Fullwood, Dottington

Abstract The day I received news of my prostate cancer diagnosis time paused for a minute. My heart was heavy, and my mind racing and my soul appeared to leave my body as the physician kept talking. I’m looking at this doctor and having internal conversations with myself about dying. My attention switched from listening to reflecting to Fred Sanford holding his heart and saying “Elizabeth, I am coming to join you”, but my wife was right next to me holding my hand. The embrace of our interlocked fingers without saying a word to one another assured both of us this too shall pass. My knowing I had support encouraged me to begin educating myself about the science of survivorship. The presence of prostate cancer resources was absent in my community. I began reading information online to grasp a better understanding of this disease. The information gained encouraged me to request a second opinion from another oncologist. I was amaze by the difference in opinion about treatment options. I felt the urge to identify and specifically speak with other Black men going through this process. Everywhere I looked for support groups felt like removing my hands from pocket and watching lent flee from my fingers. What did I do? I registered my own prostate cancer support group with the state of Florida. The group grew from a few to 20 Black men across major metropolitan cities in Florida. These group meetings extended to men leading groups in their communities. I joined the Prostate Health Education Network as the Regional Ambassador to promote prostate awareness and clinical trials. My advocacy presence in the state of Florida led to Dr. Odedina and I crossing paths to champion elimination of prostate cancer health disparities for Black men. I am a Citizen Scientist in the lab of Dr. Odedina working on the inclusive cancer care and research equity for Black men consortium. I have co-authored publications, co-presented at conferences, served on research projects, and contributed to grant funding totaling over $25 million as a citizen scientist. Currently working on a Department of Defense funded grant focusing on the point of prostate cancer diagnosis. The project has completed several events to dispel myths about participation in clinical research while discussions about early detection is vital to improve survivorship. The reward from this work is knowing I am helping create spaces for Black men never to travel this journey alone. I believe men appreciate having a patient supporter but require fellowship with men who have traveled the road to gain navigational insights on how to maneuver across this terrain. Citation Format: AJ Merriweather, Dottington Fullwood, Che Ngufor, Jennifer Crook, Emelina Asto-Flores, Parisa Fathi, Roxana Dronca, Shannon Pressey, Folakemi Odedina. Early detection saves lives: I survived, and you can too— Any day above ground is a good day [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 727.

Abstract Background: Black men continue to be disproportionately affected by prostate cancer incidence and mortality as compared to their White counterparts, despite worldwide declining prostate cancer diagnosis rates. This complex phenomenon remains poorly understood, especially at the point of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Newly diagnosed Black men report initial feelings ranging from being “shocked,” to “receiving a death sentence,” and both an ineptness of asking questions and a reliance on physicians for treatment options due to lack of knowledge. The psychological distress from prostate cancer uncertainties affects health management and treatment decisions, though it is unclear to what extent the role of social determinants of health factor in making informed healthcare decisions. Aim: In this scoping review, we examined the influence of the social determinants of health at point of prostate cancer diagnosis among Black men seeking to make an informed decision about their treatment plans. Methods: We followed the methodological framework: the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic databases, Emabase, Pubmed, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for quantitative and qualitative primary studies from the period 2005 until March 2022. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts, and full texts, against predefined criteria: empirical research, post 2000, in English-language peer-reviewed journals; participants included Black prostate cancer survivors and research explored social determinants of health at point of prostate cancer diagnosis. Studies were quality assessed for data charting. Results: The search yielded 283 studies, with 45 included studies for synthesis. Traditional social determinants of health were frequent. However, identification of themes such as social support, masculinity and stigma, fear of abandonment by medical staff, and cost of diagnostic procedures were prominent determinants. Notably, sub-themes emerged that included coping factors such as emotional distress, perceptions of normalcy, and poor prostate cancer knowledge. Conclusion: Understanding the social determinants of health impact on Black men, especially at point of prostate cancer diagnosis will allow survivors, physicians, and researchers to work at solving these health disparities. Citation Format: Dottington Fullwood, AJ Merriweather, Che Ngufor, Deidre Pereira, KC Balaji, Roxana Dronca, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Jennifer Crook, Parisa Fathi, Emelina Asto-Flores, Shannon Pressey, Folakemi Odedina. iCCaRe: Social determinants of health navigation, psycho-oncology, and emotional support for Black prostate cancer survivors: Review of current practices. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4371.

Abstract Introduction: Pain is one of the complications of cancer or cancer treatment and affects the quality of life of cancer patients. Unfortunately, factors that alleviate cancer pain have been understudied despite pain being one of the most common symptoms of cancer. The purpose of this secondary comparative analysis study was to identify factors that alleviate cancer pain and their relationship to specific cancer types. Methods: The study comprised 579 participants from inpatient and outpatient cancer care centers in Seattle, WA. The participants used paper or a tablet computer to complete the McGill Pain Questionnaire, which included an open-ended question: “What kinds of things relieve your pain?” Text responses were coded into six outcome categories: 1) Activity level, 2) Cognitive, 3) Environmental, 4) Medical, 5) Physical, and 6) Sedentary behavior. Race and ethnicity categories were collapsed into Black/Other and White based on frequency distribution. We conducted a multivariable regression analysis adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics using the number of activities/factors in each of the six outcome categories. Results: Patients were mostly White (86%), female (27%) and aged 58.7± 12.3 years on average. Nearly 13% of the sample were Black/Other patients. The current pain intensity was more intense for Black/Other patients than White patients (p <0.001). Activity (ρ=0.02), cognition (ρ<0.001), and medication (ρ<0.001) were more frequently used as pain-alleviating factors among lung cancer patients compared to head and neck cancer patients. Males (ρ=0.02) and lung cancer patients (ρ=0.02) engaged in significantly less physical activity alleviating factors than females and head and neck cancer patients. Differences between the race groups were not statistically significant for mean alleviating factors. Conclusion: Although pain intensity is more intense for minority patients than their White counterparts, their behaviors to alleviate their pain do not differ in this sample. Differences in pain alleviating factors by gender and type of cancer warrant additional research to understand the complexity of patients’ self-care behaviors with consideration of demographic and cancer variables as well as analgesics. Citation Format: Dottington Fullwood, Sydney Means, Diana J. Wilkie, Folakemi T. Odedina. Pain alleviating factors reported by cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B009.