Back to Authors

Cantwell, Hafsa M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-7774

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 13

Lichen planopilaris in men: a retrospective clinicopathologic study of 19 patients
Cantwell, Hafsa M. , Wieland, Carilyn N. , Proffer, Sydney L. , Imhof, Reese L. , Torgerson, Rochelle R. , Tolkachjov, Stanislav N. , Larkin, Sydney C , Imhof, Reese L

International Journal of Dermatology | October 31, 2020 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 482-488

10.1111/ijd.15285 Get It

AbstractBackgroundLichen planopilaris (LPP) is a scarring alopecia rarely described in men.ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical and histopathologic features of LPP in men.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of male patients with LPP seen at Mayo Clinic between 1992 and 2016.ResultsNineteen men with biopsy‐confirmed LPP were included. The disease most commonly presented with diffuse (42.1%) or vertex scalp (42.1%) involvement. None of the patients had eyebrow or body hair involvement. Perifollicular erythema (94.7%) and pruritus (57.9%) were the most frequent clinical findings. Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) co‐occurred in 26.3% of patients. Mucosal lichen planus was found in four patients (21.1%). Thyroid disease occurred in three patients (15.8%). Disease improvement (47.3%) occurred with combination topical and systemic therapy, topical clobetasol monotherapy, and minocycline monotherapy.ConclusionsLPP in men has similar clinical and histologic presentations as reported in women. Nonscalp hair loss appears less likely in men with classic LPP than reported in men with frontal fibrosing alopecia, while mucosal lichen planus and thyroid disease appear to be more common in classic LPP. Men with AGA can present with new‐onset concomitant LPP. Limitations included small study size, variable follow‐up, and lack of standardized clinical assessment due the study’s retrospective nature.
The Final Patch Test Read: Day 5 or Day >7?
Cantwell, Hafsa M. , Drage, Lisa A., Hall, Matthew R., Killian, Jill M. , Yiannias, James A. , Davis, Mark D.P. , el‐Azhary, Rokea A.

Dermatitis® | January 8, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 42-52

10.1097/der.0000000000000562 Get It

Background A major question in patch testing is when to perform the final reading. Our current standard practice is to place patches on day 1, remove them on day 3, and perform readings on days 3 and 5. For certain allergens, another reading is performed sometime from days 7 to 14≥. Objectives The aim of the study was to identify allergens with positive reactions on day 5 that were negative on day 7 or later and allergens with negative reactions on day 5 that were subsequently positive on day 7 or later. Methods We reviewed records of patients who underwent patch testing from January 2007 to December 2016 at Mayo Clinic with readings on day 5 and day 7 or later. Conclusions In total, 131 allergens had positive reactions on day 5 that were negative on day 7 or later, and 58 allergens had negative reactions on day 5 that were positive on day 7 or later. Twenty-five allergens had significantly higher reaction rates on day 5 than day 7 or later. Our standard practice is to perform readings on days 3 and 5 and on days 3, 5, and 7 or later for series containing metals. Readings on days 3, 5, and 7 or later should also be considered for acrylates.
Delayed Patch-Test Reading After 5 Days: An Update From the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group
Chaudhry, Hafsa, Drage, Lisa A., Hall, Matthew R., Killian, Jill M. , Prakash, Amy V., Yiannias, James A. , Davis, Mark D.P. , Cantwell, Hafsa M. , Chaudhry, Hafsa M, el‐Azhary, Rokea A.

Dermatitis® | July 18, 2017 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 253-260

10.1097/der.0000000000000297 Get It

Background Patch-test readings after day 5 have previously been used to identify delayed reactions to metals and topical antibiotics. Objective The aims of this study were to identify allergens for which late readings (beyond day 5) would be most valuable and to compare our results with our previous study on delayed patch-test readings. Methods This was a retrospective study of 298 patients who underwent metal and corticosteroid series patch testing from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2013. Patch-test readings were conducted on days 3 and 5 and at least once sometime between days 7 and 14. All reactions were examined at each reading. Conclusions These results were concordant with our previous findings that additional readings after day 7 are particularly useful for identifying reactions to metals (gold, cobalt, beryllium, palladium), specific preservatives (dodecyl gallate, propolis), and the topical antibiotic neomycin. New delayed reactions to bacitracin, p -phenylenediamine, and topical corticosteroids were not seen in this cohort.