Northfelt, Donald W.

Abstract Purpose: This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of cixutumumab, a human anti–insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R) monoclonal IgG1 antibody, and explored potential biomarkers in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Experimental Design: Patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer that progressed on antiestrogen therapy received (2:1 randomization) cixutumumab 10 mg/kg and the same antiestrogen (arm A) or cixutumumab alone (arm B) every 2 weeks (q2w). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Correlative analyses of IGF-1R, total insulin receptor (IR), and IR isoforms A (IR-A) and B (IR-B) expression in tumor tissue were explored. Results: Ninety-three patients were randomized (arm A, n = 62; arm B, n = 31). Median PFS was 2.0 and 3.1 months for arm A and arm B, respectively. Secondary efficacy measures were similar between the arms. Overall, cixutumumab was well tolerated. IGF-1R expression was not associated with clinical outcomes. Regardless of the treatment, lower IR-A, IR-B, and total IR mRNA expression in tumor tissue was significantly associated with longer PFS [IR-A: HR, 2.62 (P = 0.0062); IR-B: HR, 2.21 (P = 0.0202); and total IR: HR, 2.18 (P = 0.0230)] and OS [IR-A: HR, 2.94 (P = 0.0156); IR-B: HR, 2.69 (P = 0.0245); and total IR: HR, 2.72 (P = 0.0231)]. Conclusions: Cixutumumab (10 mg/kg) with or without antiestrogen q2w had an acceptable safety profile, but no significant clinical efficacy. Patients with low total IR, IR-A, and IR-B mRNA expression levels had significantly longer PFS and OS, independent of the treatment. The prognostic or predictive value of IR as a biomarker for IGF-1R–targeted therapies requires further validation. Clin Cancer Res; 22(2); 301–9. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Introduction: Overexpression and amplification of PD-L1 has been reported in a subset of cancers, including lymphoma, and gastric cancer. We have recently described amplification of chromosome 9p24 targeting PD-L1 in a subset of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), as well as 1-3% of colorectal carcinomas and glioblastomas. The clinical impact of these amplifications is not known. Methods: Tumor samples from 41 subjects with TNBC were evaluated for copy number aberrations. We performed DNA-based flow cytometry to sort nuclei from diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploid populations of tumor cells. The genomes of each sorted tumor cell population were then interrogated with oligonucleotide CGH arrays. Copy number intervals were identified and their genomic boundaries mapped using a step gram algorithm. Clinical data was available on 36 of 45 (80%) patients. Results: A recurring top ranked high level (log2ratio >1) amplicon that spanned 9p24.1 was detected in 12/41 (29.3%) of TNBCs. In contrast this amplicon was absent in ER+ (n = 8) and Her2+ (N = 15) breast tumors. The shortest region of overlap (SRO) spanned 777 kb and always included the PD-1 ligands PD-L1, PD-L2, and Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) loci, termed the “PDJ” amplicon. Additional genes in this amplicon include RCL1, MIR101-2, INSL6, INSL4, RLN2, RLN1, and C9orf46. The height of the PDJ amplicon included mean log2ratios of >4, consistent with genomic drivers such as Her2 and Myc. Patients with PD-L1 amplification (n = 8) were noted to have larger tumors (mean 3.9 vs. 1.9 cm, p = 0.04) and a higher incidence of lymph node metastases (75% vs. 26%, p = 0.01). Lymphocytic infiltration was only noted in 4 patients, all without PDJ amplification. Almost all patients received chemotherapy after definitive surgical therapy. The recurrence rate at 5 years was 62.5% in the PDJ amplified patients, and 25% in the unamplified patients (p = 0.02). Overall survival at 5 years was 37.5% in the PDJ amplified patients, compared with 78.2% in the unamplified patients (p = 0.02). Conclusion: We identified a focal amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 involving PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 in a significant proportion of TNBCs. The high level of amplification and inverse correlation with survival suggests that the PDJ amplicon is a genetic driver event in these cancers, and warrants confirmation in larger studies. Citation Format: Karen S. Anderson, Christine L. Klassen, Amylou C. Dueck, Ann E. McCullough, Donald W. Northfelt, Mariacarla Andreozzi, Barbara A. Pockaj, Michael T. Barrett. High-level amplification of chromosome 9p24 targeting PD-L1 and JAK2 correlates with worse DFS and OS in triple negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2861. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2861

AbstractPurpose: Immunotherapy as a treatment for cancer holds the promise of complete and durable tumor remission, yet the immunosuppressive environment created by many tumors, advanced patient age, and previous treatments with cytotoxic agents may limit the approach. The activity of motolimod (VTX-2337), a potent and selective Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) agonist, was therefore assessed in the context of advanced, late-stage cancer patients.Experimental Design: The repertoire of mediators induced from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to motolimod was characterized. Translational studies in cynomolgus monkeys elucidated the activity of motolimod on an intact immune system, identified biomarkers of TLR8 activation, and defined the relationship between the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) response. The PK/PD relationship for motolimod in cancer patients was assessed, compared with preclinical findings, and contrasted with activity in healthy volunteers.Results: In late-stage cancer patients, plasma levels of multiple biomarkers, including IL6, G-CSF, MCP-1, and MIP1-β, increased with increasing motolimod dose. The magnitude and breadth of the biomarker response closely aligned with the response seen in preclinical studies, demonstrating that advanced cancer patients remained responsive to TLR8 activation. In addition, the PK/PD response in cancer patients closely aligned with the activity of motolimod seen in healthy volunteers.Conclusions: Late-stage cancer patients are highly sensitive to TLR8 activation by motolimod. Tumor burden, advanced age, and prior treatment history with cytotoxic agents did not moderate or modify the response predicted by nonclinical studies and confirmed in healthy volunteers. Clin Cancer Res; 21(24); 5445–52. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Next generation sequencing (NGS) of patients has significantly changed our ways to study cancer genomics as it provides precise estimates of gene expression, fusion transcripts, expressed single nucleotide variants (eSNVs), splice variants and copy number variants. The Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy (BEAUTY) is an ongoing clinical study in which RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and whole exome sequencing (WES) are performed prior to, during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here we report the use of these sequencing technologies to investigate gene expression levels and mutational profiles in a triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient enrolled in BEAUTY whose disease did not respond to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and anthracycline/cycphosphamide. METHODS Computational approaches were used to integrate WES and RNAseq data obtained before therapy (V1T), after 12 weekly paclitaxel treatments (V2T) and after anthracycline-based regimen at surgical resection (V3T) to study a single patient with persistent TNBC disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Using RNA-Seq data, we identified an inter-chromosomal fusion transcript between chromosome 20 and 22 (GNAS-TTC38) that was highly expressed at V1T, V2T and V3T. We also identified intra-chromosomal fusion transcripts that were expressed at two time points, such as fusion transcript (KANSL1-ARL17A) on chromosome 17 for V1T and V2T and fusion transcript (RBM12B-LINC00535) on chromosome 8 for V2T and V3T time points. Several gene expression changes were also observed. Gene expression analysis of V1T, V2T and V3T tumors was performed. Differential temporal gene expression profiles of 9884 genes that were significant and varying at different time points were obtained for pathway analysis. Pathway analysis of 9884 genes identified up regulation and down regulation of several transcription factors with a fold change of 2x or more. When compared to blood, DNA tumor and RNA-Seq data, we identified 81 common somatic eSNVs that were expressed in both V1T and V2T time points and we are in the process of investigating V3T data. We found alterations of key transporter domains (CD225, Coatamer_beta_C, DUF2435, Dynamitin, EI24, GLTP, LMF1, Porin_3, V-ATPase_C) in our V1T and V2T SNV data. Similar to gene expression analysis, we are in the process of obtaining the list of mutations at various time points to identify driver and passenger mutation candidate genes for this specific TNBC patient. CONCLUSIONS Our initial time-series analysis of eSNV, fusion transcripts and gene expression data demonstrate that intensive analysis for individual patients is feasible. Further investigation of drug transporters and transcription regulators may help develop personalized treatment strategies for patients with disease resistant to current regimens. Citation Format: Krishna R. Kalari, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin J. Thompson, Douglas W. Mahoney, Poulami Barman, Jason P. Sinnwell, Hugues Sicotte, Peter Vedell, Steven N. Hart, Travis J. Dockter, Katie N. Jones, Amy L. Conners, Ann M. Moyer, Daniel W. Visscher, Jia Yu, Bowen Gao, Sarah A. McLaughlin, John A. Copland, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W. Northfelt, Richard J. Gray, Vera J. Suman, Jeanette E. Eckel Passow, Jean-Pierre A. Kocher, Eric D. Wieben, Gianrico Farrugia, Cloann G. Schultz, James N. Ingle, Richard Weinshilboum, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang, Judy C. Boughey. Analysis of sequencing data to identify potential drug targets for an individual newly diagnosed with basal breast cancer who failed to respond to current standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4185. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4185

Abstract Background Cancer genomic investigations have identified recurrent genomic aberrations critical for cancer initiation, progression, and metastases. However, these investigations are typically performed in isolation, and the effects of treatment on the clonal selection of tumor cells are mostly unknown. We hypothesized that molecular profiling of residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) would identify new drug targets/pathways in patients at high risk for disease recurrence. To better identify clonal populations of resistant breast cancer cells, we utilized DNA content-based flow sorting of nuclei to identify and isolate clonal populations for aCGH and next generation sequencing (NGS) both before and after NAC. Methods The Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY) (NCT 02022202) is a prospective study of patients with high-risk breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant 12 weekly paclitaxel (T) +/- trastuzumab followed by 4 cycles of anthracycline based chemotherapy. Tumor tissue from baseline, residual disease from surgery, distant metastases, and patient derived xenografts (PDX) are obtained for cell sorting by DNA ploidy, aCGH, RNA and exome sequencing. Results: 140 patients have been enrolled, 104 have completed surgery and 30 unique PDX have been established corresponding to 26 patients prior to chemotherapy and 4 from residual disease at surgery. Baseline exome and RNA sequencing is complete in 140. Currently, genomic analyses of flow sorted matched baseline, surgical, PDX, and distant disease samples are available in 6 patients. Substantial genomic variation was observed in the surgical sample compared to the primary tumor including gain of oncogenic drivers (EGFR) and loss of negative regulators (ATG5) (Table). The PDX recapitulated these events with excellent fidelity compared to the corresponding human tumor. In patients with TNBC, RNA seq obained from matched samples demonstrated changes in immune related pathways. Evaluation of drug targets/pathways identified in the resistant tumors are ongoing using the PDX and sequencing of the remaining matched baseline/surgical disease will be reported. Clonal changes occurring over time in patients with residual disease or disease recurrence after NACTumor SubtypeResidual Cancer BurdenDisease StatusClonal Aberration Changes (baseline and post NAC)TNBC (AR subtype)3Contralateral lymph node recurrence at 150 days2p25.2 - p25.1 amplicon lost at recurrence; 6p21.32 -p21.31 amplicon lost at recurrenceTNBC (BL 1)3Bone/liver/lymph node recurrence at 135 days5q11.2 amplicon gained at surgery; 12p13.33 - p13.2 amplicon gained at surgeryTNBC (BL 1)3Disease-free at day 1506q21 amplicon lost at sugeryTNBC (BL 2)0Brain recurrence at 390 daysChr 2 chromothripsis at surgeryLuminal B3Progression during chemotherapy7p12.1 - p11.2 amplicon gained at surgeryLuminal HER23Disease-free at day 3609q33.2 amplicon lost at surgery; 15q13.1 - q13.3 amplicon lost at surgery; 15q22.2 - q24.1 amplicon lost at surgery Conclusions: We observed substantial evolutionary changes in residual breast tumors remaining after NAC. Our findings suggest that a comprehensive assessment of the mutational landscape that has evolved during NAC can inform drug development in high risk breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Matthew P Goetz, Michael T Barrett, Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Sarah A McLaughlin, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Ann M Moyer, Donald W Northfelt, Richard J Gray, Jason Sinnwell, Douglas Mahoney, Poulami Barman, Peter Vedell, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin Thompson, Travis Dockter, Katie Jones, Sara J Felten, Amy Conners, Jeanette Eckel-Passow, Hughes Sicotte, Steven N Hart, Jia Yu, Daniel W Visscher, Eric D Wieben, Cloann Schultz, Minetta C Liu, James N Ingle, Liewei Wang, Richard W Weinshilboum, Judy C Boughey. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the clonal composition of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-3.

Abstract Background: Further stratification of the 70-gene MammaPrintTM signature into ‘high’ and ‘ultra-high’ risk groups may help predict chemo-sensitivity. In I-SPY 2, patients were classified as MammaPrint High1 (MP1) or MammaPrint (ultra) High2 (MP2), with MP2 defined as MP_score <-0.154. MP1/MP2 classification was added to HR and HER2 to define the cancer subtypes used in the I-SPY 2 adaptive randomization engine. Neratinib (N), one of the experimental agents evaluated in I-SPY 2, graduated in the HR-HER2+ signature. All patients received at least standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide; T->AC). HER2- patients were randomized to receive N+T- >AC vs. T->AC. For HER2+ patients, neratinib was administered in place of trastuzumab (N+T->AC vs. H+T->AC). Here, we assess the performance of MP1/MP2 class as a specific biomarker of neratinib response. Methods: 115 patients in the neratinib arm and 76 concurrently randomized controls had Agilent 44K microarrays and pCR data available for analysis. We assess association between MP1/MP2 and response in the neratinib and control arms alone using Fisher’s exact test, and relative performance between arms (biomarker x treatment interaction, likelihood ratio p < 0.05) using a logistic model. This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as a covariate, and in receptor subsets. Our study is exploratory with no claims for generalizability of the data. Statistical calculations are descriptive (e.g. p-values are measures of distance with no inferential content). Our analyses do not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers in the trial but outside this study. Results: There are 133 MP1 patients (neratinib: 74, Control: 59) and 58 MP2 patients (neratinib: 41, Control: 17), 84% (49) of which are Her2-. The distribution of pCR rates among MP1/MP2 dichotomized groups are summarized in Table 1. Neratinib (n=115)Control (n=76)MP1 (n=74)MP2 (n=41)MP1 (n=59)MP2 (n=17)HER2- (n=105)0 / 1715 / 337 / 395 / 16HER2+ (n=86)22 / 574 / 85 / 200 / 1 MP2, one of the 10 eligible signatures, did not meet the graduation threshold; and MP1/MP2 did not show a significant biomarker x treatment interaction (OR in neratinib relative to control arm = 1.25). The MP1/MP2 x treatment interaction remains non-significant after adjustment for HR and HER2 status (p=0.54). In HER2- patients receiving neratinib, 45% (15/33) of MP2 patients achieved a pCR, compared to 0% (0/17) of MP1 patients. In the HER2- controls, there is a 31% pCR rate in MP2 (5/16) vs. 18% in MP1 (7/39) patients (OR=2.14). This difference in performance between treatment arms appears significant (p=0.041). 90% of HER2+ patients are MP1, thus MP1/MP2 status x treatment interaction within the HER2+ subtype cannot be evaluated. Conclusion: Within the I-SPY 2 population as a whole, MP1/MP2 stratification does not appear to be a specific biomarker of response to neratinib relative to the control arm. The number of HER2- patients is small and precludes any definitive conclusion, but these data motivate further investigation of the biological mechanisms distinguishing MP1 from MP2 to better understand chemotherapy and/or neratanib responsiveness. Citation Format: Christina Yau, Denise M Wolf, Ashish Sanil, Jo Chien, Anne Wallace, Judy Boughey, Doug Yee, Debu Tripathy, Angela DeMichele, Rita Nanda, Steven Chiu, Claudine Isaacs, Kathy Albain, Hank Kaplan, Stacey Moulder, Rebecca Viscusi, Donald Northfelt, Kirsten Edmiston, Anthony Elias, Toncred Styblo, Barbara Haley, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Susan Flynn, Gillian L Hirst, Meredith Buxton, Nola Hylton, Melissa Paoloni, W Fraser Symmans, Laura Esserman, Don Berry, Minetta C Liu, John W Park, Laura van 't Veer. MammaPrint High1/High2 risk class as a biomarker of response to neratinib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-29.

Abstract Background: Further stratification of the 70-gene MammaPrintTM signature into ‘high’ and ‘ultra-high’ risk groups may help predict chemo-sensitivity. In I-SPY 2, patients were classified as MammaPrint High1 (MP1) or MammaPrint (ultra) High2 (MP2), with MP2 defined as MP_score <-0.154. MP1/MP2 classification was added to HR and Her2 to define the cancer subtypes used in the I-SPY 2 adaptive randomization engine. HER2- patients were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy or the oral PARP inhibitor veliparib in combination with carboplatin (V/C) and chemotherapy. V/C graduated in the triple-negative (TN) signature, where MP2 was not an eligible signature for graduation. Here, we assess the performance of MP1/MP2 class as a specific biomarker of response to V/C. Methods:115 HER2- patients (V/C: 71 and concurrent controls: 44) were considered in this analysis. We assess association between MP1/MP2 and response in the V/C and control arms alone using Fisher’s exact test, and relative performance between arms (biomarker x treatment interaction, likelihood ratio p < 0.05) using a logistic model. This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as a covariate. To assess MP1/MP2 in the context of the graduating signature, we added the MP2 patients to the graduating TN subset and evaluated the treatment effect in this ‘biomarker-positive’ group. Our study is exploratory with no claims for generalizability of the data. Statistical calculations are descriptive (e.g. p-values are measures of distance with no inferential content). This analysis does not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers in the trial but outside this study. Results: In the V/C arm vs. concurrent controls, there were 66 MP1 (V/C: 32, Control: 34) and 49 MP2 patients (V/C: 39, Control: 10), 78% of which are TN. The distribution of pCR rates among MP1/MP2 dichotomized groups are summarized in Table 1. V/C (n=71)Control (n=44)MP1 (n=32)MP2 (n=39)MP1 (n=34)MP2 (n=10)TN (n=59)3 / 819 / 303 / 132 / 8HR+HER2- (n=56)1 / 244 / 94 / 210 / 2 The OR between MP1/MP2 risk groups for predicting pCR is 9.71 in the V/C arm (p=6.63E-05), in comparison to an OR of 0.97 in the control arm (p=1). There is a significant biomarker x treatment interaction (p=0.023), which remains upon adjusting for HR status (p= 0.028). Based on the I-SPY 2 Bayesian model, a Phase III trial with 300 MP2 patients has a 95% predictive probability of success. When the MP2 patients are added to the graduating TN subset, the OR associated with V/C is 4.36, which is comparable to that of the TN signature (OR: 4.29), while increasing the prevalence of biomarker-positive patients by ∼10%. Conclusion: In our exploratory analysis, MP2 suggests higher sensitivity to V/C combination therapy relative to controls. This observation has prompted an investigation into the biological mechanisms distinguishing the MP1/MP2 subtype that may account for this specificity. Citation Format: Denise M Wolf, Christina Yau, Ashish Sanil, Jo Chien, Anne Wallace, Angela DeMichele, Hank Kaplan, Doug Yee, Claudine Isaacs, Kathy Albain, Rebecca Viscuzi, Judy Boughey, Stacey Moulder, Steven Chui, Qamar Khan, Toncred Styblo, Kirsten Edmiston, Donald Northfelt, Anthony Elias, Barbara Haley, Debu Tripathy, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Susan Flynn, Gillian Hirst, Meredith Buxton, Nola Hylton, Melissa Paoloni, Fraser Symmans, Laura Esserman, Don Berry, Hope Rugo, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Laura van 't Veer. MammaPrint High1/High2 risk class as a biomarker of response to veliparib/carboplatin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-25.

Abstract Background: The development of distant metastases is the strongest prognostic factor associated with cancer mortality. Customization of treatment based on molecular profiling of a patient’s primary tumor has yielded promising results and has opened a new paradigm for treating patients with advanced disease. Nevertheless profiling the primary tumor may not reflect the actionable molecular drivers of the metastatic lesions. In the last few years a large number of genomic and proteomic studies have demonstrated that at the molecular level metastatic lesions significantly differ from matched primary tumors. The impact of metastasis site organ microenvironments on breast cancer primary tumors has been only partially explored. Since most targeted therapies work by modulating aberrantly-activated protein kinase signaling, the aim of this study was to utilize reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) to explore whether metastatic lesions derived from different patients, but invading the same host target organ showed similarities in their signaling architecture and presented with organ-specific targetable signatures. Methods: Snap frozen material collected from 14 metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in a prospective phase II trial ("Side Out II") were used for this analysis. Sites of metastasis were: liver (n=7), skin/chest wall (n=4), and lung (n=3). All samples were subjected to Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) and RPPA to measure the activation/phosphorylation levels of 12 FDA approved drug targets and linked substrates. Results: Among the 7 patients with liver metastases, p70S6K, c-Abl, ERK 1/2 were highly phosphorylated in 5 cases (71.4%), ErbB2/HER2 in 4 cases (57.1%), and AKT in 3 cases (42.8%). On the contrary, of the 4 patients with skin/chest wall lesions 3 showed high activation of ErbB2/HER2, ErbB3/HER3, and ERK 1/2 (75.0%) and 2 of EGFR (50.0%). Of note, none of the skin/chest wall lesions showed activation of AKT and only 1 case presented with activated p70S6K (25.0%). Lung metastasis showed an overall low activation of all 12 analytes measured. Discussion: Although this data is based on a relatively small number of samples and needs further validation, our initial analysis revealed potentially important trends that could have an impact in the prioritization and selection of targeted agents for metastatic breast cancer trials. We found that the distribution of the 12 FDA approved drug targets and downstream substrates varies between different metastatic sites. Thus, the emergent hypothesis from this work is that breast cancer patients with liver metastases may be more susceptible to AKT-mTOR directed targeted therapeutics and patients with skin/chest wall metastasis may benefit from therapies that target EGFR and/or downstream ERK signaling. Citation Format: Mariaelena Pierobon, Stephen P Anthony, K Alex Reeder, Nicholas J Robert, Donald W Northfelt, Mohammad Jahanzeb, Linda Vocila, Julia D Wulfkuhle, Bryant Dunetz, Lance A Liotta, Emanuel F Petricoin. Pathway activation mapping of metastatic breast cancer identifies potential organ-specific signatures: Implications for patient stratification to targeted treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-23.

Abstract Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter, phase II neoadjuvant trial in women with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer using adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate novel agents added to standard chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). Goal is to identify regimens that meet a high Bayesian predictive probability of statistical significance in a neoadjuvant 300-patient phase III trial defined by hormone-receptor (HR), HER2 status, and MammaPrint (MP). Experimental regimens may “graduate” in 1 of 10 signatures, with a maximum of 120 patients. We report efficacy results for neratinib (N). Methods: Tumors ≥2.5cm by clinical exam & ≥2cm by imaging are eligible for screening. MP low risk/HR+/HER2- tumors are ineligible for randomization. Patients receive chemotherapy (paclitaxel qwk x 12, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide q2-3 wk x 4, T->AC). HER2- pts were randomized to N+T->AC vs. T->AC and HER2+ pts to N+T->AC vs. trastuzumab+T->AC. Analysis is intent-to-treat with pts who switch to non-protocol therapy regarded as non-pCRs. We provide estimated pCR rates (95% Bayesian probability intervals), probabilities of superiority of neratinib over control, and Bayesian predictive probabilities of success in an equally randomized phase III trial. Results: Neratinib met the predictive probability criterion in HR-/HER2+, “graduated”, and accrual ceased [115 N patients (65 HER2+), 78 concurrently randomized controls (22 HER2+)]. The table shows results for all 10 signatures. Two patients (1 N and 1 control) withdrew consent and are not included. Conclusion: I-SPY 2's standing trial mechanism efficiently evaluates agents in biomarker-defined patient subsets. In a modest number of patients, adaptive randomization successfully identified a biomarker signature (HR-/HER2+) for neratinib's further development. All HER2+ and MP+ tumors may also benefit from this regimen, consistent with preclinical data. Evaluation in I-SPY 3, a phase III registration trial, is planned. SignatureEstimated pCR Rate (95% probability interval)Probability NeratinibIs Superior to ControlPredictive Probability of Success in Phase IIINeratinibControlALL32% (28-36%)23% (19%-28%)92%44%HR+23% (18%-28%)17% (11%-22%)81%40%HR-43% (37%-49%)31% (24%-38%)89%53%HER2+39% (33%-45%)23% (15%-30%)95%73%HER2-26% (21%-32%)24% (18%-29%)63%20%MP+*45% (38%-53%)29% (20%-39%)91%66%HR-/HER2-36% (29%-43%)30% (23%-38%)72%34%HR-/HER2+55% (46%-64%)32% (22%-43%)94%78%HR+/HER2+31% (24%-37%)17% (10%-24%)91%65%HR+/HER2-14% (8%-19%)16% (10%-21%)39%12%* MammaPrint 44K Array Low/High score was adjusted to MammaPrint High1 (MP-) or High2 (MP+), using a pre-defined median cut-point of I-SPY 1 participants, who fit the eligibility criteria of I-SPY 2. Citation Format: John W. Park, Minetta C. Liu, Douglas Yee, Angela DeMichele, Laura van 't Veer, Nola Hylton, Fraser Symmans, Meredith B. Buxton, A. Jo Chien, Amy Wallace, Michelle Melisko, Richard Schwab, Judy Boughey, Debashish Tripathy, Hank Kaplan, Rita Nanda, Stephen Chui, Kathy S. Albain, Stacy Moulder, Anthony Elias, Julie E. Lang, Kirsten Edminston, Donald Northfelt, David Euhus, Qamar Khan, Julia Lyandres, Sarah E. Davis, Christina Yau, Ashish Sanil, Laura J. Esserman, Donald A. Berry. Neratinib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer: Efficacy results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr CT227. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-CT227

Abstract Immunotherapy has proven to be a successful treatment approach for some cancer patients. One promising paradigm in immunotherapy is targeting pathogen-associated molecule pattern receptors (PAMPS) such as the toll-like receptors (TLRs) to activate the innate immune system and enhance the development of tumor-directed adaptive immune responses. However, an ongoing concern in the application of immunotherapeutics is the potential for the immune response in cancer patients to be less robust than in healthy individuals, due to the underlying advanced neoplastic disease or due to previous regimens of cytotoxic drugs. To address this concern in relation to the response to TLR8 stimulation, we compared the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship defined in a phase 1 clinical trial of the selective small molecule TLR8 agonist VTX-2337 in oncology patients to the response in healthy volunteers. A phase 1 dose-escalation clinical trial (A101) in subjects with advanced solid tumors (n=33) demonstrated that plasma levels of multiple biomarkers of immune activation, including G-CSF, MCP-1, MIP1-β and TNFα, increased in a dose-dependent manner and correlated with increasing plasma levels of VTX-2337. The PK/PD relationship defined in the initial clinical trial was closely aligned with predictions from both in vitro assays and preclinical studies conducted in cynomolgus monkeys. A subsequent phase 1 trial (A105) was conducted as a single-center, open-label, two-period, randomized, crossover, phase 1 study in normal volunteers (n=10). The objective of this study was to compare the PK/PD profiles and local tolerance of two formulations of VTX-2337. In this study, the two preparations of VTX-2337 demonstrated comparable PK profiles and PD responses. At comparable dose levels, the PK profile and overall exposure (AUC) to VTX-2337 was similar for oncology patients and healthy volunteers. VTX-2337 induced the same repertoire of circulating cytokines and chemokines, indicative of TLR8 activation, in both populations. The magnitude of the mediator response in oncology patients was also highly comparable to the response in healthy volunteers that received a similar dose. This comparison demonstrates that the immune system of cancer patients with advanced disease remains highly responsive to TLR8 activation by VTX-2337. In summary, advanced neoplastic disease or a prior treatment history with cytotoxic agents that can negatively impact immune cell function did not appear to moderate the response to VTX-2337 based on the PK/PD relationship using predictive biomarkers. Citation Format: Greg Dietsch, Donald Northfelt, Ramesh Ramanathan, Peter Cohen, Kristi Manjarrez, Mona Newkirk, James Kyle Bryan, Robert Hershberg. Immune modulation by the TLR8 agonist VTX-2337; a comparison of the pharmacodynamic response in cancer patients and healthy volunteers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2540. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2540