Jelinek, Diane F.

Abstract The human IGHV4-34 gene encodes antibodies which are intrinsically autoreactive when the VH domain is unmutated. Therefore, B cells expressing IGHV4-34 B-cell receptor immunoglobulins (BcR IG) are normally under close scrutiny in order to avoid unwanted autoreactivity, especially against DNA. The IGHV4-34 gene is frequently utilized in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), where, typically, it shows a high load of somatic hypermutation (SHM). We have previously reported distinctive SHM patterns amongst IGHV4-34 CLL, especially for subsets with stereotyped BcR IG. However, although a large number of cases (~2000) was previously studied, since even the largest subsets account for only ~3% of CLL, meaningful conclusions could not be reached for smaller subsets. Here we revisit this issue in a series of 16,528 CLL cases and focus on IGHV4-34 expressing subsets: #4 (IGHV4-34/IGHD5-18/IGHJ6 | 156 cases, 0.9%); #11 (IGHV4-34/IGHD3-10/IGHJ4 | 16 cases, 0.1%); #16 (IGHV4-34/IGHD2-15/IGHJ6 | 41 cases, 0.25%); #29 (IGHV4-34/IGHD: unassignable/IGHJ3 | 39 cases, 0.24%); and #201 (IGHV4-34/IGHD: unassignable/IGHJ3 | 43 cases 0.26%). Focusing on codons 27-104 within the VH domain (from CDR1-IMGT to FR3-IMGT), we calculated the sequence distance between subsets and the corresponding IGHV4-34 germline sequence based on a pairwise qualitative and quantitative comparison of the respective amino acid composition. The minimum distance calculated, and hence the greatest identity, was observed between subsets #4 and #16, both concerning IgG-switched cases (IgG-CLL), which is notable given the overall rarity of IgG-CLL. In contrast, the maximum distance, implying the least identity, was between subsets #16 and #201, the latter concerning IgM/D-CLL. Extreme variations between subsets were noted in codons spanning the entire VH domain. This result is consistent with our finding of a subset-biased distribution of mutations over the VH domain. More specifically, while subsets #11, #16, #29 and #201 had a lower frequency of mutations within VH CDR1 compared to VH CDR2, the exact opposite was seen in subset #4, with 40% of mutations in VH CDR1 versus 27% in VH CDR2. In addition, subsets #4, #11, #16 and #29 had a similar distribution of mutations in VH FR2 and VH FR3, in contrast to subset #201 that showed a preference for VH FR3 over VH FR2. Consequently, we noted that certain positions were targeted in a subset-specific manner e.g. codon 28 in VH CDR1 was heavily targeted in subsets #4 (68.6%) and #16 (87.8%), with most cases carrying an acidic amino acid (AA) introduced by SHM, glycine to glutamic acid, G>E: 51.3% for subset #4 and 78% for subset #16. The high prevalence of acidic AA introduced by SHM in these subsets is notable considering the electropositive nature of their VH CDR3 (especially of subset #4), strongly recalling edited anti-DNA antibodies. Interestingly, the G>E change was identified at a much lower frequency in other IGHV4-34 subsets: 18.75% for subset #11; 2.6% for subset #29; 7% for subset #201, all of which carried electronegative VH CDR3. Further, we noted that certain positions were heavily targeted in all subsets e.g. 56-86% targeting for SHM at codon 92 in VH FR3 where serine is encoded by the agc triplet, the ”hottest of hotspots”. This result could be viewed as sequence- rather than subset-dependent and linked to the molecular features of this codon, which is supported by the low targeting of codon 93 (0-6%), also encoding serine by the tct triplet. Other positions were targeted in all subsets but at vastly different frequencies e.g. codon 64 was targeted in 37.8% in subset #4 rising to 100% in subset #29. Finally, positions heavily targeted by SHM in certain subsets were unmutated in other subsets e.g. codon 36 in VH CDR1 remained unmutated in subset #16, in contrast 76.9% of subset #29 were mutated at this position resulting in an AA change. In conclusion, we document different spectra of SHM and AA changes between stereotyped IGHV4-34 CLL subsets. The finding of subset-biased, recurrent AA changes at certain codons indicates that the respective progenitor cells may have responded in a specific manner to the selecting antigen(s), despite expressing the same IGHV gene, indicating a functional purpose for these modifications. This is exemplified by the molecular characteristics of the recurrent AA changes in subset #4, thereby offering interesting pathogenetic hints. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 92 BACKGROUND: All somatic cell types, including all B lineage cells, constitutively express a number of DNA repair proteins to maintain genomic stability and thwart tumorigenesis in the face of ongoing constitutive levels of DNA damage. Compromises in expression of these essential DNA repair factors have been shown to readily induce the development of various cancers including B cell lymphomas, suggesting expression levels are tightly regulated and limited in quantity. In germinal center (GC) B cells, however, additional DNA repair capacity is likely required to counterbalance the heightened level of mutagenic activity owing to the induced expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) during somatic hypermutation (SHM). AID is a DNA editing enzyme which introduces somatic mutations into immunoglobulin (Ig) V regions at an estimated rate which is almost a million-fold higher than the spontaneous rate in somatic cells. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that to maintain the genomic wellness of GC B cells which are undergoing SHM, there is a need for induction of an accompanying robust DNA repair system. We further hypothesize that inefficient induction of these repair genes may predispose to malignant transformation. METHODS: Using tonsillar tissue sections and purified tonsillar B cell subpopulations, we compared expression levels of various DNA repair genes and related these levels to AID expression across the subsets using immunohistochemistry, real-time RT-PCR, and Western blot analysis. To characterize the nature of signals capable of inducing expression levels of AID and/or DNA repair proteins, peripheral blood B cells were activated in vitro using a panel of stimuli, including coculture with activated CD4 T cells. As a surrogate measure of mismatch repair (MMR) activity in the relative absence of T cell help, we quantitated the number of somatic hypermutations at A/T sites in the Ig heavy chain variable (IGHV) region genes in a collection of IGHV sequences obtained from normal B cells and HIV-related lymphoma cells. RESULTS: Using immunohistochemistry, we observed that, similar to the expression of AID, DNA MMR genes are significantly induced in tonsillar GC B cells. These results were further validated using a more sensitive real-time RT-PCR assay and analysis by Western blotting. By expanding our DNA repair gene panel, we observed that proteins of homologous recombination, base excision repair and DNA single strand break signalling pathway are also similarly induced in GC B cells at RNA, protein, and functional levels compared to their expression in naïve and memory B cells. By contrast, expression of non-homologous end joining and DNA double strand break signalling molecules are unchanged. We have termed this selective induction of repair mechanisms in GC B cells as somatic hyperrepair (SHR). To identify pathways that lead to the activation of AID and SHR, we used an in vitro system and a variety of stimuli and we discovered that multiple B cell stimuli including CpG, CD40L, and anti-BCR could each independently induce the expression of AID while SHR induction strictly required the engagement of CD4+ T cells. This provocative observation suggests a novel role for CD4+ T cells in mitigating tumorigenesis of post-GC B cells through their ability to induce the SHR pathway in cells that have been induced to undergo SHM. To demonstrate the possible role of SHR in lymphomagenesis, we analysed the mutation pattern of IGHV genes from a panel of B cell lymphomas obtained from HIV infected (CD4+ T cell suppressed) patients. We found that HIV-related lymphoma cells displayed a significantly lower frequency of SHM at A/T positions relative to normal memory B cells, indicative of compromised MMR of their precursor cells during GC transit. Our findings resolve the lingering paradox that B cell malignancies are overwhelmingly prevalent under T cell suppression conditions such as HIV infection, post-organ transplant, and aging. Finally, our results also suggest for the first time that mounting efficient tumor suppression for some cells may depend on signals transmitted by neighboring cells and the specific microenvironment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 669 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in the Western world but its pathogenesis remains largely unknown. More recently, a widely prevalent premalignant condition termed monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL) has been defined and similarly involves expansion of a CD19+CD5+ population of B cells. MBL has been the focus of a wide number of recent studies in hopes it can provide insight into the early pathological events that lead to clonal expansion of a pre-leukemic CLL-like clone. Previously, we and others identified the transcription factor lymphocyte enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF-1) as one of several genes significantly over expressed in CLL B cells relative to blood CD19+ B cells from healthy adults. LEF-1 is crucial for the proliferation and survival of pro-B cells during B cell development and deregulated LEF-1 activation has been directly linked with leukemogenesis in a transgenic murine model. In the present study, we addressed three critical questions concerning LEF-1 and CLL: 1) do CD5+ normal B cells express LEF-1; 2) at what stage of transformation does LEF-1 expression first appear; and 3) what mechanism(s) underlies LEF-1 expression in leukemic B cells. Methodology: The goals of our study were to: 1) determine the LEF-1 expression status of normal CD 19+/CD5+ human B cells; 2) determine the expression status of LEF-1 in clonal B cells present in patients with MBL; and 3) identify regulatory mechanisms that control aberrant expression of LEF-1 in CLL B cells. In order to achieve the first two goals, a 3-color flow cytometry assay for CD19, CD5, and intracellular LEF-1 was developed. To achieve the third goal, we performed in silico analysis of the LEF-1 locus and correlated this with publicly available genome wide methylated CpG island recovery assay (MIRA) data describing the methylome of normal human B cells (Rauch, T. A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(3): 671-8). Results: Analysis of human umbilical cord blood B cells, a rich source of the CD19+/CD5+ B cell subset, revealed that all normal CD 19+/CD5+ human B cells are negative for LEF-1 protein expression. These data demonstrate LEF-1 expression by CLL B cells is truly aberrant and does not simply reflect the phenotype of CD5+ lineage B cells. We next tested if the CD19+/CD5+ cells obtained from patients with MBL express LEF-1 protein. In these analyses, we restricted our study to MBL patients with absolute B cell counts of less than 2.5 ×10 9 cells/(L) (range: 0.756 - 2.44 × 10 9 cells/(L)), which is significantly below the upper limit that defines the MBL to CLL transition. Of interest, each MBL sample analyzed (n=6) revealed the presence of two populations of cells: 1) CD19+/CD5+ B cells expressing LEF-1; and 2) CD19+/CD5- B cells lacking expression of LEF-1. To confirm the clonal nature of the CD19+/CD5+ cells from MBL patients we demonstrated that the cells were light chain restricted. These data clearly indicated that LEF-1 expression becomes deregulated in the premalignant state of MBL and may therefore represent an early event in CLL leukemogenesis. In order to identify differential pathways of LEF-1 regulation that may be altered in CLL and MBL B cells, in silico promoter analysis of LEF-1 was performed. We identified a number of potential transcription factor binding sites as well as a putative CpG island in the 5' promoter region of LEF-1. Using data from a human B cell genome wide methylation array, we were able to determine that this same putative LEF-1 promoter CpG island was highly methylated in normal human B cells. Methylation of promoter region CpG islands is known to play an important role in developmental regulation of gene expression and may be the operative mechanism underlying silencing of LEF-1 expression in normal B cells. Conclusions: LEF-1 expression is deregulated in MBL and appears to be an early and possibly key event in the transition of normal B cells into a premalignant/malignant state. Our data suggest that loss of epigenetic regulation of this developmentally important locus may play a role in aberrant LEF-1 expression in MBL and CLL B cells. Ongoing studies are aimed at determining the methylation status of the LEF-1 promoter in CLL B cells and the functional role of this protein in transcriptional regulation and survival of CLL and MBL cells. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2400 Poster Board II-377 Tumor necrosis factor superfamily member BAFF-R has been shown to transduce a powerful survival signal in B lineage cells upon ligation by BAFF, its soluble high affinity ligand. The availability of BAFF in lymphoid organs and its detectable levels in the blood suggest that it is the control of receptor expression by the B cell rather than ligand production by supportive cells that limits the activity of this survival signal. The presence of BAFF-R on the surface of B cells from the transitional stages of development through maturity mirrors the expression of BAFF-R on the malignancies thought to arise from these various developmental stages and may enable B lineage malignancies to receive an anti-apoptotic signal from BAFF that reinforces and supports the expansion of the malignant cells. This additional survival signal may be crucial in indolent malignancies like chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a cancer characterized more by the prolonged survival of the cancerous cells than by their abundant proliferation. While there are ongoing efforts to thwart this survival pathway with antibody-based therapeutics directed toward BAFF and BAFF-R, understanding the regulation of BAFF-R expression may open a more proximal, potent, and novel therapeutic avenue. Rel/NF-kB family member c-Rel is an appealing candidate BAFF-R regulator, since its nuclear localization and expression within B lineage cells roughly correlate with BAFF-R expression, predominating at nuclear kB sites as a dimer with p50 in mature B cells and declining in plasma cells. Recently published evidence has shown that B cell receptor (BCR)-induced c-Rel expression can modulate BAFF-R in murine transitional B cells, providing a critical increase in BAFF-R expression and thus, BAFF-responsiveness, during B cell development (Castro, I. J Immunol. 2009; 182(12): 7729). A role for the BCR is especially provocative in the context of CLL, which is commonly characterized by lower levels of surface BAFF-R despite a generally activated phenotype and, in the unmutated subtype, typically increased expression of genes downstream of the BCR. In related studies, we have analyzed BAFF-R promoter activity in BAFF-R expressing B cells vs. myeloma cell lines, which generally lack expression of this receptor, and have indeed demonstrated differential promoter activity of the region directly upstream of the BAFF-R gene. The goal of our current study was to focus on the role of the transcription factor, c-Rel, in regulating BAFF-R expression. While in silico tools identifying transcription factor binding sites in the three kilobases upstream of the BAFF-R gene found numerous possible c-Rel binding sites, only three c-Rel sites remained under the most stringent search conditions. An initial chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiment with an anti-c-Rel antibody suggested that the binding site within the first five hundred bases upstream of the transcriptional start site may be bound by c-Rel: ChIP with RAMOS B cells showed a 6-fold increase in the precipitated DNA of the region over the isotype-matched antibody control. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) using peripheral blood (PB) B cell nuclear extracts both from normal donors and CLL patients as well as malignant cell lines, demonstrate the different levels of binding to the putative c-Rel sites identified in silico and support the hypothesis that c-Rel directly regulates BAFF-R expression in these cells. These assays, which demonstrated the affinity of c-Rel for the putative promoter sites upstream of the BAFF-R gene, led to the transfection of new luciferase reporter constructs into malignant B and plasma cell lines, which demonstrate the effects both of amplifying and of mutating the c-Rel binding sites in our reporter assays. We supplemented these assays with experiments measuring the production of c-Rel in these cells both by quantitative RT-PCR, which demonstrated a twenty-fold decrease in plasma cell line ALMC-1 and a two-fold decrease in CLL cell c-Rel mRNA as compared to normal PB B cells, and by Western blot. Finally, we used a c-Rel expression vector to directly increase BAFF-R expression in the malignant cell lines. By identifying c-Rel expression and activation as a possible mechanism of direct control of BAFF-R expression in human B cells, we reveal a critical new rationale for the use of NF-kB inhibitors as chemotherapeutic adjuvants in B cell cancers. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2342 Poster Board II-319 PURPOSE: Numerous clinical and biologic parameters are able to predict time to first treatment (TFT) and overall survival (OS) for patients with CLL. The utility of prognostic testing in CLL patients may vary based on age at diagnosis given the higher mortality from other causes among older individuals. The goals of the present study were to i) evaluate differences in natural history of CLL patients based on age at diagnosis, ii) compare survival to age-matched individuals in the general population, and iii) determine the age-stratified utility of prognostic testing. METHODS: All 2487 CLL/SLL patients diagnosed between January 1995 and June 2008 and cared for in the Mayo Clinic Division of Hematology were categorized by age at diagnosis (<55 years, 55-64 years, 65-74 years, or ≥75 years) and evaluated for differences in clinical characteristics, TFT, and OS using chi-square tests. IGHV gene mutation analysis, ZAP-70 status, CD38 status, and cytogenetics abnormalities by interphase FISH testing were performed as part of clinical and/or research studies using methods previously described by our group. Cox regression was used to evaluate the ability of prognostic parameters to predict clinical outcome stratified by age at diagnosis. Patient survival was compared to that of the age matched Minnesota population. RESULTS: When grouped by age, 593 patients were age <55, 713 age 55-64, 748 age 65-74, and 433 age ≥75 at diagnosis. As of last follow-up, 268, 282, 296, and 108 patients in these age groups have been treated, respectively and 112, 171, 254, and 199 patients have died. Survival decreased as the age at diagnosis increased (p<0.001). OS of CLL patients was significantly shorter than that of the age-matched general population for patients age <55 years (p<0.001), 55-64 years (p<0.001), and 65-74 years (p<0.001) at diagnosis but not those ≥75 years (p=0.136). Among Rai stage 0 patients, survival was also shorter than that of the age-matched general population for CLL patients age <55 years (p<0.001), 55-64 years (p<0.001), and 65-74 years (p<0.001) but not those ≥ age 75 at diagnosis (p=0.07). No statistically significant differences were observed in CD38 status, IGHV mutation status, ZAP-70 status or the frequency of common cytogenetic abnormalities on FISH based on age at diagnosis category. Consistent with prior reports, all of these parameters were powerful predictors of TFT and OS for the overall cohort on univariate analysis (all p<0.001 for both TFT and OS). Given the variation in TFT and OS based on age at diagnosis, we next evaluated the utility of these prognostic parameters for predicting TFT and OS in each age category after adjusting for stage. CD38, IGHV mutation, and ZAP-70 each predicted TFT independent of stage for all age groups (all p <0.05). FISH results predicted TFT independent of stage for patients age 55-64 and 65-74 however did not reach statistical significance for those age <55 (p=0.18) or ≥75 (p=0.07). The utility of these parameters for predicting OS independent of stage was less consistent and varied by age. IGHV predicted OS independent of stage for patients <age 55 (p<0.001), 55-64 (p=0.007), and 65-74 (p'0.001) but was not a significant predictor of OS among those ≥75 (p=0.15). CD38, ZAP-70, and FISH each predicted survival independent of stage for only 2 of the 4 age categories (ZAP-70 for age <55 and 55-64; FISH for age <55 and 65-74; CD38 for 55-64 and ≥75). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of CLL patients is shorter than that of the age-matched general population for individuals age <75 at diagnosis regardless of disease stage. In contrast, survival does not differ from the age-matched general population among CLL patients ≥age 75 at diagnosis. Prognostic testing using CD38, IGHV mutation, and ZAP-70 is useful for predicting TFT independent of stage for CLL patients of all ages (including those ≥age 75) but has less value for predicting OS particularly as the age at diagnosis increases. IGHV appeared to be the best predictor of OS independent of stage among all patients age <75. Unexpectedly, prognostic testing had little utility for predicting OS independent of stage among patients age ≥75. These findings have important implications regarding the use of prognostic tests in patients with CLL as well as the use of test results to select patients for clinical trials testing early treatment for asymptomatic individuals. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon Pharma : Research Funding; Hospira: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kay:Biogenc-Idec, Celgene, Genentech, genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Celgene, Hospira, Polyphenon Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding. Zent:Genentech, Bayer, Genzyme, Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 1379 Background: Although chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has substantially improved response rates, treatment free survival, and overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 40–50% of patients achieve a complete remission and the majority have residual disease when evaluated using sensitive assays for minimal residual disease (MRD). While this observation created interest in consolidation therapy, previous alemtuzumab based consolidation trials have demonstrated excess morbidity/mortality. We conducted a lenalidomide based consolidation trial for patients with previously untreated CLL who received 6 cycles of induction with pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (PCR). Methods: Eligible patients were previously untreated and had CLL in need of treatment according to the NCI-WG criteria (Blood 111:5446). Treatment schema consisted of 6 cycles of pentostatin (2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) given every 21 days (Blood 109:405). All patients completing 6 cycles of PCR, underwent complete restaging and evaluation for MRD using sensitive flow cytometry (Leukemia 21:956). Following restaging and adequate recovery of blood counts, patients received 6 mos of lenalidomide consolidation by continuous daily administration. The starting lenalidomide dose was 5 mg/day with escalation to 10 mg/day after the first cycle as tolerated. Patients again underwent complete restaging and MRD evaluation after 6 mos of lenalidomide. At the time of this restaging, MRD negative patients entered observation. Those with residual disease continued on lenalidomide and underwent repeat MRD assessment every 3 mos with cessation of lenalidomide when an MRD negative state achieved. Results: 45 patients were enrolled at Mayo Clinic between 3/2008 and 11/2009. 44 patients were eligible for treatment: 71% male, median age 65 (range: 44–78); intermediate Rai risk 61%; high Rai risk 39%. On prognostic testing 32% were CD38+, 52% Zap-70 +, 52% IGHV unmutated, and 16% had high risk FISH (del 17p13; del 11q22). 38 of 44 eligible patients (86%) completed 6 cycles of PCR induction. Adverse events deemed at least possibly related to PCR induction included 19 (43%) patients with grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 9 (20%) with grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity. The Overall response rate to induction was 98% with 15 CR/CRi, 3 CCR, 9 nPR, and 16 PR. Four patients with CR were also MRD negative at the completion of induction. Of 38 patients who completed induction, 34 initiated lenalidomide consolidation. Thus, by protocol intent to treat analysis, 34/44 (77%) patients starting CIT with PCR were able to receive consolidation therapy. The remaining patients were unable to initiate consolidation due to: failure to complete induction (6 patients), disease progression (1), adverse event (1) and patient refusal (2). Among the 34 patients who initiated consolidation, the median number of cycles of lenalidomide received was 5.5 (range: 1–19). Adverse events deemed at least possibly related to lenalidomide consolidation included 22 (65%) patients with grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 4 (12%) with grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity. Among the 34 patients who received at least 1 cycle of lenalidomide, 4 patients have improved the quality of their response to date with 11 patients still on lenalidomide at the time of this report. After median follow-up of 16 mos, 42/44 patients are alive and median duration of response has not been reached. To date 3/44 (7%) of patients have progressed to require additional treatment. Finally, since eligibility was nearly identical to our historic trial of PCR without lenalidomide consolidation, we compared the 44 patients in the present trial to the 64 patients previously treated on our PCR trial (Blood 109:405). Demographic and prognostic characteristics of the patients in the two studies were similar. With the caveat it represents comparison across phase II trials, the proportion of patients free of retreatment at 12 mos was 97% (95%CI: 91–100) for PCR-L vs. 78% (95%CI: 68–89) for PCR (Figure 1). Conclusion: We report here the first results of lenalidomide based consolidation for CLL patients receiving first-line CIT induction. Although lenalidomide consolidation appears to improve the quality of response and prolong time to retreatment, longer follow-up is necessary to determine the clinical benefit of this strategy. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide. Kay:Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Abstract Purpose: We sought to investigate whether B cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) stereotypy is associated with particular clinicobiological features among chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients expressing mutated BcR IG (M-CLL) encoded by the IGHV4-34 gene, and also ascertain whether these associations could refine prognostication. Experimental Design: In a series of 19,907 CLL cases with available immunogenetic information, we identified 339 IGHV4-34–expressing cases assigned to one of the four largest stereotyped M-CLL subsets, namely subsets #4, #16, #29 and #201, and investigated in detail their clinicobiological characteristics and disease outcomes. Results: We identified shared and subset-specific patterns of somatic hypermutation (SHM) among patients assigned to these subsets. The greatest similarity was observed between subsets #4 and #16, both including IgG-switched cases (IgG-CLL). In contrast, the least similarity was detected between subsets #16 and #201, the latter concerning IgM/D-expressing CLL. Significant differences between subsets also involved disease stage at diagnosis and the presence of specific genomic aberrations. IgG subsets #4 and #16 emerged as particularly indolent with a significantly (P &lt; 0.05) longer time-to-first-treatment (TTFT; median TTFT: not yet reached) compared with the IgM/D subsets #29 and #201 (median TTFT: 11 and 12 years, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings support the notion that BcR IG stereotypy further refines prognostication in CLL, superseding the immunogenetic distinction based solely on SHM load. In addition, the observed distinct genetic aberration landscapes and clinical heterogeneity suggest that not all M-CLL cases are equal, prompting further research into the underlying biological background with the ultimate aim of tailored patient management. Clin Cancer Res; 23(17); 5292–301. ©2017 AACR.