Back to Authors

Master, Viraj A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7251-142X

Mayo Clinic

Emory University

Citations 17

PROSPER: Phase III RandOmized Study Comparing PERioperative nivolumab versus observation in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing nephrectomy (ECOG-ACRIN EA8143).
Kim, Se Eun , Master, Viraj A. , Cella, David , Cole, Suzanne , Shuch, Brian , Lara, Primo N. , Heng, Daniel Yick Chin, Leibovich, Bradley C. , Jewett, Michael A.S. , Maskens, Deb, Harshman, Lauren C. , Allaf, Mohamad E , McDermott, David F. , Signoretti, Sabina , Gupta, Rajan T. , Kapoor, Anil , Michaelson, M. Dror , Choueiri, Toni K. , Carducci, Michael A. , Haas, Naomi B , Cole, Suzanne

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS4596-TPS4596

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps4596 Get It

TPS4596 Background: There is no standard adjuvant systemic therapy that increases overall survival (OS) over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Anti-PD-1 nivolumab (nivo) improves OS in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. In mouse models, priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 results in superior OS compared to adjuvant dosing. Remarkable pathologic responses have been seen with neoadjuvant PD-1 in multiple ph 2 studies in bladder, lung and breast cancers. Phase 2 neoadjuvant RCC trials of nivo show preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays. PROSPER RCC seeks to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system with neoadjuvant nivo prior to nephrectomy followed by continued immune system engagement with adjuvant blockade in patients (pts) with high risk RCC compared to standard of care surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is accruing pts with clinical stage ≥T2 or TanyN+ RCC of any histology planned for radical or partial nephrectomy. Select oligometastatic disease is permitted if the pt can be rendered ‘no evidence of disease’ within 12 weeks of nephrectomy (≤3 metastases; no brain, bone or liver). In the investigational arm, nivo is administered 480mg IV q4 weeks with 1 dose prior to surgery followed by 9 adjuvant doses. The control arm is nephrectomy followed by standard of care surveillance. There is no placebo. Baseline tumor biopsy is required only in the nivo arm but encouraged in both. Randomized pts are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and M stage. 805 pts provide 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ̃56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is powered to evaluate a significant increase in OS (HR 0.67). Critical perioperative therapy considerations such as safety, feasibility, and quality of life metrics are integrated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational studies to examine the contribution of the baseline immune milieu and neoadjuvant priming with anti-PD-1 on clinical outcomes. As of February 10, 2021, 704 patients have been enrolled (N = 805). Clinical trial information: NCT03055013.
PROSPER: Phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab versus observation in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing nephrectomy (ECOG-ACRIN EA8143).
Puligandla, Mäneka, Drake, Charles G. , Cella, David , Shuch, Brian , Lara, Primo N. , Heng, Daniel Yick Chin, Leibovich, Bradley C. , Jewett, Michael A.S. , Maskens, Deb, Harshman, Lauren C. , Master, Viraj A. , Haas, Naomi B , Allaf, Mohamad E , McDermott, David F. , Signoretti, Sabina , Gupta, Rajan T. , Kapoor, Anil , Michaelson, M. Dror , Choueiri, Toni K. , Carducci, Michael A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS5101-TPS5101

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.tps5101 Get It

TPS5101 Background: There is no standard adjuvant systemic therapy that increases overall survival (OS) over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Anti-PD-1 nivolumab (nivo) improves OS in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. In mouse models, priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 results in superior OS compared to adjuvant dosing. Remarkable pathologic responses have been seen with neoadjuvant PD-1 in multiple ph 2 studies in bladder, lung and breast cancers. Phase 2 neoadjuvant RCC trials of nivo show preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays. PROSPER RCC seeks to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system with neoadjuvant nivo prior to nephrectomy followed by continued immune system engagement with adjuvant blockade in patients (pts) with high risk RCC compared to standard of care surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is accruing pts with clinical stage ≥T2 or TanyN+ RCC of any histology planned for radical or partial nephrectomy. Select oligometastatic disease is permitted if the pt can be rendered ‘no evidence of disease’ within 12 weeks of nephrectomy (≤3 metastases; no brain, bone or liver). In the investigational arm, nivo is administered 480mg IV q4 weeks with 1 dose prior to surgery followed by 9 adjuvant doses. The control arm is nephrectomy followed by standard of care surveillance. There is no placebo. Baseline tumor biopsy is required only in the nivo arm but encouraged in both. Randomized pts are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and M stage. 805 pts provide 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ~56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is powered to evaluate a significant increase in OS (HR 0.67). Critical perioperative therapy considerations such as safety, feasibility, and quality of life metrics are integrated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational studies to examine the contribution of the baseline immune milieu and neoadjuvant priming with anti-PD-1 on clinical outcomes. As of February 2020, 396 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013 .
PROSPER: Phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab versus observation in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing nephrectomy (ECOG-ACRIN EA8143).
Harshman, Lauren C. , Puligandla, Mäneka, Drake, Charles G. , Cella, David , Shuch, Brian , Lara, Primo N. , Heng, Daniel Yick Chin, Leibovich, Bradley C. , Master, Viraj A. , Jewett, Michael A.S. , Maskens, Deb, Investigators, On behalf of the PROSPER RCC, Allaf, Mohamad E , McDermott, David F. , Signoretti, Sabina , Gupta, Rajan T. , Kapoor, Anil , Michaelson, M. Dror , Choueiri, Toni K. , Haas, Naomi B , Carducci, Michael A. , Investigators, On behalf of the PROSPER RCC

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 19, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: TPS765-TPS765

10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.tps765 Get It

TPS765 Background: There is no standard adjuvant systemic therapy that increases overall survival (OS) over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Anti-PD-1 nivolumab (nivo) improves OS in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. In mouse models, priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 results in superior OS compared to adjuvant dosing. Remarkable pathologic responses have been seen with neoadjuvant PD-1 in multiple ph 2 studies in bladder, lung and breast cancers. Phase 2 neoadjuvant RCC trials of nivo show preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays. PROSPER RCC seeks to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system with neoadjuvant nivo prior to nephrectomy followed by continued immune system engagement with adjuvant blockade in patients (pts) with high risk RCC compared to standard of care surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is accruing pts with clinical stage ≥T2 or TanyN+ RCC of any histology planned for radical or partial nephrectomy. Select oligometastatic disease is permitted if the pt can be rendered ‘no evidence of disease’ within 12 weeks of nephrectomy (≤3 metastases; no brain, bone or liver). In the investigational arm, nivo is administered 480mg IV q4 weeks with 1 dose prior to surgery followed by 9 adjuvant doses. The control arm is nephrectomy followed by standard of care surveillance. There is no placebo. Baseline tumor biopsy is required only in the nivo arm but encouraged in both. Randomized pts are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and M stage. 805 pts provide 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ~56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is powered to evaluate a significant increase in OS (HR 0.67). Critical perioperative therapy considerations such as safety, feasibility, and quality of life metrics are integrated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational studies to examine the contribution of the baseline immune milieu and neoadjuvant priming with anti-PD-1 on clinical outcomes. As of October 18, 2019, 317 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013.
PROSPER: A phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab (nivo) versus observation in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing nephrectomy (ECOG-ACRIN 8143).
Harshman, Lauren C. , Puligandla, Mäneka, Drake, Charles G. , McDermott, David F., Cella, David , Shuch, Brian , Lara, Primo N. , Kapoor, Anil , Heng, Daniel Yick Chin, Jewett, Michael A.S. , Master, Viraj A. , Leibovich, Bradley C. , Maskens, Deb, Investigators, On Behalf of the PROSPER RCC, Haas, Naomi B , Allaf, Mohamad E , McDermott, David F. , Signoretti, Sabina , Gupta, Rajan T. , Choueiri, Toni K. , Michaelson, M. Dror , Carducci, Michael A. , Investigators, On Behalf of the PROSPER RCC

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS4597-TPS4597

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps4597 Get It

TPS4597 Background: The anti-PD-1 antibody nivo improves overall survival (OS) in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. There is no standard adjuvant (adjuv) systemic therapy that increases OS over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 has shown an OS benefit compared to a pure adjuv approach in mouse solid tumor models. Multiple ph 2 studies in bladder, lung and breast cancers have shown remarkable pathologic responses with neoadjuvant (neoadj) PD-1 blockade. Two ongoing ph 2 studies of perioperative nivo in M0 RCC patients are showing preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays (NCT02575222; NCT02595918). PROSPER RCC (NCT03055013) aims to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system prior to nephrectomy with neoadj nivo and continued engagement with adjuv blockade in patients with high risk RCC compared to surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is currently accruing patients with clinical stage ≥T2 or TanyN+ RCC of any histology planned for nephrectomy. Oligometastases are permitted if can be rendered NED. We amended the study to enhance accrual and patient quality of life by changing nivo dosing to 480mg q4 wks and requiring baseline tumor biopsy only in the nivo arm. The investigational arm receives 1 dose of nivo prior to surgery followed by 9 adjuv doses. The control arm undergoes standard nephrectomy followed by observation. Randomized patients are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and M stage. Accrual of 805 patients provides 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ~56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is powered to evaluate a significant increase in OS (HR 0.67). Critical perioperative therapy considerations such as safety, feasibility, and quality of life endpoints have been integrated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational work aimed at investigating the impact of the baseline immune milieu, the changes induced by neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 priming, and how both may predict clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013.
PROSPER: A phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab (nivo) versus observation in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing nephrectomy (ECOG-ACRIN 8143).
Harshman, Lauren C. , Puligandla, Mäneka, Drake, Charles G. , McDermott, David F., Cella, David , Shuch, Brian , Lara, Primo, Kapoor, Anil , Heng, Daniel Yick Chin, Jewett, Michael A.S. , Master, Viraj A. , Leibovich, Bradley C. , Maskens, Deb, Investigators, On behalf of the PROSPER RCC, Haas, Naomi B , Allaf, Mohamad E , McDermott, David F. , Signoretti, Sabina , Gupta, Rajan T. , Choueiri, Toni K. , Michaelson, M. Dror , Carducci, Michael A. , Investigators, On behalf of the PROSPER RCC

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 7, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: TPS684-TPS684

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.tps684 Get It

TPS684 Background: The anti-PD-1 antibody nivo improves overall survival in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. There is no standard adjuvant systemic therapy that increases overall survival (OS) over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 has shown an OS benefit compared to a pure adjuvant approach in mouse solid tumor models. The PROSPER RCC trial aims to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system prior to nephrectomy with neoadjuvant nivo and continued engagement with adjuvant blockade in patients with high risk M0 RCC compared to surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is currently accruing patients with clinical stage ≥T2 or node positive M0 RCC of any histology. Tumor biopsy prior to randomization is mandatory to ensure RCC and permits in depth correlative science. The investigational arm will receive two doses of nivo 240mg prior to surgery followed by adjuvant nivo for 9 months (q2 wks x 3 mo followed by 480mg q4 wks x 6 mo). The control arm will undergo standard nephrectomy followed by observation. Randomized patients are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and histology. To enhance accrual and patient quality of life, key upcoming amendments are being instituted. These include biopsy only in the nivo arm, allowance of oligometastatic disease and bilateral renal masses that can be fully resected/ablated, and change of nivo dosing to q4 wks (1 neoadj; 9 adj). With accrual of 766 patients, there is 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ~56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is also powered to evaluate a significant increase in overall survival (HR 0.67). Safety, feasibility, and quality of life endpoints critical to adjuvant therapy considerations are incorporated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational work aimed at investigating the impact of the baseline immune milieu, the changes induced by neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 priming, and how both correlate with clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013.
Increasing adipose burden in young men with metastatic testicular cancer following front-line cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Kato, Caroline, Batra, Kunnal, Mullane, Michael Russell, Lad, Thomas E. , Master, Viraj A. , Arora, Karan , Psutka, Sarah P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 7, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 525-525

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.525 Get It

525 Background: Exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC) has been observed to be associated with significant changes in body composition, namely marked lean muscle mass losses, with implications for treatment-related toxicity and oncologic outcomes. However, prior studies predominately include elderly patients who, a priori, are at risk for sarcopenia or severe skeletal muscle deficiency. To date, the impact of CC on body composition in young men with testicular cancer remains undefined. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 19 patients with metastatic testicular cancer treated with CC was performed (2015-17). Lumbar skeletal muscle index (SMI), visceral (VAI), subcutaneous (SCAI), and intramuscular adipose (IMAI) indices (cm2/m2), as well as fat-free mass (FFM, kg) and fat mass (FM, kg) were calculated using cross-sectional soft tissue area measurements on pre- and post-CC computed tomography (CT) axial scans and compared using paired Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. Results: Median age was 29 years. According to the NHANES FMI-based classification, 5 (26.3%), 9 (47.4%), 4 (21.1%), and 1 (5.3%) patients had normal, excess, class I, and class II obesity, respectively. Median pre- and post-CC BMI was 27.7 vs. 29.6 kg/m2(p = 0.03). Median pre- and post-CC SMI, VAI, SAI, and IAI were 63.5 vs 57.8 (p = 0.14), 19.9 vs 30.8 (p = 0.01), 47.9 vs 58.2 (p = 0.03), and 3.0 vs 5.2 (p = 0.002), respectively. Median muscle density pre- and post-CC were 47.0 vs 43.6 HU (p = 0.002). Pre- and post-chemotherapy FFM were 21.5 vs 19.5 kg, representing an overall median loss of 2.8%, (IQR -10.1, +4.7; Range -49.5 - +16.3; p = 0.14). Conversely, pre- and post-CC FM were 6.6 vs 7.5 kg, representing an overall median gain of 13.3% (IQR -3.3, +17.0; -24.9 - +50; p = 0.01). Median time between imaging assessments was 121 days. Specific median measures of adiposity each increased significantly, such that VIA increased by 29% (p = 0.01), SCAI increased by 39.7% (p = 0.03), and IMIA increased by 39.7% (p = 0.002). Conclusions: While lean muscularity remained stable, we observed significant increases in total body adipose mass with decreased muscle density in this consecutive case series of testicular cancer patients following CC.