expression index, HOXB13:IL17BR, and HOXB13 in particular, has been shown to be a negative predictor of clinical benefit from tamoxifen. It is unclear whether HOXB13:IL17BR or HOXB13 is also predictive of AI therapy.Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of a phase II randomized neoadjuvant study of everolimus+letrozole vs. placebo+letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Total RNA was extracted from frozen tissue biopsies taken either prior to treatment or after 15 days of treatment. HOXB13:IL13BR and a molecular grade index (MGI) were measured in 107 pre-treatment samples and 111 samples after 15 days of treatment. Antiproliferative response as defined by a ln[Ki767] <1 at day 15 in the samples analyzed was correlated with these gene expression indices.Results. In the placebo+letrozole treatment arm, the antiproliferative response rate was 30% (14/47). Using a pre-specified cutpoint of 0.06, the response rate was 40% for low HOXB13:IL17BR patients, compared to 12% for high HOXB13:IL17BR patients (p=0.05). In the everolimus+letrozole arm, the antiproliferative response rate in the samples analyzed was 55% (33/60), and the response rates for low and high HOXB13:Il17BR patients were 70% and 37% (p=0.02), respectively. When examined separately, high HOXB13 expression was significantly associated with nonresponse to therapy (everolimus+letrozole arm, p=0.02; placebo+letrozle arm, p=0.03), but IL17BR was not (everolimus+letrozole arm, p=0.6; placebo+letrozle arm, p=0.88). As expected, we observed a significant correlation between MGI and Ki67 staining (Spearman r=0.67, p<0.0001).Conclusions. High HOXB13:IL17BR index and high HOXB13 expression may identify a possible subset of patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumor that could be less responsive to aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole. Furthermore, use of MGI may enable rapid assessment of antiproliferative response by fine needle aspiration. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 2120.