Gay, Peter C.

This article addresses the issue of patient sleep during hospitalization, which the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine believes merits wider consideration by health authorities than it has received to date. Adequate sleep is fundamental to health and well-being, and insufficiencies in its duration, quality, or timing have adverse effects that are acutely evident. These include cardiovascular dysfunction, impaired ventilatory function, cognitive impairment, increased pain perception, psychomotor disturbance (including increased fall risk), psychological disturbance (including anxiety and depression), metabolic dysfunction (including increased insulin resistance and catabolic propensity), and immune dysfunction and proinflammatory effects (increasing infection risk and pain generation). All these changes negatively impact health status and are counterproductive to recovery from illness and operation. Hospitalization challenges sleep in a variety of ways. These challenges include environmental factors such as noise, bright light, and overnight awakenings for observations, interventions, and transfers; physiological factors such as pain, dyspnea, bowel or urinary dysfunction, or discomfort from therapeutic devices; psychological factors such as stress and anxiety; care-related factors including medications or medication withdrawal; and preexisting sleep disorders that may not be recognized or adequately managed. Many of these challenges appear readily addressable. The key to doing so is to give sleep greater priority, with attention directed at ensuring that patients’ sleep needs are recognized and met, both within the hospital and beyond. Requirements include staff education, creation of protocols to enhance the prospect of sleep needs being addressed, and improvement in hospital design to mitigate environmental disturbances. Hospitals and health care providers have a duty to provide, to the greatest extent possible, appropriate preconditions for healing. Accumulating evidence suggests that these preconditions include adequate patient sleep duration and quality. The Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine calls for systematic changes in the approach of hospital leadership and staff to this issue. Measures required include incorporation of optimization of patient sleep into the objectives of perioperative and general patient care guidelines. These steps should be complemented by further research into the impact of hospitalization on sleep, the effects of poor sleep on health outcomes after hospitalization, and assessment of interventions to improve it.

Background The prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in the general population is reported to be 9 to 28 percent. Various social and biological factors have been reported to contribute to the development of EDS, such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders as well as socioeconomic status. Medically, EDS is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with sleep disorders. However, whether sleepiness is an independent negative prognostic indicator in patients without sleep apnea is poorly understood. Objective To evaluate the relationship between self‐reported excessive daytime sleepiness (assessed by Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and the risk of all‐cause mortality in patients without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in a large registry of patients seen at the Mayo Clinic Center for Sleep Medicine between November 17 th , 2009 and April 15 th , 2017. All patients received a diagnostic polysomnography and had completed Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The primary outcome of all‐cause mortality risk was computed using the Kaplan‐Meier analysis and Cox‐proportional hazard model with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), baseline comorbidities and sleep measurements as confounders. Results A total of 2746 non‐OSA patients were identified. The overall median age (IQR) was computed as 53 (40, 63) with 45% of patients identifying as males. The median follow‐up time was approximately 2.3 years. In a univariate analysis, daytime sleepiness was associated with the female sex, younger age and higher BMI. No significant differences were observed in vascular related diseases between sleepy and non‐sleepy patients. EDS was not significantly associated with all‐cause mortality with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.23 (95% CI 0.86, 1.76; p =0.257). In addition, there was no significant association of EDS and the risk of all‐cause mortality even after stratifying by sex, age and BMI in non‐OSA patients. Conclusion EDS is not associated with all‐cause mortality in non‐OSA patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding. Support or Funding Information This research was supported by NIH HL65176 and NIH HL114024. Kaplan–Meier survival curve of 8 years all‐cause mortality of non‐OSA patients with and without excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) at baseline. image Kaplan–Meier survival curve of 8 years all‐cause mortality of non‐OSA patients with and without excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) at baseline. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .