Sciubba, Daniel M.

Introduction Treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases through surgical decompression and reconstruction is known to improve quality of life in patients with cancer. However, most studies have been performed on patients with mixed tumor histopathology. We systematically review the literature for prognostic factors specific to the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine to determine the indications and outcomes of the surgical treatment. Material and Methods A systemic review of the literature was conducted to answer the following questions: Q1. Describe the survival and functional outcomes of surgery or vertebral augmentation for prostate metastases to the spine; Q2. Determine whether overall tumor burden, Gleason score, preoperative functional markers, and favorable hormonal naivety for operative intervention; Q3. Establish whether clinical outcomes vary with the evolution of operative techniques. Expert consensus was obtained using a modified Delphi process. Results A total of 16 studies met the preset inclusion criteria. These studies were all retrospective series with a level of evidence of IV. Included studies consistently showed a large effect of hormone naivety on overall survival. In addition, studies consistently demonstrated an improvement in motor function and the ability to maintain/regain ambulation following surgery resulting in moderate strength of recommendation. All other parameters were of insufficient or low strength. Conclusion There is scant literature on the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine, which represents an opportunity for future research. On the basis of the existing evidence, it appears that the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine has consistently favorable results. While no consistent preoperative indicators favor nonoperative treatment, hormone naivety and high Karnofsky Performance Scores have positive effects on survival and clinical outcomes.

Introduction Surgical treatment and cement augmentation procedures are effective palliative techniques for the treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases. However, clinical results specific to a breast cancer cohort are generally lacking. We aim to systematically review the literature for clinical outcomes following operative interventions and prognostic factors for the treatment of breast metastases to the spine. Specifically, we describe the survival and clinical outcomes of surgery and cement augmentation procedures for breast metastases to the spine and to determine prognostic variables that may help recognize which patients will perform better or worse following surgery. Methods We performed a literature review using PubMed to identify articles that reported outcomes and/or prognostic factors of the breast cancer patient population with spinal metastases treated with any surgical technique since 1990. Results A total of 19 surgical studies, 4 cement augmentation studies, and 6 nonsurgical prognostic variable studies met the preset inclusion criteria. All but three studies (two surgical and one cement augmentation) were retrospective in nature, and all studies were of level of evidence IV. Median postoperative survival for metastatic breast cancer was 21.7 months (8.2–36 months), mean rate of pain improvement was 92.9% (76–100%), mean rate of neurological improvement was 63.8% (53–100%), mean rate neurological decline was 4.1% (0–8%), and mean rate LTC was 92.6% (89–100%). Kyphoplasty studies reported a high rate of pain control in selected patients. Negative prognostic variables included: hormonal (estrogen and progesterone) and HER2 receptor refractory tumor status, high degree of axillary lymph node involvement, and short disease-free interval (DFI). All other clinical or prognostic parameters were of low or insufficient strength. Conclusion With respect to clinical outcomes, studies consistently found that surgery resulted in neurological improvement for a majority of patients, with a minimal risk of worsening, and kyphoplasty studies reported a high rate of pain control. Increased postoperative survival 2002 onwards was likely due to FDA approval of new chemotherapies. However, specific factors associated with shorter survival following surgery involve hormone and HER2 receptor status and disease-free interval.

Introduction Primary spinal osteosarcomas are rare and aggressive neoplasms with poor outcomes. Enneking appropriate, en bloc resection is recommended for appendicular osteosarcomas. Obtaining even marginal margins is technically demanding in the spine, resulting in significant morbidity and possible functional sacrifice. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic variables on local recurrence and mortality, in surgically treated patients diagnosed with a primary osteosarcoma of the spine. Methods A multicenter ambispective database of surgically treated patients with primary spine osteosarcomas was developed by the AOSpine knowledge forum tumor. Patient demographic, diagnosis, treatment, perioperative morbidity, local recurrence, and cross-sectional survival data were collected. Tumors were classified according to Enneking principles and analyzed in the following two cohorts: Enneking appropriate (EA) and Enneking inappropriate (EI). EA was defined by the final pathology margin matching the Enneking recommended surgical margin and EI by not matching. Prognostic variables including age, previous spine tumor operation, biopsy type, spine level, tumor size, and chemotherapy timing were analyzed in reference to local recurrence and survival. Results Between 1987 and 2012, 57 patients (31 females and 26 males) underwent surgical treatment for a primary spinal osteosarcoma at a mean age of 36 ± 16 years. Patients were followed for a mean period of 3.4 ± 3.5 years (range, 0.5 days–14.3 years). Median survival for the entire cohort was 6.7 years postoperative. Overall, 24 (42%) patients died and 17 (30%) patients suffered a local recurrence, 10 (59%) of which died. Overall, 28 (52%) patients underwent EA resection while 26 (48%) patients were treated by EI resection. Median survival for patients with EA was 6.8 years postoperative, whereas median survival for EI patients was 3.7 years postoperatively ( p = 0.062). EI patients were at a higher risk of local recurrence than EA patients ( p = 0.002). Patient age, previous spine tumor operation, tumor size, spine level, and chemotherapy timing did not significantly influence recurrence and survival. Conclusion Osteosarcoma of the spine presents a significant challenge and most patients die from their disease in spite of aggressive surgery. There is a significant decrease in recurrence with en bloc resection when compared with intralesional resection.

OBJECT Recently, aggressive surgical techniques and a push toward en bloc resections of certain tumors have resulted in a need for creative spinal column reconstruction. Iatrogenic instability following these resections requires a thoughtful approach to adequately transfer load-bearing forces from the skull and upper cervical spine to the subaxial spine. METHODS The authors present a series of 7 cases in which lateral mass reconstruction with a cage or fibular strut graft was used to provide load-bearing support, including 1 case of bilateral cage placement. RESULTS The authors discuss the surgical nuances of en bloc resection of high cervical tumors and explain their technique for lateral mass cage placement. Additionally, they provide their rationale for the use of these constructs throughout the craniocervical junction and subaxial spine. CONCLUSIONS Lateral mass reconstruction provides a potential alternative or adjuvant method of restoring the load-bearing capabilities of the cervical spine.

Object Traditionally, hemisacrectomy and internal hemipelvectomy procedures have required both an anterior and a posterior approach. A posterior-only approach has the potential to complete an en bloc tumor resection and spinopelvic reconstruction while reducing surgical morbidity. Methods The authors describe 3 cases in which en bloc resection of the hemisacrum and ilium and subsequent lumbopelvic and pelvic ring reconstruction were performed from a posterior-only approach. Two more traditional anterior and posterior staged procedures are also included for comparison. Results In all 3 cases, an oncologically appropriate surgery and spinopelvic reconstruction were performed through a posterior-only approach. Conclusions The advantage of a midline posterior approach is the ability to perform a lumbosacral reconstruction, necessary in cases in which the S-1 body is iatrogenically disrupted during tumor resection.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Ventral decompression with posterior stabilization is the preferred treatment for symptomatic irreducible basilar invagination. Endoscopic image-guided transcervical odontoidectomy (ETO) may allow for decompression with limited morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To describe the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing anterior decompression of basilar invagination with the use of ETO. METHODS: Fifteen patients who had a follow-up of at least 16 months were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperatively, the vertebral body of C2 was removed and the odontoid was resected in a “top-down” manner using endoscopic visualization and frameless stereotactic navigation. Posterior instrumented stabilization was subsequently performed. RESULTS: The average (± standard deviation) age of the patients was 42.6 ± 24.5 (range, 11–72) years. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients, including a urinary tract infection (n = 2), upper airway swelling (n = 2), dysphagia (n = 2), gastrostomy tube placement (n = 1), and an asymptomatic pseudomeningocele (n = 1). No patients required a tracheostomy, had bacterial meningitis, or developed a venous thromboembolic event; only 1 patient was intubated for more than 48 hours postoperatively. With a mean follow-up of 41.9 ± 14.4 (range, 16–59) months, myelopathy improved in all patients and no patient experienced late neurological deterioration. The mean modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score increased from 11.2 ± 4.2 to 15.9 ± 1.4 (P = .002). Patients with a diagnosis other than rheumatoid arthritis or who had a higher preoperative JOA score had a significantly better postoperative neurological recovery (P = .005). CONCLUSION: ETO may be a valid treatment for patients with symptomatic irreducible basilar invagination that avoids some of the morbidity of transoral surgery and leads to long-term improvement in myelopathy.

With continued growth of the elderly population and improvements in cancer therapies, the number of patients with symptomatic spinal metastases is likely to increase, and this is a condition that commonly leads to debilitating neurological dysfunction and pain. Advancements in surgical techniques of resection and spinal reconstruction, improvements in clinical outcomes following various treatment modalities, generally increased overall survival in patients with metastatic spine disease, and a recent randomized trial by Patchell and colleagues demonstrating the superiority of a combined surgical/radiotherapeutic approach over a radiotherapy-only strategy have led many to suggest increasingly aggressive interventions for patients with such lesions. Optimal management of spinal metastases encompasses numerous medical specialties, including neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, medical and radiation oncology, radiology, and rehabilitation medicine. In this review, the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of spinal metastatic disease are discussed. Ultimately, the goal of treatment in patients with spinal metastases remains palliative, and clinical judgment is required to select the appropriate patients for surgical intervention.