Ismayl, Mahmoud

Introduction: Data on clinical outcomes of early transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (<48 hours) compared to late (≥48 hours) TAVR in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) and aortic stenosis (AS) remains limited. We aim to evaluate the differences between early vs. late TAVR regarding major clinical outcomes using a real-world US database. Hypothesis: There is no differences in the clinical outcomes based on the timing of TAVR procedural intervention in patients with acute heart failure. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample database by utilizing ICD-10 codes to identify all hospitalizations with a diagnosis of AHF and TAVR (2015-2020). The associations between the time of TAVR and outcomes were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was utilized to determine the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of major clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 25,285 weighted hospitalizations of AHF were identified, of which 6,855 patients (27.1%) underwent early TAVR and 18,430 (72.9%) had late TAVR. Compared with early TAVR, Late TAVR was associated with less need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (aOR 0.97 [0.96-0.98], p<0.01) and acute hypoxic respiratory failure (aOR 0.99 [0.98-0.99], p<0.01), but higher odds of developing septic shock (aOR 2.06 [1.52-2.80], p <0.01). However, there was no significant difference between both procedures regarding in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.01 [1.00-1.02], p=0.14), cardiac arrest (aOR 0.99 [0.98-1.00], p=0.21), and stroke (aOR 1.01 [1.00-1.02], p=0.18). Conclusions: Most patients with AHF and AS undergo TAVR after 48 hours of their presentation. After PSM, there was no difference in inpatient mortality, cardiac arrest, and stroke between both procedures. Late TAVR was associated with lower odds for MCS and acute hypoxic respiratory failure. The optimal timing of TAVR in patients with AHF and AS needs further study.

Introduction: Valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (ViV-TMVR) and redo surgical mitral valve replacement (redo-SMVR) are two treatment strategies for patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve dysfunction. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ViV-TMVR versus redo-SMVR. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for studies comparing outcomes of ViV-TMVR versus redo-SMVR in degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves. We used a random effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outcomes included in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year mortality, stroke, bleeding and vascular complications, acute kidney injury (AKI), arrhythmias, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: Six observational studies with a total of 1,339 subjects were included. Median follow-up was 2 years. Compared to redo-SMVR, ViV-TMVR was associated with significantly lower in-hospital (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.25-0.70; p=0.001) and 30-day mortality (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.24-0.98; p=0.04) but similar 1-year (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.64-1.47; p=0.89) and 2-year mortality (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.71-1.81; p=0.59). Stroke, bleeding, AKI, and arrhythmias were less frequent and hospital LOS was shorter with ViV-TMVR, however vascular complications were similar between both strategies. Conclusion: In patients with degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves, ViV-TMVR is associated with better outcomes compared to redo-SMVR including lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality, lower complication rates, and shorter hospital LOS. Given these findings and the ongoing advances in transcatheter therapeutics, ViV-TMVR may be preferred over redo-SMVR, particularly in individuals at intermediate-to-high surgical risk.

Background Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes exist following many cardiac procedures. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has grown as an alternative to mitral valve surgery for patients at high surgical risk. The outcomes of TMVR by race and ethnicity are unknown. We aimed to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in the outcomes of TMVR. Methods and Results We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 to identify hospitalizations for TMVR. Racial and ethnic disparities in TMVR outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. Between 2016 and 2020, 5005 hospitalizations for TMVR were identified, composed of 3840 (76.7%) White race, 505 (10.1%) Black race, 315 (6.3%) Hispanic ethnicity, and 345 (6.9%) from other races (Asian, Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, Other). Compared with other racial and ethnic groups, Black patients were significantly younger and more likely to be women (both P <0.01). There were no significant differences between White, Black, and Hispanic patients in in‐hospital mortality (5.2% versus 5.0% versus <3.5%; P =0.89) and procedural complications, including heart block ( P =0.91), permanent pacemaker ( P =0.49), prosthetic valve dysfunction ( P =0.45), stroke ( P =0.37), acute kidney injury ( P =0.32), major bleeding ( P =0.23), and blood transfusion ( P =0.92), even after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Adjusted vascular complications were higher in Black compared with White patients ( P =0.03). Trend analysis revealed a significant increase in TMVR in all racial and ethnic groups from 2016 to 2020 ( P trend <0.05). Conclusions Between 2016 and 2020, Black and Hispanic patients undergoing TMVR had similar in‐hospital outcomes compared with White patients, except for higher vascular complications in Black patients. Further comparative studies of TMVR in clinically similar White patients and other racial and ethnic groups are warranted to confirm our findings.

Background Rotational and orbital coronary atherectomy (CA) are commonly utilized to treat complex calcified coronary lesions. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate sex differences in procedural complications and clinical outcomes after CA. Methods PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were searched for all studies comparing sex differences in procedural and clinical outcomes following CA. The outcomes of interest were procedural complications (coronary dissection, stroke, major bleeding, coronary perforation, cardiac tamponade, and slow or no flow in target vessel) and the clinical outcomes (including early mortality, mid-term all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model. Results Six observational studies with 3517 patients (2420 men and 1035 women) were included in this meta-analysis. While there was no significant difference in the early mortality (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.37–3.53; P = 0.83) between men and women, at a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in women (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11–1.49; P = 0.0009). Women had an increased risk of procedure-related stroke (RR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.06–14.90; P = 0.04), coronary dissection (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.23–3.58; P = 0.006), and bleeding (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.30–3.93; P = 0.004), whereas the rates of coronary perforation, cardiac tamponade, and the risk of slow or no flow in the revascularized artery were similar in both. Conclusion In our analysis, women undergoing CA are at increased risk of mid-term mortality and procedure-related complications including stroke, coronary dissection, and major bleeding.