Carlson, Matthew L.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Simplified Chinese using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Arabic using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Spanish using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Japanese using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

Objective To compare differences in sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS)–associated patient-reported symptom scores among patients receiving observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery. Study Design Prospective longitudinal survey. Setting Tertiary referral center and the national Acoustic Neuroma Association. Patients Adults with sporadic VS. Intervention Observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery. Main Outcome Measure Baseline and follow-up surveys on patient-reported severity of tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headaches scored on a 10-point numeric scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms; changes of 2 or more points from baseline were considered clinically important. Results A total of 455 patients were eligible for study with a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.5 (2.4) years, including 122 (27%) managed with observation, 226 (50%) undergoing microsurgery, and 107 (23%) undergoing radiosurgery. Changes in tinnitus severity scores differed significantly among management groups (p = 0.006), with severity scores increasing significantly in the radiosurgery (+0.8, p = 0.005) group but not in the observation (+0.2, p = 0.5) or microsurgery (−0.2, p = 0.18) groups. The changes in dizziness/imbalance and headache severity scores did not differ significantly among management groups. When comparing clinically important improvements (decrease of 2 or more points), the microsurgery and observation cohorts had a greater proportion of patients experiencing a clinically important improvement in tinnitus compared with the radiosurgery cohort; no other clinically important changes were significantly different among management groups. Conclusions In this prospective study of 455 patients comparing patient-reported symptoms after VS management, radiosurgery was associated with worsening tinnitus severity scores overall and resulted in fewer patients reporting clinically important improvements in tinnitus compared with observation and microsurgery. As there was substantial variability in the effect of management modality on changes in symptom severity scores, possible treatment effects on subjective symptoms, including tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headache, should not be used in isolation to inform clinical decision-making for management of sporadic VS.

Introduction Although osteosarcoma represents the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children, they comprise only 0.2% of all cancers. Osteosarcoma frequently involves long bones; however, 8% of osteosarcomas involve the skull or mandible. Osteosarcoma is generally categorized based on location within the bone (central, surface, or extraskeletal) and histological grade (high-grade or low-grade). Osteoblastic osteosarcoma is a central, high-grade subtype and may be difficult to diagnose; it may present similarly to osteoblastoma, another rare, but benign, type of osteoblastic bone tumor. In this report, we present a rare case of osteoblastic osteosarcoma involving the temporal-occipital skull. Study design Case report and systematic review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Results A 21-year-old male presented for assessment of a mass appearing over his left mastoid region, first noticed within the previous 12 months. He experienced growth of the lesion and pain that increased when pressure was applied to the mass. Results from fine needle aspiration and CT-guided core biopsy were positive for osteosarcoma, osteoblastic-type. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and skull base revealed the mass to be 2.8 cm in maximal diameter. Given a somewhat favorable location, the tumor could be completely excised en bloc with negative margins, and the patient subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient is doing well at last follow-up 10 months after surgery, with no evidence of recurrence to date. Conclusion The temporal bone is an uncommon location for a primary osteosarcoma, and there are numerous conditions that could present in a similar manner. This case highlights this rare occurrence of osteoblastic osteosarcoma of the temporal bone without previous exposure to radiation. There are a limited number of similar cases in the literature, and our report serves to bring awareness to this potential diagnosis and considerations related to treatment.

Objective To assess Advanced Bionics (AB) HiRes Ultra and Ultra 3D initial version (V1) cochlear implant electrode failures over time at four large cochlear implant programs. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Four tertiary referral centers. Patients Patients receiving AB HiRes Ultra and Ultra 3D initial version (V1) devices as of December 31, 2022. Main Outcome Measures Failure rate, revision surgery, speech recognition scores. Results Over a span of 7 years, 205 (42.6%) of 483 implanted V1 devices have failed. Device failure rate varied across institutions from 32 to 67%. Of the 205 detected failures, 163 (79%) have undergone revision surgery, with 94% of revisions being performed with Advanced Bionics devices. Average time from implantation to diagnosis of device failure was 2.7 ± 1.2 years. Most patients (89.8%) with available testing were matched or exceeded their best prefailure speech performance after implant revision. After revision, patients had an average CNC score improvement of 24.7 percentage points over their most recent pre-revision scores and demonstrated average datalogging of 12.7 ± 4.1 h/d at most recent evaluation. Conclusions Comparison of patients across multiple high-volume implant centers confirms the presence of ongoing device failures. There is variability across institutions in the rate of revision surgery once a patient is diagnosed with a V1 device failure, as well as in the rate of device failure detection. Inter-institutional variability in failure rates may be explained by the variation in the routine use of electrical field imaging. Reimplantation with a new device typically results in a return to prefailure peak performance. Professional Practice Gap & Educational Need To our knowledge, a comparison of AB HiRes (V1) device failures across multiple institutions has not been conducted. Learning Objective To identify device failure rate across multiple institutions with different testing protocols. Desired Result Providers will have an improved understanding of the trajectory of device failures for HiRes (V1) devices over time. Level of Evidence Level IV—Historical cohort or case-controlled studies. Indicate IRB or IACUC IRB #230017; IRB #22-000183; IRB #STU-032018-085; IRB #H-49479.

Objective To examine comfort (C) and threshold (T) levels in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients over the first 18 months postactivation. Study Design Retrospective review of longitudinal CI programming data. Setting Tertiary academic center. Patients A total of 480 CIs among 428 adult CI recipients. Interventions Cochlear implantation with Cochlear Ltd. devices with subsequent programming to behavioral standards using Custom Sound® fitting software. Main Outcome Measures Charge levels needed to achieve C and T levels were measured longitudinally using Custom Sound®, from time of activation to a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 18 months postactivation. Charge (nC) levels were calculated as the product of pulse width (μs) and current amplitude (μA) to standardize among implant models. Changes in C and T charge levels over time were evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results When considering the entire electrode, the largest increases were seen at 1 month postactivation, and C and T charge levels did not increase significantly after 6 and 12 months, respectively. These findings were consistent across patient age at implantation and sex. When considering proximal electrodes only, C and T levels did not increase significantly after 6 months. In distal electrodes only, C levels did not increase significantly after 6 months, but T levels continued to demonstrate small, but statistically significant increases up to 18 months postactivation. Conclusions Across the entire electrode, we observed the largest changes in C and T charge levels at 1 month postactivation. Small increases in C and T levels continued out to 6 and 12 months, respectively, but may be of limited clinical significance. The stability of programming levels over time may support selective de-escalation of CI follow-up after the initial postactivation period, but, given small yet persistent increases with time, most notably in the distal electrodes, alternatives for follow-up or remote programming may still be encouraged.

Objective To examine the quality of information provided by artificial intelligence platforms ChatGPT-4 and Claude 2 surrounding the management of vestibular schwannomas. Study design Cross-sectional. Setting Skull base surgeons were involved from different centers and countries. Intervention Thirty-six questions regarding vestibular schwannoma management were tested. Artificial intelligence responses were subsequently evaluated by 19 lateral skull base surgeons using the Quality Assessment of Medical Artificial Intelligence (QAMAI) questionnaire, assessing “Accuracy,” “Clarity,” “Relevance,” “Completeness,” “Sources,” and “Usefulness.” Main Outcome Measure The scores of the answers from both chatbots were collected and analyzed using the Student t test. Analysis of responses grouped by stakeholders was performed with McNemar test. Stuart-Maxwell test was used to compare reading level among chatbots. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. Results ChatGPT-4 demonstrated significantly improved quality over Claude 2 in 14 of 36 (38.9%) questions, whereas higher-quality scores for Claude 2 were only observed in 2 (5.6%) answers. Chatbots exhibited variation across the dimensions of “Accuracy,” “Clarity,” “Completeness,” “Relevance,” and “Usefulness,” with ChatGPT-4 demonstrating a statistically significant superior performance. However, no statistically significant difference was found in the assessment of “Sources.” Additionally, ChatGPT-4 provided information at a significant lower reading grade level. Conclusions Artificial intelligence platforms failed to consistently provide accurate information surrounding the management of vestibular schwannoma, although ChatGPT-4 achieved significantly higher scores in most analyzed parameters. These findings demonstrate the potential for significant misinformation for patients seeking information through these platforms.