Geldmaker, Laura

Abstract Introduction Peyronie’s disease (PD) is characterized by penile pain, penile deformation and curvature, sexual dysfunction, and psychological implications. Fibrosis and plaque formation are often part of PD pathophysiology. Calcified plaques can alter treatment planning. Penile ultrasound with Doppler (PUS) is used to exclude erectile dysfunction and identify plaques. However, plaque extent and distribution can be obscured by acoustic shadowing, limiting complete plaque characterization. Non-contrast pelvis computed tomography (CT) provides a noninvasive method to identify plaques in 3 dimensions and quantify plaque Ca burden. Objective Our objective was to utilize Agatston Ca scoring measure Ca burden in patients with Peyronie's disease. Methods A retrospective database from 1/1/2017 and 6/30/2021 identified 25 men with calcified plaques on CT after PUS performed by a single urologist. Two abdominal radiologists reviewed CTs in consensus to measure calcified plaque size and distribution on Visage PACS. Semiautomated Agatston Ca scoring values were obtained with Syngo.via. Total Ca volume (mm3), total Ca score were correlated with hourglass deformity on clinical exam, plaque complexity on CT (>2 discrete calcified plaques, circumferential corpus cavernosum involvement, septal involvement), and surgical management using descriptive statistics and t-test. Results Mean Ca volume was 1417 mm3 (range 1.4-5425.7, standard deviation (SD) 1570); mean Ca score was 1691 (range 1.6-6048; SD 1862) with significantly higher Ca volume in patients with complex plaques (265 mm3 vs 472 mm3, p<0.05), and significantly longer plaque dimension for longest plaque dimension measured by CT vs US (31 vs 23, p<0.05). There was no significant difference in Ca volume for nonsurgical vs surgical (1791 vs 893, p=0.06) or for no hourglass vs hourglass deformity (1173 vs 1904, p=0.19). Conclusions CT scan and calcium scoring are useful tools in the assessment of PD. Semiautomated Ca scoring may help noninvasively identify complex calcified penile plaques to guide medical and surgical therapy for Peyronie’s disease. Disclosure No

ObjectiveTo validate a new baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (NB‐GFR) formula in a cohort of robotic‐assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN).MethodsNB‐GFR = 35 + preoperative GFR (× 0.65) – 18 (if radical nephrectomy) – age (× 0.25) + 3 (if tumor size >7 cm) – 2 (if diabetes). NB‐GFR was calculated in 464 consecutive RAPN from a single surgeon cohort. 143 patients were excluded secondary to insufficient eGFR follow up. We analyzed NB‐GFR accuracy utilizing the last observed eGFR 3–12 months post RAPN. Categorical variables were summarized with the frequency and percentage of patients. Numerical variables were summarized with the median, 25th percentile, and 75th percentile.ResultsThe mean difference between observed and predicted NB‐GFR was 4.6 ml/min/1.73m2 (95% CI −6.9 to 16.1 ml/min/1.73m2). There was a pattern of higher observed NB‐GFRs being underestimated by the NB‐GFR equation while lower observed NB‐GFRs were overestimated by the NB‐GFR equation. The NB‐GFR formula had a high level of accuracy with 98.8% of predicted NB‐GFRs falling within 30% of the observed NB‐GFR (95% CI 86.8% to 99.5%). The median and interquartile range of the difference between observed and predicted NB‐GFR was 3.9 ml/min/1.73m2 (IQR 0.7 to 8.2 ml/min/1.73m2). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the ability of predicted NB‐GFR to identify those with an observed NB‐GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 after RAPN was 98%, 92%, 88%, and 99%, respectively.ConclusionThe NB‐GFR equation developed with partial and radical nephrectomy cohorts is accurate in predicting post‐operative eGFR 3–12 months following RAPN.

Abstract Objective: To analyze operating room (OR) efficiency by evaluating fixed and variable OR times for open (OPN) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN).Methods: We analyzed consecutive OPN and RAPN performed by one surgeon over a 24-month period. All patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position and secured with a beanbag regardless of approach. Fixed (nonprocedural) OR times were prospectively collected and defined as: in room to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release to cut time (ARCT), and close to wheels out time (CTWO). Variable OR time was procedural cut to close time (CTCT). Comparison of fixed and variable OR time points between OPN and RAPN were performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: 146 RAPN and 31 OPN were evaluated from 2019-2020. Median IRAT was similar for RAPN versus OPN [20 min (IQR: 16-25) vs. 20 min (IQR: 16-26), P=0.57]. Median ARCT was longer for RAPN than it was for OPN [40 min (IQR: 36-46) vs. 34 min (IQR: 30-39), P<0.001]. Median CTWO was similar for OPN (12 min, IQR: 9-14) and RAPN (11 min, IQR: 7-15) (P=0.89). Median CTCT was longer for RAPN (202 min, IQR: 170-236) compared to OPN (164 min, IQR: 154-184) (P<0.001).Conclusions: In a single surgeon partial nephrectomy series with the same patient positioning, utilization of robotic technology was associated with longer surgeon operating time as well as less efficient fixed OR times, specifically ARCT.