Hammer, Shane M.

Introduction: High intensity interval training (HIIT) during early outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) and reduces mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. In a CR setting, prescribing interval intensity using rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is more feasible than using percent of VO 2peak . Additionally, prescribing HIIT with RPE may allow for progressive changes in the VO 2 response throughout a single HIIT session. However, the acute cardiopulmonary responses during individual intervals of HIIT prescribed via RPE in CR are unknown. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that VO 2peak would increase and time-to-peak (TTP) would shorten across high-intensity intervals during a single HITT session prescribed with RPE. Methods: Patients with CAD (N=14; 2 women; 56±9 yrs; 30.46±4.7 kg/m 2 ) referred to CR after an acute coronary event completed a minimum of 25 supervised HIIT sessions during which VO 2 was measured continuously. Each HIIT session included 5 or more (6±1 sessions) 1-minute high intensity intervals (target RPE: 15-17) separated by a 3 to 5-minute low intensity interval (target RPE: <12). The first and last HIIT sessions were used for analysis. VO 2peak was defined as the highest 3-breath averaged VO 2 during or up to 1 minute following each high intensity interval. Results: RPE was 15±2 and 11±2 during the high and low intensity intervals, respectively. Compared to the first HIIT session, VO 2peak was greater during the high intensity intervals of the last HIIT session (25.4±1.5 vs. 21.8±1.1 mL/kg/min; p=0.04). During the first and last HIIT sessions, VO 2peak increased across high intensity intervals (p<0.001). Although TTP was not significantly reduced across intervals during the first HIIT session (p=0.14), TTP was reduced across intervals during the last HIIT session (first interval: 67±19 vs. last interval: 58±9 s; p<0.01). Conclusions: Prescribing HIIT with RPE resulted in increased VO 2peak across high intensity intervals within single HIIT sessions and shortened TTP during high intensity intervals across CR. These findings provide evidence for a priming effect on VO 2peak during HIIT which may contribute to greater cardiopulmonary adaptations in CAD patients.

Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with improvements in exercise capacity (peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak)); however, 23% of CR patients do not improve VO 2 peak following CR. CR adherence (i.e. number of CR sessions attended) has been proposed to play an important role in VO 2 peak improvement following CR, but has not been investigated. Identifying clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement are critical as the degree of VO 2 peak improvement is associated with improved long-term outcomes in these patients. Purpose: To determine if clinical characteristics and number of CR sessions attended were predictive of patients who exhibited improvement in VO 2 peak following CR. Methods: Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project records-linkage system, we identified all consecutive patients >18 years old from Olmsted County, Minnesota who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing prior to and following CR from 1999 to 2017. Regression models were created to assess clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement (>0% baseline) following CR. Results: The analysis included 804 patients (75% men) with a mean age of 60.7±12.4 years. Of the 804 patients, 609 (76%) patients exhibited VO 2 peak improvement following CR. Significant univariate predictors of VO 2 peak improvement included younger age (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.00), lower pre-CR VO 2 peak (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99), history of peripheral artery disease (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32-0.73), and smoking (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.90). Significant independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement from a multivariate analysis included younger age (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00), number of CR sessions (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), lower pre-CR VO 2 peak (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.96), history of peripheral artery disease (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.27-0.66), and smoking (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.39-0.82). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the importance of CR adherence and individual clinical characteristics in influencing VO 2 peak improvement following CR in patients with CVD. These findings may influence the clinical practice by providing specific clinical characteristics to account for when personalizing the CR treatment plan to maximize positive outcomes.

Introduction: Peripheral factors contribute to exercise limitations in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and may be related to excess regional adiposity. Slowed oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) kinetics are common in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and reflect peripheral O 2 transport impairments and abnormal muscle metabolic control. Differences in VO 2 kinetics between HFpEF and HFrEF may reveal phenotype-specific impairments in peripheral O 2 transport but remain unknown. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that VO 2 kinetics are slower in HFpEF (compared to HFrEF) and associated with greater leg adiposity. Methods: Patients with HFpEF (n=12; 3 women; 66±6 yrs; 29±3 kg/m 2 ; ejection fraction: 59±5%), HFrEF (n=12; 3 women; 62±9 yrs; 28±4 kg/m 2 ; ejection fraction: 37±8%), and controls (n=12; 3 women; 65±5 yrs; 28±3 kg/m 2 ) cycled at 20 W for 5 minutes prior to a maximal exercise test to determine VO 2peak . Age, sex, and BMI were matched by design and were not different among groups (p>0.05). A monoexponential function with a time delay was used to describe the VO 2 transition from rest to 20 W and calculate the O 2 deficit. Leg fat mass was measured via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: VO 2peak was lower in HFpEF (18.6±6.2 mL/kg/min) and HFrEF (19.0±3.7 mL/kg/min) compared to controls (26.0±3.1; both p<0.05). Amplitude (HFpEF: 507±97 mL/min; HFrEF: 443±91 mL/min; controls: 477±117 mL/min) and time delay (HFpEF: 16±9 s; HFrEF: 11±7 s; controls: 11±6 s) were not different among groups (p>0.05). The time constant was slower in HFrEF compared to controls (45±9 s vs. 32±6 s; p=0.03) and further slowed in HFpEF (66±18 s; p<0.001). The O 2 deficit was significantly greater in HFpEF (895±201 mL) and HFrEF (649±131 mL) compared to controls (590±125 mL; both p<0.05). There were no differences in percent leg fat mass among groups (HFpEF: 33±8%; HFrEF: 31±6%; controls: 34±9%) and no associations were detected between percent leg fat mass and any VO 2 parameters (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Patients with HFpEF exhibited slower VO 2 kinetics compared to HFrEF with no association to leg adiposity. These data suggest differences in peripheral O 2 transport and intramuscular metabolic control abnormalities between HF phenotypes.

Introduction: Heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may exhibit inspiratory muscle dysfunction potentially contributing to exercise intolerance. Activation of neural afferents in response to inspiratory muscle contraction (metaboreflex) elicits increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and leg vascular resistance (LVR) through enhanced sympathetic outflow leading to decreases in leg blood flow (LBF) in healthy humans. It is unknown if HFpEF patients exhibit exaggerated cardiovascular responses to inspiratory muscle metaboreflex activation. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that patients with HFpEF will exhibit a greater increase in MAP and LVR with a decrease in LBF during inspiratory muscle metaboreflex activation than controls. Methods: HFpEF patients (n=15, 10M/5W, 69±10 yrs; 33±4 kg/m2) and controls (n=14; 10M/4W; 70±8 yrs; 28±4 kg/m2) performed inspiratory resistive breathing tasks (IRBT) at 2% and 60% of their maximal inspiratory pressure. During the IRBTs, the breathing frequency was 20 breaths/min with a 50% duty cycle. At rest and during the IRBTs, MAP was measured by photoplethysmography, venous norepinephrine was measured, LBF was measured by near-infrared spectroscopy and indocyanine green dye injections, and LVR was calculated. Results: During the 2% IRBT, there were no differences between groups in the changes from rest in MAP (HFpEF: 2±4 vs. CTL: 3±4 mmHg) or LBF (HFpEF: 1±14 vs. CTL: 1±12%) (both, p>0.05). During the 60% IRBT, venous norepinephrine increased from rest in HFpEF and controls (p<0.05), while no differences existed between groups (p>0.05). During the 60% IRBT, HFpEF patients, compared to controls, exhibited a greater increase from rest in MAP (HFpEF: 16±7 vs. CTL: 10±6 mmHg) and LVR (HFpEF: 76±45 vs. CTL: 32±19%) coupled with a greater decrease in LBF (HFpEF: -32±14 vs. CTL: -17±9%) (all, p<0.05). Conclusions: These data indicate that patients with HFpEF exhibit exaggerated cardiovascular responses with inspiratory muscle metaboreflex activation compared to healthy individuals. These findings have important implications for the integrative physiology of exercise in HFpEF patients.

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in males and females in the United States and globally. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology for secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease. CR participation is associated with improved cardiovascular disease risk factor management, quality of life, and exercise capacity as well as reductions in hospital admissions and mortality. Despite these advantageous clinical outcomes, significant sex disparities exist in outpatient phase II CR programming. This article reviews sex differences that are present in the spectrum of care provided by outpatient phase II CR programming (ie, from referral to clinical management). We first review CR participation by detailing the sex disparities in the rates of CR referral, enrollment, and completion. In doing so, we discuss patient, health care provider, and social/environmental level barriers to CR participation with a particular emphasis on those barriers that majorly impact females. We also evaluate sex differences in the core components incorporated into CR programming (eg, patient assessment, exercise training, hypertension management). Next, we review strategies to mitigate these sex differences in CR participation with a focus on automatic CR referral, female-only CR programming, and hybrid CR. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and areas of future research to minimize and prevent sex differences in CR programming.