Gangat, Naseema

AbstractWe retrospectively reviewed 72 anemic patients with myelofibrosis (MF; median age 68 years), who were JAK2 inhibitor‐naïve at the time of study entry to a phase‐1/2 momelotinib clinical trial. Driver mutation profile included JAK2 69%, CALR 17%, MPL 8%, and triple‐negative 6%; other mutations included ASXL1 39% and SRSF2 17%. Momelotinib was administered at a median dose of 300 mg daily. Anemia response was assessed by formal criteria and documented in 44% of all patients with hemoglobin levels below the sex‐adjusted reference range (n = 72), 48% of those with hemoglobin <10 g/dl (n = 54), and 46% of those who were transfusion‐dependent at the time of study entry (n = 28). Anemia response was more likely with post‐essential thrombocythemia MF (83% vs 37%; p = .001), lower serum ferritin (p = .003), and shorter time from diagnosis to momelotinib therapy (p = .001); the first two variables were also predictive in transfusion‐dependent patients. Post‐momelotinib median survival was 3.2 years; in univariate analysis, survival was superior in anemia responders (median 3.8 vs. 2.8 years; p = .14) and in the presence of type 1/like CALR mutation and inferior in the presence of age > 65 years, ASXL1/SRSF2 mutation, unfavorable karyotype, DIPSS‐plus high risk, red cell transfusion need and higher serum ferritin. Multivariable analysis confirmed the favorable impact of anemia response on survival (p = .02; HR 0.5, 3/5/10‐year survival; 69%/38%/25%). This survival advantage was also noted in transfusion‐dependent patients (3.7 vs. 1.9 years; p = .01; HR 0.3) and appeared to be restricted to patients with an unfavorable genetic profile. The current study suggests a short‐term survival benefit associated with anemia response in momelotinib‐treated patients with MF.

AbstractA group of international experts, including hematopathologists, oncologists, and geneticists were recently summoned (September 2021, Chicago, IL, USA) to update the 2016/17 World Health Organization classification system for hematopoietic tumors. After careful deliberation, the group introduced the new International Consensus Classification (ICC) for Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias. This current in‐depth review focuses on the ICC‐2022 category of JAK2 mutation‐prevalent myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, and MPN, unclassifiable. The ICC MPN subcommittee chose to preserve the primary role of bone marrow morphology in disease classification and diagnostics, while also acknowledging the complementary role of genetic markers for establishing clonality, facilitating MPN subtype designation, and disease prognostication.

Abstract The classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias was last updated in 2016 within a collaboration between the World Health Organization (WHO), the Society for Hematopathology, and the European Association for Haematopathology. This collaboration was primarily based on input from a clinical advisory committees (CACs) composed of pathologists, hematologists, oncologists, geneticists, and bioinformaticians from around the world. The recent advances in our understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, the experience with the use of the 2016 WHO classification in clinical practice, and the results of clinical trials have indicated the need for further revising and updating the classification. As a continuation of this CAC-based process, the authors, a group with expertise in the clinical, pathologic, and genetic aspects of these disorders, developed the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias. Using a multiparameter approach, the main objective of the consensus process was the definition of real disease entities, including the introduction of new entities and refined criteria for existing diagnostic categories, based on accumulated data. The ICC is aimed at facilitating diagnosis and prognostication of these neoplasms, improving treatment of affected patients, and allowing the design of innovative clinical trials.

AbstractThe current study was approached with the assumption that response to induction chemotherapy, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), overshadows pre‐treatment risk variables in predicting survival and therefore be used as an anchor for a simplified risk model. We considered 759 intensively‐treated patients with AML, not promyelocytic: median age 60 years; primary 66%, secondary 25%, and therapy‐related 9%; European LeukemiaNet cytogenetic risk category favorable 8%, intermediate 61%, and adverse 31%. Complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery was achieved in 608 (80%) patients. After a median follow‐up of 22 months, 503 deaths, 272 relapses, and 257 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (AHSCTs) were recorded. Multivariable analysis identified failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 3.8, 95% CI 3.1–4.8), adverse karyotype (2.2, 1.8–2.8), and age >55 years (2.1, 1.6–2.7) as main risk factors for survival. HR‐weighted scoring resulted in four‐tiered risk stratification: low (0 points; N = 183), intermediate‐1 (1 point; N = 331), intermediate‐2 (2 points; N = 117), and high (≥3 points; N = 128), with respective median survival (5‐year rate) not reached (68%), 34 (37%), 13 (20%), and 5 (5%) months (p < .001). FLT3‐ITD mutation was associated with inferior survival in intermediate‐1 (p = .004) and TP53 in intermediate‐2 (p = .06) and high (p = .02) risk disease; the latter was fully accounted for by the close association between TP53 mutation and complex/monosomal karyotype while the observations regarding FLT3‐ITD were not affected by treatment with midostaurin. AHSCT had a favorable impact on survival, most apparent in intermediate‐1 (p < .001), intermediate‐2 (p = .03), and high (p = .01) risk disease. The proposed 3‐factor survival model offers a novel prototype that is amenable to further enhancement by molecular information and was validated in an external cohort of 1032 intensively‐treated AML patients.