Levy, Bruce A.

Abstract Labral repair has become an essential technique in the arthroscopic surgical management of femoroacetabular impingement. Several clinical studies suggest that labral repair results in superior patient outcomes in comparison to labral debridement alone. The repair procedure requires accurate evaluation of labral tissue quality, precise placement of sutures and anchors, and careful re‐tensioning of the labrum. We present our preferred technique for labral repair. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract Appropriate identification and precise resection of the pincer lesion are integral parts of the arthroscopic surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Preoperative radiographic planning of the bone resection, as well as executing the plan intraoperatively using both fluoroscopic and arthroscopic cues, is critical to adequately removing the pincer lesion. We present our surgical technique of removing the impinging bone by defining the focal acetabular rim overcoverage, accessing the pincer lesion with labral detachment, and then performing acetabular rim resection. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Background: Tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) is a commonly used measurement for surgical decision making in patients with patellofemoral malalignment and instability. This measurement has historically been performed utilizing axial computed tomography (CT). More recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as an equivalent method, but this has not yet been fully validated. Purpose: To determine the reliability of TT-TG distance measurements on both MRI and CT and to determine whether the measurements are interchangeable with one another. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: All patients with patellar instability who underwent both CT and MRI of the knee from 2003 to 2011 were included (n = 59 knees in 54 patients). Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists measured the TT-TG distances for each patient by CT and MRI in a randomized, blinded fashion. Interobserver reliability was calculated between radiologists for both imaging modalities, and intermethod reliability was calculated between the 2 imaging modalities. The results are reported using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The 59 knees had a mean TT-TG distance of 16.9 mm (range, 8.3-25.8 mm) by CT and 14.7 mm (range, 1.5-25.1 mm) by MRI. Interobserver reliability between the radiologists was considered excellent for both CT and MRI (ICC = 0.777 and 0.843, respectively). When comparing CT to MRI, the ICC was considered only fair for each of the raters (0.532 and 0.539). Eleven patients (19%) had a TT-TG distance of ≥20 mm on CT preoperatively and underwent distal realignment by tibial tubercle osteotomy. In this surgical subgroup, the mean TT-TG distance was 22.5 mm (range, 19.8-25.8 mm) by CT and only 18.7 mm (range, 14.4-22.8 mm) by MRI for a mean difference of 3.80 mm ( P < .001). Conclusion: The TT-TG distance can be measured with excellent interrater reliability on both MRI and CT; however, the values derived from these 2 tests may not be interchangeable. This observation should be taken into consideration when MRI is used for surgical planning because MRI may underestimate the TT-TG distance when compared with CT.

Background: Decreased hip range of motion (ROM) is a common finding in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Purpose: To report the prevalence of decreased hip ROM in asymptomatic adolescent athletes and to correlate examination findings to signs of FAI on radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Cross-sectional study (prevalence); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 226 adolescent athletes presenting for state-mandated preparticipation physical examinations were assessed. Hip internal rotation was measured with the participant supine and the hip flexed to 90°. All participants with ≤10° of internal rotation were invited to return for standard radiographs and MRI of both hips. An age-matched control group, with >10° of internal rotation, underwent MRI examination only. Twenty-six athletes (13 study and 13 control) returned for clinical and radiographic examinations. Results: Nineteen athletes (34 hips, 8%) were found to have <10° of internal rotation. Eight athletes (13 hips, 3%) also had a positive anterior impingement sign. Thirteen of 19 athletes participated in the radiographic portion of the study. Of these 13 participants, 4 had limited internal rotation unilaterally, leaving 22 hips in the study group. Eight of 13 participants (15 hips, 68%) had a cam-type deformity evident on plain radiographs, and 4 participants (7 hips, 32%) had a positive radiographic crossover sign. The average α angle measured from radial MRI sequences was 58.1° in the study group versus 44.3° in the control group ( P < .001). Fifteen hips (68%) in the study group had abnormal MRI findings within the acetabular labrum or cartilage compared with 10 of 26 hips (38%) in the control group (odds ratio, 3.4; P = .078). Conclusion: Eight percent of asymptomatic teenagers had limited internal rotation on examination; 68% of these had radiographic findings suggestive of FAI. More than two thirds of these participants had evidence of asymptomatic hip pathological lesions on MRI.

Background: As anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is performed increasingly in the United States, the rate of revision ACL reconstruction continues to rise. A paucity of literature exists with respect to repeat ACL revision surgery. Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcomes of patients who had undergone at least 2 revision ACL reconstructions. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The records of all patients who had undergone repeat revision ACL reconstructions between 1998 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, operative findings, pre- and postoperative physical examination findings, radiographs, and Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores. Results: Fifteen patients had undergone repeat revision ACL reconstruction during the study period. Mean age was 27 years (range, 18-57 years). Mean follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-10 years). At the time of repeat revision surgery, new tunnels were drilled in 9 of 15 (60%) cases. Of those, 8 of 9 (89%) were drilled because femoral tunnels were deemed “too anterior.” During repeat revision, 11 of 15 (73%) patients were noted to have a meniscal tear, and 9 of 15 (67%) had International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 or 4 chondral lesions. Mean Lysholm score was 60 preoperatively and increased to 82 postoperatively ( P < .001). Mean preoperative IKDC score was 59, which increased to 80 postoperatively ( P < .001). Mean preoperative Tegner score was 6.0. Mean postoperative Tegner score was 4.5, with only 4 of 15 (27%) patients having returned to their prior activity level ( P < .001). Two patients (13%) sustained a traumatic rerupture. Presence of grade 3 or 4 chondral lesions and body mass index greater than 28 at the time of repeat revision were associated with a “fair” or “poor” outcome by Lysholm score ( P = .007 and P = .03, respectively) and IDKC subjective scoring ( P = .04 and P = .007, respectively). Conclusion: Repeat revision ACL reconstruction may improve the functional outcomes of patients who have failed revision ACL reconstruction. Most patients do not return to prior activity level following repeat revision. Presence of grade 3 or 4 chondral lesions and body mass index greater than 28 were associated with worse outcomes.

Purpose To identify clinical variables that affect a surgeon's decision to recommend arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). Methods Members of 2 orthopaedic specialty societies were invited to participate in an online survey by e‐mail. The survey consisted of surgeon demographics and case scenarios to evaluate clinical decision making for APM. Posterior probabilities were calculated to determine the effect of clinical factors on the likelihood of recommending APM. Results Of the respondents with valid e‐mail addresses, 733 (19.3%) returned a completed survey, but only 533 (14.1%) met the eligibility criteria (treated or referred an APM candidate within the past year). Respondents were aged 46.7 ± 9.4 and had performed a mean of 115 APMs in the previous year. Posterior probabilities for a combination of 6 clinical indicators identified 3 factors that most influenced a surgeon's decision to recommend APM: radiographic findings, McMurray test, and failure of nonoperative management. Conclusions Significant variation exists among practicing orthopaedic surgeons with regard to decision making for APM. The 3 clinical factors that most influenced a surgeon's decision to recommend APM were normal radiographic findings, failed nonoperative treatment, and the presence of positive physical examination findings (i.e., positive McMurray test, joint line tenderness, and effusion). Level of Evidence Level III, decision analysis.

AbstractPurposeThe primary purpose of this study was to investigate the intra‐tester and inter‐tester reliability of the dial test using a handheld digital inclinometer. Additionally, we examined the responsiveness of the test, and side‐to‐side differences for meaningful comparison.Materials/methodsTwenty‐four healthy subjects (22.5 ± 2.8 years) participated in the study. The dial test was performed on both knees at 30° and 90° of knee flexion with the subject supine. While maintaining a neutral position of the ankle, an inclinometer was positioned parallel to the medial border of the foot to quantify external rotation of the tibia. Two examiners performed the dial test in a blinded manner. The minimal detectable change across repeated measures and side‐to‐side difference was calculated.ResultsIntra‐tester reliability for examiner 1 (E1) was 0.83 at 30° knee flexion and 0.89 at 90° knee flexion. Reliability values for examiner 2 (E2) were 0.86 at 30° and 0.87 at 90° knee flexion. Inter‐tester reliability was 0.74 at 30° and 0.83 at 90°. The minimal detectable change (MDC) for E1 at 30° was ±9.4° and ±7.4° at 90°. For E2, the MDC value was ±9.1° at 30° and ±8.3° at 90°. Ninety‐five percent limits of agreement for side‐to‐side difference was 16.1° and 11.3° ° for E1 at 30° and 90° and for E2 13.9° at 30° and 14.1° at 90°.ConclusionsThis instrumented dial test using a handheld digital inclinometer to measure external rotation can be performed with acceptable reliability in the clinical setting. A difference of 10° between two measurements on the same knee suggests that a meaningful change has occurred. For right to left comparison, differences greater than 15° suggest clinical significance.Level of evidenceIII.