Buckner, Jan C.

Purpose Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, pure (AO) and mixed (anaplastic oligoastrocytoma [AOA]), are chemosensitive, especially if codeleted for 1p/19q, but whether patients live longer after chemoradiotherapy is unknown. Patients and Methods Eligible patients with AO/AOA were randomly assigned to procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) plus radiotherapy (RT) versus RT alone. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Two hundred ninety-one eligible patients were randomly assigned: 148 to PCV plus RT and 143 to RT. For the entire cohort, there was no difference in median survival by treatment (4.6 years for PCV plus RT v 4.7 years for RT; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.04; P = .1). Patients with codeleted tumors lived longer than those with noncodeleted tumors (PCV plus RT: 14.7 v 2.6 years, HR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.57, P < .001; RT: 7.3 v 2.7 years, HR = 0.40, 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.60, P < .001), and the median survival of those with codeleted tumors treated with PCV plus RT was twice that of patients receiving RT (14.7 v 7.3 years; HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.95; P = .03). For those with noncodeleted tumors, there was no difference in median survival by treatment arm (2.6 v 2.7 years; HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.23; P = .39). In Cox models that included codeletion status, the adjusted OS for all patients was prolonged by PCV plus RT (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.91; P = .01). Conclusion For the subset of patients with 1p/19q codeleted AO/AOA, PCV plus RT may be an especially effective treatment, although this observation was derived from an unplanned analysis.

Abstract Purpose: Surrogate biomarkers are lacking for predicting or monitoring response to anti-angiogenesis therapies. We investigated whether circulating biomarkers (CBMs) of angiogenesis (i.e., bFGF, SDF-1α, HGF, sKIT, Ang-2, and PlGF) correlated with treatment efficacy in a pooled analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (rGBM) patients (pts) treated with bevacizumab/sorafenib (BEV/SOR). Experimental procedures: Peripheral blood samples were obtained for CBM analyses from pts enrolled in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II studies N054C (mCRC, n=75, Grothey, ASCO 2010) and N0776 (rGBM, n=54, Galanis, ASCO 2010). Blood collection time points were: baseline (BL), cycle 1 day 3 (C1D3), prior to treatment cycles 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and after the pt went off study. Plasma CBM levels were determined by commercially-available ELISAs (R&D Systems) and performed according to manufacturer's instructions. For each CBM, a linear regression model that adjusted for study was used to evaluate the correlation with either progression-free survival (PFS) success/failure or progression within 14 days of the last blood draw for the following measures: absolute BL levels, log2 BL levels; C1D3 log2-fold change (FC) from BL, prior to cycle 2 log2-FC from BL, last draw log2-FC from BL, and last draw log2-FC from prior draw. Results summary: There appears to be no significant difference in the PFS or overall survival (OS) between the pts on these two studies; therefore, we pooled the patients from both studies for a combined analyses. We found no difference in absolute or log2 levels for any of the CBMs during the course of BEV/SOR treatment. In these pooled analyses, we found increased absolute and increased log2 BL SDF-1α levels were significantly correlated with PFS success (p=0.023 and p=0.02, respectively). After correcting for multiple comparisons (method of Benjamini & Hochberg) the p-values &lt;0.05 had a false-discovery-rate of 41.4%. None of the other CBM measures were significantly correlated with either PFS success/failure or progression within 14 days of the last blood draw (all p&gt;0.10). Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that SDF-1α may be a useful CBM for determining treatment efficacy in these pts treated with BEV/SOR. Further prospective validation of SDF-1α for predicting pt progression with this treatment combination in advanced disease (e.g., mCRC and rGBM) appears warranted. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5562. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5562

Purpose A prior Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trial in anaplastic oligodendroglioma suggested a progression-free survival benefit for procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy in addition to radiation therapy (RT), as have smaller trials in low-grade glioma (LGG). Patients and Methods Eligibility criteria included supratentorial WHO grade 2 LGG, age 18 to 39 years with subtotal resection/biopsy, or age ≥ 40 years with any extent resection. Patients were randomly assigned to RT alone or RT followed by six cycles of PCV. Survival was compared by using the modified Wilcoxon and log-rank tests. Results In all, 251 patients were accrued from 1998 to 2002. Median overall survival (OS) time and 5-year OS rates for RT versus RT + PCV were 7.5 years versus not reached and 63% versus 72%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]; 0.72; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.10; P = .33; log-rank P = .13). Median progression-free survival (PFS) time and 5-year PFS rates for RT versus RT + PCV were 4.4 years versus not reached and 46% versus 63%, respectively (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.86; P = .06; log-rank P = .005). OS and PFS were similar for all patients between years 0 and 2. After 2 years, OS and PFS curves separated significantly, favoring RT + PCV. For 2-year survivors (n = 211), the probability of OS for an additional 5 years was 74% with RT + PCV versus 59% with RT alone (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.90; log-rank P = .02). Conclusion PFS but not OS was improved for adult patients with LGG receiving RT + PCV versus RT alone. On post hoc analysis, for 2-year survivors, the addition of PCV to RT conferred a survival advantage, suggesting a delayed benefit for chemotherapy.

Abstract Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions within the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway as a critical modulator of cell survival. We previously demonstrated significant synergy of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus with RT in glioma xenografts. This Phase I study evaluated the safety and tolerability of combined therapy with the mTOR inhibitor RAD001, RT and TMZ. Methods: All patients received weekly oral RAD001, starting 1 week prior to RT/TMZ and continuing until progression, with a break from therapy between RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ. RAD001 was dose escalated in cohorts of 6 patients. In addition to RAD001, all pts received standard treatment with RT (60 Gy)/TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily) and adjuvant TMZ (200 mg/m2 daily × 5 every 28 days). DLTs were defined during therapy with RAD001 combined with TMZ/RT. Results: A total of 18 patients were enrolled. Combined RAD001/RT/TMZ was well tolerated at all dose levels with 1 of 6 patients with a DLT at each dose level. DLTs were Grade 3 fatigue (RAD001 25 mg/week), Grade 4 hematologic toxicity (RAD001 50 mg/week), and Grade 4 liver function elevation (RAD001 70 mg/week). With adverse event information available for all 18 patients, no grade 5 events were seen. Nine grade 4 events (thrombosis, fatigue, anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, SGPT (ALT), SGOT (AST), bilirubin elevation) were seen in 3 patients. On the basis of these results, the recommended Phase II dose currently being tested is RAD001 70 mg/week in combination with standard RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ. FDG PET scans were also obtained prior to the first dose of RAD001 and within 24 hours of the second dose of RAD001, prior to starting RT or TMZ, and changes in maximum standard uptake values (SUV) were compared between scans for each patient. Two patients at 25 mg RAD001/week had a 21% and 24% change in SUV, and 2 patients receiving 70 mg/week had a change in SUV uptake of −33% and −16%. Additional follow-up will be required to evaluate whether these SUV changes are associated with outcome. Conclusions: RAD001 in combination with RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ was well tolerated, and the imaging results support continued evaluation of PET imaging as an early predictor of response to therapy. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):C56.

The development of subspecialty tumor groups for uncommon malignancies represents an effective approach to building experience, increasing patient volumes and referrals, and fostering development of increased therapeutic options and clinical trials for patients afflicted with otherwise historically neglected cancers.

Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma is a devastating, incurable disease with few known prognostic factors. Here, we present the first genome-wide survival and validation study for glioblastoma. Experimental Design: Cox regressions for survival with 314,635 inherited autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) among 315 San Francisco Adult Glioma Study patients for discovery and three independent validation data sets [87 Mayo Clinic, 232 glioma patients recruited from several medical centers in Southeastern United States (GliomaSE), and 115 The Cancer Genome Atlas patients] were used to identify SNPs associated with overall survival for Caucasian glioblastoma patients treated with the current standard of care, resection, radiation, and temozolomide (total n = 749). Tumor expression of the gene that contained the identified prognostic SNP was examined in three separate data sets (total n = 619). Genotype imputation was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for SNPs that had not been directly genotyped. Results: From the discovery and validation analyses, we identified a variant in single-stranded DNA-binding protein 2 (SSBP2) on 5q14.1 associated with overall survival in combined analyses (HR, 1.64; P = 1.3 × 10−6). Expression of SSBP2 in tumors from three independent data sets also was significantly related to patient survival (P = 5.3 × 10−4). Using genotype imputation, the SSBP2 SNP rs17296479 had the strongest statistically significant genome-wide association with poorer overall patient survival (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.45-2.22; P = 1.0 × 10−7). Conclusion: The minor allele of SSBP2 SNP rs17296479 and the increased tumor expression of SSBP2 were statistically significantly associated with poorer overall survival among glioblastoma patients. With further confirmation, previously unrecognized inherited variations influencing survival may warrant inclusion in clinical trials to improve randomization. Unaccounted for genetic influence on survival could produce unwanted bias in such studies. Clin Cancer Res; 18(11); 3154–62. ©2012 AACR.

Extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma (EES) involving the central nervous system is rare, but can be diagnosed and distinguished from other primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) by identification of the chromosomal translocation (11;22)(q24;q12). We report EES arising from the spinal intradural extramedullary space, based on imaging, histopathological, and molecular data in two men, ages 50 and 60 years old and a review of the literature using PubMed (1970–2009). Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) identified the fusion product FL1-EWS. Multimodal therapy, including radiation and alternating chemotherapy including vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and ifosfamide and etoposide led to local tumor control and an initial, favorable therapeutic response. No systemic involvement was seen from the time of diagnosis to the time of last follow-up (26 months) or death (4 years). This report confirms that EES is not confined to the earliest decades of life, and like its rare occurrence as an extra-axial meningeal based mass intracranially, can occasionally present as an intradural mass in the spinal canal without evidence of systemic tumor. Gross total resection followed by multimodal therapy may provide for extended progression free and overall survival.

Abstract Purpose: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions within the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway as a critical modulator of cell survival. Methods: The mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus (CCI-779) was combined with chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients in a dose-escalation phase I trial. The first 12 patients were treated with CCI-779 combined with radiation/temozolomide and adjuvant temozolomide. A second cohort of 13 patients was treated with concurrent CCI-779/radiation/temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide monotherapy. Results: Concomitant and adjuvant CCI-779 was associated with a high rate (3 of 12 patients) of grade 4/5 infections. By limiting CCI-779 treatment to the radiation/temozolomide phase and using antibiotic prophylaxis, the rate of infections was reduced, although 2 of 13 patients developed exacerbation of pre-existing fungal or viral infections. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 of 13 patients with this modified schedule. Weekly CCI-779 (50 mg/week) combined with radiation/temozolomide is the recommended phase II dose and schedule. The immune profile of patients in the second cohort was assessed before, during, and after CCI-779 therapy. There was robust suppression of helper and cytotoxic T cells, B cells, natural killer, cells and elevation of regulatory T cells during CCI-779/radiation/temozolomide therapy with recovery to baseline levels during adjuvant temozolomide of cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, and regulatory T cells. Conclusions: The increased infection rate observed with CCI-779 combined with chemoradiotherapy in GBM was reduced with antibiotic prophylaxis and by limiting the duration of CCI-779 therapy. The combined suppressive effects of CCI-779 and temozolomide therapy on discrete immune compartments likely contributed to the increased infectious risks observed. Clin Cancer Res; 16(22); 5573–80. ©2010 AACR.

Purpose In March 1998, Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0 introduced the collection of attribution of adverse events (AEs) to study drug. We investigate whether attribution adds value to the interpretation of AE data. Patients and Methods Patients in the placebo arm of two phase III trials—North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial 97-24-51 (carboxyamino-triazole v placebo in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer) and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z9001 (imatinib mesylate v placebo after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors)—were studied. Attribution was categorized as unrelated (not related or unlikely) and related (possible, probable, or definite). Results In total, 398 patients (84 from Trial 97-24-51 and 314 from Trial Z9001) and 7,736 AEs were included; 47% and 50% of the placebo-arm AEs, respectively, were reported as related. When the same AE was reported in the same patient on multiple visits, the attribution category changed at least once 36% and 31% of the time. AE type and sex (Trial Z9001) and AE type and performance status (Trial 97-24-51) were associated with a higher likelihood of AEs being deemed related. Conclusion Nearly 50% of AEs were reported as attributed to study drug on the placebo arm of two randomized clinical trials. These data provide strong evidence that AE attribution is difficult to determine, unreliable, and of questionable value in interpreting AE data in randomized clinical trials.