Anthony, Stephen P.

TPS7100 Background: Bruton tyrosine kinase covalent inhibitors (cBTKi) have been transformative in CLL treatment. Despite achieving extended remissions, in most patients disease still relapses despite cBTKi therapy, often associated with BTK C481 mutations. Non-covalent BTKi (ncBTKi), including pirtobrutinib, can overcome this resistance (Sharman et al. ASCO . 2025). Pirtobrutinib received FDA approval in Dec 2025, for R/R CLL/CLL patients pretreated with cBTKi. Rocbrutinib (LP-168) is a highly selective next-generation BTKi that can covalently bind wild-type and gatekeeper mutations (T474X, commonly seen in patients relapsed after pirtobrutinib) and non-covalently target C481-mutated BTK , with preclinical efficacy in treatment-naïve and BTKi-resistant CLL (Gordon et al. IWCLL . 2025). In the rocbrutinib phase 1 trial (NCT04775745), encouraging safety and efficacy have been observed in CLL patients with prior exposure to BTKi and/or BCL2 inhibitor (BCL2i) (Woyach et al. Blood. 2025). Presented here is the design of a phase 3 trial aiming to compare the efficacy of rocbrutinib versus pirtobrutinib in cBTKi-pretreated R/R CLL/SLL patients. Methods: ROCKET-CLL (NCT07342478) is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study comparing rocbrutinib (Arm 1) to pirtobrutinib (Arm 2) in R/R CLL/SLL subjects who previously received treatments including covalent BTKi. Eligible subjects must require treatment per 2018 iwCLL criteria, have measurable lesions by CT, an ECOG performance score of 0-2, and adequate hematologic and other organ functions. About 306 subjects will be randomized 1:1 based on stratification factors such as 17p deletion/ TP53 mutation presence, reasons for discontinuing prior cBTKi, prior BCL2i treatment, and geographic region. Participants assigned to each arm will receive rocbrutinib (200 mg QD) or pirtobrutinib (200 mg QD) tablets continuously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or other study discontinuation criteria are met. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) per iwCLL 2018 criteria with CLL (Hallek et al. 2018) and Lugano 2014 criteria with SLL (Cheson et al. 2014). Important secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), event-free survival (EFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), PFS assessed by investigator (INV), concordance between IRC and INV PFS, safety and tolerability, and population PK. Exploratory endpoints include health-related quality of life and biomarker assessment. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT07342478 .

Abstract Despite the advent of novel targeted therapies with high overall response rates, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is still largely incurable due to the development of resistance. The bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) plays an important role in the survival and drug resistance in CLL. BM stromal cells (BMSCs) are considered a key component of BMME. Our long-term goal is to gain further insights of BMSCs-CLL crosstalk influencing both survival and drug resistance in CLL. To understand the global biologic changes that occur in leukemic CLL cells when in contact with BMSCs, we assessed RNA-seq in paired CLL cells isolated from untreated blood and BM and in untreated patients’ CLL cells cultured alone or with BMSCs. CLL cells from blood/BM and cultured alone/with BMSCs were also examined by Immunoprecipitation (IP), Western blot (WB), untargeted metabolomics (LCMS+GCMS), and preclinical drug sensitivity assays. We detected only 13 upregulated genes that overlap between CLL cells from BM and cocultured with BMSCs (p&lt0.05, fold change &gt1.5). When we analyzed the expression of these 13 genes in CLL cells from a cohort of 162 untreated patients by RNA-seq, we found associations between 4 genes (PNP, C16orf54, MOB3A, CDK2AP2) and clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and time to first treatment (TTFT) [multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, p&lt0.05]. Of the 4 genes, purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), an enzyme in the purine pathway, had the most significant association with OS, PFS, and TTFT. Metabolomic profiling indicated an increased level of purine pathway metabolites adenosine, adenine, inosine, and hypoxanthine in cocultured CLL cells. WB analysis showed variable baseline PNP protein expression with 2 cohorts: low /no (L) and high (H) PNP using CLL blood cells. An induction in PNP protein levels were noticed in CLL cells expressing only LPNP when cocultured. Given the association of HPNP with adverse clinical outcomes, we tested for L vs. HPNP cohorts drug sensitivity to known BTK inhibitors(is) or Bcl2is. Treatment of CLL cells from untreated patients with Bcl2is venetoclax, S55746, and LP-118 (Bcl2-Bclxli, Newave) showed increased sensitivity to the Bcl2/Bclxlis in HPNP but not in LPNP cells. In addition, BTKis showed no difference in drug sensitivity associated with CLL PNP levels. To explain this discrepancy, WB and IP analyses were conducted in L vs. HPNP leukemic cells for apoptotic profiles, where we found increased phosphorylated-Bcl2(S70) and an increased association of Bcl2 with Bax in LPNP-expressing CLL cells compared to HPNP. These findings support increased resistance to apoptosis afforded by inhibiting Bcl2 for LPNP vs. HPNP-expressing CLL cells. Our future goals are to continue to understand the prognostic significance of the 4 genes with adverse clinical outcomes and to investigate how best to exploit the peculiar, enhanced sensitivity to Bcl2/Bclxlis found in the HPNP CLL cells. Citation Format: Sutapa Sinha, Weiguo Han, Zhiquan Wang, Brianna M. Finke, Heather C. Darby, Kari G. Rabe, Susan L. Slager, Chantal E. McCabe, Daniel R. O'Brien, Sameer A. Parikh, Esteban Braggio, Yi Chen, Fenlai Tan, Stephen P. Anthony, Yu Chen, Bing Dai, Yue Shen, Neil E. Kay. CLL drug resistance- A multifaceted mechanism [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4423.

Abstract The treatment of Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been revolutionized in recent years, however CLL is still incurable, and the leukemic cells often develop drug resistance. Previous studies show that the interaction of CLL cells with the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment promotes spontaneous and drug induced survival. But the nature of this interaction is still in need of a full understanding. To pursue this we discerned RNA profiles using RNA-seq in paired CLL cells isolated from untreated blood and BM (n=6) and in untreated patients CLL cells (n=4) cultured alone or cocultured with BM stromal cells (BMSCs). CLL cells from blood/BM and CLL cells cultured alone or with BMSCs were examined by Western blot (WB), untargeted metabolomics (LCMS+GCMS) and preclinical drug sensitivity assays. We found upregulation of 232 genes in CLL cells from BM vs the paired blood and 917 genes in cocultured CLL cells compared to CLL cells cultured alone (p&lt0.05, fold change &gt1.5). Here we detected only 13 genes that overlap between BM and cocultured CLL cells. When we analyzed the expression of these 13 genes in blood CLL cells from a cohort of 162 untreated patients by RNA-seq we found a positive relationship between 4 (PNP, C16orf54, MOB3A, CDK2AP2) with CLL patient clinical outcome including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and time to first treatment (TTFT) [multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, p&lt0.05]. Out of the 4 genes, purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), an enzyme in the purine salvage pathway, showed the most significant association for patient’s OS, PFS, and TTFT. Metabolomic profiling indicated an increased level of purine salvage pathway metabolites adenosine, inosine, and hypoxanthine in cocultured CLL cells. WB analysis using blood CLL cells from untreated patients showed a variable PNP protein expression (high, low/no PNP) and induction in PNP protein levels were found in blood CLL cells expressing low/no PNP only when in contact with BM/BMSCs. But PNP inhibitor forodesine did not show any significant killing in high vs low/no PNP group. When we treated CLL cells from untreated patients with Bcl2 inhibitors venetoclax, S55746 and LP-118 (Bcl-2/Bcl-xl inhibitor, Newave), CLL cells showed increasing sensitivity to the Bcl2 inhibitors associated with their PNP expression (high&gtlow&gtno PNP). But a covalent and non-covalent BTKi LP-168 (Newave) cultured with CLL cells showed no difference in drug sensitivity associated with CLL PNP levels. In contrast CLL cells when treated with both venetoclax and LP-168, showed more drug sensitivity in the high PNP expressing CLL cells vs low/no PNP. These results indicate that active purine metabolism in CLL cells can contribute to differential novel agent drug responses of CLL patients. Future studies to understand the exact mechanism of how PNP relates to this differential drug sensitivity should be instructive in regard to alternate maneuvers to treat CLL. Citation Format: Sutapa Sinha, Weiguo Han, Zhiquan Wang, Kari G. Rabe, Susan L. Slager, Chantal E. McCabe, Daniel R. O'Brien, Sameer A. Parikh, Esteban Braggio, Yi Chen, Fenlai Tan, Stephen P. Anthony, Yu Chen, Bing Dai, Yue Shen, Neil E. Kay. Role of purine metabolism in CLL cell pathobiology and CLL disease progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 297.

Background: Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been transformed with targeted therapies including inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTKi). Currently three covalent BTK inhibitors (cBTKi) are approved for CLL, but most patients eventually relapse, commonly through acquisition of the C481S BTK mutation (Woyach et al. 2014). Pirtobrutinib and nemtabrutinib are non-covalent BTK inhibitors (ncBTKi) developed to target and inhibit C481S mutant BTK. However novel secondary site mutations in BTK, namely T474I and L528W, have been found to confer resistance to both cBTKi and ncBTKi (Wang et al. 2022). Regardless of these mutations, BCR signaling remains intact, suggesting that inhibition of BTK maintains its therapeutic importance. LP-168 is a novel ultra-selective 4 th generation BTKi with an active warhead capable of covalent interaction with WT BTK or non-covalent binding when a BTK C481 mutation is present. Methods: To determine the target selectivity of LP-168 we screened the compound against 468 kinases in the scanMAX Kinase Assay. For validation of covalent binding, dialysis against WT BTK was performed. Primary CLL B cells were isolated by negative selection and treated with LP-168 for all experiments. BCR signaling alterations were assessed via immunoblot to observe changes in target protein phosphorylation. Changes in CLL migration towards CXCL12 or CXCL13 were interrogated by transwell migration. Cytotoxicity towards primary CLL cells was measured via Annexin V/PI flow cytometry with and without HS-5 stromal cell support. Experiments using TMD8 cells were performed following CRISPR modification to insert WT, C481S, or T474I BTK. In vivo survival studies were performed using both the Eμ-TCL1 and Eμ-MTCP1 mouse engraftment models. Results: LP-168 demonstrated selectivity towards BTK with roughly 700-fold selectivity for BTK vs its next off-target. In an enzymatic assay, LP-168 displayed nanomolar potency towards both WT BTK (IC 50=0.11 nM) and C481S BTK (IC 50=1.0 nM). Following 2-hour drugging, LP-168 inhibited BCR signaling in primary CLL B cells at increasing concentrations, demonstrated by reduced phosphorylation of BTK (92%, p<0.0001, n=8) and its immediate downstream target PLCγ2 (41%, p=0.0013, n=8). Migration capacity of primary CLL cells towards CXCL12 and CXCL14 was also found to decrease after 2-hours of treatment with LP-168 (52%, p<0.001, n=10 and 51%, p<0.001, n=10, respectively). After 48 hours of exposure, LP-168 was able to induce cytotoxicity of primary CLL cells alone and in co-culture with HS-5 stromal cells in a dose-dependent manner, with similar or improved efficacy to other BTKi. LP-168 decreased CLL cell production of CCL3 and CCL4 chemokines (CCL3: 93%, p<0.001, n=8; CCL4: 93%, p<0.001, n=8). LP-168 also demonstrated modest cytotoxicity towards TMD8 cells harboring either C481S BTK (24%, p=0.0008 , n=3) or T474I BTK (13%, p=0.0690, n=3), as well as decreased production of CCL3 (C481S: 95%, p<0.0001, n=3; T474I: 99%, p<0.0001, n=3) and CCL4 (C481S: 97%, p<0.0001, n=3; T474I: 98%, p<0.0001, n=3) (Figure 1A). Further, we observed inhibition of downstream BCR signaling in primary CLL B cells harboring C481S via immunoblotting and cytokine production. Finally, to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of LP-168 we tested this compound in both the Eµ-TCL1 and Eµ-MTCP1 models. We treated mice daily via oral gavage and found that 50 mg/kg of LP-168 significantly improved survival in the Eµ-TCL1 model when compared to vehicle (median 51 vs 44 days; p=0.0018) or ibrutinib at 50 mg/kg (median 51 vs 45 days; p=0.0098) and the Eµ-MTCP1 model when compared with vehicle (median 122 vs 62 days; p<0.0001) or ibrutinib at 50 mg/kg (median 122 vs 96 days; p=0.0162) (Figure 1B). Conclusions: Collectively, our data demonstrate that LP-168 is a potent and selective inhibitor of BTK with activity against CLL, even in the presence of mutations that mediate resistance to cBTKi and ncBTKi. These data support the continued preclinical and clinical investigation of LP-168, which is currently being studied in the phase 1 setting of CLL (NCT04775745) and NHL (NCT04993690).

This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi‐omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients had received an average of 3.94 previous lines of treatment in the metastatic setting before enrollment in this study. Samples underwent MoMP, including exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq), immunohistochemistry, and quantitative protein pathway activation mapping by Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA). Clinical benefit was assessed using the previously published growth modulation index (GMI) under the hypothesis that MoMP‐selected therapy would warrant further investigation for GMI ≥ 1.3 in ≥ 35% of the patients. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 29 received treatment based on their MoMP and 25 met the follow‐up criteria established by the trial protocol. Molecular information was delivered to the tumor board in a median time frame of 14 days (11–22 days), and targetable alterations for commercially available agents were found in 23/25 patients (92%). Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) reached GMI ≥ 1.3. A high level of DNA topoisomerase I (TOPO1) led to the selection of irinotecan‐based treatments in 48% (12/25) of the patients. A pooled analysis suggested clinical benefit in patients with high TOPO1 expression receiving irinotecan‐based regimens (GMI ≥ 1.3 in 66.7% of cases). These results confirmed previous observations that MoMP increases the frequency of identifiable actionable alterations (92% of patients). The MoMP proposed allows the identification of biomarkers that are frequently expressed in MBCs and the evaluation of their role as predictors of response to commercially available agents. Lastly, this study confirmed the role of MoMP for informing treatment selection in refractory MBC patients: more than half of the enrolled patients reached a GMI ≥ 1.3 even after multiple lines of previous therapies for metastatic disease.

Abstract Background: The efficacy of immunotherapy, including therapeutic strategies capable of modulating innate/adaptive immune resistance, varies greatly across tumor types. As the number of available immunotherapies accelerates, the study of predictive markers by IHC (e.g. PDL1 expression) is under intense investigation. However, staining protocol inconsistency, variation across scoring systems, and subjective interpretation of the immunostaining have produced conflicting results thus far. This work explored the role of Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) coupled with Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA) as an alternative high throughput, quantitative, operator independent platform for measuring PDL1 expression across tumor types. Material and Methods: Pure epithelial cells were isolated via LCM from 178 samples including: 72 ovarian cancers (OC), 57 lung adenocarcinomas (LC), 30 metastatic breast cancers (MBC), and 19 pancreatic cancers (PC). PDL1 expression was measured on a continuous scale using quantitative RPPA based analysis. Each tumor type was processed and arrayed independently. Experimental samples and reference standards used for inter-assay normalization were printed in triplicates. Results: PDL1 expression varied greatly across tumor types. LC were characterized by the greatest intra-tumor fold dynamic range (> 35-fold), followed by OC (< 13-fold), MBC (< 4-fold), and PC (< 2-fold). PDL1 expression of 46/57 (80.7%) LC, 17/30 (56.7%) MBC, 6/19 (31.5%) PC, and 20/72 (27.8%) OC was greater than the population median of all tumors combined. Within the LC samples with PDL1 expression equal to the top quartile of the population, 10 (71.4%) were KRAS mutant lesions and 4 (28.6%) were WT tumors. Finally, amongst LC and PC harboring a KRAS mutation, PC showed an overall lower expression of PDL1 with only 2/19 (10.5%) cases been above the population median and none within the top quartile of the population. Conclusions: The LCM-RPPA workflow has the unique ability to capture immune checkpoint expression on a continuous quantitative scale as well as capture its broad dynamic range. Because RPPA is unconstrained by antigen retrieval issues as well as subjectivity of IHC interpretation, this approach may generate more accurate cut-point of therapeutic response prediction. Overall the dynamic range of PDL1 was broader in LC compared to other solid tumors, and LC had a much higher proportion of patients with tumors expressing high levels of PDL1. These quantitative differences may explain therapeutic efficacy of PDL1 inhibition across tumor types. Such speculative hypothesis should be further validated in prospective clinical trials. Finally, these preliminary data suggest that organ specific microenvironments more than specific driving mutations (e.g. KRAS) may strongly influence PDL1 expression in malignant lesions. Citation Format: Elisa Baldelli, Valerie Calvert, K. Alex Hodge, Maria Isabella Sereni, Guido Gambara, Eric B. Haura, Lucio Crino', Bryant Dunetz, Sergio Pecorelli, David J. Perry, Stephen P. Anthony, Nicholas Robert, Donald W. Northfelt, Mohammad Jahanzeb, Emanuel F. Petricoin, Mariaelena Pierobon. Quantitative measurement of PDL1 expression across tumor types using laser capture microdissection and reverse phase protein microarray [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5656. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5656