Back to Authors

Ramos, Paola

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-5079

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 12

Metabo‐ and mechanoreceptor expression in human heart failure: Relationships with the locomotor muscle afferent influence on exercise responses
Smith, Joshua R. , Hart, Corey R., Ramos, Paola , Akinsanya, Joshua G, Curry, Timothy B. , Olson, Thomas P. , Ramos, Paola A, Smith, Joshua R , Lanza, Ian R. , Joyner, Michael J.

Experimental Physiology | February 27, 2020 | Volume: 105 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 809-818

10.1113/ep088353 Get It

New Findings What is the central question of this study? How do locomotor muscle metabo‐ and mechanoreceptor expression compare in heart failure patients and controls? Do relationships exist between the protein expression and cardiopulmonary responses during exercise with locomotor muscle neural afferent feedback inhibition? What is the main finding and its importance? Heart failure patients exhibited greater protein expression of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 and cyclooxygenase‐2 than controls. These findings are important as they identify receptors that may underlie the augmented locomotor muscle neural afferent feedback in heart failure. AbstractHeart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) exhibit abnormal locomotor group III/IV afferent feedback during exercise; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine (1) metabo‐ and mechanoreceptor expression in HFrEF and controls and (2) relationships between receptor expression and changes in cardiopulmonary responses with afferent inhibition. Ten controls and six HFrEF performed 5 min of cycling exercise at 65% peak workload with lumbar intrathecal fentanyl (FENT) or placebo (PLA). Arterial blood pressure and catecholamines were measured via radial artery catheter. A vastus lateralis muscle biopsy was performed to quantify cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2), purinergic 2X3 (P2X3), transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1), acid‐sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3), Piezo 1 and Piezo 2 protein expression. TRPV1 and COX‐2 protein expression was greater in HFrEF than controls (both P < 0.04), while P2X3, ASIC3, and Piezo 1 and 2 were not different between groups (all P > 0.16). In all participants, COX‐2 protein expression was related to the percentage change in ventilation (r = −0.66) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (r = −0.82) (both P < 0.01) with FENT (relative to PLA) during exercise. In controls, TRPV1 protein expression was related to the percentage change in systolic blood pressure (r = −0.77, P = 0.02) and MAP (r = −0.72, P = 0.03) with FENT (relative to PLA) during exercise. TRPV1 and COX‐2 protein levels are elevated in HFrEF compared to controls. These findings suggest that the elevated TRPV1 and COX‐2 expression may contribute to the exaggerated locomotor muscle afferent feedback during cycling exercise in HFrEF.
Sex and Depot Differences in Palmitoleic Acid Content of Human Blood and Fat
Ramos, Paola , Bush, Nikki C., Jensen, Michael D.

Lipids | January 16, 2020 | Volume: 55 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 63-72

10.1002/lipd.12212 Get It

AbstractPalmitoleic acid has been classified as an insulin‐sensitizing lipokine, but evidence for this from human studies has been inconsistent. We hypothesized that this is related to either the types of samples or conditions under which samples are collected. We measured plasma palmitoleic acid and total free fatty acids (FFA) using ultra‐performance liquid chromatography in blood samples collected from 34 adults under a variety of conditions. We collected duplicate samples of adipose (n = 10), FFA (n = 9), and very low density lipoprotein triacylglycerol (VLDL‐TAG) (n = 7) to measure the palmitoleic acid as a percentage of total fatty acids. We tested whether the percentage of palmitoleic acid was correlated with insulin resistance, as measured by homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR). Adipose stearoyl‐coenzyme A desaturase 1 (SCD‐1) protein was measured by capillary Western blotting. FFA‐palmitoleic acid percentage increased as a function of total FFA and was greater (p < 0.005) in females than males. Adipose palmitoleic acid percentage was greater in females than males (p < 0.001), as was adipose SCD‐1. Palmitoleic acid was greater in femoral fat than in abdominal fat in both females and males (p < 0.001), and correlated positively with HOMA‐IR only in females. The test–retest reliability values for percentage palmitoleic acid were 7 ± 10% for adipose, 24 ± 26% for VLDL, and 53 ± 31% for FFA. Because FFA‐palmitoleic acid percentage varies as a function of total FFA, investigators should re‐evaluate how palmitoleic acid data is presented. The positive relationship between adipose palmitoleic acid and HOMA‐IR in females suggests that it is not a potent insulin‐sensitizing lipokine in humans.