Coleman, Morton

Abstract Background:The pathological behavior of Waldenströms macroglobulinemia (WM) cells relies on aberrant B-cell receptor (BCR), and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and is intricately supported by malfunctions in initiation of apoptosis. In this dynamic, a complex shift between functionally active pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins from the Bcl-2 family occurs and bestows the malignant cells with a significant survival advantage. This defective apoptotic signaling is associated with aggressive clinical behavior, chemoresistance, and a poor prognosis in many B-cell cancers, including WM. Thus, BCR/TLR induced proliferation and abnormal apoptotic signaling due to dysregulation of Bcl-2 signaling, act in concert for the assurance of the malignant WM cells survival. Clinically, mitigation of BCR signaling with the first in class BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, has shown promising results in WM and other B-cell cancers. However, clinical responses to the BTK inhibitor alone are less than optimal and development of ibrutinib-resistant disease is being recognized as an important and impending dilemma. We have previously shown the utility of disrupting pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein interactions in WM, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma and that this functional interference results in re-sensitization (or heightened sensitivity) of tumor cells towards chemoimmunotherapy. As such, we examined the effects of ABT-199, a Bcl-2 specific small molecule inhibitor, in preclinical models of WM. Importantly; we conducted this investigation in proprietarily developed WM cells that have acquired resistance mechanisms towards either ibrutinib (IR WM subclones) or bortezomib (BR WM subclones). Materials:WM cell lines (BCWM.1, MWCL.1 and RPCI-WM1; WT cells) including their bortezomib resistant (BR) or ibrutinib resistant (IR) subclones were used in this study. Results: An initial comparison of Bcl-2 family members, Bcl-2, Mcl-1, BCL-xL, A1 (anti-apoptotic members), Noxa, Puma, Bim (pro-apoptotic initiators) and Bak and Bax (pro-apoptotic effectors), revealed that BR WM cells express increased levels of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, particularly Bcl-2, relative to WT cells. Similarly, A1 and Bcl-2 levels were up regulated in IR cell lines suggesting that the Bcl-2 mediated survival pathway is involved in resistance to both bortezomib and ibrutinib. Cell growth (MTS) assays using ABT-199 indicated that both BR and IR cells were equally sensitivity to Bcl-2 inhibition, with an IC50 ranging between 2 – 4mM. ABT-199 induced a dose dependent increase in MOMP with concomitant induction of apoptotic cell death, the latter confirmed by observation of PARP-1 cleavage. ABT-199 induced an intrinsic apoptotic program with the activation of caspase 9 and caspase 3 in all the cells tested. This data indicated the Bcl-2 pathway as being relevant and essential in WM cell lines even under drug resistant conditions. To evaluate the priming effect of ABT-199 on bortezomib and ibrutinib induced cell death, MTS assays were performed with these drugs in presence of IC25 concentrations of ABT-199. The addition of ABT-199 significantly reduced the IC50of both bortezomib and ibrutinib in WT, BR and IR cells. This suggested that re-sensitization of BR and IR cells towards either bortezomib or ibrutinib, respectively, was possible in presence of ABT-199. Further, combined addition of ABT-199 with bortezomib or ibrutinib showed synergistic cell death (combination index range: 0.004 – 0.6, CalcuSyn, Biosoft UK) in BR or IR WM cells, respectively. Conclusion: Dysregulation of Bcl-2 signaling is associated with the pathogenesis and promotion of drug resistance in B-cell cancers, including WM. Our report is first to highlight in WM preclinically, the antiproliferative effect of disrupting Bcl-2, through use of ABT-199. Altogether, our data suggests that therapeutic interference of Bcl-2 function with ABT-199 complements the anti-WM activity of ibrutinib or bortezomib in a synergistic manner and can in fact restore sensitivity of either drug in WM cells that are resistant to proteasome or BTK inhibitors. Focused mRNA and protein profiling analyses are currently underway to delineate the mechanisms accounting for synergy observed between concomitant Bcl-2/BTK inhibition as well Bcl-2/proteasome inhibition. Disclosures Ansell: Biothera: Research Funding. Martin:Janssen: Honoraria. Coleman:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Abstract 1795 Background: Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B-cell lymphoma characterized by a heterogeneous population of lymphocytes, plasmacytoid lymphocytes and plasma cells with variable CD20 expression. Rituximab (R) achieves an overall response rate (ORR) of 25–50% in relapsed/refractory WM and is associated with IgM flares, manifested by a rapid rise in IgM, potentially leading to complications of hyperviscosity. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets an epitope encompassing both the large and small extracellular loops of CD20 and effectively induces complement-dependent cytotoxicity of B-lymphoma cells. OFA is approved for the treatment of fludarabine- and alemtuzumab-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has demonstrated clinical activity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Given the efficacy of OFA in CLL, with its decreased CD20 antigen density, similar to WM where CD20 is down-regulated with differentiation of cells into plasma cells, a Phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of OFA in patients (pts) with WM was initiated to examine the safety and efficacy of OFA in this population. We report data from a planned interim analysis, which was performed to examine IgM flare, toxicity and response data. Methods: Pts (age ≥18 years) with WM requiring therapy by 2nd International Workshop on WM criteria were eligible. Pts received OFA 300 mg week 1 and 1000 mg weeks 2–4. Premedication included acetaminophen and antihistamine (all infusions) and glucocorticoid (infusions 1 and 2). Pts who experienced grade 3–4 infusion-related adverse events (AEs) during weeks 1 and 2 also received glucocorticoid during weeks 3 and 4. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed by 3rd International Workshop on WM criteria, and toxicity was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE, v3.0. Results: Fifteen pts were enrolled between March 2009 and January 2010. Median age was 59 years (range 43–85), and 9 pts were male. Pts had a median IgM level of 3.70 g/dL (range 1.21–6.62) and median hemoglobin (hgb) of 9.8 g/dL (range 5.3–11.7). Three pts were previously untreated; 12 pts had received a median of 3 therapies (range 2–5), including 11 pts who had received R, and 7 pts who had received a purine analog. Fourteen pts completed all 4 infusions of OFA. One pt withdrew from study after infusion 3 due to a drug-related serious AE (SAE). One pt had cryoglobulinemia, which interfered with IgM assessment. Of the 14 pts with evaluable IgM levels, 3 achieved partial response (PR), and 3 achieved minor response (ORR=43%) 8 weeks to 5 months after start of OFA therapy. One of 3 previously untreated pts and 5 of 12 relapsed pts responded. Four of 11 pts who had received prior R and 2 of 4 R-naïve pts responded. Five of 9 pts with IgM <4 g/dL and 1 of 5 pts with IgM >4 g/dL responded. Four pts with a median hgb of 8.0 g/dL (range 5.3–9.2) experienced ≥2.8 g/dL increase in hgb, including 3 pts who had >5 g/dL increase; median time to reach hgb ≥11.0 was 4 weeks. Infusion-related events occurred with dose 1 (300 mg) in 12 pts and with dose 2 (1000 mg) in 7 pts; all infusion events were grade 1–2 except 2 grade 3 events (rash, serum sickness). Nine pts developed 11 infections: 7 URI, 2 UTI, 1 sinusitis, 1 oral candidiasis (all grade 2). One pt developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Two pts developed SAEs possibly related to OFA. One pt developed grade 3 Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia after infusion 3 resulting in study withdrawal, and 1 pt with a baseline IgM level of 6.62 g/dL developed grade 3 renal insufficiency due to a rapid rise in IgM and cast nephropathy 6 weeks after starting OFA. One additional pt, with a baseline IgM level of 4.69 g/dL, developed a rapid rise in IgM and hyperviscosity symptoms. Both pts with a rapid rise in IgM underwent plasmapheresis with resolution of symptoms. No other OFA-related hematologic toxicity was observed. Conclusions: OFA has an acceptable toxicity profile, although a rapid rise in IgM requiring plasmapheresis was observed in 2 pts with high baseline IgM levels. OFA shows clinical activity in pts with WM, including those who relapse after R therapy, with rapid improvement in hgb and slower reduction of IgM levels. Based on the acceptable safety profile in this study and the dose of OFA approved for refractory CLL, the study was amended to increase the OFA dose to 2000 mg and allow a 2nd cycle of therapy for pts who do not attain PR after cycle 1. Accrual to the amended study is ongoing. Disclosures: Furman: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Consultancy; Calistoga: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an investigational anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma) as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis). Switzky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Research Funding; Genmab: Employment, Research Funding. Leonard:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Liao:GSK: Employment. Shah:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment; Genmab: Research Funding. Brownell-Buttich:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Lisby:Genmab A/S: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Employment.