Sahebjam, Solmaz

Abstract On July 24, 2020, a workshop sponsored by the National Brain Tumor Society was held on innovating brain tumor clinical trials based on lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience. Various stakeholders from the brain tumor community participated including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and community clinicians, researchers, industry, clinical research organizations, patients and patient advocates, and representatives from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the National Cancer Institute. This report summarizes the workshop and proposes ways to incorporate lessons learned from COVID-19 to brain tumor clinical trials including the increased use of telemedicine and decentralized trial models as opportunities for practical innovation with potential long-term impact on clinical trial design and implementation.

3507 Background: Overexpression of GSK-3β, a serine/threonine kinase, is associated with advanced stage malignancies, aggressive tumor growth, and chemotherapy resistance. 9-ING-41 is a GSK-3β inhibitor with significant broad spectrum pre-clinical antitumor activity, including chemotherapy-resistant models. This first-in-human study (NCT03678883) is evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of 9-ING-41 monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy in patients (pts) with refractory malignancies. Methods: 9-ING-41 is given intravenously (IV) twice-weekly as a single-agent (21-day cycle) or combined with gemcitabine, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin, carboplatin/paclitaxel, doxorubicin, lomustine or irinotecan in patients previously treated with the same chemotherapy. Results: As of Jan 2020, 101 pts were enrolled. Tumor types: 25 pancreatic (PDAC), 14 colorectal (CRC), 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 8 GBM and other gliomas, 7 melanoma, 5 appendiceal, 4 breast (BC), 30 others. Seven single agent dose levels (DL) completed (1, 2, 3.3, 5, 7, 9.3, 12.4 mg/kg) without any 9-ING-41-attributable SAEs. 9-ING-41 attributable AEs include: transient visual change (color perception; n = 29), starting at DL 3 (3.3mg/kg), all G1/2; infusion reactions (n = 14), all G1/2, starting at DL 5 (7mg/kg). 9-ING-41’s mean terminal half-life is 12-20 hrs. Cmax and AUC0-72, are dose proportional with no accumulation. One BRAFV600K-mutated melanoma with > 20 brain metastases, post checkpoint/BRAF/MEK failure has an ongoing CR starting at cycle 2 and sustained after 9 months on treatment. 32 (31%) pts had SD as best response (6 PDAC, 6 CRC, 3 appendiceal, 2 BC, 2 salivary gland, 2 melanoma, 1 Merkel cell, 2 GBM/glioma, 1 RCC, 1 HCC, 1 NSCLC, 1 esophageal, 1 parotid gland, 1 nasopharyngeal, 1 peritoneal, 1 T cell-ALL). 8 pts remained on study treatment > 5 months (1 melanoma, 3 PDAC, 1 appendiceal, 1 GBM, 1 peritoneal, 1 salivary gland) with median treatment duration of 198 days (range 163-261). 32 pts continue to receive 9-ING-41. Conclusions: 9-ING-41 has dose-proportional PK, is well tolerated with significant antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy in pts with refractory tumors. 1 ongoing CR was observed in a refractory BRAF-mutated melanoma. A biologically active dose has been reached, although MTD has not been determined. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

AbstractBuilding on an initiative to enhance clinical trial participation involving the Society for Neuro-Oncology, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, and other partners, we evaluate the impact of eligibility criteria and trial conduct on neuro-oncology clinical trial participation. Clinical trials often carry forward eligibility criteria from prior studies that may be overly restrictive and unnecessary and needlessly limit patient accrual. Inclusion and exclusion criteria should be evaluated based on the goals and design of the study and whether they impact patient safety and/or treatment efficacy. In addition, we evaluate clinical trial conduct as a barrier to accrual and discuss strategies to minimize such barriers for neuro-oncology trials.

Abstract BACKGROUND A major impediment to improving neuro-oncology outcomes is poor clinical trial accrual. METHODS We convened a multi-stakeholder group including Society for Neuro-Oncology, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, and other partners to determine how we can improve trial accrual. RESULTS We described selected factors contributing to poor trial accrual and possible solutions. We focused on patient and community factors, disparities, physician and provider factors, clinical trial factors, and site and organizational factors CONCLUSIONS We will implement strategies with the intent to double accrual to neuro-oncology trials over the next 5 years.

Abstract Many factors contribute to the poor survival of malignant brain tumor patients, some of which are not easily remedied. However, one contributor to the lack of progress that may be modifiable is poor clinical trial accrual. Surveys of brain tumor patients and neuro-oncology providers suggest that clinicians do a poor job of discussing clinical trials with patients and referring patients for clinical trials. Yet, data from the Cancer Action Network of the American Cancer Society suggest that most eligible oncology patients asked to enroll on a clinical trial will agree to do so. To this end, the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) in collaboration with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, including the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC), and other partners are working together with the intent to double clinical trial accrual over the next 5 years. Here we describe the factors contributing to poor clinical trial accrual in neuro-oncology and offer possible solutions.

2024 Background: A major impediment to improving neuro-oncology outcomes is poor clinical trial accrual. Methods: We convened a multi-stakeholder group including Society for Neuro-Oncology, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, and other partners to determine how we can improve trial accrual. Results: We describe selected factors contributing to poor trial accrual and possible solutions. Conclusions: We will implement strategies with the intent to double trial accrual over the next 5 years. [Table: see text]