Back to Authors

Barary, Mohammad

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-9370

Mayo Clinic

University of Tehran

Citations 22

Remdesivir: A critical review
Afshar, Zeinab Mohseni , Hosseinzadeh, Dariush , Allahgholipour, Amirreza , Carson‐Chahhoud, Kristin , Hosseinzadeh, Rezvan , Barary, Mohammad , Ebrahimpour, Soheil , Barary, Mohammad , Carson-Chahhoud, Kristin , Babazadeh, Arefeh , Sio, Terence T. , Sullman, Mark J. M.

No container title available | May 3, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.165156484.47824744/v1 Get It

Remdesivir has appeared to be the most effective medication against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and is broadly administered to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients around the world. Remdesivir is an RNA polymerase inhibitor with a broad spectrum of antiviral activities against RNA viruses in in-vitro and in-vivo models of SARS-CoV, the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and SARS-CoV-2. Remdesivir is the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatment for adult and pediatric patients and has been used intravenously for patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19. However, questions have been raised about the value of remdesivir in treating COVID-19, and governing bodies worldwide have been hesitant to approve this medication. Nevertheless, in the context of the public health emergency and the urgent need for effective treatments for patients with COVID-19, remdesivir has been approved by several authorities worldwide. Here, we discuss characteristics and applications of remdesivir, and various challenging studies with different outcomes about its efficacy are also reviewed.
Comparison of 2-days and 7-days of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in the prevention of surgical site infection in coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial
Barary, Mohammad , Ganji, Ghasem Faghanzadeh , Aliramaji, Zahra, Ebrahimpour, Soheil , Roushan, Mohammad Reza Hasanjani , Zavareh, Mahmoud Sadeghi Haddad , Vafaei, Hamid Reza, Barary, Mohammad , Sio, Terence T. , Bayani, Masomeh , Koppolu, Veerendra , Javanian, Mostafa

No container title available | March 31, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.164873530.04730128/v1 Get It

Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the efficacy of the two different prophylactic antibiotic regimens (2-days vs. 7-days) in preventing surgical site infection in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods : Patients undergoing CABG were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. From 2016 to 2017, 370 cases were allocated to one of two groups. The groups received prophylactic antibiotic therapy for either 2-days or 7-days. All CABG patients were followed for days for surgical site infections. Two of the patients died after surgery, and 3 patients did not show up during the three-month follow-up evaluation and thus did not meet the study criteria. Results: Of the remaining 365 patients who participated in the full study, 198 (54.2%) were male, and 167 (45.7%) were female patients. The mean age of these cases was 58.64± 11.4. Of the 365 study participants who received prophylactic antibiotics prior to surgery, 16 patients developed surgical site infections (legs and sternum). Among these 16 patients, nine cases belong to the 7-days prophylactic antibiotic therapy group (2.4%), and seven cases belong to the 2-day prophylactic antibiotic therapy group (1.9%) (P=0.771). Conclusion: Comparison of two 2-day and 7-day prophylactic antibiotic regimens showed no significant difference in the incidence of post-surgical infection in the two groups.
Rare adverse events following Covid-19 vaccination: A review
Barary, Mohammad , Afshar, Zeinab Mohseni , Liang, Jackson J. , Sharma, Akanksha , Hashemi, Erfan , Abdi, Sadaf, Allahgholipour, Amirreza , Hosseinzadeh, Rezvan , Vaziri, Zahra , Ebrahimpour, Soheil , Barary, Mohammad , Liang, Jackson , Afshar, Zeinab Mohseni , Pirzadeh, Marzieh , Babazadeh, Arefeh , Deravi, Niloofar , Sio, Terence T. , Sullman, Mark J. M.

No container title available | March 31, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.164873369.97865492/v1 Get It

Although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has caused many complications, the invention of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines has also brought about several adverse events, from common side effects to unexpected and rare ones. Common vaccine-related adverse reactions manifest locally or systematically following any vaccine, including Covid-19 vaccines. Certain side effects, known as adverse events of special interest (AESI), are unusual and need more evaluation. Here, we discuss some of the most important rare adverse events of Covid-19 vaccines.
Acute poisoning due to massive leaking of methamphetamine in a methamphetamine body packer: A case report
Motevalli, Hossein, Hosseinzadeh, Rezvan , Barary, Mohammad , Barary, Mohammad , Motevalli, Hossein , Sio, Terence T. , Manouchehri, Aliasghar

No container title available | March 18, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.164761079.96603410/v1 Get It

methamphetamine (MA) has a similar structure to amphetamine which can induce a wide range of symptoms, including alertness, aggressive behavior, chest pain, psychosis, seizures, developed by the psychomotor system stimulation. This case specifically discusses prolonged severe MA intoxication induced by a novel and unique way of the drug’s ingestion.
The effect of propolis on 5-fluorouracil-induced cardiac toxicity in rats
Hosseinzadeh, Rezvan , Liang, Jackson J. , Mansouri, Razieh, Moghadamnia, Ali Akbar , Liang, Jackson , Barary, Mohammad , Sio, Terence T. , Hosseini, Mohammad, Kazemi, Sohrab

No container title available | March 17, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1359440/v2 Get It

Abstract Background 5- Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most common chemotherapeutic agents used in treating solid tumors, and the 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity is the second cause of cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapeutic drugs. Propolis (Pro) has vigorous anti-inflammatory activity. Its cardio-protective characteristic against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity was previously proven. The current study aimed to appraise the effect of Pro on 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. Methods Twenty-four male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: Control, 5-FU, 5-FU + Pro 250 mg/kg, and 5-FU + Colchicine (CLC) 5 mg/kg. Different hematological, serological, biochemical, histopathological, and molecular assays were performed to assess the study aim. Moreover, rat myocardium (H9C2(2 − 1)) and human skin fibroblast (HNFF-P18) cell lines were also used to assess this protective effect in-vitro. Results 5-FU resulted in significant cardiotoxicity represented by an increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) expression, cardiac enzyme levels, and histopathological degenerations. 5-FU treatment also decreased bodyweight, total anti-oxidant capacity (TAC), catalase (CAT) levels, blood cell counts, and hemoglobin (Hb) levels. In addition, 5-FU disrupted ECG parameters, including increased elevation in the ST-segment and increased QRS complex and QTc duration. Treating with Pro reduced oxidative stress, cardiac enzymes, histopathological degenerations, and COX-2 expression in cardiac tissue alleviated ECG disturbances and increased the number of blood cells and TAC levels. Moreover, 5-FU-induced bodyweight loss was ameliorated after treatment with Pro. Conclusion Our results demonstrated that treatment with Pro significantly improved cardiotoxicity induced by 5-FU in rats.
Fulminant Hepatitis following COVID-19 Vaccination: A case report
Barary, Mohammad , Sharifi‐Razavi, Athena , Ebrahimpour, Soheil , Barary, Mohammad , Rakhshani, Nasser , Sio, Terence T. , Baziboroun, Mana

No container title available | February 24, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.164574620.05836625/v1 Get It

The side effects of COVID-19 vaccination were mostly self-restricted local reactions that quickly resolved. Nevertheless, rare autoimmune hepatitis cases have been reported in some vaccinated individuals. This article presents a young man who developed fulminant hepatitis a few days after vaccination with the first dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.
The effect of propolis on 5-fluorouracil-induced cardiac toxicity in rats
Hosseinzadeh, Rezvan , Liang, Jackson J. , Mansouri, Razieh, Hosseini, Mohammad , Moghadamnia, Ali Akbar , Liang, Jackson , Barary, Mohammad , Sio, Terence T. , Kazemi, Sohrab

No container title available | February 21, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1359440/v1 Get It

Abstract Background 5- Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most common chemotherapeutic agents used in treating solid tumors, and the 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity is the second cause of cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapeutic drugs. Propolis (Pro) has vigorous anti-inflammatory activity. Its cardio-protective characteristic against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity was previously proven. The current study aimed to appraise the effect of Pro on 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. Methods Twenty-four male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: Control, 5-FU, 5-FU + Pro 250 mg/kg, and 5-FU + Colchicine (CLC) 5 mg/kg. Different hematological, serological, biochemical, histopathological, and molecular assays were performed to assess the study aim. Moreover, rat myocardium (H9C2(2 − 1)) and human skin fibroblast (HNFF-P18) cell lines were also used to assess this protective effect in-vitro. Results 5-FU resulted in significant cardiotoxicity represented by an increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) expression, cardiac enzyme levels, and histopathological degenerations. 5-FU treatment also decreased bodyweight, total anti-oxidant capacity (TAC), catalase (CAT) levels, blood cell counts, and hemoglobin (Hb) levels. In addition, 5-FU disrupted ECG parameters, including increased elevation in the ST-segment and increased QRS complex and QTc duration. Treating with Pro reduced oxidative stress, cardiac enzymes, histopathological degenerations, and COX-2 expression in cardiac tissue alleviated ECG disturbances and increased the number of blood cells and TAC levels. Moreover, 5-FU-induced bodyweight loss was ameliorated after treatment with Pro. Conclusion Our results demonstrated that treatment with Pro significantly improved cardiotoxicity induced by 5-FU in rats.
SARS‐CoV‐2‐related and Covid‐19 vaccine‐induced thromboembolic events: A comparative review
Afshar, Zeinab Mohseni , Barary, Mohammad , Hosseinzadeh, Rezvan , Alijanpour, Amirmasoud , Miri, Seyed Rouhollah , Carson‐Chahhoud, Kristin , Länger, Florian, Ebrahimpour, Soheil , Barary, Mohammad , Carson-Chahhoud, Kristin , Alijanpour, Amirmasoud , Babazadeh, Arefeh , Sio, Terence T. , Sullman, Mark J. M.

Reviews in Medical Virology | February 3, 2022 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/rmv.2327 Get It

AbstractSince the start of the pandemic, thrombotic events have been a well‐known and severe complication associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. Nevertheless, the initiation of vaccination programs brought another rare yet highly fatal thrombotic event, vaccine‐induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia, which has caused extensive debate regarding the safety of vaccines. This review defines the thromboembolic events following infection and vaccination, identifies their risk factors, describes their pathophysiology, and discusses their management, treatment, and prevention.
Challenges posed by COVID‐19 in cancer patients: A narrative review
Afshar, Zeinab Mohseni , Hosseinzadeh, Rezvan , Barary, Mohammad , Ebrahimpour, Soheil , Alijanpour, Amirmasoud , Hosseinzadeh, Dariush , Miri, Seyed Rouhollah , Sio, Terence T. , Sullman, Mark J. M. , Carson‐Chahhoud, Kristin , Mohseni Afshar, Zeinab , Sayad, Babak , Miri, Seyed Rouhollah , Sio, Terence T , Sullman, Mark J M , Carson-Chahhoud, Kristin , Babazadeh, Arefeh , Barary, Mohammad , Alijanpour, Amirmasoud , Miri, Seyed Rouhollah

Cancer Medicine | December 24, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1119-1135

10.1002/cam4.4519 Get It

AbstractA novel coronavirus, or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), was identified as the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). In early 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID‐19 the sixth public health emergency of international concern. The COVID‐19 pandemic has substantially affected many groups within the general population, but particularly those with extant clinical conditions, such as having or being treated for cancer. Cancer patients are at a higher risk of developing severe COVID‐19 since the malignancy and chemotherapy may negatively affect the immune system, and their immunocompromised condition also increases the risk of infection. Substantial international efforts are currently underway to develop specific methods for diagnosing and treating COVID‐19. However, cancer patients’ risk profiles, management, and outcomes are not well understood. Thus, the main objective of this review is to discuss the relevant evidence to understand the prognosis of COVID‐19 infections in cancer patients more clearly, as well as helping to improve the clinical management of these patients.