Drake, Matthew T.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell cancer. Therapeutic advances have greatly improved patient survival; however, all patients are expected to relapse. New treatments are critically needed to overcome relapse and provide durable response. There is evidence that dormant MM cells exist in the bone marrow, where they exhibit reduced proliferative capacity and resistance to treatment. These cells are present over extended periods of time and may regain proliferative capacity to drive relapse. Tumor dormancy shares features with senescence, a state of stress-induced growth arrest. Chemotherapies, including those used in the treatment of MM, have been shown to cause therapy-induced senescence in a variety of tissues. Dormant MM cells have been shown to be maintained in their non-proliferative state by interactions with bone lining cells. Interestingly, matrix signaling has also been shown to protect against chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in an in vitro ovarian cancer organoid model. Taken together, this suggests that interaction of MM cells with the bone niche maintains growth arrest and survival. We hypothesize that therapy-induced senescence drives dormancy in MM cells that depends on interactions with the mesenchymal bone niche. GFP-expressing 5TGM1 mouse MM cells were treated with vehicle or melphalan for 48 hours and then cultured in the presence or absence of ex vivo mouse bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Cells were maintained for 12 additional days to allow for the development of senescence after the initial stress response. Cells were imaged and quantified during media replacements to assess adherence/survival. Cells were then fixed and stained for nuclei, phospho-γH2AX, and telomeres by immunofluorescence/fluorescence in-situ hybridization (IF/FISH). Melphalan-treated 5TGM1 cells cultured with BMSCs were significantly growth arrested over 2 weeks compared to vehicle-treated cells. Co-culture with BMSCs significantly enhanced melphalan-treated 5TGM1 adherence compared to culture without BMSCs during media replacement. Of note, melphalan-treated 5TGM1 did not survive in the absence of BMSCs after a week in culture. Melphalan-treated 5TGM1 also exhibited significantly greater adherence with BMSCs than vehicle-treated cells. Melphalan-treated 5TGM1 were significantly larger than vehicle-treated cells and exhibited both heterochromatin foci and persistent DNA damage foci associated with telomeres, which are all markers of cellular senescence. Our findings suggest that interactions with BMSCs promote the survival of melphalan-treated MM tumor cells. The enhanced adherence of these cells also suggests that current methods for minimal residual disease assessment may be inadequate, as rare populations of MM cells adhered to the marrow stroma may not be captured by routine bone marrow aspiration. These cells exhibit features of therapy-induced senescence which may be key to MM dormancy. Thus, targeting senescence survival pathways via senolytic therapy may be a novel approach to eliminate dormant MM cells and prevent disease relapse. Citation Format: Angelo J. Guilatco, Gabriel Alvares Borges, Tamar Tchkonia, James L. Kirkland, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Matthew T. Drake, Megan Weivoda. Enhanced survival and adherence of melphalan-induced senescent-like dormant multiple myeloma cells co-cultured with bone marrow stromal cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Aging and Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-20; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;83(2 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B023.

Abstract This abstract is being presented as a short talk in the scientific program. A full abstract is available in the Short Talks from Proffered Abstracts section (PR012) of the Conference Proceedings. Citation Format: Gabriel Alvares Borges, Angelo Jose Guilatco, Christine M. Hachfeld, Ming Ruan, Sonya Royzenblat, Ming Xu, Claire M. Edwards, Marta Diaz-delCastillo, Thomas L. Andersen, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Tamar Tchkonia, James L. Kirkland, Matthew T. Drake, Megan Weivoda. Pre-malignant plasma cells exhibit a senescence-like phenotype and accumulation of transposable elements [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Aging and Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-20; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;83(2 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B020.

AbstractBackgroundIntegrating shared decision making between patients and physicians and incorporating their values and preferences in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is of critical importance to optimize CPG implementation and treatment adherence. This applies to many debilitating diseases, including hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM).ObjectiveEvaluate patient and physician values, preferences, and attitudes to better inform CPGs to treat HCM in adults.MethodsWe followed a mixed-methods approach. We conducted a systematic review using 5 databases to identify studies reporting on patient and physician values, costs and resources, feasibility, acceptability, and equity regarding HCM treatment. We also gathered data from different countries on the cost of multiple treatment modalities. We collected data on outcome prioritization from the CPG Working Group. Similarly, we collected data from patients with HCM regarding outcome prioritization and administered a questionnaire to evaluate their attitudes and perceptions toward treatment as well as treatment acceptability and feasibility.ResultsIn the systematic review, we included 2 cross-sectional surveys conducted on the same population of physicians who agreed that treating HCM alleviates symptoms and improves quality of life; however, harms and benefits should be thoroughly considered when deciding on the duration of treatment. We also included 2 studies on cost showing that intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate is more cost-effective than a combination of IV bisphosphonate and calcitonin and administration of IV zoledronic acid at home is more cost-effective than other IV bisphosphonates. The cost of zoledronic acid, denosumab, and cinacalcet varied widely among countries and types (brand vs generic). Both the CPG Working Group and patients with HCM agreed that the most important outcomes when deciding on treatment were survival and resolution of HCM, but there was some variability in the ratings for other outcomes.ConclusionUsing mixed methods, CPG developers can obtain meaningful information regarding evidence to decision criteria. In the case of HCM CPGs, this approach has provided the required contextual information and supported the development of evidence-based recommendations.

AbstractContextHypercalcemia is a common complication of malignancy that is associated with high morbidity and mortality.ObjectiveTo support development of the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy in adults.MethodsWe searched multiple databases for studies that addressed 8 clinical questions prioritized by a guideline panel from the Endocrine Society. Quantitative and qualitative synthesis was performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess certainty of evidence.ResultsWe reviewed 1949 citations, from which we included 21 studies. The risk of bias for most of the included studies was moderate. A higher proportion of patients who received bisphosphonate achieved resolution of hypercalcemia when compared to placebo. The incidence rate of adverse events was significantly higher in the bisphosphonate group. Comparing denosumab to bisphosphonate, there was no significant difference in the rate of patients who achieved resolution of hypercalcemia. Two-thirds of patients with refractory/recurrent hypercalcemia of malignancy who received denosumab following bisphosphonate therapy achieved resolution of hypercalcemia. Addition of calcitonin to bisphosphonate therapy did not affect the resolution of hypercalcemia, time to normocalcemia, or hypocalcemia. Only indirect evidence was available to address questions on the management of hypercalcemia in tumors associated with high calcitriol levels, refractory/recurrent hypercalcemia of malignancy following the use of bisphosphonates, and the use of calcimimetics in the treatment of hypercalcemia associated with parathyroid carcinoma. The certainty of the evidence to address all 8 clinical questions was low to very low.ConclusionThe evidence summarized in this systematic review addresses the benefits and harms of treatments of hypercalcemia of malignancy. Additional information about patients’ values and preferences, and other important decisional and contextual factors is needed to facilitate the development of clinical recommendations.

Abstract Background Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) is the most common metabolic complication of malignancies, but its incidence may be declining due to potent chemotherapeutic agents. The high mortality associated with HCM has declined markedly due to the introduction of increasingly effective chemotherapeutic drugs. Despite the widespread availability of efficacious medications to treat HCM, evidence-based recommendations to manage this debilitating condition are lacking. Objective To develop guidelines for the treatment of adults with HCM. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of clinical experts, together with experts in systematic literature review, identified and prioritized 8 clinical questions related to the treatment of HCM in adult patients. The systematic reviews (SRs) queried electronic databases for studies relevant to the selected questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. An independent SR was conducted in parallel to assess patients' and physicians' values and preferences, costs, resources needed, acceptability, feasibility, equity, and other domains relevant to the Evidence-to-Decision framework as well as to enable judgements and recommendations. Results The panel recommends (strong recommendation) in adults with HCM treatment with denosumab (Dmab) or an intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). The following recommendations were based on low certainty of the evidence. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) (1) in adults with HCM, the use of Dmab rather than an IV BP; (2) in adults with severe HCM, a combination of calcitonin and an IV BP or Dmab therapy as initial treatment; and (3) in adults with refractory/recurrent HCM despite treatment with BP, the use of Dmab. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) the addition of an IV BP or Dmab in adult patients with hypercalcemia due to tumors associated with high calcitriol levels who are already receiving glucocorticoid therapy but continue to have severe or symptomatic HCM. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) in adult patients with hypercalcemia due to parathyroid carcinoma, treatment with either a calcimimetic or an antiresorptive (IV BP or Dmab). The panel judges the treatments as probably accessible and feasible for most recommendations but noted variability in costs, resources required, and their impact on equity. Conclusions The panel's recommendations are based on currently available evidence considering the most important outcomes in HCM to patients and key stakeholders. Treatment of the primary malignancy is instrumental for controlling hypercalcemia and preventing its recurrence. The recommendations provide a framework for the medical management of adults with HCM and incorporate important decisional and contextual factors. The guidelines underscore current knowledge gaps that can be used to establish future research agendas.

Tumor-induced osteomalacia is a rare and often misdiagnosed condition that presents with progressively worsening unexplained chronic pain and proximal muscle weakness. The osteomalacia leads to multiple stress fractures which do not heal properly, leading to progressive disability. It is caused by chronic hypophosphatemia due to inappropriate urinary phosphate wasting. This is due to a typically benign mesenchymal tumor that over-secretes a phospaturic hormone. Neurologists need to appreciate the relevance of chronic hypophosphatemia in people with chronic unexplained pain, as timely diagnosis and treatment of tumour-induced osteomalacia can be curative.

Abstract In an effort to enhance the trustworthiness of its clinical practice guidelines, the Endocrine Society has recently adopted new policies and more rigorous methodologies for its guideline program. In this Clinical Practice Guideline Communication, we describe these recent enhancements—many of which reflect greater adherence to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to guideline development—in addition to the rationale for such changes. Improvements to the Society’s guideline development practices include, but are not limited to, enhanced inclusion of nonendocrinologist experts, including patient representatives, on guideline development panels; implementation of a more rigorous conflict/duality of interest policy; a requirement that all formal recommendations must be demonstrably underpinned by systematic evidence review; the explicit use of GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks; greater use and explanation of standardized guideline language; and a more intentional approach to guideline updating. Lastly, we describe some of the experiential differences our guideline readers are most likely to notice.

ABSTRACT The development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines has proceeded at an unprecedented pace, with numerous trials conducted simultaneously across the world as a result of massive technological and financial resource expenditures. With multiple vaccines having now received regulatory approval, public health efforts to promote widespread vaccine dissemination are currently underway. There has been particular emphasis placed on vaccination of older populations, the age group in which COVID-19 infection has been most lethal. However, such widespread vaccination approaches have necessarily raised important questions related to potential interactions with underlying diseases and concomitant treatments among persons to be vaccinated. Osteoporosis is a chronic condition marked by reduced bone strength and an associated increased risk for fracture that generally requires sustained medical intervention(s). Osteoporosis is neither associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 infection nor by more pronounced disease severity following infection, such that individuals with osteoporosis need not be more highly prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination. Osteoporosis therapies do not interfere with the efficacy or side effect profiles of COVID-19 vaccines and should not be stopped or indefinitely delayed because of vaccination. Depending on the specific drug profile within an anti-osteoporosis medication category, minor adjustments to the timing of drug administration may be considered with respect to the patient's COVID-19 vaccination schedule. Herein we provide practical recommendations for the care of patients requiring treatment for osteoporosis in the setting of COVID-19 vaccination. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).