Back to Authors

Palmer, Joshua D.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3311-0129

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Citations 54

Epidemiology of synchronous brain metastases
Singh, Raj , Stoltzfus, Kelsey C. , Chen, Hanbo , Louie, Alexander V. , Lehrer, Eric J. , Horn, Samantha R. , Palmer, Joshua D. , Brown, Paul D. , Palmer, Joshua D , Horn, Samantha R, Trifiletti, Daniel M. , Zaorsky, Nicholas G.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | April 24, 2020 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdaa041 Get It

Abstract Background The objectives of this study were to characterize (1) epidemiology of brain metastases at the time of primary cancer diagnosis, (2) incidence and trends of synchronous brain metastases from 2010 to 2015, and (3) overall survival (OS) of patients with synchronous brain metastases. Methods A total of 42 047 patients with synchronous brain metastases from 2010 to 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Descriptive analysis was utilized to analyze demographics and incidence. The Kaplan–Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model were utilized to evaluate potential prognostic factors for OS. Results The majority of patients were diagnosed from age older than 50 (91.9%). Common primary sites included lung (80%), melanoma (3.8%), breast (3.7%), and kidney/renal pelvis (3.0%). Among pediatric patients, common primaries included kidney/renal pelvis and melanomas. The incidence was roughly 7.3 persons/100 000. Synchronous brain metastases were associated with significantly poorer OS compared to extracranial metastases alone (hazard ratio [HR] =1.56; 95% CI: 1.54–1.58; P < .001). Among patients with brain metastases, male gender (HR = 1.60 vs 1.52), age older than 65 years (HR = 1.60 vs 1.46), synchronous liver, bone, or lung metastases (HR = 1.61 vs 1.49), and earlier year of diagnosis (HR = 0.98 for each year following 2010) were associated with significantly poorer OS. Conclusions The vast majority of brain metastases are from lung primaries. Synchronous brain metastases are associated with poorer OS compared to extracranial metastases alone.
Multidisciplinary patient-centered management of brain metastases and future directions
Palmer, Joshua D. , Gondi, Vinai , Rusthoven, Chad G. , Mishra, Mark V. , Bovi, Joseph , Williams, Nicole , Lustberg, Maryam B. , Brown, Paul D. , Rao, Ganesh , Schild, Steven E. , Palmer, Joshua D , Mishra, Mark V , Lustberg, Maryam , Trifiletti, Daniel M. , Chan, Michael David , Minniti, Giuseppe , Roberge, David

Neuro-Oncology Advances | March 16, 2020 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdaa034 Get It

Abstract The incidence of brain metastasis is increasing as improvements in systemic therapy lead to increased survival. This provides new and challenging clinical decisions for patients who are trying to balance the risk of recurrence or progression with treatment-related side effects, and it requires appropriate management strategies from multidisciplinary teams. Improvements in prognostic assessment and systemic therapy with increasing activity in the brain allow for individualized care to better guide the use of local therapies and/or systemic therapy. Here, we review the current landscape of brain-directed therapy for the treatment of brain metastasis in the context of recent improved systemic treatment options. We also discuss emerging treatment strategies including targeted therapies for patients with actionable mutations, immunotherapy, modern whole-brain radiation therapy, radiosurgery, surgery, and clinical trials.
Neuro-Oncology Practice Clinical Debate: stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy following surgical resection for brain metastasis
Palmer, Joshua D. , Greenspoon, Jeffrey , Brown, Paul D. , Johnson, Derek R. , Johnson, Derek R , Palmer, Joshua D , Roberge, David

Neuro-Oncology Practice | October 1, 2019 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 263-267

10.1093/nop/npz047 Get It

Abstract The treatment of resected brain metastasis has shifted away from the historical use of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) toward adjuvant radiosurgery (stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]) based on a recent prospective clinical trial demonstrating less cognitive decline with the use of SRS alone and equivalent survival as compared with WBRT. Whereas all level 1 evidence to date concerns single-fraction SRS for postoperative brain metastasis, there is emerging evidence that fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) may improve local control at the resected tumor bed. The lack of direct comparative data for SRS vs FSRT results in a diversity in clinical practice. In this article, Greenspoon and Roberge defend the use of SRS as the standard of care for resected brain metastasis, whereas Palmer and Brown argue for FSRT.