Abstract Only a small cohort of patients show durable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and the mechanisms regulating CD8 T cell responses to ICIs are yet to be elucidated. To that end, we explored T cell intrinsic factors that may be attributed to low ICI therapy response rates. We have identified Dual Specificity Phosphatase 2 (DUSP2) as a potential negative regulator of ICI response within CD8 T cells. We demonstrated that DUSP2 expression in human CD8 T cells is transient, peaking at two-hours post-T cell stimulation with rapid waning thereafter. Downregulation of DUSP2, via siRNA transfection, increased cytotoxicity of human CD8 T cells activated for 48-hours prior to inclusion in a four-hour tumor killing co-culture assay, despite the return of DUSP2 expression to baseline levels at this time-point. Additionally, DUSP2 overexpression, via mRNA transfection, decreased release of effector molecules (Granzyme B and Interferon-gamma) from human CD8 T cells at 24-hours post-activation when compared to control mRNA. When we utilized RNA-sequencing to analyze and compare differentially expressed genes between responders and non-responders of ICI therapy, we found DUSP2 expression in CX3CR1 positive CD8 T cells to be consistently decreased in responders but not in non-responders. Since CX3CR1 positive CD8 T cells identify a highly resilient and cytotoxic subset in response to ICI therapy, we hypothesize that DUSP2 negatively regulates ICI-responsive effector CD8 T cells. Thus, uncovering the role of DUSP2 in CD8 T cells may provide a target to improve the efficacy of ICIs in patients with limited therapeutic alternatives. Mayo Clinic Department of Immunology Pilot Award Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
PD-1 in balancing expansion of effector T cells and attrition of memory T cell during tumor-reactive T cell responses
Abstract Though anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy has demonstrated robust anti-tumor immunity in human patients with advanced cancers such as melanoma, only a fraction of patients achieved such durable anti-tumor responses. Among all the non-responders, some patients responded initially but developed resistance to the therapy in the later treatments. This reflects an urgent need to understand the role of PD-1 signals in CD8+ T cells at priming and at effector stages during tumor development for the benefit of immunotherapy. The controversy of rapid tumor progression in PD-1 conditional knockout in regulatory T cells and tumor regression in PD-1 targeted deletion in regulatory T cells indicated germline PD-1 knockout mice might not be sophisticated enough to study the role of PD-1 in CD8+ T cells during tumor development. Thus, we produced a CD8 T cell-specific PD-1 knockout mouse model (CD8 E8ICre-PD-1fl/fl, also called CD8-PD-1 cKO mice) in which PD-1 is deleted in CD8+ T cells in the peripheral tissues. When CD8-PD-1 cKO mice were challenged with B16-OVA mouse melanoma cells, we found a delayed tumor growth and prolonged survival of CD8-PD-1 cKO compared to control mice. However, after 20 days of tumor challenge, the delayed tumor growth rebound in CD8-PD-1 cKO mice. In an OVA antigen immunization model, we found increased effector cells and tissue resident cells in the spleen of CD8-PD-1 cKO mice compared with control mice on day 7 after immunization. Taken together, our results suggest that PD-1 may restrain the expansion of effector T cells that contribute to the early phase of tumor control, but the augmented effector T cell response may cause an attrition of memory T cell pool that will be needed for long term protection. R01CA256927