Back to Authors

Craici, Iasmina

0009-0004-6739-4531

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 49

P.470: Public awareness and interest in kidney donation: An analysis from January 2004 to March 2024.
Abdelgadir, Yasir, Thongprayoon, Charat, Craici, Iasmina , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit, Valencia, Oscar A. Garcia , Thongprayoon, Charat , Miao, Jing , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit

Transplantation | September 16, 2024 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 9S | Pages: No page available

10.1097/01.tp.0001068616.11490.9c Get It

P.109: Exploring advanced nephrology fellowships: AI Insights into Transplant Specialization.
Craici, Iasmina , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit, Valencia, Oscar A. Garcia , Thongprayoon, Charat , Miao, Jing , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit

Transplantation | September 16, 2024 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 9S | Pages: No page available

10.1097/01.tp.0001067304.63310.5c Get It

243.3: Ethical advancements in healthcare: Ensuring accurate and culturally relevant translations of kidney transplant information for the Hispanic population.
Leeaphorn, Napat , Budhiraja, Pooja , Craici, Iasmina , Budhiraja, Pooja , Valencia, Oscar A. Garcia , Thongprayoon, Charat , Jadlowiec, Caroline C. , Mao, Shennen A. , Suarez, Maria Lourdes Gonzalez , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit

Transplantation | September 16, 2024 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 9S | Pages: No page available

10.1097/01.tp.0001064692.63071.b6 Get It

P.110: Harnessing social listening to gauge public awareness of kidney transplantation.
Leeaphorn, Napat , Craici, Iasmina , Valencia, Oscar A. Garcia , Thongprayoon, Charat , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit

Transplantation | September 16, 2024 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 9S | Pages: No page available

10.1097/01.tp.0001067308.49512.b4 Get It

Digital health tools in nephrology: A comparative analysis of AI and professional opinions via online polls
Pham, Justin H. , Thongprayoon, Charat , Miao, Jing , Craici, Iasmina , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit , Miao, Jing , Craici, Iasmina M, Cheungpasitporn, Wisit , Thongprayoon, Charat , Suppadungsuk, Supawadee

DIGITAL HEALTH | August 28, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/20552076241277458 Get It

Background Professional opinion polling has become a popular means of seeking advice for complex nephrology questions in the #AskRenal community on X. ChatGPT is a large language model with remarkable problem-solving capabilities, but its ability to provide solutions for real-world clinical scenarios remains unproven. This study seeks to evaluate how closely ChatGPT's responses align with current prevailing medical opinions in nephrology. Methods Nephrology polls from X were submitted to ChatGPT-4, which generated answers without prior knowledge of the poll outcomes. Its responses were compared to the poll results (inter-rater) and a second set of responses given after a one-week interval (intra-rater) using Cohen's kappa statistic (κ). Subgroup analysis was performed based on question subject matter. Results Our analysis comprised two rounds of testing ChatGPT on 271 nephrology-related questions. In the first round, ChatGPT's responses agreed with poll results for 163 of the 271 questions (60.2%; κ = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.38–0.46). In the second round, conducted to assess reproducibility, agreement improved slightly to 171 out of 271 questions (63.1%; κ = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.42–0.50). Comparison of ChatGPT's responses between the two rounds demonstrated high internal consistency, with agreement in 245 out of 271 responses (90.4%; κ = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82–0.90). Subgroup analysis revealed stronger performance in the combined areas of homeostasis, nephrolithiasis, and pharmacology (κ = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.47–0.59 in both rounds), compared to other nephrology subfields. Conclusion ChatGPT-4 demonstrates modest capability in replicating prevailing professional opinion in nephrology polls overall, with varying performance levels between question topics and excellent internal consistency. This study provides insights into the potential and limitations of using ChatGPT in medical decision making.
AI-Driven Patient Education in Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluating Chatbot Responses against Clinical Guidelines
Acharya, Prakrati , Alba, R. Maniega, Krisanapan, Pajaree , Acharya, Chirag , Csongrádi, Éva, Mao, Michael A. , Craici, Iasmina , Miao, Jing , Thongprayoon, Charat, Cheungpasitporn, Wisit , Acharya, Chirag , Mao, Michael A , Craici, Iasmina M, Miao, Jing , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit , Krisanapan, Pajaree , Suppadungsuk, Supawadee , Thongprayoon, Charat

Diseases | August 16, 2024 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 185

10.3390/diseases12080185 Get It

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients can benefit from personalized education on lifestyle and nutrition management strategies to enhance healthcare outcomes. The potential use of chatbots, introduced in 2022, as a tool for educating CKD patients has been explored. A set of 15 questions on lifestyle modification and nutrition, derived from a thorough review of three specific KDIGO guidelines, were developed and posed in various formats, including original, paraphrased with different adverbs, incomplete sentences, and misspellings. Four versions of AI were used to answer these questions: ChatGPT 3.5 (March and September 2023 versions), ChatGPT 4, and Bard AI. Additionally, 20 questions on lifestyle modification and nutrition were derived from the NKF KDOQI guidelines for nutrition in CKD (2020 Update) and answered by four versions of chatbots. Nephrologists reviewed all answers for accuracy. ChatGPT 3.5 produced largely accurate responses across the different question complexities, with occasional misleading statements from the March version. The September 2023 version frequently cited its last update as September 2021 and did not provide specific references, while the November 2023 version did not provide any misleading information. ChatGPT 4 presented answers similar to 3.5 but with improved reference citations, though not always directly relevant. Bard AI, while largely accurate with pictorial representation at times, occasionally produced misleading statements and had inconsistent reference quality, although an improvement was noted over time. Bing AI from November 2023 had short answers without detailed elaboration and sometimes just answered “YES”. Chatbots demonstrate potential as personalized educational tools for CKD that utilize layman’s terms, deliver timely and rapid responses in multiple languages, and offer a conversational pattern advantageous for patient engagement. Despite improvements observed from March to November 2023, some answers remained potentially misleading. ChatGPT 4 offers some advantages over 3.5, although the differences are limited. Collaboration between healthcare professionals and AI developers is essential to improve healthcare delivery and ensure the safe incorporation of chatbots into patient care.
Enhancing Patient Education Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Evaluating ChatGPT's Accuracy in Providing Information on Living Kidney Donation
Craici, Iasmina , Leeaphorn, Napat , Valencia, Oscar A. Garcia , Jadlowiec, Caroline C. , Mao, Shennen A. , Mao, Michael A. , Budhiraja, Pooja , Thongprayoon, Charat , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | May 18, 2024 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 11S | Pages: 1099-1099

10.1681/asn.20233411s11099b Get It

Safety and Efficacy of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Advanced CKD and ESKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sanpawithayakul, Kanokporn , Craici, Iasmina , Krisanapan, Pajaree , Pattharanitima, Pattharawin , Thongprayoon, Charat , Tangpanithandee, Supawit , Miao, Jing , Mao, Michael A. , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | May 17, 2024 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 11S | Pages: 854-854

10.1681/asn.20233411s1854b Get It

Bridging the Literacy Gap in Living Kidney Donation Information by ChatGPT
Craici, Iasmina , Leeaphorn, Napat , Valencia, Oscar A. Garcia , Jadlowiec, Caroline C. , Mao, Shennen A. , Mao, Michael A. , Budhiraja, Pooja , Thongprayoon, Charat , Cheungpasitporn, Wisit

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | May 17, 2024 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 11S | Pages: 623-623

10.1681/asn.20233411s1623c Get It