Joyner, Michael J.

OBJECTIVE— We determined whether reduced insulin sensitivity, mitochondrial dysfunction, and other age-related dysfunctions are inevitable consequences of aging or secondary to physical inactivity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— Insulin sensitivity was measured by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and ATP production in mitochondria isolated from vastus lateralis biopsies of 42 healthy sedentary and endurance-trained young (18–30 years old) and older (59–76 years old) subjects. Expression of proteins involved in fuel metabolism was measured by mass spectrometry. Citrate synthase activity, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) abundance, and expression of nuclear-encoded transcription factors for mitochondrial biogenesis were measured. SIRT3, a mitochondrial sirtuin linked to lifespan-enhancing effects of caloric restriction, was measured by immunoblot. RESULTS— Insulin-induced glucose disposal and suppression of endogenous glucose production were higher in the trained young and older subjects, but no age effect was noted. Age-related decline in mitochondrial oxidative capacity was absent in endurance-trained individuals. Although endurance-trained individuals exhibited higher expression of mitochondrial proteins, mtDNA, and mitochondrial transcription factors, there were persisting effects of age. SIRT3 expression was lower with age in sedentary but equally elevated regardless of age in endurance-trained individuals. CONCLUSIONS— The results demonstrate that reduced insulin sensitivity is likely related to changes in adiposity and to physical inactivity rather than being an inevitable consequence of aging. The results also show that regular endurance exercise partly normalizes age-related mitochondrial dysfunction, although there are persisting effects of age on mtDNA abundance and expression of nuclear transcription factors and mitochondrial protein. Furthermore, exercise may promote longevity through pathways common to effects of caloric restriction.

Phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PNMT) catalyzes the synthesis of epinephrine from norepinephrine. We previously identified and functionally characterized common sequence variation in the PNMT gene. In the present study, we set out to determine whether common PNMT genetic polymorphisms might be associated with individual variation in circulating epinephrine levels during exercise in 74 Caucasian American subjects. Circulating epinephrine levels were measured in each subject at baseline and during two different levels of exercise, ∼40% and ∼75% of peak workload. The PNMT gene was resequenced with DNA from each study subject. Eight novel PNMT polymorphisms were identified, including a C319T (Arg107Cys) nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and I1G(280)A, a SNP located in the first intron of the gene. The I1G(280)A SNP was significantly associated with decreased exercise-induced circulating epinephrine levels and with a decreased epinephrine-to-norepinephrine ratio. The Cys107 recombinant allozyme displayed significantly lower levels of both PNMT activity and immunoreactive protein than the wild-type allozyme after transfection into COS-1 cells, but it did not appear to be associated with level of epinephrine in these subjects. Electrophoretic mobility shift and reporter gene assays performed with the I1G(280)A SNP indicated that this polymorphism could bind nuclear proteins and might modulate gene transcription. Our studies suggest that functionally significant variant sequence in the human PNMT gene might contribute to individual variation in levels of circulating epinephrine during exercise.

Despite being the subject of investigation for well over 100 years, the nature of exercising muscle blood flow control remains, in many respects, poorly understood. In this review we focus on the potential role of nitric oxide in vasodilation of muscle resistance vessels during a bout of exercise. Its contribution is explored in the context of whether it contributes to steady-state exercise hyperemia, the dynamic adjustment of muscle blood flow to exercise, or the modulation of sympathetic vasoconstriction in exercising muscle. It appears that the obligatory role of nitric oxide in all three of these categories is modest at best. The elucidation of the integrated nature of exercise hyperemia control in terms of synergy and redundancy of mechanism interaction remains in its infancy, and much more remains to be learned about the role of nitric oxide in this type of integrated control.

Patients with hypertension have a blunted sensitivity of baroreflex control of heart period. In these patients, baroreflex sensitivity is positively related to heart rate variability and inversely related to blood pressure variability. We hypothesized that this relationship would also be evident in healthy normotensive subjects and that individuals with higher baroreflex sensitivity would have lower ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate were recorded in 50 healthy, normotensive, nonobese individuals (31 women and 19 men). The baroreflex was assessed using sequential bolus administration of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine, and baroreflex sensitivity was calculated as the slope of the relation between systolic blood pressure and R-R interval during the resulting blood pressure transients. Baroreflex sensitivity was inversely correlated to 24-hour average mean arterial pressure ( R =0.49; P <0.001) and positively related to daytime heart rate variability ( R =0.33; P =0.02). In contrast, no relationship was found between baroreflex sensitivity and 24-hour heart rate or blood pressure variabilities. We conclude that the relationship between baroreflex sensitivity and daytime heart rate variability was similar to that reported previously in hypertensive subjects. Furthermore, the inverse relation between baroreflex sensitivity and mean arterial pressure supports the idea that the baroreflex may exert longer-term effects on blood pressure than thought previously.

OBJECTIVE—Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor agonist and glipizide, an insulin secretagogue, are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes. Our study was designed to examine the effects of pioglitazone versus glipizide on body water, body composition, and hemodynamic parameters in the presence of comparable glycemic control between groups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We studied 19 diabetic subjects randomly assigned to either 45 mg pioglitazone (n = 8) or 10 mg (median dose) glipizide (n = 11) for 12 weeks. Body water content was measured with deuterated water, body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography, and cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance by acetylene rebreathing technique both before and after therapy. RESULTS—Pioglitazone increased (P &lt; 0.001 from baseline) total body water (+2.4 ± 0.5 l) accounting for 75% of the total weight gain (+3.1 ± 2.0 kg) but did not alter vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations. Total abdominal (−32.2 ± 19 cm2) and visceral fat area (−16.1 ± 8 cm2) tended to decrease with pioglitazone but increased (P &lt; 0.02 for differences between groups) with glipizide (+38.4 ± 17 cm2 abdominal; +19.1 ± 9 cm2 visceral). Pioglitazone tended to reduce (P = 0.05) diastolic (−8.4 ± 4 mmHg) and mean (−9.5 ± 5 mmHg; P = 0.08) blood pressure and reduced (P &lt; 0.001) systemic vascular resistance (2,785 ± 336 vs. 2,227 ± 136 dynes/s per m2), while there were no differences in these parameters with glipizide. Neither therapy altered circulating catecholamine concentrations. CONCLUSIONS—When pioglitazone and glipizide are given in doses sufficient to achieve equivalent glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone increases total body water, thereby accounting for the majority of weight gain, tended to decrease visceral and abdominal fat content and blood pressure, and reduces systemic vascular resistance.

Upper body obesity is associated with insulin resistance, hypertension, and endothelial dysfunction. We examined forearm vascular function in response to vasodilator (endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent) and vasoconstrictor stimuli in 8 normotensive, upper body/viscerally obese men with a positive family history of hypertension and 8 age-matched nonobese men. We also measured body composition and insulin regulation of free fatty acid (FFA) and glucose metabolism. Forearm blood flow was measured before and during brachial artery infusions of acetylcholine (Ach), sodium nitroprusside (NTP), and angiotensin II (±nitric oxide synthase [NO]) synthase blockade with N G -monomethyl l -arginine [ l -NMMA]). On a separate day, baseline and insulin-regulated glucose ([3- 3 H]glucose) and FFA ([9,10- 3 H]palmitate) turnover were measured. The vasoconstrictor response to angiotensin II was greater ( P <0.05) in obese men than in nonobese men, whereas endothelium-dependent vasodilation was similar. The slope of the angiotensin II dose-response curve correlated significantly with the basal plasma palmitate concentration. Basal and insulin-mediated glucose disposal was significantly reduced and FFA turnover significantly increased in viscerally obese men. No differences in endothelium-independent vasodilation or relationships between vascular responsivity and palmitate and glucose kinetics or body composition were found. Angiotensin II–stimulated forearm vasoconstriction is increased in viscerally obese normotensive men.

A polymorphism in the gene encoding the β2-adrenergic receptor (arginine or glycine at amino acid position 16) is associated with altered vasodilator responses to β2-agonists, which may modulate the pressor response to endogenous catecholamines during stress. To test the hypothesis that the Arg16/Gly polymorphism is associated with differences in acute pressor responses to sympathoexcitation, we measured mean arterial pressure (MAP, Finapres) and heart rate (HR, ECG) during mental stress (MS), cold pressor test (CPT), and handgrip (HG) to fatigue in 31 healthy, nonobese, normotensive adults (mean age ± SE: 31 ± 1; 16 females). Subjects were homozygous for Gly16 ( n = 16) or Arg16 ( n = 15). Both groups had similar baseline MAP (Arg16, 86 ± 3 mmHg; Gly16, 89 ± 2 mmHg; P = 0.4) and HR (Arg16, 68 ± 2 beats/min; Gly16, 65 ± 3 beats/min; P = 0.3). For MS and CPT, MAP and HR did not differ between genotype groups. Handgrip also produced similar increases in MAP; however, the change in HR was greater in the Gly16 homozygotes ( PANOVA= 0.001, genotype-by-time interaction). During HG, peak HR at fatigue was 100 ± 4 beats/min for Gly16 (54% increase from rest) vs. 93 ± 3 beats/min for Arg16 (37% increase). We conclude that the cardiovascular responses to MS and CPT do not differ between Gly16 and Arg16 homozygotes. However, the greater HR response to exercise in the Gly16 homozygotes may serve to maintain the pressor response (increased cardiac output) in the face of augmented peripheral vasodilation (decreased total peripheral resistance) in this group.