Kremers, Walter K.

AbstractBackgroundThe three most common genes responsible for the familial Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (f‐FTLD) are MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72, with the C9orf72 mutation being the most common cause of f‐FTLD. The ALLFTD Consortium targets to characterize f‐FTLD, including its preclinical stage, to prepare for clinical trials in FTLD. We sought to investigate the initial symptoms and clinical picture of f‐FTLD and compare them among the common pathogenic genes using longitudinal CDR® plus NACC FTLD.MethodWe longitudinally assessed the CDR® plus NACC FTLD among 292 asymptomatic participants of the ALLFTD Consortium who are family members of f‐FTLD caused by MAPT (n = 99), GRN (n = 67), or C9orf72 (n = 126) mutations, and described the detailed profiles of the CDR® plus NACC FTLD in the participants who developed Mild Behavioral and/or Cognitive Impairment (MBCI).ResultForty‐one participants (17 MAPT, 11 GRN, 13 C9orf72) developed MBCI during follow‐up visits . Age at the diagnosis of MBCI was 52.3±13.0 years (GRN 63.2±11.8, MAPT 43.5±8.6, C9orf72 54.7±10.7). Frequencies of abnormal rating on the eight CDR® plus NACC FTLD domains at the time of MBCI diagnosis were: “Memory” 44% (MAPT 47%, GRN 55%, C9orf72 31%); “Orientation” 7% (MAPT 6%, GRN 9%, C9orf72 8%); “Judgment and Problem Solving” 39% (MAPT 41%, GRN 55%, C9orf72 23%); “Community Affairs” 22% (MAPT 24%, GRN 18%, C9orf72 23%); “Home and Hobbies” 22% (MAPT 35%, GRN 0%, C9orf72 23%); “Personal Care” 0%; “Behavior/Comportment/Personality” 51% (MAPT 59%, GRN 55%, C9orf72 38%); “Language” 29% (MAPT 18%, GRN 55%, C9orf72 23%).ConclusionInitial symptoms and clinical picture of f‐FTLD in MBCI stage differ among responsible FTLD genes, which could be useful in detecting very early features of f‐FTLD in pathogenic mutation carriers.

AbstractBackgroundRemote assessment tools offer significant promise for aiding early detection of cognitive impairment. Mayo Test Drive (MTD): Test Development through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion, is a web‐based platform for remote self‐administered assessment that includes a computer adaptive word list memory test (Stricker Learning Span; SLS) and a measure of processing speed (Symbols Test). We examined the diagnostic accuracy of the SLS and a MTD composite (SLS max span, SLS trials 1–5 total correct, SLS delay correct, [Symbols correct item response time*‐1]) for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). We also explored diagnostic accuracy for a broader group that included individuals with possible MCI (pMCI; see Figure 1).MethodsParticipants were recruited from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging for this ancillary remote study. 226 were cognitively unimpaired (CU; concordant CU diagnosis by 3 independent raters). Fifty‐six participants had possible MCI (at least 1 of 3 raters indicated MCI) and 16 had a consensus diagnosis of aMCI. Primary outcome variables were SLS sum of trials, AVLT sum of trials, Symbols correct items response time, and MTD composite. Mean difference analyses used linear model ANOVAs (alpha = .05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied; we derived optimal cutoff scores based on the Youden index method.ResultsBoth aMCI and possible MCI groups showed significantly lower performance than the CU group on SLS (Hedge’s g aMCI = ‐1.72, pMCI = ‐1.04), Symbols (Hedge’s g aMCI = 1.38, pMCI = 0.64), and MTD composite (Hedge’s g aMCI = ‐1.89, pMCI = ‐1.09); see Tables 1 and 2 (all p‘s<.01 even when additionally covarying age, education, sex). Total area under the curve was high for differentiating of CU vs. aMCI (MTD Composite = 0.91, SLS = 0.91) and acceptable for CU vs. pMCI (MTD Composite = 0.77, SLS = 0.77); see Table 2. Consistent with our flexible platform, a variety of device types were used to complete remote testing (32% smartphone, 12% tablet, 56% PC).ConclusionsMTD and the SLS show high diagnostic accuracy for aMCI. MTD is a flexible, brief, and easy‐to‐use remote cognitive assessment tool with great potential for scalable use in future studies seeking to maximize inclusion of individuals with aMCI in clinical trials or for cognitive screening in clinical settings.

AbstractBackgroundMayo Test Drive (MTD): Test Development through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion, is a web‐based platform for self‐administered assessment for novel (Stricker Learning Span) and open access (Symbols Test) cognitive measures with previously demonstrated validity and reliability. Our study aim was to examine the usability of MTD, defined as the extent to which MTD was used to achieve the desired study goal of completing a testing session among participants willing to engage in an all‐remote study.Methods248 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center participants were invited to participate in this ancillary, uncompensated remote pilot study via email. To examine 1) willingness to participate in a remote cognitive assessment study and 2) usability of MTD, the initiation and completion rates of MTD were examined by cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 142) and cognitively impaired (CI; n = 106) groups (see Figure 1). These rates and other factors associated with MTD feasibility were further explored across age in CU (i.e., 50–69, 70–79, and 80+ years) and specific diagnostic groups in CI (i.e., individuals with dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and possible MCI).ResultsSession completion rate (usability) was 98% across all participants who chose to participate, and, surprisingly, completion rates did not vary by age or diagnostic groups (p = .69; see Table 1). As expected, more individuals chose to participate in the CU (77%) versus CI (52%) group (p < .001). In terms of feasibility, individuals over 80 and with CI were more likely to have some contact with the study coordinator. Use of smartphones decreased with age, with most CU individuals over 70 using a personal computer (69‐73%; Table 2).ConclusionsThough the CI group was less likely to choose to participate than the CU group, out of those that did choose to participate the rate of completion was 98%. This demonstrates high usability of MTD. Study coordinator support and a flexible testing platform is critical for facilitating participation in remote testing across the aging population, and more supports and incentives may be needed for individuals with cognitive impairment to improve participation rates.

AbstractBackgroundStudies of aging and dementia often acquire brain MRI and PET images, then de‐identify and share these widely with other researchers. It is known that research participants can potentially be re‐identified from brain MRI and CT using face recognition, but this has not been tested with PET imaging.MethodWe generated face reconstruction images of 182 volunteers using their existing amyloid (PiB), tau (FTP), and FDG PET scans from clinical GE PET/CT scanners, and we measured how often commercial automatic face recognition (Microsoft Azure) correctly matched these reconstructions with photographs of their faces. We additionally compared these match rates with face reconstructions from CT (from PET/CT) and MRI. When testing face recognition from PET scans, CT was used only during PET reconstruction, not for face recognition. We also validated our updated mri_reface software, originally developed to de‐identify (“de‐face”) faces in MRI, with new support for PET images. We measured face recognition rates before and after applying mri_reface to PET, CT, and MRI. In addition, we measured effects of de‐facing on biomarker measurements (global and regional SUVR) using 244 ADNI Florbetapir (FBP) amyloid PET scans with two automated pipelines: FreeSurfer 6.0 (PETSurfer) and an in‐house SPM12‐based pipeline.ResultRates of successful face recognition with PET ranged from 32‐41% (Table 1) across tracers. These were lower than MRI (98%) and CT (78%) but still concerning for participant privacy. Using mri_reface reduced face recognition to 0‐3.5% for PET, 5% for CT, and 8% for MRI. mri_reface had little effect on global amyloid SUVR measurements from ADNI PET images (Figure 1). ICC values between original and de‐faced images were 1.00 with biases and median absolute differences < 0.5%, across both pipelines. Effects on individual regions all had ICC values > 0.98 with biases and median absolute differences < 2%.ConclusionFace reconstructions from PET images have sufficient quality for potential re‐identification using publicly available face recognition technology. Research studies should consider using face de‐identification (de‐facing) software on PET images in addition to CT and structural MRI. Our free, automatic mri_reface software greatly reduced the potential for face recognition without substantially affecting SUVR measurements.

AbstractBackgroundMayo Test Drive (MTD): Test Development through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion, is a web‐based platform for self‐administered assessment for novel (Stricker Learning Span) and open access (Symbols Test) cognitive measures with previously demonstrated validity and reliability. Our study aim was to examine the usability of MTD, defined as the extent to which MTD was used to achieve the desired study goal of completing a testing session among participants willing to engage in an all‐remote study.Methods248 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center participants were invited to participate in this ancillary, uncompensated remote pilot study via email. To examine 1) willingness to participate in a remote cognitive assessment study and 2) usability of MTD, the initiation and completion rates of MTD were examined by cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 142) and cognitively impaired (CI; n = 106) groups (see Figure 1). These rates and other factors associated with MTD feasibility were further explored across age in CU (i.e., 50‐69, 70‐79, and 80+ years) and specific diagnostic groups in CI (i.e., individuals with dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and possible MCI).ResultsSession completion rate (usability) was 98% across all participants who chose to participate, and, surprisingly, completion rates did not vary by age or diagnostic groups (p =.69; see Table 1). As expected, more individuals chose to participate in the CU (77%) versus CI (52%) group (p < .001). In terms of feasibility, individuals over 80 and with CI were more likely to have some contact with the study coordinator. Use of smartphones decreased with age, with most CU individuals over 70 using a personal computer (69‐73%; Table 2).ConclusionsThough the CI group was less likely to choose to participate than the CU group, out of those that did choose to participate the rate of completion was 98%. This demonstrates high usability of MTD. Study coordinator support and a flexible testing platform is critical for facilitating participation in remote testing across the aging population, and more supports and incentives may be needed for individuals with cognitive impairment to improve participation rates.

AbstractBackgroundKidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for invasive aspergillosis (IA), a disease with poor outcomes and substantial economic burden. We aimed to determine risk factors for posttransplant IA by using a national database and to assess the association of IA with mortality and allograft failure.MethodsUsing the United States Renal Data System database, we performed a retrospective case-control study of patients who underwent kidney transplant from 1998 through 2017. To evaluate risk factors for IA, we performed conditional logistic regression analysis by comparing characteristics between IA-infected patients and their matched uninfected controls. We performed Cox regression analysis to evaluate the effects of IA on mortality and death-censored allograft failure.ResultsWe matched 359 patients with IA to 1436 uninfected controls (1:4). IA was diagnosed at a median of 22.5 months (interquartile range, 5.4–85.2 months) after kidney transplant. Risk factors for IA were Black/African American race, duration of pretransplant hemodialysis, higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, weight loss, chronic pulmonary disease, need for early posttransplant hemodialysis, and a history of cytomegalovirus infection. Receiving an allograft from a living donor was protective against IA. IA was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.02 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.58–7.04], P &lt; .001). Additionally, IA was associated with 1-year allograft failure (aHR, 3.37 [95% CI, 1.96–5.77], P &lt; .001).ConclusionsOur findings emphasize the importance of timely transplant to mitigate the risk of posttransplant IA. An individualized approach to disease prevention is essential to decrease mortality and allograft failure.

ImportanceIndividuals with total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have long-term exposure to metal-containing implants; however, whether long-term exposure to artificial implants is associated with cognitive function is unknown.ObjectiveTo compare long-term cognitive trajectories in individuals with and without TJA.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based cohort study assessed serial cognitive evaluations of 5550 participants (≥50 years of age) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging between November 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020.ExposuresTotal joint arthroplasty of the hip or the knee.Main Outcomes and MeasuresLinear mixed-effects models were used to compare the annualized rate of change in global and domain-specific cognitive scores in participants with and without TJA, adjusting for age, sex, educational level, apolipoprotein E ε4 carrier status, and cognitive test practice effects.ResultsA total of 5550 participants (mean [SD] age at baseline, 73.04 [10.02] years; 2830 [51.0%] male) were evaluated. A total of 952 participants had undergone at least 1 TJA of the hip (THA, n = 430) or the knee (TKA, n = 626) before or after entry into the cohort. Participants with TJA were older, more likely to be female, and had a higher body mass index than participants without TJA. No difference was observed in the rate of cognitive decline in participants with and without TJA until 80 years of age. A slightly faster cognitive decline at 80 years or older and more than 8 years from surgery was observed (b = −0.03; 95% CI, −0.04 to −0.02). In stratified analyses by surgery type, the faster decline was observed primarily among older participants with TKA (b = −0.04; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.02).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, long-term cognitive trajectories in individuals with and without TJA were largely similar except for a slightly faster decline among the oldest patients with TKA; however, the magnitude of difference was small and of unknown clinical significance.

ImportancePhysical activity is associated with cognitive health, even in autosomal dominant forms of dementia. Higher physical activity is associated with slowed cognitive and functional declines over time in adults carrying autosomal dominant variants for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), but whether axonal degeneration is a potential neuroprotective target of physical activity in individuals with FTLD is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the association between physical activity and longitudinal neurofilament light chain (NfL) trajectories in individuals with autosomal dominant forms of FTLD.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study included individuals from the ALLFTD Consortium, which recruited patients from sites in the US and Canada. Symptomatic and asymptomatic adults with pathogenic variants in one of 3 common genes associated with FTLD (GRN, C9orf72, or MAPT) who reported baseline physical activity levels and completed annual blood draws were assessed annually for up to 4 years. Genotype, clinical measures, and blood draws were collected between December 2014 and June 2019; data were analyzed from August 2021 to January 2022. Associations between reported baseline physical activity and longitudinal plasma NfL changes were assessed using generalized linear mixed-effects models adjusting for baseline age, sex, education, functional severity, and motor symptoms.ExposuresBaseline physical activity levels reported via the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly. To estimate effect sizes, marginal means were calculated at 3 levels of physical activity: 1 SD above the mean represented high physical activity, 0 SD represented average physical activity, and 1 SD below the mean represented low physical activity.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAnnual plasma NfL concentrations were measured with single-molecule array technology.ResultsOf 160 included FTLD variant carriers, 84 (52.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 50.7 (14.7) years. A total of 51 (31.8%) were symptomatic, and 77 carried the C9orf72 variant; 39, GRN variant; and 44, MAPT variant. Higher baseline physical activity was associated with slower NfL trajectories over time. On average, NfL increased 45.8% (95% CI, 22.5 to 73.7) over 4 years in variant carriers. Variant carriers with high physical activity demonstrated 14.0% (95% CI, −22.7 to −4.3) slower NfL increases compared with those with average physical activity and 30% (95% CI, −52.2 to −8.8) slower NfL increases compared with those with low physical activity. Within genotype, C9orf72 and MAPT carriers with high physical activity evidenced 18% to 21% (95% CI, −43.4 to −7.2) attenuation in NfL, while the association between physical activity and NfL trajectory was not statistically significant in GRN carriers. Activities associated with higher cardiorespiratory and cognitive demands (sports, housework, and yardwork) were most strongly correlated with slower NfL trajectories (vs walking and strength training).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, higher reported physical activity was associated with slower progression of an axonal degeneration marker in individuals with autosomal dominant FTLD. Physical activity may serve as a primary prevention target in FTLD.

The Spheroid Reservoir Bioartificial Liver (SRBAL) is an innovative treatment option for acute liver failure (ALF). This extracorporeal support device, which provides detoxification and other liver functions using high-density culture of porcine hepatocyte spheroids, has been reported in three randomized large animal studies. A meta-analysis of these three preclinical studies was performed to establish efficacy of SRBAL treatment in terms of survival benefit and neuroprotective effect. The studies included two hepatotoxic drug models of ALF (D-galactosamine, α-amanitin/lipopolysaccharide) or a liver resection model (85% hepatectomy) in pigs or monkeys. The SRBAL treatment was started in three different settings starting at 12 h, 24 h or 48 h after induction of ALF; comparisons were made with two similar control groups in each model. SRBAL therapy was associated with significant survival and neuroprotective benefits in all three animal models of ALF. The benefits of therapy were dose dependent with the most effective configuration of SRBAL being continuous treatment of 24 h duration and dose of 200 g of porcine hepatic spheroids. Future clinical testing of SRBAL in patients with ALF appears warranted.