LeMond, Lisa

Introduction: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with concomitant heart failure (HF) are often denied kidney transplantation (KTx). The aims of this study were to explore factors predictive of suitability for KTx and to assess cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) presenting for KTx evaluation. Methods: We evaluated 109 consecutive adults with LVEF≤40% at the time of initial KTx evaluation between 2013 and 2018. Post-transplant CV outcomes were defined as non-fatal MI, admission for HF, CV death and all-cause mortality. Results: Mean age was 58.2 years (SD11.9), 78% were male, 58% had diabetes, 70% had history of CV events and 42% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Mean LVEF was 31.5% (SD 6.47). Eighty patients had nuclear stress imaging; 10% were positive for reversible ischemia and 43% for prior infarct. Mean VO2max was 14.4(SD 5.71)ml/kg/min (31 patients). A cardiologist evaluated 93% of patients and was present at 58% of selection committee meetings. Twenty-four patients (22%) were denied by a cardiologist for KTx and 59 (54%) were denied by the selection committee, of whom 43 were due to CV risk. On univariate analysis, the variables associated with denial for KTx were: cardiologist denial, denial due to CV risk, Native American race (6% of cohort), higher NT-pro-BNP, prior MI, coronary intervention, positive stress study, anemia, lower EF and lower VO2max (all p<0.05). On multivariate analysis, cardiologist denial was the only significant predictor of denial for KTx (OR: 29.4, p=0.0007). At median follow-up of 15 months, 5 (5%) suffered non-fatal MI, 13 (12%) were hospitalized for HF exacerbation and 17 (16%) died. Only 22 (20%) underwent KTx. Post-KTx, there was one death, one non-fatal MI and 3 hospitalizations for HF. Mean LVEF improvement was 16% (SD12.9). Conclusions: Only 38% of ESRD patients with LVEF≤40% presenting for KTx evaluation were approved and of those, only 52% received KTx. Cardiologist approval was the primary predictor of suitability for KTx. Despite careful selection, prevalence of CV events and mortality after KTx was 23%. There is need for a consistent multidisciplinary approach during KTx evaluation, including cardiologist input, to improve CV outcomes.

Abstract Background Heart transplant (HTx) patients can develop graft dysfunction (GD) without biopsy evidence of cell or antibody mediated rejection. Cardiac MRI (CMR) can detect inflammatory or infiltrative causes of cardiomyopathy however CMR findings in HTx recipients with GD have not been previously described. Purpose We sought to identify CMR characteristics of HTx patients with GD, and evaluate its additive value in its diagnosis and prognosis. Methods CMR has been performed routinely to evaluate GD at our institutions. There were 37 HTx recipients who presented with acute decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of &lt;50% and &gt;10% from baseline, with no biopsy evidence of rejection between 2007 and 2018. Coronary angiogram with IVUS was done to rule out allograft vasculopathy. Treatment of GD was per discretion of the treating clinician. Responders were defined as those with LVEF improvement &gt;10% at 180 days or greater post-presentation. LV and RV indices, the presence and pattern of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were determined by CMR. Results There were 34% females and mean age at transplant was 49±13 years. Median time from HTx to GD was 1.2 years. Presenting symptoms were heart failure (n=25), cardiogenic shock (n=1) and 11 patients were asymptomatic. Mean LVEF at presentation was 37±12% and donor specific antibodies were detected in 38% patients. Most patients were treated with steroid bolus (n=29), and/or plasmapheresis (n=23). There were no major changes made in immunosuppression in 6 patients. Delayed enhancement MRI was performed with standard inversion-recovery (IR) gradient echo sequences, between 5 and 20 minutes after institutional-standard protocol administration of IV gadolinium contrast. Biventricular LGE was present in 18/37 (49%) patients with GD and was more prevalent in responders (57%, 13 of 23) than non-responders (35%, 5 of 14), although not statistically significant (p=0.21). There were two patterns of LGE noted: 1) Diffuse epicardial (10 patients out which 9 were responders) and 2) Patchy pattern with non-specific distribution (8 patients out of which 4 were responders). Myocardial edema by triple IR sequencing was seen in 6 patients, all having diffuse epicardial pattern of enhancement matching the delayed enhancement pattern. When comparing different treatment groups, among those treated for GD (n=31), 12 of 21 (57%) responders had LGE and 4 of 10 (40%) non-responders had LGE (p=0.37), a pattern similar to the broader population. Among those not treated for GD (n=6), 1 of 2 responders had LGE and 1 of 4 non-responders had LGE (p=0.5). Conclusion CMR identified inflammation as a potential cause of GD in approximately 50% of HTx patients. There are 2 distinct patterns of LGE observed in GD, diffuse epicardial (56%) and patchy (44%). Although the presence of LGE in itself is not associated with myocardial recovery, 90% of patients with a diffuse epicardial pattern have recovery of GD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Advanced heart failure therapies, including heart transplantation and durable mechanical circulatory support, are available to a limited number of patients because of the scarcity of donors, expense, and large burden of care. The importance of psychological and social determinants of health, including cognitive status, health literacy, psychopathology, social support, medical adherence, and substance abuse, are emphasized in advanced heart failure and further amplified in the context of mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation. The psychosocial assessment of advanced heart failure therapy candidates remains largely subjective, requiring a multidisciplinary evaluation, which may include psychiatrists, social workers, case managers, financial coordinators, pharmacists, and clinicians. Objective tools—including the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation, Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation, and Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale—were developed and validated in limited populations to help standardize the evaluation process. Small, retrospective studies have inconsistently shown that these tools may predict clinical outcomes in the transplant population, with higher-risk scores associated with readmissions, rejection episodes, and infections. However, it has been more difficult to show that these tools can predict mortality, and their applicability to the mechanical circulatory support population is less studied. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation released a consensus statement in 2018 to promote consistency of psychosocial evaluation across advanced heart failure programs, but it lacks specific recommendations given the current state of evidence. This state-of-the-art review expands on the current consensus by critically reviewing current studies supporting available objective assessment tools, proposing a psychosocial evaluation framework that uses a multidisciplinary approach and offering future directions for research.