Keser, Zafer

Background: Arterial dissection represents a rare but significant cause of ischemic stroke. We hypothesized that the detection rate of arterial dissections has increased in recent decades. Objective: To determine the incidence of cervical artery dissection in a defined population. Methods: We identified Olmsted County, Minnesota residents diagnosed with carotid artery or vertebral artery dissection between 2002 and 2020 using the Rochester Epidemiology Project database. Patients who had suffered major trauma, were under 18 years of age or had intracranial artery dissections were excluded. Virtually all Olmsted County residents receive their medical care within the participating health systems, leading to a high likelihood of complete case ascertainment. We assessed longitudinal trends by dividing the data into 5-year time windows, with the last being a 4-year interval. Incidence rates were adjusted for age and sex. Results: In a 19-year period from 2002 through 2020, 127 patients with a diagnosis of cervical artery dissection were identified. There were 64 females (50.4%) and 63 males (49.6%). The average age at diagnosis was 51.2 years (SD 15.7). There were 63 internal carotid artery dissections (ICAD), 60 vertebral artery dissections (VAD), and three common carotid artery dissections (CCAD) identified. One patient had ICAD and VAD at diagnosis. The overall incidence rate of detection for cervical artery dissection, adjusted for age and sex, was 4.9 per 100,000 person-years (py) (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.7). The incidence rate of ICAD was 2.5 per 100,000 py (95% CI, 1.8 to 3.1). The incidence rate of VAD was 2.3 per 100,000 py (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.9). The incidence rate of CAD gradually increased over time from 2.3 per 100,000 py (95% CI, 1.1 to 3.5) in 2002-2006 to 9.4 per 100,000 py (95% CI, 6.9 to 11.8) in 2017-2020, a 4.2-fold increase. Conclusion: The incidence of detection rate of cervical artery dissection increased over four-fold in the last 19 years. This can potentially be attributed to increased usage of non-invasive angiographic imaging.

Background The formation of dissecting pseudoaneurysms (dPSAs) is a common sequela of cervical artery dissection, which has been suggested to increase thrombotic risk in previous studies. This study reported clinical features and long‐term outcomes of cervical internal carotid (cICA) and vertebral artery (cVA) dPSAs. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review over a 10‐year period (January 2012–December 2021). Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, medical and endovascular treatments, and long‐term outcomes were reported for cICA and cVA dPSA groups separately. Nonparametric tests were used to compare group differences. Results In our cohort, 120 (12%) of 999 cervical artery dissection patients had dPSA, with 85% occurring in the cICA and 15% in the cVA. Most dPSAs occurred spontaneously or in association with minor trauma. Compared with cICA dPSA, patients with cVA dPSA were younger (median age [range]=34.5 [24–70] versus 52 [30–77]; P <0.01), had a smaller dPSA size (median size [range]=4.5 mm [2–17] versus 8 mm [1.2–32]; P <0.01), and were more likely to reduce in size at follow‐up (median size change [range]=−2.8 mm [−17;0] versus 0 [−24;10.8]). Antithrombotic therapy was predominately aspirin monotherapy. No patients with cVA dPSA experienced recurrent strokes and only 3% of patients with cICA dPSA developed new/recurrent stroke in the territory of dPSA while on an antithrombotic regimen requiring endovascular intervention, and none of the dPSAs ruptured. A total of 98% of the patients had an excellent outcome (modified Rankin scale 0–2 at final follow‐up). Conclusion Most cICA and cVA dPSAs have a benign prognosis with medical therapy alone. Further prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to provide high quality evidence on the necessity of additional endovascular therapy at diagnosis in addition to medical therapy alone.

AbstractBackground and PurposePrevious studies have proposed multiple parallel channels for waste clearance from the brain, though many gaps remain in our understanding of these systems. In this study, we examined periarterial fluid drainage around intracranial and extracranial segments of the internal carotid arteries (ICAs) from the brain into the cervical lymph nodes using a noninvasive and clinical‐based method.MethodsEighty‐one subjects (45 females, aged 15‐80 years old) with nonlesioned epilepsy underwent high‐resolution 3‐dimensional T2‐weighted fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI. We utilized a noninvasive and clinical‐based method with a manual semiautomated approach to characterize the periarterial lymphatic system's maximum thickness and signal intensities along the ICAs using high‐resolution 3‐dimensional FLAIR imaging. We conducted group comparisons and correlation analyses to investigate sex‐ and age‐based trends. Results were corrected with Bonferroni's test for multiple comparisons, and we performed power analysis for sample size calculations.ResultsUsing high‐resolution FLAIR images, we show evidence that fluid drainage emerges around the ICA petrous segment and joins lymphatic flow from cranial nerves in the upper neck, with this flow ultimately draining into the cervical lymph nodes bilaterally. Lymphatic signal at the petrous segment level was significantly thinner in females compared to males bilaterally (w = 413, p = .0001 on the right, w = 356, p < .0001 on the left). Lymphatic drainage around the petrous segments of the ICAs bilaterally was thicker with age in males but not in females.ConclusionsWe describe the in vivo high‐resolution imaging characteristics of periarterial fluid drainage along the vessel walls of ICAs. This represents a potentially major channel for brain waste clearance. We also report interesting sex‐ and age‐based trends in these structures within our cohort.

Purpose: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) represents a unique clinical entity with a high risk of ischemic stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) showed good efficacy in CAD management but are cumbersome to use with potentially higher bleeding rates. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are easier to use and may have similar effects but lower hemorrhagic risk. In this systematic review, we compare the efficacy of NOAC to VKA as a potential alternative treatment. Methods: The literature was searched on Pubmed, PMC, and Embase via API through the Nested Knowledge AutoLit software in February 2022 for studies evaluating both NOAC and VKA. Baseline characteristics, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and hemorrhagic and ischemic complications were collected for single and double-arm studies and analyzed using random-effect subgroup meta-analysis. Findings: Overall, 11 studies were included with 699 patients treated with VKA and 53 treated with NOAC (from three studies; two were head-to-head comparative studies). There was no statistical difference in the baseline characteristics of VKA and NOAC patients. The rates of TIA/stroke in VKA and NOAC groups were 12.3% (95% CI; 0%, 28.6%) and 5.7% (95% CI; 0%, 12.2%), respectively. Major bleeding or intracranial bleeding were comparable between groups. Lesions treated with VKA showed angiographic recanalization with a rate of 51.4% (95% CI; 35.6%, 67.1%) and for those treated with NOAC was 58.4% (95% CI; 23.9%, 93.9%). The rates of good clinical outcomes were 79.9% (95% CI; 67.6%, 92.2%) in the VKA group and 91.4% (95% CI; 78.1%, 100%) in NOAC. No statistical difference was noted among any of the outcomes between the two treatment groups. Discussion and conclusion: We highlighted comparable efficacy and safety of NOAC to VKA for stroke prevention in CAD. Further head-to-head studies are warranted to validate these results.

Introduction Management of intracranial artery dissection (IAD) remains elusive in medical practice. Intracranially, vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is more commonly encountered than internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD). Deconstructive (EVT-d) and reconstructive (EVT-r) endovascular techniques have been utilized to treat VAD and ICAD. This meta-analysis investigates the safety and efficacy of EVT-r and EVT-d in the management of VAD and ICAD. Methods The literature was searched for all studies with consecutive patient series evaluating EVT-d or EVT-r for VAD or ICAD management. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between EVT-r and EVT-d groups using the random-effect model and meta-regression approaches. Results Overall, 1095 cases pooled from 56 studies were included. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between VAD and ICAD. EVT-r was applied in 647 cases (59.1%) and EVT-d in the rest There was no statistical difference in the rate of procedural complications between EVT-r and EVT-d. Although EVT-d was significantly associated with higher rates of complete aneurysm occlusion (86.4%), lower rates of good clinical outcomes (72.1%) and higher mortality (15.1%) were achieved compared to EVT-r (70.2%, 83.3%, and 9.5%; respectively). The mortality rate was higher, and good clinical outcomes were less common in ruptured aneurysms. Ischemic presentation was statistically associated with poor outcomes (mRS 3-5) but low mortality. ICAD often tended to grow following treatment and resulted in poor neurological outcomes. Conclusions IAD has favorable outcomes when treated appropriately. Novel reconstructive endovascular techniques are promising and should be integrated well in endovascular practice. Further studies are warranted.

Introduction: Stroke code simulation training is effective at reducing door to needle times (DTNT) for tPA administration. We aimed to evaluate the effect on DTNT from simulation training specifically for Neurology residents. Method: Stroke code simulation was implemented at our comprehensive stroke center in July 2017, targeting PGY2 adult neurology residents and PGY3 pediatric neurology residents who were first responders at stroke codes during off-hours. Training was completed at the beginning of the residents’ respective training years. An interrupted time series analysis of DTNT for tPA before and after the implementation of simulation training from July 2016 to July 2019 was performed. Demographics, tPA metrics, and safety and hospital metrics were compared pre and post intervention among the residents. No other quality improvement projects targeting DTNT were implemented during this time. Results: Between July 2016 and July 2019, 305 patients received thrombolysis from a resident first responder - 118 (39%) of whom were treated pre-simulation and 187 (61.3%) treated during the simulation period. There was no significant difference in patient baseline characteristics between the two groups (Table 1). Median DTNT was 49.5 (IQR 40-71) min during the pre-simulation period and 48 (IQR 37-60) min during the post-simulation period (p= 0.04). Compared to pre-simulation, there were no months in which the median DTNT exceeded 60 min post-simulation. IQR for the DTNT appeared both clinically and statistically different. Pre and post simulation, there was no difference in incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage nor in 90-day outcomes. Conclusion: In our analysis of the effect of stroke code simulation training among neurology residents, improvement in DTNT after simulation training appears more driven by improvement in the variation in times rather than a clinically significant decrease in median times.