Porrata, Luis F.

Abstract The International Prognostic Index at the time of relapse (IPI-R) has been reported to predict clinical outcome in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) [Jabbour et al, Leukemia & Lymphoma2005;46(6):861–867; Lerner et al, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplant2006;13:486–492; and Costa et al, Bone Marrow Transplant2008;41:715–720]. The absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) has been reported as a prognostic factor for survival at diagnosis, during standard chemotherapy and at day 15 post-ASCT for multiple hematological malignancies; however, no reports have addressed whether ALC at the time of relapse (ALC-R) predicts survival. Thus, we assessed the prognostic significance of ALC-R in patients with relapsed DLBCL. To be included in the study, patients were required to have been diagnosed with relapsed DLBCL, have ALC values available from the time of relapse, and to be followed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. From Feb 2,1987 until March 6, 2006, 121 DLBCL patients qualified for the study. The overall survival (OS) was measured from the time of relapse to the date of death or last follow-up and progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from relapse to the time of progression, relapse, death, or last follow-up. The median age at relapse was 68 years (range:25–88 years) and the median ALC-R was 1.21 x 109/L (range: 0.33–5.99 x 109/L). The value of ALC-R ≥ 1.0 x 109/L was used for the analysis based on previous publications. The groups (ALC-R ≥ 1 or < 1 x 109/L) were balanced for the IPI-R (p=0.1), as well as for undergoing ASCT (p=0.4). Superior OS was observed in patients with an ALC-R ≥ 1.0 x 109/L (N = 76) [median OS: 27.5 months, 3 years OS rates of 42%] compared with patient with an ALC-R < 1.0 x 109/L (N =45) [median OS: 9.4 months, 3 years OS rates of 13%] (p <0.0001). Superior PFS was also observed in patients with an ALC-R ≥ 1.0 x 109/L (N = 76) [median PFS: 14.8 months, 3 years PFS rates of 30%] compared with patient with an ALC-R < 1.0 x 109/L (N =45) [median PFS: 6.2 months, 3 years PFS rates of 11%] (p <0.001). ALC-R was an independent prognostic factor for OS [RR = 0.551, p < 0.009] and PFS [RR = 0.674, p < 0.02] in the multivariate analysis when compared with the IPI-R and whether patients underwent ASCT or not. Our study supports the hypothesis that ALC at relapse predicts clinical outcome in DLBCL and suggests that patient host immunity is an important variable predicting survival in relapsed DLBCL.

Abstract Background: Germinal center B cell-like (GCB) DLBCL, as determined by gene expression profiling or immunohistochemistry, is more likely to be cured by initial conventional chemoimmunotherapy than non-germinal center B cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL. For patients with relapsed or refractory chemosensitive DLBCL, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplant is considered standard-of-care treatment, but it is unknown whether the outcome of these patients is similarly influenced by the subtype of DLBCL. We therefore explored the differences between patients with GCB and non-GCB DLBCL as regards their clinical features at relapse after first line therapy and their outcome following salvage autologous HSC transplant. Methods: Patients undergoing BEAM conditioning and autologous HSC transplantation for relapsed or refractory chemosensitive DLBCL at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 2001 and 2006 were included. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for CD10, BCL-6 and MUM1 allowing classification in GCB and non-GCB-like DLBCL, as well as for BCL-2. GCB and non-GCB groups were compared in terms of known prognostic factors at time of progression and outcome after HSC transplant Results: Fifty-nine patients were included and had retrievable tumor samples to allow immunohistochemical analysis. Median follow-up of survivors was 25 months; median age at the time of transplant was 60 years (range 17–77); All patients had failed at least one previous anthracycline-based regimen (15 had refractory disease). Overall, 25/59 cases (42%) were positive for CD10, 32/58 (55%) for BCL-6, and 19/58 (32%) for MUM1. Thirty-two patients (54%) were classified as having GCB and 27 (46%) non-GCB-like DLBCL. Patients in the GCB and non-GCB group had similar time to progression (TTP) (median 12.5 months vs. 11 months, Wilcoxon P=0.81) after first line therapy and similar IPI-R scores (Chi-square, P=0.38). In univariate analysis, GCB and non-GCB did not differ in time to relapse after HSC transplant (log rank test P=0.77) or survival (log rank test P=0.48; figure). The lack of demonstrable difference in survival persisted even after correction for IPI-R and TTP, factors know to affect transplant outcome (Cox regression, RR=0.80 for GCB; P=0.28). BCL-2 was highly expressed in both GCB (81%) and non-GCB (96%) and did not correlate with outcome in the entire population nor in any of the two groups. Conclusion: Patients with chemosensitive relapsed or refractory GCB and non-GCB-like DLBCL derive similar benefit from autologous HSC transplant. Figure Figure

Abstract Background: High-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is curative in about 40% of patients with relapsed chemosensitive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The international prognostic index obtained at the time of relapse (IPI-R) and the time from initial treatment to relapse (TTR) have been suggested in different series to be predictors of outcome after HSC transplantation. We explored the concomitant effect of IPI-R and TTR on therapeutic outcome in a modern and uniform cohort of patients with relapsed chemosensitive DLBC undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral HSC transplantation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 80 consecutive patients treated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 2001 and 2006 who received a peripheral HSC transplant (except for 3 patients who receive bone marrow) after being conditioned with BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) for relapsed chemosensitive DLBCL. Results: Median follow-up of survivors was 31.4 months, Median age at the time of transplant was 62 (interquartile range 53–65; range 26–77), 65% were males; median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2. All patients had received at least one previous anthracycline-based regimen, 78% had been previously exposed to rituximab and all achieved at least CRu after the initial treatment. The median time from diagnosis to relapse was 19 months (interquartile range 10–43), 25% of patients had a high or high-intermediate IPI-R. The median survival from the time of transplant for patients with TTR>18 months v. ≤ 18 months was not reached and 50 months respectively (P=0.005). Median survival for patients with high or high-intermediate IPI-R at the time of relapse (IPI score ≥3) was 23.3 months and not reached for patients with low or low-intermediate IPI (P=0.01). These two factors were independent in multivariate analysis with RR for death of 1.8 (1.2–2.9; P=0.004) for TTR ≤ 18 months and 1.7 (1.1–2.5; P=0.017) for high or high-intermediate IPI and therefore combined in a prognostic system were patients with none (n=32), one (n=39) or two (n=9) of these prognostic factors had median disease free survival not reached v. 50 months v. 3.3 months (P=0.001) and overall survival not reached v. 50 months v. 5 months (P=0.0001) (Figure). Conclusion: TTR and IPI-R provide an easy and powerful prognostic system in patients with DLBCL undergoing modern high-dose chemotherapy with HSC support. Figure Figure

Abstract Background: mTOR inhibition has produced responses in mantle cell lymphoma as well as other non-Hodgkin lymphomas. This phase II study tested the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) in simultaneous two-stage phase II lymphoma studies, including one arm involving Hodgkin lymphoma. The goals were to learn the toxicity profile and to assess the anti-tumor response. A total of 17 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma were enrolled in the uncommon arm at completion of enrollment. Methods: Patients (pts) received 10 mg PO daily for each 28 day cycle (up to 12, with a possible extension in responders) and restaged after 2, 6, and 12 cycles. The primary endpoint is the confirmed response rate, including CR, CRu or PR. Results: The median age of the 17 pts with Hodgkin lymphoma was 37 yrs (range: 27–68), with a median of 6 (range, 4–14) prior therapies. Fourteen pts (82.4%) had a prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Pts completed a median of 6 (range, 1–13) cycles of therapy. Fifteen of 17 patients were evaluable for response as of this analysis. The overall response rate was 47% (7/15), all partial responses. Ten patients are continuing on study while 6 have gone off due to disease progression and 1 due to other reasons. Common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) include thrombocytopenia (5 pts), anemia (5 pts) and alkaline phosphatase elevation (1 pts). 1 patient was reported to have grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Oral everolimus has promising activity with acceptable toxicity in Hodgkin lymphoma. These results provide the rationale for additional studies with this novel class of agents and to integrate mTOR inhibitors into salvage treatment regimens for Hodgkin lymphoma.

Abstract The infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) is an independent prognostic factor for survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Previous studies have shown that A-ALC directly correlates with the peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (PC-ALC) at the time of apheresis collection. However, factors affecting the PC-ALC at apheresis remain undefined. We hypothesized that one possible factor impacting PC-ALC may be the time interval from last chemotherapy to stem cell collection (TILC). Data from 160 patients who underwent AHSCT for treatment of relapsed NHL at Mayo Clinic between 1993 and 2001 were collected and analyzed. The primary end point of this study was correlation between TILC and PC-ALC, and our analysis revealed a strong correlation (r = 0.67, p < 0.0001). Further analysis revealed higher PC-ALC numbers in patients with TILC ≥ 60 days versus TILC < 60 days (median of 7.44 x 109/L in the ≥ 60 day group versus 3.87 x 109/L in the < 60 day group, p < 0.0001). Both the median overall survival (figure below) and the progression-free survival were longer in the TILC ≥ 60 days group versus the TILC < 60 days group (76 versus 21 months, p < 0.0037; 76 versus 11 months, p < 0.018, respectively). These findings were independent of other prognostic indicators for relapsed NHL patients undergoing APHSCT. The data supports our hypothesis that TILC affects PC-ALC and survival post-AHSCT in NHL. Figure Figure

7559 Background: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare indolent lymphoma commonly treated with rituximab (R)-based therapy. The use of rituximab maintenance (mR) in WM is controversial. We present a case-control study of patients (pts) with WM treated with mR. Methods: Pts evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester with active WM that received mR between 1/2000 & 6/2018 were included. Cases comprised pts who received mR following R-based induction as primary therapy. Cases were matched based on the time of diagnosis in 1:2 ratio with a control group treated with R-based primary induction therapy without mR. Time to event analyses were performed from initiation of R-based induction. Results: Of 776 pts with active WM, 42 (5%) cases received mR and 84 pts were selected as controls. The median follow-up and the proportion of high risk pts were comparable between the two cohorts (Table). Pts in the mR cohort show a trend toward longer time to next therapy (TTNT) and a significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to the control group (Table). The R-based induction therapies were comparable in the two cohorts (p = 0.6). Median duration of mR was 1.9 yrs (95% CI 1.6-2) and mR was used most frequently every (q) 2 (range 1-6) months. Of the 42 mR pts, 25 (60%) received an R-based combination for induction and 17 (40%) received R monotherapy as induction. Five (12%) pts discontinued mR due to toxicity, infections were reported in 13 pts (31%) during mR therapy and 3 pts (7%) received IVIg infusions for recurrent infections. Conclusions: R-based induction followed by mR demonstrates a longer OS in WM compared to R-treated control population not receiving mR, albeit at a high rate of infections. Despite limitations of a retrospective study, with a heterogeneously treated cohort, these data add to the body of literature supporting Rituximab maintenance. Results from an ongoing randomized controlled trial are awaited. [Table: see text]

7526 Background: Stem cell transplant (SCT) was considered to be beneficial in CLL patients with Richter transformation (RT). We report a single center experience of SCT for RT. Methods: CLL patients with biopsy-confirmed RT to DLBCL who underwent SCT were identified from Mayo Clinic CLL database, and clinical information was abstracted by chart review. Survival analysis was done with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Twenty-four of 204 RT patients underwent SCT, 20 autologous and 4 allogeneic. The median lines of prior CLL therapy was 1 (range 0-4). Only 4 patients were exposed to ibrutinib prior to RT. The median age at RT diagnosis was 62 (range 41-73). Five of 17 (29%) patients had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm), 12 of 20 (60%) had elevated LDH, and 6 of 15 (40%) had TP53 disruption (del(17p) or TP53 mutation). The median lines of RT therapy prior to SCT was 2 (range 1-4); treatments included R-CHOP-like alone (n = 7), platinum-based alone (n = 1), both R-CHOP-like and platinum-based (n = 11), novel agents (n = 2), and high dose MTX-based (n = 3). Response prior to SCT was CR in 12 (50%) and PR in 12 (50%) patients. The median time from RT diagnosis to SCT was 6.8 months (range 3.3-42.3). After a median follow-up of 52.7 months after SCT, there were 10 RT relapses, 4 CLL progression, and 11 deaths (7 RT, 1 CLL and 3 unrelated). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.5 months (95% CI 8.3-NA; 1-year PFS 61.8%, 2-year PFS 50.5%). The median post-SCT survival was 56.3 months (95% CI 30.6-76.6; 2-year survival 82.0%, 4-year survival 65.6%). Elevated LDH was associated with worse PFS (median 8.9 months vs NA, P= 0.014) and a trend of worse post-SCT survival (53.7 vs 67.4 months, P= 0.153). Other factors including age, prior CLL treatment (untreated vs treated), bulky disease, response prior to SCT, and TP53 disruption were not associated with PFS or post-SCT survival. Among the 4 allogeneic SCT patients, 1 had RT relapse 10.5 months after SCT and was treated with venetoclax, ibrutinib and obinutuzumab and remained alive at last follow-up (12.9 months after SCT). All 3 other patients remained in remission and alive at last follow up (15.6, 16.1 and 108.5 months after SCT, respectively). Conclusions: SCT may benefit select RT patients. The role of SCT in the novel agent era needs further study.

8581 Background: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Recent studies have elucidated the relationship in ASCT between absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery and improved survival, highlighting the importance of immune recovery. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with multiple myeloma to observe the impact of different measures of immune recovery at day 100 post-ASCT on outcome. Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from the existing clinical databases identified 1184 patients with multiple myeloma that underwent ASCT at Mayo Clinic between 1987-2011. Markers of immune recovery analyzed on day 100 status-post ASCT included ALC, monocyte count, and immunoglobulin levels. Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to determine progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Among the 1184 patients, median age at diagnosis of multiple myeloma was 57 (range, 23-75 yr), and median age at time of transplantation was 59 (range, 24-75 yr); 59% were male. The median OS and PFS post-transplant were 80 months and 34 months respectively. 62% of patients were alive 5-years post-transplant. The median OS was not improved with normal vs. abnormal IgG levels at day 100 (p=.298). In contrast, monocyte recovery was a significant predictor of OS. Patients with normal monocyte counts of greater than 0.3 x 10⁹ cells/L at day 100 showed superior survival (65 vs. 37 months, p= .001). Similarly, patients with normal monocyte recovery at day 15 post-transplant showed a significant survival benefit (68 vs. 50 months, p=.007). Early ALC recovery, which has been shown to be a positive prognostic indicator at day 15 post-transplant, was not prognostic at day 100 (p= .960). Conclusions: The present study further elucidates prognostic indicators after ASCT for MM highlighting the importance of various markers of immune recovery. Immunoglobulin recovery was not associated with superior survival, while monocyte recovery at day 15 and day 100 post-transplant translated to an improved survival and requires further study. It may be hypothesized that early immune system reconstitution may have a positive effect against disease post-transplant.

7041 Background: Prognostic factors for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) at day 100 post-autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APBHSCT) have not been evaluated. We previously reported that absolute monocyte (AMC)/lymphocyte count (ALC) prognostic score (AMLCPS) at diagnosis of DLBCL patients is a prognostic factor of survival, stratifying patients into three risk groups: low- (AMC<630/μL and ALC>1000/μL), intermediate- (AMC ≥ 630/μL or ALC ≤ 1000/μL) and high-risk (AMC ≥ 630/μL and ALC ≤ 1000/μL) (Leukemia 25: 1502-9, 2011). Therefore, we evaluated day 100 AMLCPS as a prognostic factor of survival by landmark analysis from day 100 post-APBHSCT in DLBCL patients. Methods: DLBCL patients that achieved complete response by day 100 post-APBHSCT qualified for the study. From 2000 to 2007, 134 consecutive DLBCL patients were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The median follow up from day 100 for the cohort was 5.5 years (range: 0.17-12.17 years) and for living patients (N=93) was 6.9 years (range: 2.5-12.17 years). Day 100 AMLCPS was able to stratify patients into three risk groups low-, intermediate-, and high-risk for OS [low: median OS = not reached, 5-year survival rate = 94% (95%CI 83.3%-98.1%); intermediate: median OS = not reached, 5-year survival rate = 70% (95%CI 58.0%-79.8%); high: median OS = 2.2 years, 5-year survival rate = 13% (95%CI 3.4%-40.5%); p<0.0001] and PFS [low: median PFS = not reached, 5-year progression free rate = 87% (95%CI 74.5%-94.3%); intermediate: median PFS = 10.9 years, 5-year progression free rate = 67% (95%CI 55.4%-77.5%); high: median PFS = 1 year, 5-year progression free rate = 13% (95%CI 3.4%-40.5%); p<0.0001]. The day 100 AMLCPS was balanced in relation to the International Prognostic Index (IPI; p=0.22), infused CD34+ stem cells (p=0.92), and disease status pre-APBHSCT (complete remission versus partial response; p=0.11). Conclusions: The day 100 AMLCPS is a simple biomarker that can help identify DLBCL patients post-APBHSCT with poor clinical outcomes.

8600 Background: The prognosis of stage IV melanoma patients remains poor. Published results have suggested that components of the complete blood count have significant prognostic value in several malignancies. Among the most studied were the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and absolute monocyte count (AMC) on clinical outcomes of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Thus, we sought to investigate if the pre-operative ALC (ALC-PO), AMC (AMC-PO) and ALC/AMC ratio (ALC/AMC-PO) affects the risk of disease recurrence and survival after complete surgical resection of metastatic melanoma. Methods: We studied 66 stage IV, resected melanoma patients followed at Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2010. Log rank chi-square analysis was used to determine the best cut-off values for each pre-operative variable, while proportional hazards models were used to compared survival. Results: The median follow-up of the cohort was 24 months (range: 2.3 – 117 months). ALC-PO, AMC-PO and ALC/AMC-PO, as continuous variables, were all identified as prognostic factors for both relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The best cut-off values for ALC-PO, AMC-PO and ALC/AMC-PO were 1.9; 0.62; and 2.05, respectively. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with an ALC-PO ≥ 1.9 x 109/L experienced superior OS and RFS compared with ALC-PO < 1.9 x 109/L patients [median OS of 58 months vs. 34 months, p < 0.04; median RFS of 14 months vs. 5 months, p < 0.009]. Conversely, a low AMC-PO (<0.62 x 109/L) was associated with better OS and RFS compared with higher AMC-PO (≥ 0.62 x 109/L): [median OS of 47 months vs. 14 months, p < 0.007; median RFS of 9 months vs. 5 months, p < 0.02]. When the ALC-PO and AMC-PO were combined as an ALC/AMC ratio, the group with an ALC/AMC-PO ≥ 2.05 experienced a superior OS and RFS compared to patients with ALC/AMC-PO < 2.05: [median OS of 49 months vs. 12 months, p < 0.0001; median RFS of 10 months vs. 4 months, p < 0.0001]. Multivariate analysis showed ALC/AMC-PO to be an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS (HR = 0.32, p < 0.003; HR = 0.23, p < 0.002). Conclusions: Our study showed, that ALC/AMC-PO ratio is an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS in patients undergoing resection of metastatic (stage IV) melanoma.