Madsen, Cathy S.

The mucin MUC1 is typically aberrantly glycosylated by epithelial cancer cells manifested by truncated O -linked saccharides. The resultant glycopeptide epitopes can bind cell surface major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and are susceptible to recognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), whereas aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 protein on the tumor cell surface can be bound by antibodies to mediate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Efforts to elicit CTLs and IgG antibodies against cancer-expressed MUC1 have not been successful when nonglycosylated MUC1 sequences were used for vaccination, probably due to conformational dissimilarities. Immunizations with densely glycosylated MUC1 peptides have also been ineffective due to impaired susceptibility to antigen processing. Given the challenges to immuno-target tumor-associated MUC1, we have identified the minimum requirements to consistently induce CTLs and ADCC-mediating antibodies specific for the tumor form of MUC1 resulting in a therapeutic response in a mouse model of mammary cancer. The vaccine is composed of the immunoadjuvant Pam 3 CysSK 4 , a peptide T helper epitope and an aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 peptide. Covalent linkage of the three components was essential for maximum efficacy. The vaccine produced CTLs, which recognized both glycosylated and nonglycosylated peptides, whereas a similar nonglycosylated vaccine gave CTLs which recognized only nonglycosylated peptide. Antibodies elicited by the glycosylated tripartite vaccine were significantly more lytic compared with the unglycosylated control. As a result, immunization with the glycosylated tripartite vaccine was superior in tumor prevention. Besides its own aptness as a clinical target, these studies of MUC1 are likely predictive of a covalent linking strategy applicable to many additional tumor-associated antigens.

Abstract MUC1 is an excellent target for immunotherapeutic strategies for cancers expressing Mucin 1 (breast, pancreas etc). MUC1 was recently selected by the NCI working group as the number 2 cancer vaccine target antigen, based on its immunogenicity, oncogenicity and wide-spread cell-surface expression. More than 90% of breast cancers over express MUC1, it stimulates both humoral and cellular immunity, its normal apical distribution is lost in cancer cells and aberrant glycosylation exposes peptide epitopes and novel carbohydrate antigens. Clinical trials using unglycosylated MUC1 epitopes have resulted in MUC1 specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) with limited effects on clinical response. Patients with breast tumors have exhibited spontaneous immune responses to MUC1 with the presence of T cells and antibodies specific for glycosylated MUC1. Because these natural immune responses are often not efficient in eradicating the tumor, it is necessary to specifically modulate these immune responses. Hence it is possible that better immunogenicity would be obtained using peptides more representative of the novel (glycosylated) forms of MUC1 as seen in cancer to which individuals may be less tolerant. The presentation of antigenic peptides by MHC class I molecules is crucial for the development of vaccines. MUC1 peptides from the VNTR region, which has five potential glycosylation sites, can be presented by a variety of class I molecules and can generate MUC1 specific CTLs. But these epitopes lack definite anchors and bind with low affinity compared to high affinity peptides. Hence, we developed several peptides from the MUC1 H-2Kb peptide (SAPDTRPAP) epitope with all possible modifications to improve their MHC and TCR binding efficiency. Preclinical studies were performed using the modified H-2Kb-restricted peptides along with the DC stimulants (CpG-ODN and GM-CSF) and foreign helper epitope (hepatitis B virus optimized I-Ab T helper peptide) in incomplete Freund's adjuvant in C57BL/6 mice transgenic for human MUC1. Peptides that were glycosylated at threonine and had methionine or leucine as the terminal amino acid induced a strong CTL response and were able to overcome tolerance in MUC1.Tg.mice. In the breast cancer model with the MUC1- expressing MMT cell line, the onset of tumor was delayed with peptide immunization and there was significant reduction in the tumor weight. Increased lytic activity of CD8+ CTLs and infiltration of T lymphocytes to the tumor site were observed with modified peptides as compared to the effect of MHC class I Kb and Db restricted native MUC1 peptides. Interestingly, the CTLs specific for glycosylated peptides were able to recognize both the Tn (GalNAc) and peptide epitopes. Thus, MUC1 peptides with carbohydrate at the appropriate position may be an optimal vaccine candidate because they can generate CTLs of dual specificity and high affinity. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2403.

Mucins are the major glycoprotein component of respiratory tract secretions. Little is known about their expression in the upper respiratory tract. In order to define this expression, in situ hybridization was performed on 19 normal and 4 vasomotor rhinitis (VMR) inferior turbinates to identify mucin mRNA. MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC5B, and MUC7 were expressed in both the normal and VMR turbinates. MUC 4 and MUC5AC were the most highly expressed mucins. MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5AC were expressed mainly by the epithelial border, whereas MUC5B and MUC7 were expressed by the submucosal glands. MUC1 and MUC4 exhibited a diffuse expression by multiple cell types along the mucosal border, whereas MUC2 and MUC5AC expression appeared to be limited to a subpopulation of epithelial cells, most likely goblet cells. Although MUC1, MUC4, and MUC5AC showed sporadic submucosal glandular expression, MUC5B and MUC7 appeared to be the predominant submucosal gland mucins in the inferior turbinates. MUC3 and MUC6 expression, which have been found primarily in the gastric mucosa, were not seen in any of the inferior turbinate samples examined. The only difference seen between normal and VMR turbinates was a slight decrease in MUC1 expression in the VMR group. The variety of mucins expressed and the diversity of their expression patterns may have significance in terms of the rheologic and particle clearance properties of nasal secretions. Understanding the expression patterns in normal turbinates will serve as the foundation for further study of these mucins in disease states.