LaPlant, Betsy

Introduction: Nanotechnology for cancer therapy aims to increase drug delivery to tumor sites while lowering toxicity. AR160 is a novel 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate consisting of commercial grade nab-paclitaxel (NP) nanoparticles non-covalently coated with rituximab (R) for targeted delivery into tissues expressing CD20. The drug delivery system and clinical grade product was developed in the laboratory of Svetomir N. Markovic, M.D.,Ph.D. Single agent rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 in relapsed patients with aggressive lymphomas is not utilized and has limited activity in patients with multiple relapses. Taxanes (Younes 1995, Wilson 1995) have modest clinical activity as a single agent with overall response rates of 23% and 17%, respectively, when administered at doses of 200 mg/m 2 and 140 mg/m 2 in previously treated patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We hypothesized that utilizing the targeted ability of rituximab that the AR160 taxane nanoparticle would have activity in relapsed B-cell NHL and offer a new class of agents for relapsed B-cell NHL. Methods: A 3+3 phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with relapsed refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AR160 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were required to have had prior systemic treatment with no other therapy with clinical benefit. Patients with aggressive lymphoma were required to have a stem cell transplant if transplant eligible. AR160 was prepared on-site in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Research Pharmacy, and the product was reconstituted by mixing the two agents delivering as one combined infusion at a specific concentration. The starting dose level (DL1) was NP at 100mg/m 2 with R at 40 mg/m 2. These doses were significantly lower than standard doses. Disease evaluations were conducted after every 2 treatment cycles using CT based criteria from the revised 2014 Lugano Classification or PET scans. Patients were treated until disease progression or intolerability. Samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Results: Nine (7 males and 2 females) patients with a median age of 61 (range 55-84 years) were enrolled (2 follicular lymphoma (FL), 1 previously transformed from FL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) followed by FL relapse, 1 high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements transformed from FL, 1 transformed FL to DLBCL, 2 high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements, 1 high-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS and 1 mantle cell lymphoma. The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range 3-16). At dose level 1, all 3 of the first 3 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (C1D15, C4D1, and C1D15) with the C4D1 a grade 4 and unlikely related. After the first three patients, de-escalation to dose level -1 was implemented per protocol with NP at 75 mg/m 2 and rituximab at 30 mg/m 2. There was one patient with a grade 3 non-hematological adverse event all possibly related to treatment (anorexia, diarrhea, and enterocolitis). There were 6 partial responses (71%), 1 complete response (14%) with high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangement, 1 stable disease with mantle cell lymphoma and 1 patient had progressive disease. Six of the 9 patients were alive with subsequent therapies. PK evaluation is pending. Conclusion: AR160 therapy is a novel drug delivery system incorporating significantly lower doses of paclitaxel and rituximab that is safe and demonstrates promising clinical activity in patients with low-grade and high-grade previously treated B-cell lymphomas. This principle of treatment is applicable to other disorders. Further clinical testing is warranted in these patient populations.

Background: Frailty is a state of decreased reserve affecting multiple organ systems, thereby increasing vulnerability to stressors. Several tools have been proposed to measure frailty in multiple myeloma (MM), such as the IMWG frailty index, and the Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index. However, these are based on clinical trial datasets, and include chronological age as one of the indicators of frailty. A frailty index based on the principle of accumulation of health deficits (Rockwood doi:10.1093/gerona/62.7.738), provides a measure of physiologic age. This index can be readily calculated using various combinations of health deficits and has been shown to predict outcomes in several populations. Social support has been associated with improved outcomes in various populations, however its impact on survival in patients with MM has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of frailty measured by a deficit accumulation frailty index and the impact of relationship status on outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Methods: This is a retrospective study including patients diagnosed with MM between January 6 th, 2005, and September 19 th, 2018. We calculated a deficit accumulation frailty index using previously published methods (McNallan et. al doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.008, Searle et al. doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-24). We used the electronic medical record system at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, to extract data on activities of daily living (14 items) provided by patient-completed questionnaires, and data on comorbidities as recorded by treating providers (16 items), within 6 months prior to diagnosis. Each item was scored as 0, 0.5, or 1, with 1 indicating the presence of deficit (Table 1). The frailty index was defined as the sum of individual scores divided that by the total number of non-missing items. Patients who had N >2 missing items were excluded. Patients with a frailty index ≥0.15 were considered frail. We also extracted data on self-reported relationship status within 6 months prior to diagnosis. Variables were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using Cox proportional hazard models. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the Log-rank test. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: We included 578 patients. Median age was 67 (interquartile range: 59-74) years, and 40% were female. Among all patients, 226 (39%) were frail. Compared to fit patients, patients who were frail were older (median age: 70 vs. 65 years, P<0.001) and more likely to have International Staging System (ISS) III (vs. I/II) disease (47% vs. 27%, P<0.001) and ECOG performance status ≥2 (vs. 0 or 1) (45% vs. 17%, P<0.001). There was no difference in R-ISS III disease or presence of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities between fit and frail patients. Median OS was 7.6 and 4.1 years in fit and frail patient, respectively (P<0.001). Physician assessed ECOG performance status was available for 268 patients. Among patients with ECOG performance status 0 or 1 (193 patients), 136 (70%) were fit, and 57 (30%) were frail. The OS was 8.3 and 4.6 years in the 2 groups, respectively (P=0.006) (table 2). On multivariate analysis including age, frailty status, and R-ISS stage (III vs. I/II), all were associated with OS with frailty's hazard ratio (HR): 1.4 (95%CI [1.1-1.8]), P=0.004; the HR was 1.4 (95%CI [1.1-1.9]), P=0.02, when analysis was restricted to patients ≥60 years. Among all patients, those who were married or in a committed relationship (474 patients) had improved survival (median OS: 7.0 vs. 3.7 years, respectively, P<0.001) compared to patients who were divorced/separated, widowed, or single (96 patients). On multivariate analysis, which included age, R-ISS III, frailty status, and relationship status, all were associated with OS. The HR for relationship status was 1.4 (95%CI [1.0-1.8]), P=0.0465. Conclusion: Frailty, defined by the deficit accumulation frailty index, is independently associated with decreased survival in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Being married or in a committed relationship is associated with improved survival independent of age, disease stage, and frailty.

Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 proteins play a role in multiple myeloma (MM) cell survival, for which targeted inhibitors are being developed. AT-101 is an oral drug, which disrupts Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 function, impedes mitochondrial bioenergetic processes and induces apoptosis in MM cells. When combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), AT-101 significantly reduced tumor burden in an in vivo xenograft model of MM. These data provided rationale for a phase I/II study to establish the effective dose of AT-101 in combination with Rd (ARd regimen) in relapsed/refractory MM. A total of 10 patients were enrolled, most with high-risk cytogenetics (80%) and prior stem cell transplant (70%). Three patients were lenalidomide-refractory, 2 were bortezomib-refractory and 3 were daratumumab-refractory. The ARd combination was well tolerated with most common grade 3/4 adverse events being cytopenia’s. The overall response rate was 40% and clinical benefit rate was 90%. The median progression free survival was 14.9 months (95% CI 7.1-NE). Patients responsive to ARd showed a decrease in Bcl-2:Bim or Mcl-1:Noxa protein complexes, increased CD8+ T and NK cells and depletion of T and B-regulatory cells. The ARd regimen demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory MM prompting further investigation in additional patients.

PURPOSE Bone marrow biopsies (BMB) are performed before/after therapy to confirm complete response (CR) in patients with lymphoma on clinical trials. We sought to establish whether BMB add value in assessing response or predict progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) outcomes in follicular lymphoma (FL) subjects in a large, multicenter, multitrial cohort. METHODS Data were pooled from seven trials of 580 subjects with previously untreated FL through Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) and SWOG Cancer Research Network (SWOG) completing enrollment from 2008 to 2016. RESULTS Only 5/580 (0.9%) had positive baseline BMB, CR on imaging, and subsequent positive BMB ( P < .0001). Therefore, BMB were irrelevant to response in 99% of subjects. A sensitivity analysis of 385 FL subjects treated on an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study was included. In the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group cohort, 5/385 (1.3%) had BMB that affected response assessment. Since some subjects do not undergo confirmatory BMB, we performed a landmark survival analysis from first radiologic CR with data from 580 subjects from Alliance and SWOG. Of subjects with CR on imaging (n = 187), PFS and OS were not significantly different among those with negative BMB to confirm CR (n = 47) versus those without repeat BMB (n = 140; PFS: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.10, 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.94, log-rank P = .686; OS: hazard ratio, 0.59, 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.53, log-rank P = .276). CONCLUSION We conclude that BMB add little value to response assessment in subjects with FL treated on clinical trials and we recommend eliminating BMB from clinical trial requirements. BMB should also be removed from diagnostic guidelines for FL except in scenarios in which it may change management including confirmation of limited stage and assessment of cytopenias. This would reduce cost, patient discomfort, resource utilization, and potentially remove a barrier to trial enrollment.